Network Sites: FPSguru.com RTSguru.com UnboundGamer.com
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Games:570  Guilds:2,964
Members:1,441,659  Online:0
Guests:0  Posts:4,581,633
Mythic Entertainment | Official Site
MMORPG | Genre:Fantasy | Status:Final  (rel 09/18/08)  | Pub:Electronic Arts
PVP:Yes | Distribution:Download,Retail | Retail Price:$39.99 | Pay Type:Subscription
Desktop Client | System Req: PC Mac | ESRB:T

Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning News - Release Moved Back

Posted by Jon Wood on Nov 01, 2007  | 21 comments in our forums

It was announced today in the EA Earnings Call that Warhammer Online has pushed back its launch date from Q1 2008 to Q2 2008. Mark Jacobs, the VP of EA Mythic, spoke with MMORPG.com and told us that this decision was made in order to deliver a polished product at launch, and does not threaten the game's production.

A complete article concerning this announcement and the conversation with Mark Jacobs will be available at MMORPG.com at midnight server time.

 

Read more Exclusive News...

 
 
mackdawg19 writes:

Not to say this is a bad thing, but is it just me, or is that quote becoming rather overused in MMORPG's. Sounds exactly like what GnH said, AoC said, TR said, and quite a few others. I wonder what game developers think polish is. Seems the word is getting over used way to much these days.

New Post Quote
11/01/07 7:27:40 PM
 
ste2000 writes:

Expected..........................

New Post Quote
11/01/07 7:33:05 PM
 
treefitty writes:

Mythic can take all the time they need. I want their game to succeed. It will give me time to try out POTBS.

New Post Quote
11/01/07 7:34:56 PM
 
naldric writes:

I cant say i m really surprised, in the mmo world things tend to take longer than the devs always think they will

New Post Quote
11/01/07 7:35:33 PM
 
X-LiciT writes:

Well, yeah this is what the third time they have set-back? In the mmo world also do not forget time is money, each time to delay a opening is money lost in general terms overall profits might be slightly better due to better "quality" but some stuff can be fixed in a heavy beta stage. due to the increased tech of mmo, upgrades, improvements, and performances you update to meet the qualitys of A, when B passes you by as it has just appeared on the markets, I admire them taking time to improve gameplay, but i for one would like to see a active beta when they anounce this to SEE progress is still being made from a load/player base point of view.

New Post Quote
11/01/07 7:59:23 PM
 
Arawon writes:

Two thoughts. The VG disaster  really sent a message to producers about what will be accepted and what will be torn to shreds. Secondly the past beta showed the devs and producers there were signifigant elements that did not work well and  would jepardize the success of the potential returns on the game investment.These will be revised before the game sees the light of day.

New Post Quote
11/01/07 9:01:18 PM
 
Estrus writes:

/cry

.. but a good thing nonetheless.

New Post Quote
11/01/07 9:03:25 PM
 
Orthedos writes:

Originally posted by Arawon

Two thoughts. The VG disaster  really sent a message to producers about what will be accepted and what will be torn to shreds. Secondly the past beta showed the devs and producers there were signifigant elements that did not work well and  would jepardize the success of the potential returns on the game investment.These will be revised before the game sees the light of day.


Strongly agree with the VG idea.  The huge financial loss with VG flop sent a strong message to all publishers.  Do it well or fold up, you got basically 1 shot at success.

EA does not enjoy the good record of SoE in fixing broken games.  At least SoE fixed EQ2, for all the fiascos in the history of SoE publication.  We can only hope WAR make it out in flying colors.

New Post Quote
11/01/07 9:13:56 PM
 
Shannia writes:

IMHO, I doubt we'll see AoC or WAR before the November 2008.  No one wants to be the next big flop so they are in polish mode and we all should take stock in Kiwi.

New Post Quote
11/01/07 9:23:45 PM
 
gatheris writes:

maybe they are planning on a simultaneous release with Darkfall

 

sorry

couldn't help myself

 

New Post Quote
11/01/07 9:26:33 PM
 
Midaveg writes:

Good to hear they pushed back. Worth the wait!

New Post Quote
11/01/07 9:45:42 PM
 
Ammon777 writes:
Originally posted by gatheris

maybe they are planning on a simultaneous release with Darkfall

 

sorry

couldn't help myself

 

Hehe, well... Maybe Darkfall will come out before those two (WAR and Conan) and provide us with some sandbox fun!

New Post Quote
11/01/07 9:47:18 PM
 
knowom writes:

  It's EA's ultimate strategy near completion bush the release date back then two week later cancel it in favor of rehashing UO and DAOC instead then possibly buying out another burnt out mmorpg franchise.

No, but seriously it's not real surprise it got pushed back it looked way to demanding graphically for the average gamer and that situation just doesn't sell and neither does a piss poor release that isn't even beta worthy let alone let something people have to pay monthly for unless perhaps it's highly entertaining like UO was. People don't tolerate poor server stability, sluggish graphic performance, half finished content, and buggy unbalanced game mechanics the same way they use to they've developed measures to look up to now MMO's have evolved and if companies don't continue to do so along side it they get left behind in favor of the ones who do.

New Post Quote
11/01/07 10:19:34 PM
 
knowom writes:

Soon: Warhammer WAR, Unleash the FURY, Age of Conan, Huxley & APB
Future: DARKFALL, Bioware, 38-Studios, World of Darkness, Red-5 Studios, Colony (Space), Warhammer-40k, Stargate Worlds, Heros Journey, Funcom (Earth)

 

Out of all those games the most likely actually be released and possibly not suck is Huxley if I were to guess.

Darkfall if I have little faith in being released this millinum

WAR is A) a EA product and B) a EA product I have less faith in it cause it'll C) be canceled or D) be a crappy rehash go figure.

As for some the others haven't heard of them, don't care enough to follow them, system requirements to high for the average player, or are just plain likely to self combust.

New Post Quote
11/01/07 10:32:20 PM
 
Gemma writes:

I wouldn't be too surprised if they pushed it back again, come January~March-ish.

New Post Quote
11/01/07 10:33:35 PM
 
knowom writes:

Possibly, but with EA it's more likely they'd just can the project at that point they have track record of doing that after all.

New Post Quote
11/01/07 10:42:49 PM
 
zanfire writes:

i dont mind waiting, ppl get mad but id rather it come out fully complete then bugged to hell.  its better to wait and have a great finished product then to rush it out still in what is considered "alpha stage" if u look at games like vanguard(game seems great but had a bad start) ud see making sure its finely tuned is worth a couple extra months of wait........and hell as long as i get into beta....im all good lol

New Post Quote
11/01/07 10:43:26 PM
 
spaz1337 writes:

lameeeeeeeee

New Post Quote
11/01/07 11:15:14 PM
 
Bhagpuss writes:

I'm getting very fed up with this obsession with "polish". Personally, if I'm interested in playing a game at all I'm happy to pay to play it while they build it around me. I might be run over by a truck before the "polished" version finally appears, if it ever does.

I've been playing Vanguard from Beta3. It was stable enough for me to enjoy it then, and I played it solidly for 6 months from launch and loved it. I only stopped because I topped out on new small-group content, and even then I only took a break for the Summer and am now back playing VG again until RoK comes out.

Yes, if they'd folded Sigil last December and SoE had taken over before launch and fixed the worst of the bugs, VG could have had a more successful launch. that would have been better for the developers. But better for me was that I got to play it and thoroughly enjoy it sooner.

Maybe MMOs should start considering using longer, larger Betas that charge a reduced subscription fee - say $5.99 a month to beta a game that plans to charge $14.99 a month after launch. I would certainly pay to beta a game I am interested in playing Live, even assuming all the beta servers would be wiped at launch.

I'd rather have that as an option than "wait til we think its "polished" enough to make us a ton of money".

 

 

New Post Quote
11/02/07 4:03:03 AM
 
Zerocyde writes:

As long as they make up for it with a nice LOOOOOOOOONG open beta, I could really care less how much it gets pushed back.

New Post Quote
11/02/07 4:16:50 AM
 
Burnthebed writes:

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!  /end Darth Vader impersonation

 

But seriously, WAR is one of the only games that I'm looking forward to in this new wave MMO genre. AOC looks like it may have some promise, but "innovative combat" will make or break this game. Too much innovation can be a really bad thing in the gaming world....

What I'm trying to say is; This sucks, and I hate launch movement.

 

New Post Quote
11/02/07 2:59:04 PM
 
Leave this field empty
Post Your Comment:
Our Rating
7.4
User Rating: 8.2
Popular Features:
Player Perspectives : Content Locusts Killed My MMO Column added on Friday January 27
It used to be that hitting the level cap in an MMO was something that... Read More
Star Wars: The Old Republic : Good Cop, Bad Cop – SWTOR General Article added on Monday January 30
There is no question that Star Wars: The Old Republic has stirred strong feelings on... Read More
General : The 2011 Player’s Choice Winners Award added on Thursday January 19
A couple of weeks ago, we asked you, our valuable readers, to vote for those... Read More
The Secret World : Deck Templates Dev Journal added on Thursday February 09
The Secret World is going to feature one of the most complex abilities systems in... Read More
The WoW Factor : What is a “WoW Killer?” Column added on Monday January 16
Everyone is always looking for that game that will be a "WoW Killer" but what... Read More
Latest News:
Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning : Night of Murder Returns Reported on Feb 08, 2012
The Warhammer Online Herald has been updated with the news that the annual Night of... Read More
Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning : New Version Goes Live Reported on Jan 30, 2012
The Warhammer Online team has announced that v1.4.5 has been deployed. The Warhammer Herald has... Read More
Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning : The All Things WAR Interview Reported on Jan 01, 2012
With Warhammer Online well-established in the MMOniverse, we felt now would be a great opportunity... Read More
Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning : Keg's End Seasonal Event Begins Dec. 14 Reported on Dec 13, 2011
The Warhammer Online team has announced that the annual Keg's End seasonal event is scheduled... Read More
Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning : Come for PvP, Stay for WAAAGH! Reported on Oct 23, 2011
Warhammer Online is one of the small handful of games that continues to make steady... Read More