| Username | Randem |
| Real Name | Matt L |
| Rank | Novice Member |
| Joined | August 24, 2007 |
| Gender | Male |
| Age | 23 |
| Location | Fort Worth, TX, United States |
| Last Visit | April 25, 2008 |
| Post Count | 10 |
| Biography | |
| Quote |
Is this the same game as WW2 Online: Blitzkrieg?
Ah right on, I think I see what you're saying. Yeah, while I think WoW "set the bar" so to speak in gameplay for MMO's, I hope other games won't simply be satisfied with being on par with what WoW has done. I hope games will keep trying to improve upon what WoW has kind of set the industry standard for.
Why should Warhammer change the way that their art looks? It's familiar to the fans, and it was theirs first.
I've never seen so many people get so mad over the fact that two dudes have an opinion. Also, people keep talking like after this random editorial that NOW is the time for DF to shit or get off the pot. Why now all of the sudden? Because some guy wrote something on a website and called them out? "OH SHIT! THIS GUY'S RIGHT! Some guy played the editorial card, so we've REALLY got to get on this." I mean, people were saying this game was never going to come out long before this article was written.
I'm going to try AoC when it comes out, and if DF ever comes out, I will most definitely try it. For me, the ideas behind DFO are what I'm looking for in a *perfect* game. And I'm not ashamed to admit that I'm a big enough nerd that as I was reading Tasos' Journal I got just a little hard at all the things he said the game was suppose to be.
So what's the harm in waiting for a game that may never come out, but still wanting to try other games that might still be fun, even if they're not my definition of a "perfect game?"
How many hours per day do you play MMORPGs?