| Username | Saerain |
| Real Name | Kyle |
| Rank | Apprentice Member |
| Joined | March 27, 2006 |
| Gender | Male |
| Age | 21 |
| Location | Holyoke, MA, United States |
| Last Visit | May 15, 2008 |
| Post Count | 120 |
| Biography | |
| Quote |
Originally posted by Consensus
still anyone can make some screen of pretty enviroments. that does not mean it is a game.
Neither do videos. Nothing but a hands-on presentation 'proves' a game's existence if you want to be so existentialist about it.
If they're going for futuristic ambience, it's no Brian Eno or Jon Hallur, but we'll see. Hear. Yeah.
Originally posted by weslubow
Let me see if I understand this clearly.
In an earlier article it was reported that 80% are PVE and 20% are PVP. So CCP is putting out a PVP expansion?
To bridge the gap and balance the distribution. I don't see a more logical course of action.
Originally posted by m3ta
You called the next expansion both "Empryian" and "Empyrian".
However, the correct name is "The Empyrean Age".
A speciality of Jon Wood is raising the eyebrows of English-speaking gamers.
I actually preferred Vanguard in Beta 2 over the final product, for a number of reasons, but I always find distaste for Vanguard's art and graphics interesting, because I have higher praise for it in that area than any other game save perhaps EVE, although EVE gets off easy by rendering far less than any terrestrial setting demands.
Out of curiosity, which MMO do you favour visually? I mean it sincerely, not suggestively.
In your opinion, what kind of gamer are you?