Network Sites: FPSguru.com RTSguru.com UnboundGamer.com
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Games:570  Guilds:2,964
Members:1,441,597  Online:0
Guests:0  Posts:4,581,192
Blizzard Entertainment | Official Site
MMORPG | Genre:Fantasy | Status:Final  (rel 11/23/04)  | Pub:Blizzard Entertainment
PVP:Yes | Distribution:Download,Retail | Retail Price:$19.99 | Pay Type:Subscription
Desktop Client | System Req: PC Mac | ESRB:T

World of Warcraft Editorial: Character Customization

Garrett Fuller looks at the idea of being unique in World of Warcraft.

By  on November 08, 2006

World of Warcraft: Character Customization

Editorial by Garrett Fuller

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of MMORPG.com, its staff or management.

On the verge of the Burning Crusade expansion I wanted to ask the question to Warcraft players how you view your character. In playing many MMOs we all stick by our avatar very closely going through the trials of leveling up to the end game. Since Warcraft has been at its end game for over a year (being out two years) now many players constantly look for ways to tweak their character out and make them better. In this aspect Blizzard has given us a loot based system. The classes and races themselves are balanced to some degree (I know Will of the Forsaken tips the scales a bit). It is in the loot that players win and use that really makes the difference. The other way to boost your character is by gaining faction with various races or creatures in the world and using that faction to buy more loot. With another ten levels being added to the game, is there a chance we'll be able to customize out characters without having to grind raid dungeons or PvP instances to get the boost we need?

I know I know we'll get more talents, spells and abilities. Do those things really make the difference when playing? Yes they do on an even playing field. The bottom line of Warcraft is you are only as good as your loot. The game was designed this way to keep players going after new items for further enhancement. One of my biggest complaints about Warcraft has been character or avatar customization. If I am an orc shaman with Ten Storms Gear, an Aurastone Hammer and a Red Dragonscale Protector, I pretty much look like every other orc shaman with those items. There is no way to set your character apart at that point. The look of your character stays the same. Some games allowed players to at least dye their items for a customized look. Warcraft does not, everything is the same and we all have to wear it. I know this seems like some thing small to complain about in the grand scheme of things, but don't you like having the ability to give your character something that is uniquely his or her own? Being the top MMO in the world right now, maybe it would be nice to have yourself stand out a bit more in the population of seven million players.

Moving beyond the look of an avatar, what about the depth of the set up that players are given? We get talents to customize things, these are quick and easy to figure out and most players use a spec that is the best for their given class. Once you get to the end, if your spec works, there is little reason to change it. Again we hit a dead end. I have not changed my spec as a shaman in over a year. It works for what I need to do. Warriors basically have two choices: defensive tank or PvP crit-warrior. The same holds true for most classes. My point about talents is when you really get through the experimental stages to find out what works, many players settle on what is best for their class. This holds true in any game, but giving players another level of customization to their characters might be a nice addition. I guess for me it's the depth that Warcraft goes in building your character, it can be shallow. Don't get me wrong I am not asking for this huge immersive character building experience. I do think however that developers should give players ways to have depth in abilities while still keeping the game in balance.

Finally let's talk about loot, gear, equipment, items, all of it. This is where Warcraft has become very unbalanced. Players who reach sixty with all blue gear will get crushed by a player in epic gear. I understand that player has gone through a lot to get the epics and they deserve them, but why not give the gear bonuses in other areas besides damage and attack speed. If all weapons did the same damage at the end game and hit for basically the same DPS overall it may allow fights to go on longer and allow players to reach into a different bag of tricks for PvP. Make epic weapons give players a bonus to other areas. Boost strength or stamina a little more, I can even see boosting the crit-strike chance. It is really the DPS that drives these weapons and armor over the edge of balance. In a way developers have created the perfect system to keep players raiding and pushing for the next best thing. Still, there should be ways for every players to compete on an equal playing field or at least a field where you are level sixty, have a few epics and blues, and don't get crushed by a Tier three mage with all the gear possible.

I know there are some opinions in this editorial that people may question. But that is why we bring up these topics, to get you to question the balance and design of games. I wish there were more ways to customize World of Warcraft. I think Blizzard owes it to the players who have stuck by the game for two years now. Fortunately, myself and all the shamans of the guild look pretty good together. Kind of like a football team. Maybe with the expansion we'll see a deeper level of customization in the characters we play. In the feedback, let us know what areas you think Warcraft could improve on as far as character customization goes.

More World of Warcraft Features:

The WoW Factor - The Role of Utility Column added on Monday February 13
The WoW Factor - The WoW Killer Redux Column added on Monday January 30
The WoW Factor - What is a “WoW Killer?” Column added on Monday January 16

More Editorial:

General - Naming Your MMO Baby Editorial added on Tuesday January 31
The List - Five TV Shows That Should Be MMOs Editorial added on Monday December 19

More Features:

Guild Wars 2 - Micro-Awesomeness Column added on Tuesday February 14
The Free Zone - Is F2P Ruining Korea’s Youth? Column added on Tuesday February 14
 
 
Suave writes:

Lol, what customization?  As far as I'm concerned the only thing they're adding to make it any more personal is two new races, and I'll be damned if anyone goes as far as starting over from level 1 just to look different from other people.

WoW is upsetting in many respects, and this is just one of them that I don't see getting any better with BC.

New Post Quote
11/08/06 12:05:39 PM
 
Lukane77 writes:

Agree, and Agree

Might be nice to look a little different than everyone else out there.  WAR supposedly is allowing you to hang skulls from your armor.  Even if it is a the same armor everyone else has, that little tweek can mean a lot to a player.

And yes I hate raiding as well.  As much trouble and guild drama I went through to get the Tier 1 stuff, there is no way I was going to completely ignore RL again to get another purple.  Do I get destroyed in PvP?  Sometimes.  WoW loves Raiders.  Because they never cancel their account hehe.

I quit WoW for just that reason.  I'll resub for BC because I heard it is possible through PvP to get raid quality gear without the 80 hour a week BG grind.  We'll see. 

It's a good game.  Great mechanics.  Few Bugs.  Easy to play.  Now if they can listen to the rest of us besides the raiding-every-night-forum-trolls, it'll be even better.

New Post Quote
11/08/06 12:37:05 PM
 
Giana writes:

 

            The extent to which WOW takes gear is way over the top, i dont mind raiding, i dont mind PVPing, i like them both, heck i like WOW as a game .It was, at one time, a very fun MMO. With that being said i think people are getting fed up with the neverending gear grind. Honestly if raiders werent allowed to bring thier tier 2-3 epics into the BGs, no one would ever have complained about raid gear. I in no way think this is the players fault, they worked hard for those epics and they have the right to wear them wherever they choose. But its Blizzards mechanic that is to blame.

            WOW did alot of good things for the MMO buisness overall, it attracted ALOT more people to MMOS which will, in the long run, benefit us die hard MMO fans by allowing companies to invest more time into a game and make it better and more polished on release, in other words, investors wont be breathing down the necks of game companies now that they have seen how much $$ WOW has brought in, well not breathing down their necks as much heh.

            I honestly believe WOW is turning the corner, in the near future there are several promising games coming out, Im not saying WOW will lose all of its playerbase by any means, in fact i think it will still continue to be #1 for quite some time. Personally i think its time for me to move on, i had a great time with it, but like Mr. Fuller pointed out the purple neverending gear grind is just gettin old and so is WOW.

            I look forward to what these new games will bring, Vanguard, LOTR, Warhammer, Spellborn all seem to be very interesting games, im sure they will have raiding wether it be PVP or PVE, but it will be a different atmosphere and hopefully they will see the mistakes that WOW has made with thier snowballing gear effect, because gamers are evolving, and its time for these games to evolve with us.

New Post Quote
11/08/06 12:46:44 PM
 
Gnomig writes:

Well... i think the talents are pretty well done for a MMO, and if you like to you will always be able to play a "different" character - theres always some "best" build, no matter how complex your system may be...

But as for the looks - yes, i agree... its not fun looking like evry other orc schaman (yes, me too).

 

New Post Quote
11/08/06 12:49:02 PM
 
Guler writes:

I can honestly say I don’t think WoW was ever made to be the eye candy game. What it was made to be was a game with very low poly counts so it could run on the worst machines, and also be able to handle multiple people on the same screen without messing up.

I think if you consider the original plans for WoW included player built cities similar to WC3 cities, and also raid based PvP it is not hard to figure out why WoW has limited themselves in customization for better performance and more action on the screen at the same time.

New Post Quote
11/08/06 12:58:34 PM
 
Bonzar writes:
Gonna disagree with you here, Guler. Their low system specs have nothing to do with their lack of different models. We're not asking for more detailed armors or weapons, just different variations. Also, their limited facial/body features during creation are surprising. You can't even control weight/height.

I wish that WoW had created more specialized gear for raids with slight bonuses as opposed to huge bonuses that completely tip the scales. I wouldn't mind if Tier 3 weapons armor had higher damage or armor values, that's expected. But the bonuses we see make it end all be all gear. Since all you have to do is raid your heart out, you become a god in the game with just minimal skill over your opposition.

If the bonuses were specialized to the class or certain talents/spells, then you'd have to become a better player while also gathering better loot, because if you didn't know how to take advantage of the spells or talents affected then you'd never get the most out of your gear.

Of course, this is just how I feel. A game that caters to casual players shouldn't all of a sudden force you into hardcore raiding to keep up.
New Post Quote
11/08/06 1:15:17 PM
 
qbangy32 writes:

If you look at the batch of current next gen MMO's other than WoW and the ones in development you will see a similar trait in all of them, a diverse and extremly in-depth customisation of your character from creation to your first stumbling steps into their gaming world.

Customisation to alot of players is extremly important, take Everquest 2 for example, they had pre-order disks before the game went live so that you could create and play around with the very same character creation system you would eventually use in the real game.

WoW reminds me of the vast amount of korean games we see filling the MMORPG games list, they all offer one or 2 different character choices and very few other options to make your beloved character appear any different from the thousands of other players you spend your gaming time with.

I used to play a Druid in WoW and in any raid you would be hard pressed to be able to pick me out of a crowd of other druids as we all looked exactly the same with our tier1 armour, in fact it was ridiculous how alike we all looked and quite sad for a game that has so many paying subscribers.

I've since quit WoW in frustration at the many failings in the game and one of them is the lack of variety in how my character is seen in the game world.

 

 

New Post Quote
11/08/06 1:48:10 PM
 
Amathe writes:

I am all for more game systems (in this game and any game) where it's not all about the loot. There are many other things that can be emphasized.

But I disagree with some of the factual premises in this article, to the point I wonder if we are playing the same game?

I routinely defeat player opponents wearing much better gear than I. Gear makes things easier but it is no substitute for competence.

I also see entire raids full of people in awesome gear wipe, and just as often raids with lesser equipped players succeed. Tactics, teamwork and leadership are just as important as what you are wearing.

Then there are the talent trees and the choices you make on what to equip, or what pets or attacks or combinatons of those to use, and a million other things. There are lots of choices.

So while I applaud wanting to see less importance given to loot and more emphasis to other things, I disagree that what you wear is all there is to WoW.

New Post Quote
11/08/06 2:06:09 PM
 
Valentina writes:
Exactly, what customization? They could improve this in more ways than one, by FAR...

1) Appearance of Characters (hair,face etc)
2) Armors
3) Skills...


The list can go on, but in their FAQ they recetly updated, they said there was no plans to add to or improve the customization of characters, which I find very very lame.
New Post Quote
11/08/06 2:31:14 PM
 
malachidark writes:
I totally agree with this editorial. playing an mmorpg to me is all about customization and looking cool. sometimes in WoW when i find two pieces of gear that are similar, i may take the one that's a little bit weaker just because it matches the rest of my armor and looks good. when you get to the end game you look cool, but you look common!

One Human Tanking Warrior w/ Tier3 Epics is exactly the same as another Human Tanking Warrior w/ Tier 3 Epics.
Skillwise and gearwise

I'd like to see a new system that's not about the gear, or at least not ALL about the gear. I'd love for WoW to add more armor sets for each tier.

This is the reason i'll be quitting WoW when Vanguard: Saga of Heroes comes out =)
New Post Quote
11/08/06 2:47:01 PM
 
DarkeOne writes:
Just to add my two cents, I'm in agreement with the customization and the game balance toward gear.

When UO first came out, everyone was dying everything they could get away with. DAoC followed suit but it seemd to have gotten lost along the way. Since WoW is not graphic intense, you'd think it would be easy to implent. I guess if it's no in the code then it won't be in the code. Programmer I'm not.

As for as gear, WoW stirkes  me of the 'Monty Haul of MMOG's. Yeah things like Rings of Power, Invisibility cloaks, and the mighty Excalibur were central to certain stories and grabbed our attention. But to have everything based on loot lacks depth and loses appeal sooner or later (especially when all the phat loot to be had is had...what then ?!). Who know perhaps things will change in time.

Then again, perhaps not.

D

New Post Quote
11/08/06 2:50:28 PM
 
liddokun writes:
Wow and Customization shouldn't even be used in the same sentence. The only thing you can really customize in wow is your character name without meeting another dozen clones of your character.
New Post Quote
11/08/06 3:17:01 PM
 
Blue3000 writes:

First and foremost WoW is an overly-hyped game. It's overly-exaggerated game as far as it being the very best.  Well, if it is it just goes to show you the much worse all the other games of the same type really are.  WoW is the best of the worse.

Yes, many people have played it at one time or another but thats because of a few reasons. One, because the game extends to many places unlike many other games.  Two, because of all the hype, people have gone on to try the game out. But just as many like myself saw first hand just how bad it really is and have left never to return.

With this said, the customization in this game is terrible. It has about 6 faces per type with just the hair parts being different and those hairs are just as few as the faces.  Hence, everyone looks alike.

As far as the weapons and armor and other items are concerned, you need a whole lot of grinding and luck just to be able to come up with something worthwhile. And even when you're lucky enough to loot something good, you have to pray you can actually use it. Most items you loot, you can't use due to your profession being different. Nor can you trade, sell or give them away to another player. Only to the vendors can you sell it and they will give you virtually nothing for them.

There is no money to be made in this game. Missions unlike other games don't reward you with cash. Even a game as bad as Starwars Galaxies with it's new nge pays off good cash per mission.

Once you hit the mid to late 50's before this new levels come aboard, you tend to run out of missions with only dungeons to be done. Dungeons which need a whole lot of people to do.  It's not worth it, it's really not.

The people who have played this game and left won't be persuaded to return because we already know how it is.  Now they add 2 new professions but other then this, nothing else has changed.

New Post Quote
11/08/06 3:55:23 PM
 
Blue3000 writes:

I missed adding this. When Vanguard comes out many many of the people on WoW now will leave for this game.  Blizzard also knows this.  WoW won't ever catch up to this new game once it comes out and they know it.

Can't wait for a real good game to come out, something Vanguard looks to be.

New Post Quote
11/08/06 4:02:09 PM
 
damian7 writes:
it's the reason i'll play games like eve, uo, and city of- before i play WoW again.  in each of these games, there's a ton of ways to customize your toon.  if they wanted to do something, then they'd make crafting equal to whatever the higher end equipment is, also making it able to change AT LEAST the color of equipment.  or, they'd add one or two more talent trees to each class with BC.

but as usual, nothing worth worrying about in BC.  pre-order and get the pre-order pet, play a toon or two to max level, get bored with the same old garbage they've been doing for the past couple of years, quit again.  not even going to bother.

bleh.
New Post Quote
11/08/06 4:18:00 PM
 
GungaDin writes:

Good editorial Garrett

You basically summed up what I hated about the game when I tried it for 2 weeks.   Thats right, just 2 weeks and I could tell this game was nothing more than a Loot Whoring affair.   I still don't get why people play it, there is really no way to distiguish yourself other than Loot and Level.  

This game took a step back from Ultima Online, like most MMORPGs have.  However, since many people are new to MMORPGs and have never played Ultima Online (Pre Trammel), they don't know the full potential a MMORPG has.  Even Star Wars Galaxies and COH/COV at least made you feel like your character was unique. 

Nice job and keep up the good work. 

New Post Quote
11/08/06 4:24:15 PM
 
Jodysseus writes:
I used to be a WoW raider and accumulated 50/50 tier 1 and 2 set items from MC and BWL.  The continuous grind to get better items was always addictive, yet after awhile, it became tedious and boring.  About that time I, as a hunter, aquired a petrified leaf from the majordomo loot.  This item began a quest that made me love the game again.

For the first time, I could obtain an epic quality item on my own schedule, based on my own skills.  After some unsuccessful attempts and some annoying "good samaritans" trying to help me, (for those who do not know, any assistance during the quest's demon fights despawns the demons for hours) I completed the quest and received the epic bow and staff for my troubles.

After completing the quest, I realized how much more I enjoyed combatting enemies where the end result was dependent on my actions alone.  Raiding had become essentially repeating the same few key strokes with the occasional change up for a boss.  To get the best items, i had to be online on the set schedule to receive enough DKP (i.e. guild points used to determine looters) which also causes strain with non-WoW players (i.e. the wife).

In my opinion, more solo / small team instances should be created to give players the opportunity to show what they are made of.  The loot should be comparable to high end raid 40 man instances.  I can guarantee that mastering these types of encounters can be just as difficult, if not more so, than the big 40 man raids.  Let the players choose some different item sets for completing the instances.  As a hunter, AGI reigns supreme; however Blizz could change the mechanics of the game up a bit to allow more diversity.  Let the players decide between high strength -vs- high stamina.

As for PvP, it is fun, but the same rules as raiding applies, especially for AV. 
New Post Quote
11/08/06 4:29:07 PM
 
karat76 writes:
As a father of two I only have a few hours to play each week usually 10. Blizzard needs to pay alot more attention to the nonraiders. They need to realize a large portion of their players might actually have jobs and families. Toss us a bone give us 5 or at most 10 people encounters to do for great loot. The raiders have been given more than enough give the other 90% something to play with for a little while.
New Post Quote
11/08/06 5:50:25 PM
 
Maltese writes:
Well, is customization of your Avatar really that important? Those MMORPGs with the highest subscriber base are those with the least customization for your electronic alter ego (According to Mmogchart.com). It seems that the majority of players don't really mind the lack of options. At least not enough to affect their decision as to play which game.
Telling a good game from a bad game is pretty simple once it's out. A good game sells like the proverbial hotcakes while a bad one collects dust on the shelf. You may argue that there are examples of good companies going bust while others thrive on selling trash, but generally I see the market as a good indicator on how much merrit a product has.

Now let's imagine a game with a lot of sliders and colour bars to fiddle with during character creation. Assume you can adjust your size, morph your face to quite some extent, chose hairstyle, eye and skin color, various body adornments, etc.
For my argument I will further assume that, almost without exception, everyone in MMORPGs will wear their fighting gear at all times.

Let's start with eyecolour and face options. Practically no one except you will ever notice which one you chose. You will be the Lvl xx healer/tank/dps, not the guy/girl with the slanted blue eyes. Facial hair seems to make you stand out in some cases, though.

Now hairstyle and haircolour will usually be hidden by your helm. Unless, of course, the helm design is so sub-par that the gameprovider offers you an option to hide the helmet (This indeed has happened in at least one case). Further, if you want to display both your helmet/headdress and your hair, this raises polycount and of course there may be problems with the geometry of helm and hair clashing. If you stick to generics here, you run into less trouble.

Scaling options for tall and short. A very subtle distinguishing feature, but somewhat noticeable, granted. However, including this apparently excludes some interaction with world geometry today (i.e. sitting down in a chair at your friendly inn), also mo-capped animations don't seem to scale very well (see EQ2). There may be other ramifiactions which raise development costs/time too, I presume.

Body adornments and skin colour. Unless the armor worn is revealing, next to pointless.

Options for being either left- or righthanded. I am not aware of any game offering this option, so this may not belong here at all. Would probably be noticeable, you really do a lot of fighting in these type of games after all.

If we speak of options for your armor, that's a different kettle of fish, I suppose. Since your gear ist what others actually get to see of you. Adding custom colour and maybe eyecandy effect options to visible equipment pieces may go a long way, in fact the more a developer goes hog wild here, the better.
And if you as developer stuck to two or three standard avatars with maybe a handful options each which do not affect character geometry, I am considerably certain that development will have a much easier time coming up with new weapon and armor designs, since they will exactly know what they will be dealing with. There wont be any surprise graphic glitches with fat/thin tall/short avatars, or the brow not fitting under the helm, etc. No guesswork or extensive testing required on adding new outfits.

Thank you for bearing with me.
New Post Quote
11/08/06 6:47:09 PM
 
shmig writes:
Customization of appearance is nice, but has nothing to do with WoW. I like the idea of custom appearances but it's an utter waste to do it when you're likely to be covered in armor in the end. Of course, there's likely a chunk of time where you won't be fully decked-out and will matter somewhat. The funny thing is, you have more control over your appearance before you have any armor (in WoW) than you do once you are 60. However, alot of the armor available is bright and very unique (easy to notice in a crowd), and that is very nice.

But the type of customization he (the author) seems to be referring to is talents and armor.

Talents in WoW are customizable within reason and class. Like He said, a warrior basically has only 2 choices. A priest typically has 3 and is more likely to switch between them than other classes. I play a rogue mostly, have never changed it (even after patch 1.12), but can propose between 5-10 very unique talent specs based on style and weapon choice. Sadly, most rogues still settle with 1 of 2 'popular' options, which is truly sad.

With the expansion, there does seem to be an attempt to encourage people to customize their talents more than in the past, but this is not entirely true. Priests, and especially rogues, are being pigeonholed into even more specific class roles than before (priests through new talents, rogues through new abilities). Thus, customization of play-style/talents is very debatable.

Armor, on the other hand (and in my opinion) offers next to no customization currently in WoW. As I already said, there's many pieces of armor that'll stick out and look very neat, but the customization is strictly in what pieces you have. There is no ability to change color, or add some spikes, or do anything to customize your armor from someone with the same piece. Furthermore, customization through the STATS on the armor is even more restricting, and plays back into talent customization. Upper level armor in WoW provides little opportunity for a class to choose strength over agility, or AP over crit, and so on. By the time you reach tier2 armor, the stats you will be optimizing has been chosen for you, all you can do is throw on some enchantments. This, in turn, controls how you are likely to spend your talent points, as to make the best use of your stats.

Thus, in the end, your only customization in WoW is your glowy effects, and how far up the armor ladder you've made it.

But then there's jewelmaking. Really, none of us know how it'll all end up. I don't mind the loss of some customization in appearance if it reduces latency, so long as I can still find my friends when I need to. What I don't like is losing customization in how I choose to play my character.
New Post Quote
11/08/06 7:13:57 PM
 
pabloex writes:
Wow. It was almost painful to read.

2 weeks ago Garrett Fuler decided to render a negative opinion on the Burning Crusade expansion. I posted in response to that piece indicating that everyone was entitled to their opinion and I won't recant that here. However, I will say that when a person continually has 'editorials' about the same subject, in this case WoW, and they consistently convey the same message, in this case Garrett Fuler has lost interest in WoW, it changes from being an opinion to a glorified whine. How many more articles can we expect on why Garrett Fuler has lost interest in playing WoW? Perhaps we are just fortunate enough to be getting his novella one chapter at a time - 'WoW, How I hate thee'.

So let's cut to the chase - you want to feel unique, you want to stick out from every other player, you want to create a visual statement that makes people remember you. Nothing wrong with that but that isn't what WoW offers and instead of trying to force what you want into WoW why not try one of the several other games that do let you do that? Simply put, if that visual statement is that important to you, then WoW isn't your game. Doesn't make WoW good, bad or anything else, it just means it isn't what you want. Would you buy car racing game on your X-Box if you wanted to play Basketball?

Ok, last point, you are totally off your rocker with your comparison of the haves and have nots when it comes to loot. First of all you are insinuating that players MUST compete against other players at the end game. This couldn't be farther from the truth. Second, you are also iimplying that when players do compete against other players, that it often happens in a 1 on 1 scenario. This is also not the norm. Yes, if your end game consists of standing outside the gates of Ogrimmar or on the streets of Goldshire dueling with other players then you are 100% spot on. Otherwise, this is nothing more than cleverly disguised statement of loot envy.

In closing, yes, you are welcome to have your opinions but perhaps you should broaden your horizon and speak of issues that span the MMOG genre as a whole instead of trying to appeal vocal minority that riddle the forums of MMOG games with their complaints about how no game is ever good enough.

If this is the kind of drivel that the MMORPG.com site wants to sponsor when it comes to 'fresh new content', I am going to have to seriously consider its removal from my list of sites to read.
New Post Quote
11/08/06 8:31:47 PM
 
MisterJaw writes:

Hero's Journey offers total customization and a deep gameplay experience.  Role-playing is going to be emphasized, just like it was in EQ's first days.  Here's to hoping it sticks!

WoW could revamp their system to allow for the customization of armor.  Heck, just having the ability to turn off shoulderpads would be an improvement.  Choosing which two colors your armor displays would be a massive improvement in the fight to stand out in a crowd.  Don't want fuschia warriors?  Don't include it in the palette!

Faces would be great if they just added ten more faces per race.  A bevy of new hairstyles would do wonders.  Height/weight sliders would be great!  An option to display a different type of armor than what you are wearing, Say there's a rogue who loves Defias armor.  If they obtain the whole set, let that be an unlocked suit that they can don whenever they like.  Even if they are running about in full Darkmantle, they will look like they want to.  They will also be easier to pick out in a raid, as they have more options for their level.  Disable this ability for PvP and dueling.

Meh.  I like two hundred and eighty different types of pie.  However, I don't seem to complain too loudly when only three kinds are offered at an event.  Seeing that someone thought to bring whipped cream, caramel sauce and/or ice cream for the pie certainly makes the limited choices of pumpkin, cherry and apple more livable though.

The Burning Crusade doesn't seem to be that thoughtful in this regard.  Having socketed items does not change the shape of this cookie cutter one bit.  Am I bad for still wanting a cookie?

New Post Quote
11/08/06 8:35:42 PM
 
Mischiff writes:
This is the exact reason i left WOW, because the end game is all about instances, trying to get epic gear, and grinding faction. Its all gear driven, balance, what balance .. they worry about it through out the whole game untill you reach 60 then unbalance it at the end through the whole gear grind end game. It is a big turn off also that everyone looks the same.

Faction grind, instant grinds, and BG grinds .. They took the "play" out of the game at the end IMHO and made it one big grind.

I love the idea of epic stats being in diff area's other than DPS, and i play a rogue .. they could shorten cool downs etc, lots of areas to make them desirable for the diff class's.

The end game is so bad that i just found myself making new characters so i could enjoy "playing" the game again .. did find that i really liked warlock a lot though .. and i know a lot of people will read this and think, I just needed to get into a good guild, I belonged to a good guild, we ran instances 4 times a week, and sundays; all the way up to AQ20, and was working on AQ40 .. we owned Ony and others .. (was even on a PVP server) when we were not doing instances or grinding faction, almost everyone was doing an ALT .. why, because there is no other fun content for a level 60 to do !

I dont see or hear anything new with this expansion, shame, all I see is more of the same, lots of Instancing. What they have proposed wont bring me back; and I'll admit, its been the most fun game Ive playd to date, just the worst endgame Ive played to date.
New Post Quote
11/08/06 8:42:45 PM
 
DaMaDo writes:
Honestly after almost 2 years in WoW, I went to EQ2 because there's a lot more depth there. Not just with loot, but with housing etc. There's just more "ownership" there and that feeling of ownership is what I need...I loved it in UO. It seems UO got almost everything right from the start and now we just need a new game to incorporate all those elements.
New Post Quote
11/08/06 9:08:35 PM
 
damian7 writes:

Originally posted by Maltese
Well, is customization of your Avatar really that important? Those MMORPGs with the highest subscriber base are those with the least customization for your electronic alter ego (According to Mmogchart.com). It seems that the majority of players don't really mind the lack of options. At least not enough to affect their decision as to play which game.
Telling a good game from a bad game is pretty simple once it's out. A good game sells like the proverbial hotcakes while a bad one collects dust on the shelf. You may argue that there are examples of good companies going bust while others thrive on selling trash, but generally I see the market as a good indicator on how much merrit a product has.

Now let's imagine a game with a lot of sliders and colour bars to fiddle with during character creation. Assume you can adjust your size, morph your face to quite some extent, chose hairstyle, eye and skin color, various body adornments, etc.
For my argument I will further assume that, almost without exception, everyone in MMORPGs will wear their fighting gear at all times.

Let's start with eyecolour and face options. Practically no one except you will ever notice which one you chose. You will be the Lvl xx healer/tank/dps, not the guy/girl with the slanted blue eyes. Facial hair seems to make you stand out in some cases, though.

Now hairstyle and haircolour will usually be hidden by your helm. Unless, of course, the helm design is so sub-par that the gameprovider offers you an option to hide the helmet (This indeed has happened in at least one case). Further, if you want to display both your helmet/headdress and your hair, this raises polycount and of course there may be problems with the geometry of helm and hair clashing. If you stick to generics here, you run into less trouble.

Scaling options for tall and short. A very subtle distinguishing feature, but somewhat noticeable, granted. However, including this apparently excludes some interaction with world geometry today (i.e. sitting down in a chair at your friendly inn), also mo-capped animations don't seem to scale very well (see EQ2). There may be other ramifiactions which raise development costs/time too, I presume.

Body adornments and skin colour. Unless the armor worn is revealing, next to pointless.

Options for being either left- or righthanded. I am not aware of any game offering this option, so this may not belong here at all. Would probably be noticeable, you really do a lot of fighting in these type of games after all.

If we speak of options for your armor, that's a different kettle of fish, I suppose. Since your gear ist what others actually get to see of you. Adding custom colour and maybe eyecandy effect options to visible equipment pieces may go a long way, in fact the more a developer goes hog wild here, the better.
And if you as developer stuck to two or three standard avatars with maybe a handful options each which do not affect character geometry, I am considerably certain that development will have a much easier time coming up with new weapon and armor designs, since they will exactly know what they will be dealing with. There wont be any surprise graphic glitches with fat/thin tall/short avatars, or the brow not fitting under the helm, etc. No guesswork or extensive testing required on adding new outfits.

Thank you for bearing with me.



what about talent/skill/power/etc options for customization?  where there's too many choices for there TO be a cookie cutter build?
New Post Quote
11/08/06 9:14:29 PM
 
damian7 writes:

Originally posted by pabloex
Wow. It was almost painful to read.


So let's cut to the chase - you want to feel unique, you want to stick out from every other player, you want to create a visual statement that makes people remember you. Nothing wrong with that but that isn't what WoW offers and instead of trying to force what you want into WoW why not try one of the several other games that do let you do that?

customer complaints is what made them change up BG queues to include everyone everywhere.  people being content with garbage didn't make that change.  customer complaints (and account cancellations) made them rethink the kaplan-onlyraidcuzi'matalentlesshack concept and take him down from being their spokes-troll.  little babies taking it like babies didn't get BC changed from raid-only to pvp and smaller instances...

Simply put, if that visual statement is that important to you, then WoW isn't your game. Doesn't make WoW good, bad or anything else, it just means it isn't what you want. Would you buy car racing game on your X-Box if you wanted to play Basketball?

 maybe he wants the WoW that was hyped before they hired kaplan and his dark sith guildmaster from EQ....

Ok, last point, you are totally off your rocker with your comparison of the haves and have nots when it comes to loot. First of all you are insinuating that players MUST compete against other players at the end game.

yes, kaplan's own numbers show that a good 0.69% of the wow population engages in raiding.  that's about two-thirds of ONE percent, which means that 99.31% of the wow population (by kaplan's number) do NOT engage in raiding.  if they're not raiding, that means they don't like raiding right?

so if that 99+% of the population isn't raiding... what are they doing?  quilting?  oh wait, crafting is a joke in wow, no quilting here.

 Otherwise, this is nothing more than cleverly disguised statement of loot envy.

um, or it's talking about what 99.31% of the wow population does/doesn't do, which is something all these people that say "oh wow must be doing everything right, they've got millions of subs"... seems those people ALWAYS forget, that by KAPLAN's own numbers... less than one percent of the population raids.  if 99% of the subs DON'T raid... it's really not euclidean geometry to draw a straight line of logic here.

In closing, yes, you are welcome to have your opinions but perhaps you should broaden your horizon and speak of issues that span the MMOG genre as a whole instead of trying to appeal vocal minority that riddle the forums of MMOG games with their complaints about how no game is ever good enough.

vocal minority, yet 99% of the wow players by their ACTIONS agree that raiding is caca and pvp and non-raids need tons of work.

If this is the kind of drivel that the MMORPG.com site wants to sponsor when it comes to 'fresh new content', I am going to have to seriously consider its removal from my list of sites to read.

can i have your stuff?


New Post Quote
11/08/06 9:23:35 PM
 
Xiaoki writes:

WoW and other MMOs with limited customization features do it for a reason. Too bad none of the geniuses on this board has grasped that though. Pity.

WoW has very limited character and armor customization because it's meant to have upwards of 100 characters(players and/or NPCs) in close proximity. Now if you had all those fancy facial features like nose length, or chin width or 18 different types of ear hair it would bog down your computer like no tomorrow. Blizzard even vastly downgraded the graphics of nearly everything from the original closed beta so that older or less powerul computers would have few problems running it. You don't get 7 million subscribers by making it so your game can only be played by hardcore performance nuts. Limiting customiztion was just good busines sense.

The most idiotic thing about that editorial was the comparison to Guild Wars. Yikes.

Epic raid gear is meant for ::gasp:: epic raids and NOT and I repeat NOT PvP. You get epic raid gear so you can fight bosses than can hit for 20,000 damage and have 3 million hit points. PvP is just merely a side effect. When an editor says that epic raid gear is meant solely for PvP there is something wrong and I don't mean with WoW. Take your personal vendettas else where.

New Post Quote
11/09/06 1:00:06 AM
 
Reinjin writes:
Hey, Fuller. Your editorials suck. I'd prefer it if you fondled Everquest II like the rest of the MMORPG.com writers and stop mentioning WoW in the same breath as the majority of the grindfest games on this site.
New Post Quote
11/09/06 2:55:06 AM
 
hashdh writes:
all this talk of wow customization has me seriously thinking ive been playing the wrong game for the past few years.

there ISNT any character real customization to speak of. sure they do a good job to make it look like theres customization, but besides the ui, there just isnt.

character appearance basically 5 different values to play with, with 5-10 choices for each value, if you can call them choices. skin color is a joke honestly, do you want to be this yellow green orc or this bluish green orc? the facial/head hair styles are nice looking i will admit, but then poor helmet clipping issues throws it out the window. either your hair clips thru the helm, or helms will make hair vanish all together, even if the helm isnt covering that part, ie my bearded dwarf loses his bead when he put on a foot-ball style helmet. the different facial ring placements on women arent noticable in the game, and to top it off, there not even a height/weight option of any sort. clonecraft ftw.

character build customization the talents in wow just arent deep enough to have any sort of individualism what so ever. sure it looks like a huge buffet of options to tailor your character just so, but after playing you realize that many of these talents arent that great, some are just plain pointless, while others are almost mandatory. whether you want to or not, almost every player is forced into one of a few "cookie cutter" builds for that class. since some builds are actually "better" than others, coupled with the changes bliz has made over the past couple years that have killed off certain builds, theres really only 3 choices max per class. more clonecraft.

phat lewtz loot is as bad as character builds. your build dictates the loot you go after, and then its just a constant grind to get that perfect set put together. heres the kicker tho, its the same damn set everyone else with your build is going for. when a new instance is added to the game then the "dream set" changes, and everyone goes after that set instead. the end result is the majority of the population look the same, as theyre wearing the same armor, carrying the same weapons. since you cant even change height/weight of your character, it just makes the whole 'everyone-looks-alike' syndrome that much worse. 

again, character customization doesnt exist in wow imo. hopefully this will change in bc, i can only hope.

yes it looks like nothing but me whining about wow, and yet i still play the stupid game.
New Post Quote
11/09/06 3:20:52 AM
 
Abcdxyz writes:

I dont really dont get the drama about customisation of your character. Who really cares if some of us look the same in armor? Isn't the point that they have made items recognisable which makes more sense. The mention that all players of a certain class and in the same guild look the same makes me wonder what type of guild you are in. I would think most guilds are working on dungeons where most players haven't completed the set, if you are all in tier 1 gear and look the same perhaps its time for your guild to move on to BWL? :P

I read another post in this thread where the guy suggested this was a whine and tbh it does kind of read that way. The complaint about being beat by people in better gear makes little sense to me too. It is imperative that when we reach level 60 everyone is not on an equal par, otherwise why carry on? Full epic gear probably gives the same advantage as 2-3 levels over a blue geared player and so it should or we would all stop and get bored at level 60. Again if the grind to get that gear was not made difficult then everybody would have it and there would be little point in carrying on. 

It kinda seems that on the one hand you want to be unique (in the way u look) but on the other u want everybody the same (as far as gear goes)...hmnn is sounding like a whine for whine sake.

Talents, well you paint a pretty dim view, and i think some classes are limited to maybe only 1-2 routes and healing classes in particulalrly have certain specs demanded of them by guilds. For solo play though I think they are more than sufficient and can give 2-3 completely different playing styles, multuply that by the choice of 9 different classes and is enough in my opinion.

Now the above may sound like Im one of the 'stop having a go at wow, i love it brigade', im not, in fact im bored to death of it and desperately waiting for something new and good to come out. I've tried Eve (zzzzz) and a couple of others lately but it's nice to be starting a new game when everyone esle is rather than 2 years behind.

In my opinion whats is wrong with wow is the need to be in a guild to obtain them epics, the guilds become less about fun and collectively playing together and more about gaining items. The top end guilds on servers rape the average guilds for players as soon as them average guilds have given players a few tier 1 epics. Some players come in and guild jump and within 3/4 weeks of turning 60 are in Naxx guilds...whats so hard about that grind? Rewarding people with no loyalty and poor attitudes with quick epics.

And the pvp now is a joke, i guess i've been lucky as i ranked a warrior to 14 and mage to 13 in the good old days. Now almost every time i join a bg solos for a little fun theres a 'fixed' group opposite and absolutely no chance to win. I think that may be addressed in TBC. But why havent premade groups been paired against each other before? Why cant u join as a random and expect to play against randoms? I have no idea....it's just bad design. The only route to epics before as a semi-solo player was through the pvp system, and now that's been made impossible.

Personally i'm watching this space, as no doubt a lot of wow addicts are. New games due out soon should try bloody hard to be out before TBC finally hits the stores. There's a hell of a lot of people looking for something else to play since its pointless searching for better gear in wow until TBC, the trouble is if nothing new and inspiring comes out beforehand we will all end up giving TBC a chance. No doubt another few months of wow addiction followed by end game dissapointment will follow.

 

  

New Post Quote
11/09/06 6:35:04 AM
 
pabloex writes:
Damian7, I certainly have no issue with you doing a counterpoint to my post, however, when you take the points out of context, it simply shows a lack of depth in original thinking.

At nowhere in my original posting did I mention raiding. The editorial complains about an imbalance in gear at the end game. This complaint is further developed stating that some players will never have a chance to defeat other players. Thus this isolates the end game down to one on one PvP. I didn't say that, I simply pointed out that this was an overbroad generalization and completely ignored what could be done at end game. And quite frankly, it really doesn't matter what percentages you pull out of your hat about what activities players engage in at end game because again it is a discussion of what you can do versus how you choose to limit yourself.

You were obviously an individual that built up a lot pre-release expectations that were not satisfied. Welcome to the wonderful world of Artistic Creativity meets Business Funding Model. We all expect that MMOGs will continue to evolve as the games age, such as the changes you pointed out with the Battlegrounds. However, every game has some fundamental systems that are far too cost prohibitive to change. Completely changing the character creation system would have deep ramifications for the game. But rather than attempting to understand the far reaching effects such a change would have, you would rather express your dislike for 'Kaplan' and continue on in your naive perspective that developers can make any change at any time and don't have corporate mandates to which they must also answer.

Finally, I am not disputing that many WoW characters visually appear similar. I am not disputing that WoW's end game is focused on loot. And I am not saying that WoW is the best game on the market as I believe the 'best' game on the market is the one the individual enjoys playing thus this could be different for every individual you meet. What I am saying is that too much time is spent opining about why Title X stinks rather than accepting that it simply isn't the game for you. As long as several million people are paying to have an account, Blizzard will continue to see this as an endorsement that their product does meet the needs of a large enough customer base for them to continue to support what is already there.

Get over it and move on. 
New Post Quote
11/09/06 7:43:16 AM
 
mpl1979 writes:

Lack of graphic custumization is indeed a problem in WoW. It is annoying when I can't tell one NE druid from the other. And sure I would like to be able to look more unique. On the other hand, I have never seen any char that looked exactly like mine. Sometimes the gear is quite alike, but then the weapons are different. Some ppl have their helm and cape turned on, some don't. More personal options would be nice though. Nice to see two new races in TBC. (although the mmorpg podcast suggested that there was only ½ new race:P)

Talents seems a bit underrated in this editorial. As a paladin I can change between many builds, and they do change the game for me. I am not required to spec a certain way to join raids and if ppl are, then they can find a different guild. A friend of mine is playing rogue, warrior and mage. He changes talent-spec frequently, since for him the spec matters a whole lot. There is more than 1-2 great builds for every class!

New Post Quote
11/09/06 7:51:10 AM
 
damian7 writes:

Originally posted by Reinjin
Hey, Fuller. Your editorials suck. I'd prefer it if you fondled Everquest II like the rest of the MMORPG.com writers and stop mentioning WoW in the same breath as the majority of the grindfest games on this site.

are you the person that works for wow that has the murlock for your avatar on your forums?   the logic in your posting reminds me a lot of that *person*.

i'd really like to know what exactly you're trying to post, because it doesn't make a lot of sense... it's like you said, "jojo, your mama has a job and so does mine!"  and it's supposed to be an insult.


wow is the largest and most horrid example of a grindfest for a western game that's out atm.


l2r.
New Post Quote
11/09/06 8:16:15 AM
 
unbelieveroz writes:

Damien7 needs a wowwy pop I'm thinking.

But seriously, these so called "editorials" are nothing more the glorified forum posts, which is to say a waste of bandwidth.

Seriously, marking them as a feature is insane and completly shafts the value of this zomg-new-screen-shot news site.

New Post Quote
11/09/06 8:33:59 AM
 
Smokeysong writes:

customization in WoW is alomost nil - you can choose your head's appearance, but who can see that when geared up?

About the gear being over the top, I strongly disagree. Gear is another form of levelling, it is good to have hard fought for gear that makes a real difference. Balance between high level gear and low level gear is just silly; why go through the effort to get the good stuff if it doesn't make a difference?

I say this hating the grind and not much liking the raiding, which, imo, is another form of grinding. The difference I would like to see is that WoW provides us solo-lovers with ways to get high level gear, ways that do not involve doing the same quest again and again.

Btw, I have 2 L60 characters neither of which has gone beyond having green gear with some blues, but I'm still glad to have epic-geared peoples able to kick my butt :)
New Post Quote
11/09/06 9:09:38 AM
 
indyne writes:

Originally posted by unbelieveroz

But seriously, these so called "editorials" are nothing more the glorified forum posts, which is to say a waste of bandwidth.

Seriously, marking them as a feature is insane and completly shafts the value of this zomg-new-screen-shot news site.


editorial [ed-i-tawr-ee-uhl, -tohr-]
– noun

1.  An article in a newspaper or other periodical presenting the opinion of the publisher, editor, or editors.
2.  A statement broadcast on radio or television that presents the opinion of the owner, manager, or the like, of the station or channel.
3.  Something regarded as resembling such an article or statement, as a lengthy, dogmatic utterance.

You have to take them for what they are.  It's merely the opinion of someone who works at the site.  Not everyone will agree with them, but isn't that the beauty of it all?  These editorials stir up a lot of conversation with valid points on both sides and gets the community involved in debate.
New Post Quote
11/09/06 10:02:34 AM
 
Parsifal57 writes:
The level of customization in WoW is pathetic, at the very minium i'd want to be able to add armor and weapon dyes. But there needs to be more ability to customize the look and build of a character. In addition whilst not directly related to character customization I view guild/personal housing as a must also, these buildings could be alternate hearth points, places were excess inventory can be stored (other than bank vaults), trophies displayed and personal vendors situated. None of which affect the characters abilities in Pve/PvP but which add more depth to the game. Whilst I enjoy Wow any game that offers better customization,housing and a useful crafting system (Much of wows is useless when some items can only be worn/used by the person who made them and the few good items that can be made are usually outclassed by world/set drops).


New Post Quote
11/09/06 10:36:01 AM
 
JackDonkey writes:
set pieces are the dumbest idea ever, we already have plate, mail, leather, and cloth why further restrict it by making it classes: Priest  It's lazy in my opinion they threw in the different types of armor and couldn't think of any way to balance that out other than further restricting it to classes.  Dumb and lazy in my opinion.  In eve you can put lasers on your scorpion if you want, or projectiles on your apocolypse probably not the smartest thing, but at least you have that option.

Blizzard says: "here is how you'll play [raids] and here is what you'll loot [class loot]"  dumb lazy and restrictive in my opinion.

New Post Quote
11/09/06 2:33:51 PM
 
Alanthus writes:

*shrug*

I'll buy BC 'cause it's the only thing out there but when something remotely on par with WoW that doesn't require endless PvE grinding to be able to PvP on a remotely even playing playing field comes along me and wife will wave goodbye and not look back. (AoC, W.A.R., ???)

Btw, reading the headline I thought this would be about customizing appearance etc. and couldn't really wrap my head around the concept of WoW and actual choices but then I read the piece and of course it was WoW and gear which is really all it is about.

New Post Quote
11/09/06 5:02:22 PM
 
damian7 writes:

Originally posted by pabloex
Damian7, I certainly have no issue with you doing a counterpoint to my post, however, when you take the points out of context, it simply shows a lack of depth in original thinking.

At nowhere in my original posting did I mention raiding. The editorial complains about an imbalance in gear at the end game.

where does this imbalance in gear come from?  r a i d i n g?

This complaint is further developed stating that some players will never have a chance to defeat other players.

BG pug with other random players who don't raid 24/7, vs a BG composed of people in a raiding guilds.  or a BG composed of different folks from raiding guilds.

Thus this isolates the end game down to one on one PvP.

see my last

 I didn't say that, I simply pointed out that this was an overbroad generalization and completely ignored what could be done at end game.

what can you do once you hit 60... crafting... um, i guess you could make pots, pick weeds, sell ores.  or you can do baron 100,000 times and hope that you get his horse when it finally drops.  you could also um, grind faction against a myriad of mobs, all of which give you epic recipes. that's cool, until you realize that those recipes have mats you get only from raid instances.  you could pvp.  nothing really to gain unless it's in a bg though.

And quite frankly, it really doesn't matter what percentages you pull out of your hat

um, those percentages are pulled directly from kaplan (designer at wow, you might've heard of him), at that lil gathering a few months back where he used slides to show how many thousands participate in raids and how many millions play the game.  the math itself wasn't shown by kaplan because it'd have shown that it's less than one percent of the total population.  saying X thousands raid made it look like a lot of people raid instead of doing the %.  so um, yeah i pulled the percentage out of the lead dev's hat.

 about what activities players engage in at end game because again it is a discussion of what you can do versus how you choose to limit yourself.

limit yourself?  the devs at wow limit you.  unless you're in a raiding guild, they really didn't make much for the pvpers in a game that has 'war' in it's title.

You were obviously an individual that built up a lot pre-release expectations that were not satisfied. Welcome to the wonderful world of Artistic Creativity meets Business Funding Model. We all expect that MMOGs will continue to evolve as the games age, such as the changes you pointed out with the Battlegrounds. However, every game has some fundamental systems that are far too cost prohibitive to change. Completely changing the character creation system would have deep ramifications for the game. But rather than attempting to understand the far reaching effects such a change would have, you would rather express your dislike for 'Kaplan' and continue on in your naive perspective that developers can make any change at any time and don't have corporate mandates to which they must also answer.

here we get into one of those 'i play eve and i'm better than you attitudes', yet you play wow... that is so ironic i'm about to cry from laughing.  they changed the game to suit kaplan... but they can't change the game to suit the 7 million paying customers? oh wait, they did, and are continuing to change it... the multi-realm bgs are an example.  but i guess if you're ranting from a 'i'm so superior' soap box, facts don't matter.  rant on bro.

Finally, I am not disputing that many WoW characters visually appear similar. I am not disputing that WoW's end game is focused on loot. And I am not saying that WoW is the best game on the market as I believe the 'best' game on the market is the one the individual enjoys playing thus this could be different for every individual you meet. What I am saying is that too much time is spent opining about why Title X stinks rather than accepting that it simply isn't the game for you. As long as several million people are paying to have an account, Blizzard will continue to see this as an endorsement that their product does meet the needs of a large enough customer base for them to continue to support what is already there.

well, by your logic, they wouldn't have ever redone bgs.  by your logic, they wouldn't have changed BC to be a WHOLE lot more non-raider friendly.  oh look, customers complaining IS making them change how they do business.  then again, i'm talking about facts and what has happened and is continuing to happen.  wonder why they took kaplan down as spokes-troll?  oh yeah, bad PR from *learn to raid noobs*, especially after a lot of customer complaints about wow.  so in order to appease said customers... they're changing a lot about the game... wonder if that's why BC got put off?  they realized how it wouldn't be a quick fix to undo all the raids kaplan had imposed and that it'd take time to make the game something that would retain paying customers...  so i guess that sort of blows your "blizz is doing everything right and doesn't need to change anything" theory out the water.  if they were... then where's kaplan and his endless raids?  why is BC tooting itself as being solo and single group friendly?

Get over it and move on.

use facts instead of fancy and get off your high horse.


New Post Quote
11/10/06 8:01:54 AM
 
pabloex writes:
Damian7 you have proven yourself to be quite obtuse.

I am amazed at your remarkable ability to recite as fact what I play and what I know when such statements were never made by me. Couple this with the depth of your behind the scenes knowledge of the why's and how's that a gaming company is making their changes and you truly do excel at achieving one of the highest ranks of whiney forum hate puppets.

Despite the fact that you are better than most 'haters' in your command of vocabulary, it still doesn't mask the fact that your statements are filled with assumptions, unsubstantiated conclusions and a narrow perspective that is driven simply by your emotional response to a video game. I do not feel that I am superior to you, as you state in your post, I just refuse to resort to attacking you personally and would rather stay focused on the argument, logic statements and possibilities that are overlooked.

What really makes me laugh is the fact that on many occassions in many places writing I have done has been highly critical of Blizzard. But that is a different discussion. For the sake of this thread nothing you have said changes what I first wrote about the joke that this editorial is and the fact that the vocal whiners feel a sense of entitlement about how a game should be changed rather than finding a different title that may be more suited to satisfying their complaints.

This will be my last post on this thread so you may have the last word as you strike me as the type of person that needs to do that.
New Post Quote
11/10/06 9:13:36 AM
 
damian7 writes:

Originally posted by pabloex
Damian7 you have proven yourself to be quite obtuse.

I am amazed at your remarkable ability to recite as fact what I play and what I know when such statements were never made by me.

blah blah blah = you busted me on not knowing anything so now i play the "YOU DON'T KNOW ME" card.

Couple this with the depth of your behind the scenes knowledge of the why's and how's that a gaming company is making their changes and you truly do excel at achieving one of the highest ranks of whiney forum hate puppets.

you STATED that wow is going great, no need to make changes.  i pointed out how you are completely wrong, and showed FACTS.

Despite the fact that you are better than most 'haters' in your command of vocabulary, it still doesn't mask the fact that your statements are filled with assumptions, unsubstantiated conclusions and a narrow perspective that is driven simply by your emotional response to a video game.

yet, kaplan did recite the numbers, they do come out to those percentages, BC was going to be another raidfest and they're changing it to be NONraid, BGs were changed... why is that?  because after two years of success, they decided OUT THE BLUE, to make changes?  or... maybe, just maybe, it's because of customer complaints.  you're the only one just making things up, which is great, if you're doing a non-factual editorial.  the things i've stated are facts, backed by LOGICIAL speculations.    l2r.

I do not feel that I am superior to you, as you state in your post, I just refuse to resort to attacking you personally and would rather stay focused on the argument, logic statements and possibilities that are overlooked.

wow, you ignore facts presented, state no actual facts, but only opinions.

What really makes me laugh is the fact that on many occassions in many places writing I have done has been highly critical of Blizzard. But that is a different discussion. For the sake of this thread nothing you have said changes what I first wrote about the joke that this editorial is and the fact that the vocal whiners feel a sense of entitlement about how a game should be changed rather than finding a different title that may be more suited to satisfying their complaints.

those so-called whiners are the REASON that wow is changing for the better.  ignorant little people that take what's given them and don't try to change something they like (and enjoy) for the better are NOT the reason...


This will be my last post on this thread so you may have the last word as you strike me as the type of person that needs to do that.

except that i'm using facts to dispute your thoughts.  you're just throwing your opinion, no facts.   sure, MAYBE wow is going away from two years of raiding NOT because of customer complaints, but because raiding IS what made them so successful and they're tired of success?  or, maybe, my speculations, based upon what actually happens, is the truth.

again, someone that knows they're in a wrong position, just trying to be a big online mang.  it's great to have an OPINION.  when someone shows facts, and bases their opinions upon facts presented, that does not entitle you to libel, slander, nor go "oh, you don't know what you're talking about."

if i'm wrong about BC not having tons of big raids, if i'm wrong about BGs being modified, if i'm wrong about kaplan's numbers, PLEASE correct me.  don't just dismiss FACTS because you don't like them.

if wow is so successful, 7 million subs and all, AND they're doing everything RIGHT... why the huge changes?  the BG queue, plus auto-grouping in BGs, those are based upon customer complaints about honor farmers, same with the new BC bg changes where it assigns teams based upon gear.  now did anyone actually SAY that?  no.  are these well-known customer complaints that have been around probably since BGs first started?  if not that long, then for months?  yes, they are.  again, it's not euclidean geometry to draw a line from point a to point b and come to a LOGICAL conclusion that YES, BG changes ARE due to customer complaints.

same with kaplan not being spokes-troll.  you can't pretend that the "learn to raid" comments weren't a total pr nightmare.

same with LACK of huge raids, almost-apologies for the nothingbutraidgarbage they've been feeding customers.

no one has officially said EVERYTHING i've posted, but um, well, it's not that hard to connect dots to well-known customer complaints and game changes which address said complaints.


last word?  only if someone is being holier-than-thou and/or acting like i'm making up information, when in fact... well, it's facts...


New Post Quote
11/10/06 9:49:57 AM
 
Vrazule writes:

Amen to that Damian7.  Its amazing how so many fanbois try to use smoke and mirrors to disprove what is right in front of their faces.  If a game mechanic is working, you don't change it period, customer complaints or not.  You only change things if there is a real problem, such as subscriber losses or customer complaints that number in the thousands creating very bad public press (reducing potential subscribers).  While I think they're taking too small steps, they are taking steps to change the formula.  Whether it will be enough to keep a large part of their subscriber base is yet to be seen. 

They already lost me months ago and I'm sure I wasn't and won't be the only one.  I won't be coming back till they reward all play styles equally.  If I can't get epic gear solo / small group, instance / non-instance, raid / non-raid, then this game has nothing to offer me.  The same goes for any MMO that uses this outdated and elitist paradigm.  Its hard to imagine any subscriber base paying a developing company to treat even a small portion of their patrons like second class citizens, let alone the large percentage they abuse now.  Its sad, its disgusting and it has to change, not just for WoW, but for future MMO's to come.

New Post Quote
11/10/06 12:12:05 PM
 
eris0023 writes:
I have a totally different take on this ever important "customization".

I played SWG from release to right after JTL when i couldnt complete a space mission because of a bug and i lost interest. Anyway i digress, In swg you could customize your face down to the frecklels, but all combat classes wore pretty much the exact same gear once you could afford it leaving the non-coms to wear the fancy stuff, unless you were just walking about town and not planning on pvping at all. So what you have is a bunch of custom faces running around in helms all covered up.

I played COH from launch for about a year, and yes it is the most customizable game out there as far as looks. But as far as spells, it was all the same crap. And as far as the poor blasters with rifles that could not (and still cant from what i gather) be replaced. So yes i LOOKED different but my playstyle was very similar to 100 other people on my server.( In addition at end game there was nothing to do other than farm/buy more enhancements so you could do.... something im sure)

I played EVE and all i will say is .................................. I know alot of people like this game but you have got to be kidding me when people start spouting about SKILL in EVE, TIME levels you up in that game and there is very limited customization until you have invested a exteneded amount of time (and no not just in-game time, but time sleeping, maybe you were watching a movie, it doesnt matter cause you were gaining SKILLS!) I dont know about endgame in EVE cause i was so dangerously close to gouging my eyes out after my 10 day trial that i couldnt stand it. But you are still going to be in the same ship that 100 other people are going to be in. (Though i will give them that its forgivable in a game like this since you can technically be part of a squad) Meh to eash tier own.

In addition to those games i have pretty much tried every mmo out there (eq1,eq2,Ryzom, GW, anarchy online, god even Planetside, FFxi, RF :( , and a whole slew of others i cant even remember at this point. I just wanted to clarify this before i went on to my main point to try to prevent flames like gawd play other games or some crap.

Now ill get to the meat of my point. I play wow and i wanted to hate it when it was coming out.  When i got into the character customization i WAS very dissappointed, this feeling of course didnt last long due to the fun leveing grind and the fact that the game was very fun to start out with. Through the 1-60 process you rarely if ever see another character with the exact same items as you which is nice.  So once you hit endgame raiding is where Mr. Fuller's point of Sameness Set Pieces comes in and where i find wow has done something that no other game has.

As an example We have two Tauren warriors in our guild we will call them Tank 1 and Tank 2, both have the exact same visible pieces of armor(not counting trinkets, rigns, etc.) but the demeanor of the people that play the characters is completely different, and in that i see 2 completely different tauren warriors when i look at them.
This is obviously purely a mental thing and may be restricted to just me.  But in the sameness that blizzard created they have forced me to look beyond the gear of my guildie and his toon and to see how is play style and attitude effect the way i see and feel about this person.

Meh well that is my point, sorry for the rambling..... Off to get food.

New Post Quote
11/10/06 1:08:50 PM
 
damian7 writes:
eris, i think the customization that i want to see includes individual talents/trees, in the case of wow.

it'd be nice if they'd at LEAST have crafters able to tint armors.  supposedly there's going to be the diablo-style socketing?  that's a way to customize armor.

but, i just wish there were more talent trees.  so that it'd be impossible to just have a couple of *have to build* cutters.  but, guess that's asking for too much, i mean, after two years, they reskinned night elves and orcs, couldn't be bothered to make new classes, and said "look, our expansion has flying mounts".   big whoop.

where's housing?  where's guild housing?  where's that guild level stuff that eq2 has?  i mean, heck, kaplan stole raiding from eq cuz that's all he and his dark sith master do, why not steal housing and guild levels?  or even a take on AA (alternate advancement)?

i hate to say it, but if UO ever breaks down and finally gets a new graphics engine, i'm willing to bet a LOT of people are going to flock there.  even with the semi-nerfed pvp, uo has a TON of things in it that other games aren't even trying to do.  everything from the pets, to treasure hunting, to the fish tanks, fishing, craftables, completely customizable housing, farming/breeding plants and a laundry list of things to do that  you never see in other games.

please don't compare fishing in uo to fishing in wow though.  never seen a sea serpent or sunken ships found in wow from fishing/treasure hunting/sos bottles/etc.

it's sad when you can look fondly at a game that's 9+ years old and say "man, if only they'd finally go thru with it and redo the graphics engine..."
New Post Quote
11/10/06 1:52:11 PM
 
eris0023 writes:
I am certainly not saying that i dont want customization, i think socketed items would be a perfect time to implement this visually.  But what im saying is that if you truly enjoy the game[any game] then you start to see other things in the players you spend hours of your life with, and to the people who enjoy the raiding aspect like i do its not the loot that is the most rewarding if you will, its getting past that C-Block and being able to retain that skill and ability every time you set foot in that instance.

A bit off topic but about the Raid in wow, I never played eq up enough to find out what the raids were like in that game.(mainly becausse i couldnt stand the shabby graphics and weird interface, ya i came in late with eq when there were other/better things around.)  But coming from running a 150 player SWG guild on Bloodfin (The Sons Of Sith, in case anyone remembers us) where we would have 70 people online with virtually nothing to do but pvp for nothing with also no negative to dying after the second patch, or *try* to farm overpopulated Krayt Dragons, 3 years later and a plethora of other boring/unintersting mmo's WOW comes out and you can actually use 40 people to do something and its fun.

Normally someone will make the point that yes raiding is fun maybe the first time, but doing it over and over again is a pain in the ass.  Well oddly enough i have never played a mmo where you didnt really just do the same thing over and over again regardless of what it was. All mmo's have this even the Cancer Curing Luchemia Cleansing Holy Grail of Mmo's EVE(which i find is way overrated and extensively boring, though i understand the reason its entertaining to people).  What i like about wow is even though ive done aq40 200 times, the guild interacts differently every day of the week, depending who is on and in the run, and that is why i play mmos and not sprpg's mainly.

In Coh when i was almost max level i saw the first max level character on our server, so i asked him, what do you do now that you are max level? He says to me "Not sure, thinking about rerolling." It wasnt a week later that i quit that game. What is the point of getting max level if you cannot further improve your character after that?  CoH tried to do this with Enhancements and weird semi impressive visual effects, but these are still limited and you run into another hero who has the same fancy visual effect. (also regarding CoX's endless* customization, even with the most horrendous gear and color combos i still ran into people that looked almost exactly like me)

So i guess it just all comes down to what it is that makes you appreciate a game at end game and how far are you willing to extend the umbrella of sameness. Alot of hate is thrown at WOW on this website, about how its just a copy blah blah blah, and though this may be partially true. If it's a copy of the best aspects of the some the best games does that not make it a good game? At least by some standards?

Bah again sorry for the ramblings, Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaally bored at work. An no im not a wow fanboi, i just happen to enjoy the game and the social aspects of it.
New Post Quote
11/10/06 2:25:55 PM
 
acidleak writes:
i have to disagree with a couple things said here.

1. eye candy. useless stuff, if i look like everyone else that is my race/class combo... who cares? no one cares what you  look like, but they will pay attention to you when you melt some faces. eye candy just limits the # of ppl that can play the game. no one likes lag

2. he assumes that there is a "best build". ill agree that as WoW stands now you have a "best build". if you are an ice mage you are like every other ice mage out there. but as i fool around with the new talent trees i see that it is really hard to focus on a build.

HUGE NOTE SKIP IF YOU REALLY DONT WANT TO READ A HUGE THING ON BUILDS. note most of these are pvp ideas... raiding ftl

 warlok. i thought to run a 19/21/21 build, drain tank with ruin. plausable? yes. next i saw the fel guard abilities and the huge buffs to demo so a demo build with nightfall. does it work? yes. night fall with full destruction to get something sick like 5 insta casts (one is a .5 sec cast but w/e heh). yes. is any one of those builds better than the other? probably not. i personally settled on a 30/31/0 build, pure suvivability build. obviously i wont be the best dmg dealer.

rogue. ty blizz for the sub buff :) full sub is a viable option imo. reason : with the addition of more melee characters (the hybrids are finally hybrid) ghostly strike with... setup is it? would work, obviously not agaist warriors, that would hurt. basically what you could do with a sub build is go down to imp sprint, get +hit all that stuff, then you are unstopable, in a very snarelike sense. do warlok dots piss you off when you could vanish? 41 talent ftw. also with the 15% agi and the outta stealth thingy and the atk power increase you arent completely gimped for dmg. we know that combat and asn work.

shaman. resto builld = god mode. i used to be able to heal tank in pvp with 4 guys on me.... now? heals cant get inturrupted basically. you could sit for days spamming lesser heal and no one would kill you, allowing a flag cap usually heh.
elemental - same good stuff with double casts (wondering still if the first crit will the second automatically?)
enhancement - DW FTW! recent info says that dw will have elemental wep buffs on both weps , note that this shows for the raiders that you will probably not have more than 1 or 2 restos bc a shaman that can DW is better.... 400+ healing from your weps alone and can do dps when you have enough healers? jeeez first time shamans would ever b able to downgrade heals.

pally - ...... ya l2heal. have freakin plate for a reason. pallys just need to give up on the dps thing, tho that vid about the holy smiter had my eyes bugged out. would link but cant find it again

warrior - again, full arms full fury, half fury half arms, maybe some prot, s'all goood.

priest - ehhh, they did manage to make 41 holy or dis worth while..... i guess...

hunter - beast build viable, suvival very nice (for those that are complaining about the survival 41 must realize that all traps will b on timers. so with that 41 talent a hunter could effectively CC 4 ppl at a time,if not more considering entrapment) then... silence.... the one thing that hunters were missing.

druid -  zomg trees! wooot. obviously a good mix, i like moonkin, some friends going crazy on the feral changes and looking at resto it looks good for everything other than pvp...... like always (freaking screw raiding)

mage - options.... arcane shatter build (no im not explaining, but lets just say that i think i can get 3 to 4 k crits 1.5 sec casts.... MWAHAHA.... thats w/o AP and trinkets, that was up around 6k ) arcane/fire pyro nastyness build (just ask jayne(z) ) pure ice.... well that will b interesting.

END INSANELY LONG NOTE ON BUILDS.

for those that desided to skip that part basically what i was saying it that they did a good job with the talent trees by making it into teirs, so you build a build by picking up an idea, like shatter, or nightfall, stuff like that.

other than that, i hope that they studied guild wars in the last 2 years, especially the part where i can spend 2 min and have the best gear in the game. obviously not the best idea for wow, but pvpers should have the best pvp gear. i totally agree that pvp does need to be player dependant not gear dependant. i for one wish that raiding was a fun thing to do, not for the gear. it would b really nice to raid, say youve done it, then never even consider farming it.




New Post Quote
11/12/06 3:16:53 PM
 
britFROMcali writes:

See, I knew this coming into WoW when I first played back when it came out. I knew the customization options were gonna be low, I knew the high end game was going to be about raiding, but it didn't matter to me. I'm not a raider nor will I ever reach anything remotely close to what some players have, but what kept me playing WoW was the world PvP.

It had the best world PvP I'd seen in any game. Granted, DAoC had better PvP mechanics, but WoW incorporated it into a world so well. I remember a couple months after the game came out the huge raids we would have on the capital cities, and on the Xroads in the Barrens. It didn't really matter what you looked like because we were all fighting for a common purpose. We were also fighting people and NPC's alike.

Battlegrounds and dishonourable kills have all but taken away World PvP, and with it the fun that myself and I'm sure plenty of other people had with the game. In fact right now i'm playing on the Haomarush server, alliance side on the guild The Resistance. Were trying to bring back world pvp, and on the horde side Total War is doing it. Come check it out if you guys are interested.

Anyway, I'll prolly leave for Warhammer Online, but Blizzard could have gotten a couple more dollars outa me if they hadn't destroyed World pvp.

New Post Quote
11/12/06 3:18:18 PM
 
acidleak writes:
i agree about the WAR thing, game looks freakin awesome :) wow looks like they are trying to bring back world pvp with some of the events and removing DKs. *shrug* i think blizz lost way too many ppl bc they cant produce fast enough, 2 years for an expansion? ah well, like every game ppl come back with expansions
New Post Quote
11/12/06 3:26:19 PM
 
britFROMcali writes:

Originally posted by acidleak
i agree about the WAR thing, game looks freakin awesome :) wow looks like they are trying to bring back world pvp with some of the events and removing DKs. *shrug* i think blizz lost way too many ppl bc they cant produce fast enough, 2 years for an expansion? ah well, like every game ppl come back with expansions

They're taking out dk's???!
New Post Quote
11/12/06 3:30:19 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
"why not give the gear bonuses in other areas besides damage and attack speed. If all weapons did the same damage at the end game and hit for basically the same DPS overall it may allow fights to go on longer and allow players to reach into a different bag of tricks for PvP. Make epic weapons give players a bonus to other areas. Boost strength or stamina a little more, I can even see boosting the crit-strike chance."

Okay, and when we're done taking away all the damage a melee class can do let's let all those mages and locks, with +750-900 spelldamage crit your for 4k damage anyways.The problem is not balance, and if you've been talking to people in expansion beta the stats at 70 are RIDICULOUS compared to now, according to my friend in beta the game is no longer about burst damage, every fight takes time AND skill, and even with an unbalanced playing field, hell the lvl 61 greens in tbc are more powerful than most MC epics. What's to say epics in TBC won't be as unbalanced as now, also with scaling raid difficulties virtually anyone can get together a 25 man and at least do the easier versions of raids to gear up. 25 man raids will be alot easier to set up than 40 mans for most guilds and most likely guilds will be running 2 simulataneous raid if they have 50 online.
New Post Quote
11/12/06 4:15:12 PM
 
acidleak writes:
yes they are taking out DKs, they figured it was stupid to make civilians (which it was).

also, the blues and greens in the expansion will make your lvl 60 epics look like trash. but what about the lvl 70 epics? basically with the info that fan sites have released from beta says that they are capped at 67 right now which leads me to believe that they havent started raiding.

so the only thing that these uber blues tells us is that they are leveling the playing field for those that didnt spend 10000000000 hrs getting geared out. it doesnt say a thing that it wont happen again at 70. there have been absolutely no garuntees that a hard mode guild wont just melt your face in pvp. absolutely no evidence that shows that the pvp gear is comparable to anything raided for. so basically unless blizzard changed in the past 2 yrs you will have about 3 to 4 months of good pvp b4 you get the uber leet guild melting your face. which isnt fun, and why would raiding gear ever be better than the pvp gear for pvp? doesnt make a bit of sense to me.
New Post Quote
11/12/06 5:27:51 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
Last I checked "uber raiding guilds" don't leave Naxx, to pvp. They pvp on their own, but you will very rarely if ever see an entire t3'd team. Bottom line is if you don't have the time to put forward to get good gear through raiding, then your character isn't as good as someone elses. Imagine there wasn't a level cap like other games instead of spending months farming gear, they'd just be spending months grinding level can you blame a lvl 80 for beating the crap out you at lvl 50? Gear has "ITEMLEVELS" In my opinion that means it raises your level a little bit. Yes the game is literally capped at 60 at this point but there are Ilvl items of 80+ quality, implying that yes these things are good, how would someone be able to justify playing end game if they get facemelted in pvp by someone whose never even raided, itemization is a necisary part of the game. If you don't have the time to do end game don't do it. Just quit, and quit whining. Blizzard wants to keep as many customers as it can but it wants to keep it's hardcore playerbase the most because they are the most likely to buy the expansion and keep playing into the new content, also the whole argument of only .7% of players raiding or w/e That probably includes lvl 1-59, and alts that never set foot in a raid instance. Imagine the number of accounts that have at least one 60 that has been in a raid instance, you'd be hard pressed to find anyone with a 60 who hasn't raided, at least a few times. At one point I had about 6 of my friends all playing WoW, 1 quit at 49, 4 went on to raid MC and BWL before quitting for college and 1 went pvp only in organized groups; and I'm currently working on AQ40 with my guild. Therefore out of 7 friends 5 made it to 60 and started raiding, 1 didn't make it to 60 and 1 refused to raid, because it was time consuiming and he didn't enjoy it.


Therefore even though it is a small census one would assume the numbers at 60 are very directly in favour of raiding.
in my opinion; if I could take out someone who spent months working on pve, with my greens and blues I would be pissed at the game itself. In the expansion one can grind their own gear through pvp and pvp gear has always at least closely scaled with pve gear, in alot of cases better than all but the very best pve gear. This game isn't a single player game if you want to PVP effectively you need an organized group, pugs don't work, and if you want to PVE effectively you obviously need a guild worthy of the instance you want to do. As much as you bitch and complain this is an MMO, just cause you think it's a waste of time to lock yourself in a room and farm gear so you can be better than the next schmoe doesn't mean everyone doesn't enjoy raiding.

I love raiding, I enjoy the teamwork I enjoy progression through end game, and I especially enjoy getting a new piece of phat lewt and pwning some noob in the face with it. Like any other MMO it takes effort to get to the top and if you can't cut it that's your fault.
New Post Quote
11/12/06 8:24:35 PM
 
acidleak writes:
alright.... last time i checked pvp stood for player vs player.... not player vs gear. if im going to face melt/ wtfpwn ppl..... i want to know that i did it bc im a better player, not bc i have no life and can invest 4+hrs 7 days a week.

that a game requires you to grind endless amounts of npc to be good in pvp is crazy, pvp gear should be equivalent in stats to the end game stuff, and better for pvp (ie more sta)
New Post Quote
11/12/06 8:34:32 PM
 
Vrazule writes:

I'm so damn sick and tired of hardcores saying they're the ones who will stick with a game and buy all of the expansions.  If one MMO would just have the balls to actually cater to casuals, they would see we are just as loyal as any "living in mom's basment" freak.

The only thing necessary in these games is the entertainment value.  All of these ridiculous arguments about "work" and "earning" your place in a game is a crock.  You want to make a difference in the world, get a job or be a volunteer for the homeless, but don't turn these games into a job and that's exactly what raiding does.

You hardcores have no more right to a game than anyone else.  You are not entitled to have it play your way.  We pay a monthly subscription fee too and we have a right to be catered to as well.  So screw your "hardcores deserve the best" crap.  Get out of your mom's basement and get a life.

New Post Quote
11/13/06 1:00:29 AM
 
Vatigu writes:

Originally posted by Vrazule
You hardcores have no more right to a game than anyone else.  You are not entitled to have it play your way.  We pay a monthly subscription fee too and we have a right to be catered to as well.  So screw your "hardcores deserve the best" crap.  Get out of your mom's basement and get a life.


So you're saying that Blizzard should give you items for free? If you want to have the same items as every other player play an FPS like CS:S. WoW is about being prepared. Engineering is prep for pvp, gear is prep for pvp, if I was stuck at 60 without gear upgrades what would be the point of playing? To pvp with no advancement of gear? Getting gear through any means; pvp, pve w/e has a sense of accomplishment with it. Oh and with the new honour system pvping on a casual schedule is viable for getting gear, as well as the fact that by updating the pvp gear in patch 1.11, or 1.12(don't remember) they obviously want to keep the pvp gear at least competitive with the pve gear. It's not like Blizz is saying Raid or don't pvp, Blizz is saying if you raid and pvp you'll do well, but that's hard so if you just pvp you'll still do decently. Even for a casual player it's only gunna take like a month to farm the stuff for a HWL weapon. And I'm sure just as there is T4 and T5 in pve there will be an updated pvp set for 70 I'm sure.
And my final point; Why should someone who has a life and spends it doing something other than WoW be catered to specifically in WoW? Should Blizz give bonuses to people who donate money to the red cross? What are you freaking thinking? It's a video game for entertainment, if you don't put effort into it your character will suck, that's what MMO implies, it's "COMPETITIVE" Therefore there has to be a way to advance beyond the other players you are competing against, if you want pvp balanced entirely around skill I've heard GuildWars is the game for you. All of you claiming that you should do just as well in pvp as hardcores just have a severe case of jealousy for the guy who always pwns you in his T2/equivelants and his ass'kandy or whatever else.

oh and BTW Teamwork > gear. Get vent -> Get a group of friends who know how to play -> Get some BG strats through your heads, and healers -> Pwn whoever you want -> Quit complaining that your character sucks cause you don't know how to play.

P.S. T0.5 was directly aimed at casual players, so it's not like Blizz is shunning you noobs alot of the T0.5 gear was pretty good.
New Post Quote
11/14/06 3:51:37 AM
 
boognish75 writes:

Ok i am not bashing wow i'll throw that out there first, i play as well from time to time, there are a few things that make casual gamers love wow and a lot of die hard gamers hate it and like it

1 It is sucessful because of the neame true, it is also sucessful because it caters to the masses, it is simple to learn, its graphics are not over the top they are console lvl making it acessible to those with low end computers and the familiarity of console graphics look, And  these are the same reason a lot of hardcore gamers hate wow, compared to looks with other games it is ''lame'' it is ''cartoony'' , the chars customization is nill, there is no real challenge in the end, why raid here when i can raid something that looks very nice and is a bit more challenging,

I am sure to get flamed, i was just trying to bring a dble perspective as why some people like wow and some people dont.

I like it, yes, i like it because a lot of people i know that play it in r/l i tag up with them  as they dont have the expenses to get a nice gaming rig to run some of the more detailed games.

New Post Quote
11/14/06 8:53:38 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
I personally find that no other mmorpg has a control style I can deal with. Alot of the other mmo's have better graphics, as far as realism, but that's no good to me if the screen doesn't turn right r the character's actions are unresponsive. The controls in world of Warcraft are my favorite aspect. Also I've yet to run out of content to be as just as my guild was getting finished BWL and started AQ40 Naxx came out, and in 2 months the expansion is coming along with 5 or 6 good new raiding instances. I've heard Guildwars is as good as WoW but I don't like the idea of entirely instanced areas other than cities. I like meeting random people and helping them out with quests or finding some good pvp in the middle of lvl grinding. I have tried MAAANY different mmo's and none of them offered what I wanted. Losing too much stuff on a death really ticked me off on a lot of games, with WoW it's 10% durability and a bit of a walk. Cept for pvp with is free of course.
New Post Quote
11/14/06 10:43:11 PM
 
Vrazule writes:

Originally posted by Vatigu

Originally posted by Vrazule
You hardcores have no more right to a game than anyone else.  You are not entitled to have it play your way.  We pay a monthly subscription fee too and we have a right to be catered to as well.  So screw your "hardcores deserve the best" crap.  Get out of your mom's basement and get a life.


So you're saying that Blizzard should give you items for free? If you want to have the same items as every other player play an FPS like CS:S. WoW is about being prepared. Engineering is prep for pvp, gear is prep for pvp, if I was stuck at 60 without gear upgrades what would be the point of playing? To pvp with no advancement of gear? Getting gear through any means; pvp, pve w/e has a sense of accomplishment with it. Oh and with the new honour system pvping on a casual schedule is viable for getting gear, as well as the fact that by updating the pvp gear in patch 1.11, or 1.12(don't remember) they obviously want to keep the pvp gear at least competitive with the pve gear. It's not like Blizz is saying Raid or don't pvp, Blizz is saying if you raid and pvp you'll do well, but that's hard so if you just pvp you'll still do decently. Even for a casual player it's only gunna take like a month to farm the stuff for a HWL weapon. And I'm sure just as there is T4 and T5 in pve there will be an updated pvp set for 70 I'm sure.
And my final point; Why should someone who has a life and spends it doing something other than WoW be catered to specifically in WoW? Should Blizz give bonuses to people who donate money to the red cross? What are you freaking thinking? It's a video game for entertainment, if you don't put effort into it your character will suck, that's what MMO implies, it's "COMPETITIVE" Therefore there has to be a way to advance beyond the other players you are competing against, if you want pvp balanced entirely around skill I've heard GuildWars is the game for you. All of you claiming that you should do just as well in pvp as hardcores just have a severe case of jealousy for the guy who always pwns you in his T2/equivelants and his ass'kandy or whatever else.

oh and BTW Teamwork > gear. Get vent -> Get a group of friends who know how to play -> Get some BG strats through your heads, and healers -> Pwn whoever you want -> Quit complaining that your character sucks cause you don't know how to play.

P.S. T0.5 was directly aimed at casual players, so it's not like Blizz is shunning you noobs alot of the T0.5 gear was pretty good.

Where in the hell do you get the idea casusals want loot for free.  This is the most idiotic argument you hardcores always come up with.  Its baseless innuendo.  You can't stand the idea of anyone but hardcores getting the good loot.  Makes you feel elite I suppose, kind of sad when you consider this is a game and none of this crap means a damn thing in the real world.  Accomplishments don't mean crap in a game either.  You want a real sense of accomplishment, get off your ass, get outside and do something worthwhile, but don't you dare spout off this work ethic crap for a stupid game.  Its this exact kind of mentality that earns you the label of geek and freak.  Its also why these games will never and I mean never appeal to mainstream unless they change this ridiculous attitude.
New Post Quote
11/16/06 12:40:01 PM
 
obarash writes:
  To make WOw more fun and to give new looks to old things let alh make dyes for armor and stuff so we can customize the look. It would be funny to see what peeps would change into. A all pink set or mix and match but would give peeps a new look to what they have and have fun with it. Just a thought a simple solution to make peeps look diffrent.
New Post Quote
11/16/06 2:06:23 PM
 
Vatigu writes:

Originally posted by Vrazule 
Where in the hell do you get the idea casusals want loot for free.  This is the most idiotic argument you hardcores always come up with.  Its baseless innuendo.  You can't stand the idea of anyone but hardcores getting the good loot.  Makes you feel elite I suppose, kind of sad when you consider this is a game and none of this crap means a damn thing in the real world.  Accomplishments don't mean crap in a game either.  You want a real sense of accomplishment, get off your ass, get outside and do something worthwhile, but don't you dare spout off this work ethic crap for a stupid game.  Its this exact kind of mentality that earns you the label of geek and freak.  Its also why these games will never and I mean never appeal to mainstream unless they change this ridiculous attitude.

I hardly consider 7.5 MILLION ACTIVE accounts world wide as not main stream. If all gear could be attained in a casual time frame it would no longer be unique. You know how multiplayer games work? Competition. You know how to screw over a competition? Make it completely balanced. Why would I want to go to Naxx if farming UBRS gets me equivelant loot? Face it if you want good gear, you have to work for it. Whining that it's too hard or that your life is more important is not logical. If your RL is more important to you than raiding and getting the gear you so crave, then quit. Obviously this game is infringeing on your real life, and needs to go. Now for me and the rest of the "hardcores" which is a BS title, as I only raid 2-3 nights a week for 3 hours at a time, we'll keep raiding and getting our epics and melting face in pvp.

Just find a casual guild. Not all guilds require 75% raid attendance to push through high end PVE. As far as pure hardcores there are about 10 in my guild, then about 60 casual who raid most nights a week and about another 25-30 who raid less than 3 times a week and in 6 months we've pushed from ZG to Battleguard Sartura in AQ40. Raiding doesn't require giving up your life, it just takes a group of like minded players.
New Post Quote
11/16/06 3:45:55 PM
 
Vrazule writes:

I don't play this game anymore, I quit months ago.  Secondly, I'm not interested in what you hardcores want.  You've been getting it your way for a very long time.  Its time for dev companies to get off their collective asses and come up with games that are fun and reward other play styles than those who raid or prefer to sit in front of their computers 8 hours straight.  7.5 million is a mere drop in the bucket compared to the sheer millions that play yahoo and msn games and the other countless millions who don't play computer games at all, but could be enticed to do so.  The potential is phenomenal and yet they continue to do things the same way ever frigging game that comes out in the MMO market.

Can anyone tell me how many of those 7.5 million are happy with the end game in WoW?  Wasn't there some number floating around that only 20% of all players actually raid which was stated during some Blizzard roundtable?  If those numbers are true, how do you justify the current state of the game?  How many of those 20% raid because they think its fun versus those who do it because there is nothing else to do?  Why should they focus so much attention on such a small portion of their player base and why should they get the best rewards in the game?  Your hardcore play style is no more worthy of this specialized reward system over that of solo / small group / questing / crafting styles.

For some people, raiding isn't about time constraints, its about play style, its about being tired of the same old paradigms that are not only getting outdated and boring, but are unfair to a lot of players.  So get off your high horse and realize that your play style isn't the only one worthy of the developer's attention nor is it the only one worthy of the best gear in the game.

New Post Quote
11/16/06 10:47:16 PM
 
Vatigu writes:

The devs obviously envision WoW as a game where you work hard for your items and gear, and therefore the game is based around working hard for gear to be competitive. What the devs decide to do hardly concerns someone who doesn't play and hasn't played for months, if you "don't care" then stfu.

 

New Post Quote
11/17/06 12:46:35 PM
 
Vrazule writes:

 

Actually, it does concern me and others like me.  For one, the game up to 55 does not require work, the work part only kicks in when raiding becomes the only venue for advancement.  The game is casual for a good part of its life cycle.  I don't care if they have raiding in the game, I only have issue with them rewarding only raiders with the best gear.  Its unfair and it completely undermines the casual 1 - 55 game that came before it.  I am still a potential customer and there is a good likelyhood, considering the other posts that mirror mine, that I'm not the only one who has taken issue with their current "raid or die" paradigm.  So it would behoove Blizzard to change, and guess what, they are making changes in the upcoming expansion, almost expressly due to complainers such as myself.  They are adding non-raiding activities to the endgame, but the changes aren't large enough to suit me since they still give the best rewards to raiders, so I will continue to voice my opinion as long as I desire to do so.

The fact of the matter is that voicing opinions on boards doesn't just affect WoW, it is read by others, even other developers and it can make an impression on them to make changes in the future for any MMO.  Currently, online boards are the only viable method of getting our opinions heard, so you better get used to us hanging around and having our say. 

If your only comeback is to tell others to STFU, then maybe you should remember what country this game resides in. As long as you're going to play a US game, you're going to have to deal with the voice of dissent.  Its because of people like us that the genre moves forward and evolves, if people didn't complain about the "status quo" things would never change at all.

New Post Quote
11/17/06 3:18:21 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
So, Mr. Smartass tell me, as if I were Blizzard who deserves the best loot; the casual gamers that dedicate little time to the game? Or the people who work hard for it. Play basically any MMO and you'll realise getting better is directly related to working hard at it. In non-lvl capped MMOs it's a struggle as to who can level the highest the fastest. In pve based MMOs like WoW, you are rewarded with gear that you work for. Are you implying that naxx equivelant gear should be available from less than an hour 5 man instances? Cause that would make end game unique, you'd see every 60 of a class in tier 3s with the best gear available. It may be an e-peen stroke, but that's what working hard to get the best gear is about. It doesn't effect RL, and if everyone was rolling a hand of rag and a thunderfury they're no longer unique, I mean there's only one AQ epic mount per server; The reason? e-peen strokage.
New Post Quote
11/17/06 6:27:22 PM
 
Vrazule writes:

There is nothing hard about Naxx or any of the other raiding instances, its all about time investment.  If you want something hard, get a frickin job, smart ass.  These are suppose to be entertainment software, not second jobs.  The equalizer is the monthly fee.  They have no right to charge casuals for content that only harcore's enjoy.  Our play style is just as deserving of a meaningful reward system.  You want to work for your gear, that's your business.  I just want to be rewarded for the way I like to play the game.  I pay 15 bucks a month, I expect to get equal representation, otherwise, set up elite servers that charge 39.99 a month so you can get your elite raiding gear and screw any other play style.

There's no point in arguing with you, you and your raiding buddies feel entitled and there's nothing any other player can say to change your egotisitcal beliefs.  Lets just hope the developers will get smart and realize they can't make us second class players and get away with it.  Either start treating us equally or start expecting more fallout as players get fed up with this elitists mentality that is so pervasive in MMOs today.  As the industry matures, players will become less likely to accept being pissed on and move on to something else.  The Golden Age of the MMO caste system will be their downfall if they don't straighten up their act.  It has become so expensive to create and maintain these games anymore, they can't afford to be niche.  They will have to appeal to a larger audience or investors  will stop investing with such small returns.

New Post Quote
11/17/06 11:39:24 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
So we have another noob saying "GIVE ME STUFF FOR FREE BLIZZZZZZZ SO I CAN PWN THE PEOPLE WHO EARNED IT, AND DON'T HAVE TO EVEN ATTEMPT THE NEW CONTENT" new content -> keeps people playing making new content not = new rewards = make people stop playing new content = people who would be hardcore quitting for a different game. The $15 a month isn't FOR representation of play style, it's FOR server costs and developement. The tier .5 content patch was aimed entirely at casuals. The honour system patch is aimed directly at casuals. Stfu they can't do any more for you, without basically saying, "you've been a good subscriber here have some items, and stop bitchin'. Noob"
New Post Quote
11/19/06 1:07:08 PM
 
Vrazule writes:

Wow, that must have hit a nerve.  You sound like one of those spoiled brats who throws a tantrum because their mommy tells them to share their toys with a sibliing.  I get the picture, you don't like to share, period.  Its obvious that raiders get some kind of false sense of superiority with the current paradigm.  You think your way of playing is the only one that is challenging and that its the only path worthy of the best equipment.  I hate to break it to you, but there is nothing special about raiding, nor is there anything special about raiders.  You invest the time, but you do not hold the market on skill.  Well, we casuals also invest the time, maybe not in one sitting, but we will eventually spend as much time in game as you do and yet our play style will never have recourse to the good gear.  You think that's fair, I don't and I'm not alone in that belief. 

Thank God not everyone is as narrow minded as you are, although many of the dev companies seem to agree with your opinion currently, but they're learning that it isn't okay to alienate any segment of their player base.  It may take a while, but eventually, you raiders will have to deal with the fact that you aren't God's gift to the MMO industry and that casuals / non-raiders are just as loyal and just as likely to spend money on expansions as long as we are being catered to.  We outnumber you and sooner or later we will get the lion's share of the best content a game has to offer.  Mark my words, your days as the MMO top dogs are numbered.

New Post Quote
11/19/06 4:06:37 PM
 
Vatigu writes:

Tell me all about it when you've found this game that caters to casuals exclusively, I'll be sure to skip that one. The new honour system is designed to give you rewards. Faction grinding gets you items, that are quite decent. There are plenty of ways to get good gear but raiding has been expanded upon hugely and therefore the other methods of gearing up have been left behind. Crafting is now based on patterns attained from raiding. But the bottom line is 3/4 of end game IS through 40 man raids(soon to be 25 mans) so you arethe one that chooses to skip what 3/4 of end game is all about. You're missing out not me. Blizzard's destruction of macros and mods is making me quit Wow permanently

New Post Quote
11/20/06 12:47:51 PM
 
Vrazule writes:
That's rich coming from a raider that states raids are hard and should be rewarded better than other play styles and yet is going to quit because Blizzard is removing tools that make raiding easier.  Does that mean you don't think people should earn their gear, but macro's should?  Or is that admitting that raiding isn't fun and it takes macros to give it some semblence of fun?  This makes me wonder about the whole risk vs reward arguement that you people are always shoving down our throats.
New Post Quote
11/20/06 4:13:33 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
Last I checked mods involved with raiding will still work. I'm quitting, not because this will make raiding harder, it will make playing more annoying in general. No mods will be able to activate abilities even with user input after the patch supposedly. That's probably even going to kill custom action bars and such. I _HATE_ the default UI. It's ugly clogged and just plain bad. The fact that I could customize my UI kept me playing WoW because UIs in other games of similar types suck just as bad. Also, just because I raid doesn't mean I'm a hardcore raider. When I did raid it was from 8:30 pm server to 10:30 server time. Usually 2-3 times a week. We had the numbers to raid even on a casual schedule. And we finished BWL within 6 months of starting on ZG. So if you're too much of a noob to get into a good guild, then it's your loss.
New Post Quote
11/21/06 7:08:42 PM
 
Vrazule writes:

I take it you call anyone who doesn't agree with your opinion a noob.  I don't join guilds because they suck.  I don't need the politics and infighting that goes with it, especially in a raiding guild.  I'm glad to see you know how annoying a game can be.  Many of us "noobs" don't raid because we find it annoying.  It has absolutely nothing to do with ability and has everything to do with a lack of desire to sit in front of a computer for 4 to 8 hours straight.  There is just something deeply disturbing about people who are willing to sit their fat asses in front of a computer for that long and not get paid for it.

 

New Post Quote
11/21/06 10:47:56 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
Like I said, find a _GOOD_ guild. My guild has been active for the past 9 months with 2 hour raids per night for the last 7 months and with very little e-drama, the unusual g-kick for someone apping a different guild, but that's about it. If casual players appear in such huge numbers, there shouldn't be much difficulty in finding a "casual" guild with your gameplay style in mind.
New Post Quote
11/23/06 3:28:12 PM
 
Vrazule writes:

Your lack of reading comprehension is par for the course.  Raiders have never shown any consideration for other points of view.  Its always some spiel about how anyone can join a raiding guild, even casually....blah....blah....blah.  Once again, we don't want to raid, we want our play style to be rewarded.  We want the developers to realize that raiding is not and should not be the only avenue for loot progression.  Not only is the game currently only raid friendly at the end game, even when the expansion comes out, non-raiders will still have virtually no avenue outside of raiding in order to get the best gear.  Even the PvP gear is going to be substandard to raid gear.  Pretty ridiculous for a game that says you can PvP without raiding or PvE and be just as competitive, which is patently false.  We're sick and tired of developers fostering a caste system within a freaking game.  Our time investment is just as valueable as any raider's.

 

Raiders and non-raiders risk absolutely nothing but time in these games. I don't care what kind of death penaly they put in a game, it all boils down to time.  How can you possibly argue that a raider's time is more important than any other's?

New Post Quote
11/23/06 3:48:33 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
It has nothing to do with a raider's time being more valueable per second per se, but the fact remains raiders invest a lot MORE time. Quantity for the same quality. They spend MORE time. Their time is no more valueable than yours but they invest a crap load more of it. Your argument simmered down is this: "I want lewts equivelant to that guy, even though he spent 20 days played raiding in the last month, where as I only spent an hour or 2 per day." The way the reward system works is this; you spend time in the game, you are generally rewarded for time spent. Therefore if you spend a small amount of time, you get less rewards. See how that works? it's called a balanced system of server gear progression. Those who work hardest for it and devote the most time get the best rewards first. 
New Post Quote
11/25/06 6:13:42 PM
 
Vrazule writes:
Lets see, a raider spends 4 to 8 hours in a raid instance and gets one or two pieces of epic gear.  A casual player spends 4 to 8 hours in two or three sittings and gets no epic gear.  They spend the same amount of time over all, but the rewards are not comparable.  Its completely unfair.  We do the time eventually, but we're never given the rewards we deserve.  These stupid games are all about time invested, yet the rewards only go to those who invest time in large chunks and in a single sitting, it does not reward those who spend a lot of time over a longer period, but the total hours played ends up the same.  That is prejudicial treatment.
New Post Quote
11/25/06 11:19:04 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
if you pvp all that time, especially in the upcoming patch. You can build up honour over time and get pvp epic gear. What else is there supposed to be in this game other than pvp and pve? choose one, choose your schedule and go with it. PVE gear is not always better than pvp gear. In fact compare any healer classes pvp gear vs pve gear, and the pvp gear is obviously better. Also, I dunno what raids you've been on but a raider only averages 1-2 pieces of loot a week, unless he's new to the guild and the gear he needs isn't needed by anyone else of that class. But as far as loot out of BWL in a full clear in my guild we got 2-3 pieces in total for a warrior, and with 10 or so active warriors you'd be lucky to get one piece of gear from BWL in a week, however if you needed a piece from MC, Ony, AQ20, or ZG you'd prolly get it pretty much uncontested. Alas, I digress. After the update to pvp gear most of it, as far as item level is on par with BWL/AQ40 (early bosses) epics. Now how many guilds that have cleared AQ40/Naxx actively engage in pvp? Almost none. Granted 1v1 you'll get your ass handed to you; in pvp it is a team effort, so you have no excuse to complain. A warrior with a TUF will beat an asskandi warrior if the TUF warr has a healer.

The PVP changes are targetting casuals by making it possible to attain epic gear with time spent over a period. There's not much else Blizz can do. As far as gearing up casually your choices are: Get into a good guild where you can raid casually, Rep grind for epic gear; like the pvp battlegrounds and various other factions as CC, or as of 2.01 pvp gain honour and tokens then buy items on your own time basis. Don't forget the fact that epic craftables in the expansion are going to roxxor your boxxors, and the mats required are mostly from the hard level instances, but I believe can still be done in small groups, cause of the scaling difficulties of dungeons.
New Post Quote
11/26/06 3:28:31 PM
 
Vrazule writes:
You are joking right?  "There's nothing more that Blizzard can do"?  I have never heard such nonsense.  Its not a matter of capability, its a matter of desire.  You and obviously the devs in Blizzard want this schism between casuals and hardcores.  They have a preferred play style and they foist it on the players.  If they don't straighten up their act, upcoming games are going to capitalize on Blizzard's laziness and sheer arrogance.  EverQuest is a perfect example of this.  They have 450,000 subscribers, but they've gone through more than 2 million distinct subscribers and never retained more than the current amount.  WoW will not close, but it sure will fall on its collective laurels if content isn't equalized.  They keep growing, but you never hear mention if they're growing in the USA or Europe.  Its always about the asian market, the exact market that loves raids and horrendous time sinks.  And yet, due to the way subscriptions work, they seem to make more money off the American and European markets than that of Asia.
New Post Quote
11/26/06 10:46:25 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
I'm all ears, buddy. Tell me in your own words 1 way that Blizzard could make good gear available to casuals without making it easier than raiding, because casuals shouldn't advance faster than raiders. Bear in mind if it's content that gets equivelant gear in the same amount of time, just over a longer period, Power gamers will just blast through it by playing days at a time. So without heavily modifying the quest system how do you propose they make naxx equivelant gear available to non-raiders without making it possible to get even faster by a hardcore. Then you'll get people raiding at nighyt and grinding that gear during the day gearing up twice as fast as everyone else. Again hardcore playing unbalancing the field.
New Post Quote
11/28/06 9:48:06 PM
 
Vrazule writes:

Hmmm, lets see, raiders and hardcores blasting through the content if its made available to casuals.  Who cares, they blast through the content already, at least this way, everyone gets a good shot at it.  I don't give a damn if hardcores get it more easily, in the end, a casual game isn't about hardcores, is it.  The whole argument is that you freaks have gotten it your way with every single MMO out there currently and its about damn time that some dev company got their collective asses in gear and do something for casuals for once and see it through to the end.  As far as the difficulty of the content, I'm sorry, as a casual I'm not competing against hardcores and its not my concern that our content be just as hard as theirs in order to justify the rewards.  There is no risk vs reward scheme in these games, its something the devs came up with to justify the gear gap.  People only risk time in these games and guess what, hardcores and casuals waste time in them equally, hardcores in one sitting and casuals in several sittings.  So, there is no justification for the reward gap. 

If a hardcore invests 8 hours and has a decent chance at epic gear, then a casual who eventually invests 8 hours in a game should have the exact same chance to get epic gear.  This is NOT the case currently in any MMO.  I'm not a developer, nor am I getting paid for my advice, therefore it is not my responsibility to come up with ideas on how to change current paradigms, but it is THEIR job to listen to us if they want our money and it is THEIR job to come up with solutions to our complaints, yet again if they want to continue getting our money.  Supply and Demand works both ways and sometimes companies and consumers forget that.  If a game touts itself to be casual, then it should keep that focus for every single part of the game, God knows they do that for hardcore games.  Making us feel second class in a game that is suppose to cater to us is criminal.  I don't give a flying crap how you hardcores think it should go, this game wasn't suppose to cater to you and it didn't, at least till level 55.  For them to change that formula at 55 and up is completely wrong and they should be ashamed and I hope it bites them in the ass, because that's the only way to make these companies learn from thier mistakes.

New Post Quote
11/29/06 10:25:21 AM
 
Vatigu writes:
Lol, so in the end you can't come up with any good ideas? Btw I dunno where WoW said it was designed _For_ casual players, last I checked it said Game experience may change during online play. Also, what you seem to forget is that hardcores raid because raiding is the only viable option to gear up quickly, half of WoW's content would be completely neglected if gearing up casually were easier. Also, what difference does it make if everyone can get that gear easily? You're saying you want a level playing field? If that's the case go onto the PTR forums and whine and moan for some premades, because obviously that's what you indeed want as a final result.
New Post Quote
11/29/06 6:21:18 PM
 
Vrazule writes:

I don't need to come up with any ideas, I know what I like and what I don't like.  I tell them what I don't like and its up to them to decide to do something about it.  They're the paid professionals after all.  If I made money off this crap, then you bet your bottom dollar I'd come up with solutions. 

You hardcores whine just as much if not more than casuals, so give it a rest.  You pricks always want things your way and we're getting fed up with it.  Blizzard advertised their casual gameplay during development and during beta.  It was not some kind of secret you seem to think it is.  Even their advertisements in magazines and websites stated it was a great game for those who never played an MMO before (as in non-hardcore market).  This also implies non-hardcore gameplay.  Try to deny it if you want, it only proves how clueless you are.  The game is very and I mean very casual friendly all the way up to level 55 and that cannot be refuted, even by the most noobish hardcore / raider out there.  For them to suddenly change that formula for the last 5 levels of the game is a rip-off for casuals.  There is not a single advertisement out there that states the end game is not for casuals nor does it state that raiding is the only avenue for advancement and yet it is exactly that.  The change in gameplay phrase does not mean it should change from casual to hardcore, they should stay within the vision of the game and that WAS casual through and through.

Hardcores have no right to the best gear in the game, because this game wasn't made for them.  It was made for casuals and PvP'ers and yet even PvP'ers don't get the best gear in the game.  Yet again, you seem to think this game should be base lined off of hardcore play, meaning that the difficulty of the game and therefore its rewards should be based off of raiding.  This is a fallacy since this was not suppose to be a raid centric game.  Many interviews were given during development and during beta and it was adamantly stated that raiding would not reward people with the best gear.  It would however reward them with unique gear that didn't give superior stats, but rather gave them a unique look such as particle effects.  They turned this into a lie and with no explanation what so ever.

We casuals / non-raiders have a right to be pissed with how they changed the game to suit the minority.  You raiders have all those other games out there that suit you perfectly, you have no right what so ever to come to this game, complain that things aren't playing out the way you want and causing change that is detrimental to a majority of the player base.  You people need to piss off and play your EQ and FFXI and leave us the hell alone.

New Post Quote
11/29/06 10:02:51 PM
 
Xeroshadow writes:

Yep, as much as I like WoW, I find the quest for gear a little overwhelming and am more than a little turned off by it.  At first it was really fun but then I realized how very rare I would get the drop I wanted and the time invested didn't feel very rewarding.  My friend on the other hand, will not rest until he completes his set of raid gear.  I would consider neither of us casual players either.

New Post Quote
12/01/06 10:04:33 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
So, you're saying, if I may; that you can't think of any way to solve the problem, but you want blizzard to fix it nonetheless. You know why some content actually does get changed for players. The suggestion boards. If you could come up with a halfdecent idea that "All the casuals who hate raiding" would get behind you'd have, according to you around 7 million players in support. That would be a large flag for blizz. Oh, But wait. People come up with decent ideas ALL THE TIME!, I forgot. The reason blizz never pays attention is the only ideas that end up ith 20-30 pages of /signs are the ones that help raiding. And the suggestion forum being the only official way to say anything even if it is largely overlooked it would help if it actually were flooded by all you complaining noobs who seem to think the game needs fixing so badly.
New Post Quote
12/03/06 12:24:27 PM
 
Vrazule writes:

So you're saying, if I may, that you have no valid reason against non-raid content other than this ridiculous excuse that its up to casuals to come up with ideas for non-raiding content.  May I ask, who exactly gets paid for making these games.  Why the hell should we be doing THEIR job?  Why is it that MMO companies are the only businesses out there that expect customers to come up with ideas for them?  When a customer makes a complaint about a product in the real world, they certainly don't turn in ideas to make the product better.  Guess why?  Its not their frigging job.  If Blizzard and other companies want casual player patronage, then they need to start devising content that is just as rewarding and just as exciting as raiding content.  They certainly have no problems coming up with raid content on their own, its not much of a stretch to believe these "professionals" can come up with decent non-raid content on their own too.  But then, where would you get your excuses.  You have not given any valid arguments that support this denial of content to non-raiders.  Well, other than your typical epeen strokage that is.

You don't have a leg to stand on and neither do the developers.  You do not advertise a game to be friendly to certain play styles only to deny them in the end and raise one above all the others.  If they only want to truly reward hardcores, then it should be a hardcore game from beginning to end.  Not this wishy washy crap they have now that draws many casuals in and then screws them over in the end game.  WoW isn't the only game that does this, EQ2 is just as bad.  It doesn't make it right just because a prescedent has been set.  I get it though, its obvious that you and your kind prefer this kind of setup.  You like the fact that you get exclusive content that the rest of us noobs help pay for.  I suppose it helps make up for the self esteem issues you suffer in real life.

New Post Quote
12/03/06 7:21:45 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
It's called feedback, Blizzard are no more mind readers than you or I, They don't know how to make you happy so you will shut up. That's why you gotta throw them a frigging bone, if you want things to change. Can't just keep it in and expect change to occur, Change only comes through action. So quit nubbing up the wrong forum and complaining. Also I have never seen an ad that declares WoW as casual or hardcore.

As I've said it's _YOUR_ playstyle that limits you from getting gear. Casual guilds exist. They raid at a casual rate. If you don't like "Raiding" That's your fault. That's part of the content. You're complaint is; "I don't like raiding because you have to be hardcore to raid." Which is not the truth, you can be casual AND raid. What your real complaint boils down to is this. "I'm too lazy to find a group of like minded players with whom I can experience endgame content at a casual pace." My guild (SEVEN) is working it's way through AQ40 with no more than 4 hours of raiding per night, but most people only stay in the raid for 2 hours, then other players take the spots as people have to leave. (people from different timezones make doing this especially easy.)
New Post Quote
12/04/06 1:32:46 AM
 
Reklaw writes:

I agree that customisation could be alott better in WOW but to say that it might look strange or wierd spotting you in a crowd where most have the same gear is kinda pretty stupid to say , why? maybe some of you need to lok at our army's, besides ranks do you see them wearing alott of different clothing or do you see them wearing clothing that stands for their ranks, can someone tell me why this is normal and excepted in RL and why in a game as WOW that should not be normal??

I really get the feeling people turn on games these day's not for the fun of the game but merly for its content, they seem to forget fun and only focus towards non gamers stuff like calling stuff grind wich infact should be called collecting stuff to survive in the world you live (play) in, should we call our real life work "grind" now?

People that call others Twinks also such a non gamers word, i mean this is kinda the most stupid thing i see people saying especialy those that use those words on RP realms.

I told this many times People seem to forget they could use their own fantasy in games and i'm sure that alott of games would become much more fun instead of only doing what the crowd is doing or being able to Pwn someone. Games should be entertaining and if its not or not anymore its time to move on to another game.

New Post Quote
12/04/06 3:49:22 AM
 
Vrazule writes:
Yes, all casual gamers and non-raiders are lazy, the ongoing cry of the raider / hardcore players.  You people haven't got a clue, therefore you come up with ridiculous and non-founded claims on what a casual player is and what they want.  Despite the fact that we have never asked for free lewt, we want a challenge, we just don't want it in a raiding format and yet that's the argument you keep throwing in our faces.  Any kind of content can be challenging, if only the devs would put some effort into it.  Raiding is only challenging because the devs "choose" to make it so.  In order to justify the gear gap, they don't make solo / small group content as challenging.  Like I said, you people don't have a leg to stand on and your silly arguments only point that out painfully.
New Post Quote
12/04/06 1:00:47 PM
 
Parsifal57 writes:

Originally posted by qbangy32

If you look at the batch of current next gen MMO's other than WoW and the ones in development you will see a similar trait in all of them, a diverse and extremly in-depth customisation of your character from creation to your first stumbling steps into their gaming world.

Customisation to alot of players is extremly important, take Everquest 2 for example, they had pre-order disks before the game went live so that you could create and play around with the very same character creation system you would eventually use in the real game.

WoW reminds me of the vast amount of korean games we see filling the MMORPG games list, they all offer one or 2 different character choices and very few other options to make your beloved character appear any different from the thousands of other players you spend your gaming time with.

I used to play a Druid in WoW and in any raid you would be hard pressed to be able to pick me out of a crowd of other druids as we all looked exactly the same with our tier1 armour, in fact it was ridiculous how alike we all looked and quite sad for a game that has so many paying subscribers.

I've since quit WoW in frustration at the many failings in the game and one of them is the lack of variety in how my character is seen in the game world.

 

 


    I agree 100% here, and if anything with BC the race for teh uberz gearz is going to get worse all the while WoW moves further and further away from the MMORPG market and more back to Blizzards diablo roots, jewel crafting will destroy what precious little balance there is in the game.

    Blizzard (regardless of thier commitment to the casual non-raider/non pvper lol) are forcing this game into one of two playstyles PvP (mainly in BG;s for honor marks or 'world' Pvp (i.e. grief everyone that doesn't Pvp) or raids there is some content outside this but that is there as a means to get to the two Blizzard preferrend 'endgames'. It's this shortsightedness that eventually will lead to Blizzard loosing a noticable chunk of its playerbase. Wether they will care or not is moot since they probably will still keep the Bnet diehards just because of their game.

    There are several new and interesting games coming up in 2007 and I know for sure one of them will be good enough to get me to move from the blandness that is WoW.
New Post Quote
12/04/06 1:10:39 PM
 
Parsifal57 writes:

Originally posted by Vatigu
I'm all ears, buddy. Tell me in your own words 1 way that Blizzard could make good gear available to casuals without making it easier than raiding, because casuals shouldn't advance faster than raiders. Bear in mind if it's content that gets equivelant gear in the same amount of time, just over a longer period, Power gamers will just blast through it by playing days at a time. So without heavily modifying the quest system how do you propose they make naxx equivelant gear available to non-raiders without making it possible to get even faster by a hardcore. Then you'll get people raiding at nighyt and grinding that gear during the day gearing up twice as fast as everyone else. Again hardcore playing unbalancing the field.

   So to avoid penalizing the raiders , you want to penalize the people who pay as much for the game yet cannot invest the time in large chucnks or have the misfortune to not be in one of the 10 - 20 competant raiding guilds or are not in the game for PvP , which by the way was an afterthought by Blizzard (and it shows). Yup this attitude is pretty typical of raiders, if you play so much perhaps Blizzard should start charging raiders and full time Pvp'rs a premium for all the content being developed just for them that the majority of the player base never gets to see.

I propose that you have to pay an extra 5$ per 4hour play session above 24hours in a week, plus entrance fees to each of the raid instances of $2.50 (just to pay for YOUR content).

    Hardcore will always find ways to get ahead of everyone else what you suggest only penalizes the people who are in no position to abuse the system don't you think the hardcores should be the ones suffering the penalities ? or is that not fair ?
New Post Quote
12/04/06 1:19:19 PM
 
Vatigu writes:
What you're saying implies that being hardcore is in itself a problem, a problem that needs to be taxed. Well what good does that do Blizz other than make the other 1/2 of players at 60 quit. Cause apparently the first half already did because of lack of content designed for them. Now let me get this straight you guys want; Content with as good gear but harder so the gear matches up. Now let's have a look at what end game was designed to be. Group instances. Raid instances. PVP(as an afterthought, which I agree does show) Now what sets raid instances apart from group instances? Oh yeah the reset schedule. What happens when instances can be reset? Farming runs. What happens when farming runs occur? The gear that is supposedly on par with raid gear is all of a sudden easily farmable so that you can gather any piece in a day of farming. Course you could say, "What if I want it to be reset based like raiding so it's even?" Oh, guess what? Then it's the same as raiding but with a smaller group. What you people seem to hate is this idea that "OH NOEZ, I HAVE TO WORK WITH OTHER PEOPLE TO IMPROVE MY CHAR?!?" Guess what, the only possible way to keep this game moving is to use groups to gear up. Single player content just isn't possible because no classes aside from druids and locks are good enough at soloing to do any difficult 1man content. So face it groups have to exist. Reset timers have to exist to prevent farming. Therefore your entire argument is moot in that raiding in some form or another is the only style ever originally concepted by Blizz devs in the first place.

Oh and btw socketed items are not that overpowered, at least not from what I've seen, but I may be wrong
New Post Quote
12/04/06 4:53:51 PM
 
Vrazule writes:

Let me get this straight, 5 people in a group does not constitute as "working together" to improve their characters?  Only raiders corner the market on cooperative play?  What about soloers, which I also do by the way.  We have to make up for the lack of abilities that a group can bring to bear and yet in your eyes, we don't put any effort into the game?  By the way, casuals group all the time, you'll have to come up with some better excuses, because you lack any credibility at this point.  You have done absolutely nothing to further your belief system, nor have you given any valid arguments against casual player rights.  I also notice you seem to be under the impression that hardcores / raiders constitute half of the player population.  Despite the fact that it has been mentioned not only by Blizzard, but other third party consensus that hardcores are far and away outnubered by us noobs.  Fiscally speaking, it makes no sense what so ever for MMO companies to cater almost exclusively to the smallest segment of the market, let alone the moral issues of segregation and discrimination against play styles that don't coincide with raiding.

By the way, do you even have any clue as to the numbers of level 60's that raid?  How about the number of casuals that re-roll rather than play the dead end game that is raiding?  Blizzard let it slip in an interview during one of their fan fests that less than 20% of all players world wide actually take advantage of the raid content.  If this is truly the case, out of the horse's mouth mind you, why heck do you think you guys deserve the lion's share of the end game content?  It takes a lot of gall for you to argue that raiders deserve the best rewards in the game.  I guess only time will tell, but mark my words.  These companies are getting greedier by the day and they won't be satisfied with current subscription numbers nor will they be satisfied with the current turn over rates common with these games.  They WILL make changes and I bet you a dollar they won't be sticking with the current  hardcore / raiding paradigm.  Enjoy your hardcore leetness while you can, your days are numbered.

New Post Quote
12/04/06 6:53:33 PM
 
Leave this field empty
Post Your Comment:
Our Rating
8.1
User Rating: 8.1
Popular Features:
Player Perspectives : Content Locusts Killed My MMO Column added on Friday January 27
It used to be that hitting the level cap in an MMO was something that... Read More
Star Wars: The Old Republic : Good Cop, Bad Cop – SWTOR General Article added on Monday January 30
There is no question that Star Wars: The Old Republic has stirred strong feelings on... Read More
General : The 2011 Player’s Choice Winners Award added on Thursday January 19
A couple of weeks ago, we asked you, our valuable readers, to vote for those... Read More
The Secret World : Deck Templates Dev Journal added on Thursday February 09
The Secret World is going to feature one of the most complex abilities systems in... Read More
The WoW Factor : What is a “WoW Killer?” Column added on Monday January 16
Everyone is always looking for that game that will be a "WoW Killer" but what... Read More
Latest News:
World of Warcraft : The Role of Utility Reported on Feb 12, 2012
In The WoW Factor today, we take a look at the concept of "utility" in... Read More
World of Warcraft : Subscribers Down, Profits Up Reported on Feb 10, 2012
During yesterday's investor's call, Activision-Blizzard announced that World of Warcraft subscriber numbers are ~10.2 million.... Read More
World of Warcraft : Press Event for Mists of Pandaria in March Reported on Feb 01, 2012
The official World of Warcraft Twitter has been updated with the announcement that a press... Read More
World of Warcraft : The WoW Killer Redux Reported on Jan 28, 2012
In the last edition of The WoW Factor, the discussion swirled around what exactly it... Read More
World of Warcraft : No 2012 Blizzcon Reported on Jan 25, 2012
Citing a "jam packed schedule", Blizzard will not be hosting its (usually) annual fan convention,... Read More