Trending Games | Rift | Neverwinter | WildStar | Defiance

Network: Gamertube FPSguru RTSguru

Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game

Games:587 Online:0 Guests:0
Members:2,388,222 Posts:5,545,246

Game On: ESP Edition 07 - Sexism in MMOs

Home Game List Reviews 1 Live Stream Features Forums News Videos Blogs Columns Guilds Search Store

Play Now

Neverwinter (NW)

Cryptic Studios | Play Now

| Out of date info? Let us know!

Overview Features Forums Hype Links News Reviews Screenshots Videos

Neverwinter Forum » General Discussion » how low can you go?

9 posts found
Kilrain Apprentice Member Joined: 12/25/03 Posts: 212	2/10/13 7:48:12 PM#1 Report this post Explain why you are reporting this post: (750 characters max.) To anyone that has played, how low of a system do you think could handle it at say.. 20-30 fps ? I know my desktop will handle anything, I'm curious about my ultrabook. The i5, HD4000 will run start trek perfectly fine.
Login or Register to never see this panel The Best MMOs of 2013... So Far Rift : Loving Rift's Shift Darkfall: Unholy Wars : A Tough But Rewarding Nut to Crack WildStar : The Summer of WildStar is Upon Us Camelot Unchained : Mark Jacobs on What Next for CU MMORPGcom Features of the Week - May 18, 2013
BitterClinger Novice Member Joined: 11/19/12 Posts: 195 2013 Watch List: ESO, Neverwinter	2/10/13 8:04:23 PM#2 Report this post Explain why you are reporting this post: (750 characters max.) That should be fine. This is a desktop machine that I built in 2008, and it runs it like a champ. Here are my specs, nothing to write home about. ------------------ System Information ------------------ Operating System: Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 3 (2600.xpsp_sp3_gdr.120821-1629) Language: English (Regional Setting: English) Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz (4 CPUs) Memory: 3264MB RAM Page File: 811MB used, 4339MB available DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904) --------------- Display Devices --------------- Card name: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ Manufacturer: NVIDIA Chip type: GeForce 9800 GTX+ Display Memory: 512.0 MB Current Mode: 1920 x 1080 (32 bit) (60Hz) Monitor Max Res: 1600,1200 Driver Name: nv4_disp.dll Driver Version: 6.14.0013.0142 (English) Driver Attributes: Final Retail Top Games Played APR 2013: World of Warplanes, Guild Wars 2
Kilrain Apprentice Member Joined: 12/25/03 Posts: 212	2/10/13 8:09:59 PM#3 Report this post Explain why you are reporting this post: (750 characters max.) awesome, thanks for the quick response. I wish the big founder pack was $59, then I'd pay and find out on my own :/ oh well, patience. I figured it probably would, just nice to know.
korent1991 Elite Member Joined: 5/01/09 Posts: 1165	2/10/13 8:32:15 PM#4 Report this post Explain why you are reporting this post: (750 characters max.) Originally posted by Kilrain awesome, thanks for the quick response. I wish the big founder pack was $59, then I'd pay and find out on my own :/ oh well, patience. I figured it probably would, just nice to know. since it's still in beta, the game is probably not optimized the best for every PC so at release it would run much better than it would in beta. Most likely :) "Happiness is not a destination. It is a method of life." -------------------------------
Kilrain Apprentice Member Joined: 12/25/03 Posts: 212	2/10/13 10:53:10 PM#5 Report this post Explain why you are reporting this post: (750 characters max.) yeah for sure, been in many betas. Just wanted an idea from where it stands right now. Looks promising .
Fendel84M Elite Member Joined: 5/20/04 Posts: 1083 I actually still like MMORPGs	2/10/13 11:11:19 PM#6 Report this post Explain why you are reporting this post: (750 characters max.) Originally posted by Kilrain awesome, thanks for the quick response. I wish the big founder pack was $59, then I'd pay and find out on my own :/ oh well, patience. I figured it probably would, just nice to know. the $59 founder pack gets you into this beta weekend FYI.
Kilrain Apprentice Member Joined: 12/25/03 Posts: 212	2/11/13 1:08:49 PM#7 Report this post Explain why you are reporting this post: (750 characters max.) Yeah I know, it's just my opinion that the $59 would be worth it if it was the bigger pack, $29 for the other one. I just think they were a tad greedy with them.
jdnyc Advanced Member Joined: 4/10/12 Posts: 828	2/11/13 1:19:39 PM#8 Report this post Explain why you are reporting this post: (750 characters max.) Originally posted by Kilrain I just think they were a tad greedy with them. In my opinion can't judge a game by what it offers as an incentive with other B2P or P2P things, when other AAA games out there make you buy it just to play the game to begin with.
Kilrain Apprentice Member Joined: 12/25/03 Posts: 212	2/12/13 8:46:26 AM#9 Report this post Explain why you are reporting this post: (750 characters max.) Originally posted by jdnyc Originally posted by Kilrain I just think they were a tad greedy with them. In my opinion can't judge a game by what it offers as an incentive with other B2P or P2P things, when other AAA games out there make you buy it just to play the game to begin with. What are you on about? I was stating an opinion about the prices of their starter packs. My opinion, no everyones. This had absolutely nothing to do with judging a game, just the price of their starter packs. Re-read what I said, maybe you'll understand better.