Trending Games | Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn | Guild Wars 2 | EverQuest | Landmark

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,920,665 Users Online:0
Games:760  Posts:6,312,140
Zenimax Online Studios | Official Site
MMORPG | Genre:Fantasy | Status:Final  (rel 04/04/14)  | Pub:Bethesda Softworks
Distribution: | Retail Price:$59.99 | Pay Type:Subscription
System Req: PC Mac Playstation 4 Xbox One | Out of date info? Let us know!

Elder Scrolls Online Forum » General Discussion » This would be much better with 2 major factions

4 Pages « 1 2 3 4 Search
75 posts found
  ShakyMo

Apprentice Member

Joined: 11/21/11
Posts: 7246

4/16/13 7:19:19 PM#61
Originally posted by baphamet

another thing to consider is these pvp campaigns have a shelf life, whenever the campaigns end they can re-balance them similar to what GW2 does.

ending is a mistake

this is what GW2 does with its server shuffle, and WAR does with its city seige.

DAOC and planetside don't end, they are by far the best 2 games to do this sort of PVP.

  ShakyMo

Apprentice Member

Joined: 11/21/11
Posts: 7246

4/16/13 7:25:56 PM#62
Originally posted by Livnthedream
Originally posted by azzamasin

I suggest you look up this little game that was titled DAoC (Dark Age of Camelot) to get a sense for what a 3rd faction does to combat the overpopulated and winning faction.

Except newer games have shown just how false that is. Tsw, Ps2, Gw2. They all show a much more selfish playerbase more willing to get theres before they get got, rather than team up to rule. I have heard this happened in said Daoc also, but I have no personal experience with it to say.

TSW is a PVE fest.  During closed beta a bunch of "everquest types" whined like fuck, much like they do in every mmo in beta (and as they are doing with TESO now).  So in the end they let everyone be chums in PVE, but fight in PVP.  Suprise suprise the "PVP" in TSW ended up being a keep trading fest to power gear PVErs so they could get a starter set for the end game dungeons.  Its the only mmo iv'e played where I got screamed at by my own side for actually pvping in the pvp area.

GW2 left server transfers open to long.  Also there is no long term draw with the server shuffle and not knowing who killed you. If they had closed down transfers like 1 week after launch it probably would have been a better pvp game.

You are incorrect on PS2.  PS2 has a HARD FACTION LOCK just like DAOC and planetside 1.  The servers are much more balanced.  Also the ammount of time you invest in characters discourages rerolling to the cheap side.  Finally being the succesor to the 1st plaentside theire are a bunch of hardcore pvp guilds from PS1 (and the likes of DAOC, lineage2 and shadowbane) who really really dont want to play for the "newb zergers" on a given server.

  ShakyMo

Apprentice Member

Joined: 11/21/11
Posts: 7246

4/16/13 7:30:40 PM#63
Originally posted by TheScavenger

WoW was the first to do only two major factions, instead of three. This worked out much better, for balance. You didn't have anyone ganging up on the little guy either. It also made the game more interesting. This also proved to be a far more popular design, as seen by how many people got into it.

 

In WoW, you had Alliance vs Horde. If they were to have done capture points in the open world, it would have been far more hectic than if you had a third faction.

 

Just imagine

 

A 100 vs 100 battle (if they had that in WoW)...all even. This is epic. But then if there was a 3rd faction, they'd come along and greatly overbalance one side and the battle becomes no fun anymore. The only people who would have fun are the one that pwn the now greatly outnumbered side.

 

Three factions can never be balanced, as seen in DAOC. One faction is always greatly outnumbered and gets pwned all the time...they can't play the game or capture anything, because the two sides always go after them as they are easy pickings. This will be even more true with the modern MMO crowd, who always choose the 1 (or 2) most popular sides and want the easy pickings of the weak faction.

 

That is never a problem with 2 factions, as WoW proved.

 

(edit: Also look at GW2. It has three servers against each other, but one server is ALWAYS getting pwned so badly. Most badly I've seen thus far is one server had 200k points, another 190k points and the third had a measly 6k points. This again would be vastly different in a server vs setup, and not a three way server battle).

 

So I think they should have the 3rd faction be AI controlled only, so they don't have to redesign or get rid of anything. An AI controlled faction would be rather interesting anyway.

thats because wow is a 95% PVE game where the PVP is either INSTANCED SHITE or magical fairy land flick a switch and PVP magically happens servers.

My planetside 2 server is

36% New conglomerate

32% vanu sovereignty

32% terran republic

FIND ONE WOW SERVER ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD THAT IS THAT BALANCED

  LordSneerg

Novice Member

Joined: 3/21/13
Posts: 121

4/16/13 7:33:04 PM#64
I love how the op makes a statement but has not played the game. Play the game first before you can accurately assess the game. Geesh give the game a chance to come out. Sigh
  Enoyx

Novice Member

Joined: 7/14/12
Posts: 8

4/16/13 8:02:21 PM#65
Originally posted by TheScavenger

WoW was the first to do only two major factions, instead of three. This worked out much better, for balance. You didn't have anyone ganging up on the little guy either. It also made the game more interesting. This also proved to be a far more popular design, as seen by how many people got into it.

 

In WoW, you had Alliance vs Horde. If they were to have done capture points in the open world, it would have been far more hectic than if you had a third faction.

 

Just imagine

 

A 100 vs 100 battle (if they had that in WoW)...all even. This is epic. But then if there was a 3rd faction, they'd come along and greatly overbalance one side and the battle becomes no fun anymore. The only people who would have fun are the one that pwn the now greatly outnumbered side.

 

Three factions can never be balanced, as seen in DAOC. One faction is always greatly outnumbered and gets pwned all the time...they can't play the game or capture anything, because the two sides always go after them as they are easy pickings. This will be even more true with the modern MMO crowd, who always choose the 1 (or 2) most popular sides and want the easy pickings of the weak faction.

 

That is never a problem with 2 factions, as WoW proved.

 

I just dont think this is true at all. Two faction/two sided fighting has never worked for open world games. It works in PvP scenarios with captured points or short matches but when you have a continuous battle in the open world it just isnt as effective. One side always ends up being unfairly stacked against another and there is no real way to have the game naturally balance itself back out.

 

If you have ever played a 3 faction game, even the ones that didnt do it necessarily the best, your scenario where two sides work together simply cant work together the way you describe. Battle is simply too messy when you are in the middle of it to avoid hitting a faction because they are "working" with you. The lack of communication between sides also helps prevent this. In a game like DAOC, the only way to communicate was to have somone "cross-realming" which is something that is quickly banned.

 

The comment about three factions never being balanced with DAOC being an example is simply false. Most of the servers had great faction balance where one or two sides would raid and take over huge sections but there would always be a response by the other factions. It worked in DAOC because as a faction took over more area, it had more to defend. The more you had to defend, the ahrder it was to defned. This provided an incentive for the other realms to engage you. The biggest problem with a game like GW2 is that it does not have this advantage. The different WvW areas are all separate, too small, and have number control on each zone. It makes it all to easy to control everything and keep it. Unlike DAOC, a raid in one team's area does not indicate a vulnerability in another. This concept is what kept DAOC from having your "easy pickings" problem. If you logged on in Albion and saw Midguard was taking over Hibernia, for example, your first though wasnt "lets go hit Hybernia too" because Midguard was already there with numbers. Your thought was "hey Midguard is preoccupied with Hibs, lets hit them in their own zone". This was fun not only because it would lead to Hibernia receving help in a natural way by forcing Midguard to go home to defend, it also created the ability for much more small group stratergy. Games like GW2 make this impossilbe with their small seperate maps and create very much a "zerg or be zerged" mentality.

 

I'm not saying that ESO is a guarenteed home run in open world PvP, but I think it's pretty clear that three faction is a indicator of promise, not a concern. 

 

 

  Neherun

Elite Member

Joined: 9/06/07
Posts: 240

4/17/13 7:11:52 AM#66
Originally posted by muffins89
Originally posted by azzamasin

Spoken like the WoW fanboi you are OP.  I suppose you're one of those who insist WoW was the first MMO too.

 

 

 it was the first truley Massive on.   ;)

 

Right, as the SERVER crashed if fights exceeded over 100 people, or the game lagged itself out.

 

Meanwhile in games like Shadowbane....

 

  Livnthedream

Novice Member

Joined: 3/20/13
Posts: 582

I like this planet, YOU get off!

4/17/13 10:51:44 PM#67
Originally posted by ShakyMo

You are incorrect on PS2.  PS2 has a HARD FACTION LOCK just like DAOC and planetside 1.  The servers are much more balanced.  Also the ammount of time you invest in characters discourages rerolling to the cheap side.  Finally being the succesor to the 1st plaentside theire are a bunch of hardcore pvp guilds from PS1 (and the likes of DAOC, lineage2 and shadowbane) who really really dont want to play for the "newb zergers" on a given server.

My experience on Helios as a TR would disagree. Hard lock or not we get flanked by Vanu far more often than they start their own push into NC territory. I for one as looking forward to the merge with Connory, though by all accounts it too is NC heavy, which is funny since they are so "underpowered" according to the forums.

http://chroniclesofthenerds.com/nerdfight/

Y U NO FLIP TABLE?!?!?!

  Shadanwolf

Apprentice Member

Joined: 6/13/10
Posts: 1901

4/17/13 11:01:48 PM#68

I predict 23 more threads on top of the 18 we've already had ...advocating two factions rather than the three factions. OP.... Three factions  is a settled core feature of ESOL.

 

OP ..think 3 factions doesn't work.....check DAOC......10+ years and still going. It has 3 factions.....an dare I say inviolate realm territorys that can only be visited by creating a character in the other realms !!

 

  Livnthedream

Novice Member

Joined: 3/20/13
Posts: 582

I like this planet, YOU get off!

4/17/13 11:03:43 PM#69
Originally posted by Shadanwolf

I predict 23 more threads on top of the 18 we've already had ...advocating two factions rather than the three factions. OP.... Three factions  is a settled core feature of ESOL.

 

OP ..think 3 factions doesn't work.....check DAOC......10+ years and still going. It has 3 factions.....an dare I say inviolate realm territorys that can only be visited by creating a character in the other realms !!

 

I wouldn't call life support for the last 8 years as "still going" personally.

http://chroniclesofthenerds.com/nerdfight/

Y U NO FLIP TABLE?!?!?!

  Gravarg

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 8/24/06
Posts: 3217

4/17/13 11:07:21 PM#70
They should have like 10 factions imho, I wouldn't join any of them, since I'd be happy just chopping down trees and making bows, shields, housing stuff, etc.  But it would be cool :)
  GrayGhost79

Novice Member

Joined: 8/30/08
Posts: 4889

4/17/13 11:16:11 PM#71
Personally, I'd rather have seen 2 player factions and 1 NPC faction. This would have done a great deal to keep me interested and still help maintain the balance that 3 factions can bring. It also would have been more in the spirit of TES games imho. 
  redcapp

Novice Member

Joined: 5/13/11
Posts: 733

4/17/13 11:39:16 PM#72

I disagree.  In an open RvR system like DAoC, three factions is superior.  WoW was unbalanced and the majority of PvP was instanced besides.

 

Now, in an elder scrolls game, it would make more sense to me if players could choose to join factions as their characters grow, some of which would be PvP enabled throughout the world.

  Redhawk2006

Novice Member

Joined: 4/13/10
Posts: 109

4/22/13 4:39:42 PM#73

I have to agree here based on what I have seen with GW2. I have been on two different servers in multiple tiers in GW2, and it is not uncommon to have two sides gang up on the third side. This doesn't require some nefarious consipracy although there are sometimes wilfull alliances or a deliberate policy of  targeting one enemy over the other. What usually happens is one side just happens to be weak and everyone just naturally goes after the weaker side rather than take on the heavy hitters. Some servers are just horribly outmanned at different times of the day, but viable at other times. It really is a fustercluck.

Two sides matched by time zone/population would be a lot better. If one side was weaker than the other it is possible recruitment or limiting the number of bodies to balance as WoW does could make up the difference. But when one side is weaker than the other two and the other two are ganking your side to the point no one wants to do WvW  RVR or whatever, then good luck getting recruits.

Throw in death penalty BS and having to run miles looking for fights a la GW2 and getting people to participate in WvW can be a nightmare.

  meddyck

Advanced Member

Joined: 1/18/08
Posts: 1134

4/23/13 6:49:37 AM#74
With 3 factions even if 1 has more players, the other 2 can still have a good time fighting each other or gang up on the bigger one. With 2 factions once the larger populated side starts to dominate, people flee the smaller side and you quickly get server death (at least in PvP). Besides having 3 sides just adds a lot more variety to PvP because you're not always fighting the same people and you can be fighting one realm then have the 3rd show up and get a massive, hectic 3 way battle. For AvA to have any chance of being popular and successful, 3 realms is definitely the way to go.

Camelot Unchained Backer
DAOC [retired]: R11 Cleric R11 Druid R11 Minstrel R9 Eldritch R6 Sorc R6 Scout R5 Healer

  ShakyMo

Apprentice Member

Joined: 11/21/11
Posts: 7246

4/23/13 7:43:55 AM#75
I can't think of a single 2 faction game with good pvp.

War was average

The rest were very poor.
4 Pages « 1 2 3 4 Search