A very impressive expansion.

They paid attention to what people were saying and delivered.

Remind me, why does SOE have such a bad reputation?

Oh, and Sort out your typo in the title, Szark. Lazy hippy.

The link is wrong, this is the correct link.

http://eq2players.station.sony.com/news_archive_content.vm?id=1927&section=News&locale=en_US

Isn't adding another 50-60 points of AA a bit much? Classes will now have 200 AA points, its becoming EQ1 again. Most of the class trees already suck, putting more points into each tree is gonna have some classes so overpowered (guardians). Crusaders will never catch up to warrior tanks now.

not exactly a link is it?

Originally posted by gatheris

not exactly a link is it?

thanks for being an ass and adding nothing to the discussion.

nope - but got ya to fix it

it really helps us lazy gits that don't want to type an address

thanks

(i just love angry people - they are soooo cute)

Originally posted by gatheris

nope - but got ya to fix it

it really helps us lazy gits that don't want to type an address

thanks

(i just love angry people - they are soooo cute)

 

Did you really just say "soooooo cute"? hahaha

You are welcome And I am definetely not angry, it is not a good idea to assume things. Expressing my opinion that you added nothing to the discussion does not constitute being angry.  I was already in the middle of an edit fixing the link and adding an opinion about the new AA increase while you made a snide remark mocking me 2 minutes after I posted, give a guy a chance to fix something

:edit my spelling sucks

So far for me and my sons the packs havnt been bad. I wish there were some changes to the crafting part however. It seems like you have to be ten levels above what you want to build for. Makes it hard to be an armorer and build equipmet for your self.

Originally posted by smut

The link is wrong, this is the correct link.

 

http://eq2players.station.sony.com/news_archive_content.vm?id=1927&section=News&locale=en_US

 

Isn't adding another 50-60 points of AA a bit much? Classes will now have 200 AA points, its becoming EQ1 again. Most of the class trees already suck, putting more points into each tree is gonna have some classes so overpowered (guardians). Crusaders will never catch up to warrior tanks now.

You are not putting more points in the same two trees they are adding a 3rd tree for the extra points they are giving us. If you search EQ2flames some ppl have already posted what they are for all classes and how the new tree works

Originally posted by Nocuma

Originally posted by smut

The link is wrong, this is the correct link.

 

http://eq2players.station.sony.com/news_archive_content.vm?id=1927&section=News&locale=en_US

 

Isn't adding another 50-60 points of AA a bit much? Classes will now have 200 AA points, its becoming EQ1 again. Most of the class trees already suck, putting more points into each tree is gonna have some classes so overpowered (guardians). Crusaders will never catch up to warrior tanks now.

 

You are not putting more points in the same two trees they are adding a 3rd tree for the extra points they are giving us. If you search EQ2flames some ppl have already posted what they are for all classes and how the new tree works

Glad to hear that, thank you for the information. I will go see what the new trees are like!

Originally posted by smut

Originally posted by gatheris

nope - but got ya to fix it

it really helps us lazy gits that don't want to type an address

thanks

(i just love angry people - they are soooo cute)

 

 

Did you really just say "soooooo cute"? hahaha

You are welcome And I am definetely not angry, it is not a good idea to assume things. Expressing my opinion that you added nothing to the discussion does not constitute being angry.  I was already in the middle of an edit fixing the link and adding an opinion about the new AA increase while you made a snide remark mocking me 2 minutes after I posted, give a guy a chance to fix something

 

:edit my spelling sucks

this is fun
 

you may not be an angry person but, uhm, maybe a bit touchy then?

that pretty innocent comment should have made you chuckle - but instead it elicited a rather rude comment from you

but - we all know emails and chat don't exactly convey the right intent - maybe "ass" was meant in a kindly way

Originally posted by gatheris

Originally posted by smut

Originally posted by gatheris

nope - but got ya to fix it

it really helps us lazy gits that don't want to type an address

thanks

(i just love angry people - they are soooo cute)

 

 

Did you really just say "soooooo cute"? hahaha

You are welcome And I am definetely not angry, it is not a good idea to assume things. Expressing my opinion that you added nothing to the discussion does not constitute being angry.  I was already in the middle of an edit fixing the link and adding an opinion about the new AA increase while you made a snide remark mocking me 2 minutes after I posted, give a guy a chance to fix something

 

:edit my spelling sucks

this is fun
 

you may not be an angry person but, uhm, maybe a bit touchy then?

that pretty innocent comment should have made you chuckle - but instead it elicited a rather rude comment from you

but - we all know emails and chat don't exactly convey the right intent - maybe "ass" was meant in a kindly way

 

 

I am having fun to, I can tell we are both smart asses so lets just leave it at that.