Profile: Deadzo
Send PM  Forum Posts  Forum Topics 

Recent Forum Posts [more...]

• • If you pre-ordered this game and are upset with the changes...

  • Originally posted by Visax
    

    Originally posted by boognish75
    

    Originally posted by Sepulcher
    

    Go back to the store or website and get a refund.  Stop acting like Mythic owes you something because you are disapointed.  You can be as upset as you want, you can come up with whatever reason you want, it means nothing.  All they owe you is your money back, so go to the store/site and get it back.

    They do not need to make changes for you, they do not need to ask your opinion, they do not need to appologize to you, they do not need to do a damn thing accept give you your money back.

    So stop comming up with your retarded posts about all the "lies" and "unfullfilled promises" garbage.  Go get your money back or shut up and enjoy the game.  You fools can't see the forest through all the trees.

    
     

    I dont know if I would be mad at mythic persay, i think mythic made a mistake by getting in bed with eagames, i would point the finger at ea-games and ask did you have anything to do with this, I feel bad for any company that goes under ea-games, and i feel as though they didnt do there hom,ework and look at there past to see what they do to smaller companies they buyout....tisk, tisk, tisk.

    
    “This has nothing to do with EA,” he said, pointing out that this was entirely a Mythic decision, and it isn’t a directive from the company which many MMO players feel has a dubious history in our genre. “they had zero input in this. This is not something we went to them with and said ‘hey guys, we need an extra few months…’ and they said ‘no, you must ship on this day’. They don’t even know about it. It’s not a discussion we would have with them.”

    
     

     

    And what, you believed that because it was posted on the internet?  Or because someone "said" it? 

    RE: OP, Go GO  Fanboi extrordinare !!

  • Posted: 7/12/08 2:41 AM
    WAR (Warhammer Online)
• • Besides the content removed what does this say about the game?

  •  

    It tells me they either: don't know what the hell they want to do/ what the hell are doing, or are in such a huge hurry that they don't care.  Seriously who drops 4/6 of their content right before launch?

  • Posted: 7/12/08 2:27 AM
    WAR (Warhammer Online)
• • Warhammer Online : Age of Reckoning: Mark Jacobs Interview Part Two

  •  

    Still skeptical of this game & waiting to see wtf mythic will finally decide to do.  A pvp game anyone can jump into with massive warfare from the get-go and beautiful siege battles still sounds to me: too good to be true.  I don't believe it and they'll need to prove it.

     

    As for the annoucement, this is what I hear: Expansion Pack-Dwarves!  Expansion Pack-Dark Elves!  Expansion Pack-High Elves!!  Expansion Pack- Greenskins!!  Now complete with cities and all new classes!!  

    I also hear: We're in an hurry, just go with what we've got and hope it doesn't seem too identical to Stormwind & Orgrimarr.  It'll work great, we think, we don't know, better just go with 2, it'll work great, if there's problems only 2 citys to fix, which will work great, maybe, we think, we don't know, we cant fix it live, well we can but that'd be harder, 4th quarter's INC!, put more dungeons in, it's a RVR game, still need double the dungeons (that sounds like PVE), no no it's pvp only you fight against npc and raid bosses, what?, it'll work great, well maybe, we don't know, just put these 2 out for now, these tanks seem similar, so do these dps classes, we better ditch them, really?? we worked for months on those, the armor's the same only this class's armor is black & that guy's is silver, it'll work great, we think.

    I still have no idea what to think of this game.  So Mythic "doesn't lie to the players", that's because their products didn't have the character, emersion, and mass appeal that Blizzard's do.  E.A. Mediocre Entertainment, "we no lie, but no one cared".

     

     

  • Posted: 7/12/08 2:15 AM
    General Discussion
• • Should you pay a subscription for a Not-Really MMO?

  • Originally posted by Channce
    

    (X) voted OP is a troll and this thread fails.

     

    Hey if being picky about where i spend my hard earned money makes me a troll, then so be it. 

     

    I see most of you are more than happy to not only bend over and beg companies to put the ***** to you, but you've got a list of reasons telling them how entitled they are in so doing. 

    If a game sucks, I'll post about it and stop paying them.  Try it sometime.

     

     

  • Posted: 6/01/08 10:53 PM
    General Discussion
• • Should you pay a subscription for a Not-Really MMO?

  •  

     

    The recent launch of AoC and the instancing gripes from it's players begs the question: Should you be paying a monthly fee for a "multiplayer role playing game"? 

    Take into consideration games such as: Hellgate London, Guild Wars, Dungeons and Dragons Online, Dungeon Runners.

    Some charge, some just sell you the box and hope you get bored, thus staying off the servers, some go into nickel and diming you for inventory space etc.

     

    It used to be that you could pick up virtually any game for pc, and it would be supported in multiplayer in one fashion or another.  Even the worst game ever would have a multiplayer function, a few servers with no one playing it, but no fees.

    Now, it seems every company is only looking for a reason to charge you a monthly subscription, no focus on game quality or quantity, just "Whats another way we can charge a subscription to people?"

    I understand that games that support huge amounts of players have a better reason to charge a fee, as opposed to an out-of-the-box first person shooter.  

    I'm asking, shouldn't we have specific standards in games before we're expected to start paying a subscription fee?

  • Posted: 6/01/08 12:56 AM
    General Discussion