Trending Games | World of Warcraft | Overwatch | The Division 2 | Final Fantasy XIV

    Facebook Twitter YouTube YouTube.Gaming Discord
Quick Game Jump
Members:3,840,141 Users Online:0

Show Blog

Link to this blogs RSS feed

Paradox, Humor and Change.

games, life and geekrage.

Author: mOoK

The Best MMORPG will be the most expensive (Or how to save the online rpg industry)

Posted by mOoK Thursday November 8 2007 at 2:44PM
Login or Register to rate this blog post!

Allow me to geek out for a moment.

Its been awhile since I stepped foot into a game. I think Vanguard: Saga of Heroes was the last time. I was burned with that. A believer such that I spent money to visit them in San Diego during the development. While it was nice to rub shoulders and drink beers with such pivotal icons like Brad McQuaid, it wasn't long until I found out that again, developers and publishers had missed their mark.

To say that a massive, thriving sandbox world of dynamic goals and events has been a dream of mine since I discovered computing, would be an understatement. Ever since I thought, "Gee, wouldn't it be nice if I could play Civilization with real people", my geek-o-meter for this genre of game has been pegged.

I'm not going to go into a history of MMOs here, we all know the story. Unless you don't know the story, then go here. Suffice to say, I've been pleased, burned and disappointed.

Lets get to the brass tacks. MMORPGs need to be less massive and more expensive. They need to be customized and niche specific. You cannot please everyone all of the time. Just some of the people some of the time.

  • Build your engine smaller

Build it less like a sand box. If you want it to play like a movie or a novel, there is a set or a stage. Add on later.

  • Hire talented GMs, writers, etc.

If you want compelling stories, interactive characters and theme, A.I. and scripted characters aren't going to cut it. Hire real people who have a passion. Give them room to experiment. Don't keep them behind the scenes, give them credit and customers will being to recognize and build a relationship and fan base. Fans are by definition, fanatical.

  • Cater to guilds, tabletop groups and clubs.

These people play together, are reliable and will invest. They are the hardcore, live it, breathe it types who will come back again and again.

  • Personalize the experience.

Real human interaction cannot be replaced by hard-coded goals. Multiple people should be making this experience as unique and awesome as possible. Live give and take in conversation. Fudging of numeric outcomes, intelligent opponents. On-the-fly plot twists.

  • Serialize your content and have seasons of games as they have seasons for television.

NBC doesn't have 1 show. It has variety. They also take breaks, write new material. Sell your game as an event. "This fall, return to the realm of rainbow trolls!" Allow the customer to reflect and try another product. Meanwhile, you're planning away, polishing.

  • Create exportable characters to allow a single persona to persist across games.

People become attached. Allow them to wear a campaign ribbon or trophy. People become accountable for their actions.

  • Schedule play times.

You can't staff this 24/7 nor should you. People don't play 24 hours a day and because you cater to smaller groups, you don't have to. Several times a week, to monthly. All on a sliding pay scale.

  • Charge more.

You get what you pay for and all of this isn't cheap. It takes more people, more time to and personal attention to pull off this interaction. People pay more for customer service. If they feel like royalty, they will pay to play. Charge a group rate.

Take this a step further. Charge more for pilot programs. If a group wants to boldly go into fresh territory, charge them a premium for the privilege. First to see. Conversely, charge less for older chapters. If there are a hundred walk-throughs, if they've read the transcripts of group-As adventure, then a lot of the hard work, polishing the experience, is done.

These ideas are all very abstract, but ultimately, brings a little bit of the RPG back into the genre.

I am, of course, available to hire or consult ;)

Read more here

DeathMutant3 writes:

The Everquest "Legends" (Stormhammer) had ideas similar to this but has since been discontinued. Apparently, not even US$40 extra a month could cover the costs of frequent and well-run live events. . .

Thu Nov 08 2007 4:29PM Report
thedrakon writes:

Hum ... that's why table RPG still exist .. cuz they are this ... personnal game make for specific people. Pay me, I will make any great story you want. (been Game master for 13 years).

I don't want to flame or anything, I just think that, what you want from an mmorpg is ... what real RPG is. I still play some great campaing with my friend. I always try to find more people. I DONT used any existing game system (like D&D or whitewolf) I use my own game system for 7 years. I've got 2 nice world.

I've runned 6 epic campaing for 13 different players.  Each of them have memory. The thing you need is a real good Game master with dedication. find time and some people and play the game.

Otherwise, from a point of view of PC game, your choice is mod or help me finish my own mmorpg ;) ...

Thu Nov 08 2007 5:06PM Report
DeathMutant3 writes:

Neverwinter Nights (NWN) can be a good solution for some truly niche games and without a subscription fee! There are many teams of very talented developers, artists, writers and dungeon masters (it uses the D&D 3.x ruleset) that build, host, DM and continually improve upon their own homegrown persistent worlds (generally) in response to what their community of players want to see and do.

Thu Nov 08 2007 6:23PM Report
mOoK writes:

@DeathMutant3 - Stormhammer, while an interesting idea was flawed by the fact it was based on a typical server, with occasional GM content.  Yes CS was better, but the GM to CU ratio was still to low, the GMs didn't have the tools or time they needed to create dynamic content. Ultimately, I would charge even more per month.  How much does a week vacation cost?

@thedrakon - You kind of make my point, in the fact that smaller, hand crafted content is far superior.  I think bringing some of that to ORPGs would be a boon. I think we need to redifine what we consider "massive" and what we expect from an online experience.

@ DeathMutant3 - I used to be involed with ALFA, which had the idea of recreating the forgotten realms world.  The prblem with the NWN engine was that it was closed source and not intended for large masses of player.  While the hacks that allowed some amazing devices to be used, it doesn't have the developers tools and freedom that an in-house company that produced/evolved the engine and the content.  Its ALMOST there, but not quite.

Fri Nov 09 2007 1:27PM Report writes:
Login or Register to post a comment