Trending Games | Elder Scrolls Online | Guild Wars 2 | ArcheAge | Dragon Age: Inquisition

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,645,674 Users Online:0
Games:686  Posts:6,082,858
Gas Powered Games | Official Site
MMORTS | Genre:Historical | Status:Final  (rel 08/16/11)  | Pub:Microsoft Game Studios
PVP:Yes | Distribution:Download,Retail | Retail Price:n/a | Pay Type:Free | Monthly Fee:n/a
System Req: PC | ESRB:E10+Out of date info? Let us know!

Age of Empires Online Forum » General Discussion » Hmmm I thought Age of Empires online would attract alot of players

4 Pages 1 2 3 4 » Search
65 posts found
  eddieg50

Advanced Member

Joined: 6/22/05
Posts: 1469

 
OP  8/17/11 3:21:40 PM#1

I figured all RTS players would want to try it but it does not seem like anyone wants to try it?

  marz.at.play

Advanced Member

Joined: 5/08/08
Posts: 910

nanu nanu

8/18/11 10:44:58 AM#2

I was going to buy this thining it was going to be a box price, but sadly the item shop has scared me away.

  User Deleted
8/18/11 10:47:46 AM#3

The prices are very much on the steep side, and eitists are having hissy fit about the graphics (Which look fine in my mind, nothing wrong with a lighthearted atmosphere)

  dragonbrand

Novice Member

Joined: 1/16/10
Posts: 422

8/18/11 10:51:28 AM#4
Originally posted by Archeminos

The prices are very much on the steep side, and eitists are having hissy fit about the graphics (Which look fine in my mind, nothing wrong with a lighthearted atmosphere)

 Graphics does not equal art style, two different things. The people complaining about the art style don't like how "cartoony" and child-like the style is. No one is complaining about the graphics and the requirements necessary to drive them.

Gaming since Avalon Hill was making board games.

Played SWG, EVE, Fallen Earth, LOTRO, Rift, Vanguard, WoW, SWTOR, TSW, Tera
Tried Aoc, Aion, EQII, RoM, Vindictus, Darkfail, DDO, GW, PotBS

  lizardbones

Elite Member

Joined: 6/11/08
Posts: 10002

I've become dependent upon spell check. My apologies for stupid grammatical errors.

8/18/11 10:55:11 AM#5


Originally posted by marzatplay
I was going to buy this thining it was going to be a box price, but sadly the item shop has scared me away.



Microsoft said that paying players would have an advantage in fights. It may not be pay to win, but it's definitely pay to be competitive.

This isn't terribly surprising though...Microsoft's business model has always been to charge a premium for mediocre stuff that you may not be able to get elsewhere.

For every large, complex problem, there is a simple, clear solution that also happens to be absolutely wrong.

  Eladi

Advanced Member

Joined: 11/23/06
Posts: 1047

8/18/11 10:56:16 AM#6

Problem for this game is that they try and get new player to play the game, its not aimed at old time rts players at all , its basicly a casual rts clone whit simple gameplay that cost more to play fully then the big highly adv rts games that offer more gameplay and have multiplay asmuch as you like for less cost. 

rts gaming is a fairly small market compated to the big fps/rpg markets designing the game for easy accessbut lacking the depth and to a extent realism of modern rts is not going to draw a huge crowd.

  Sulaa

Novice Member

Joined: 7/13/11
Posts: 830

8/18/11 11:00:44 AM#7

Don't like the art style but that is not most important.

 

Prices (as with most f2p games but in AoE Online it is more clearly visible) are idiotic. Way too high.

Come on 99 $ for "buying" content that will be released in next 6 months? or 20$ for full access to ONE civilization + things in item store ON TOP of all that?

 

No thank you.

 

Most rts games you can buy for 50-60$ for FULL game.

I still have AoE 2 box in my home, aoe2 was like 8 civilizations? so 8*20 $ = 160 + item store ON TOP of that.

 

Well most f2p games are expensive if you play them for real / longer time , but this pricing is lol

 

I prefer old business models , very rarely f2p is good enough to get me into it. League of Legends have it good f.e. , well anyway I am not going to pay hundreads of dolars for AOE Online to have access to same amount of content I could get for 50-60$ for earlier versions of AoE.

  Isometrix

Novice Member

Joined: 1/06/05
Posts: 252

8/28/11 5:25:36 AM#8

It did attract a lot of players.

Half of them jumped ship when they saw the graphics and read the features list (I didn't btw, I like the art style and don't mind the graphics that much).

40% more tried it out, got to level 10, figured they had to pay to be able to have any fun or be competitive and dropped out as soon as they saw the ridiculous prices.

9% kept on going but got bored after level 20, realizing there's really nothing to the PvE other than build up and zerg CPU.

The other 1% are the people still in this game, throwing their money away at it.

 

This game is the biggest scam in history. A pay2win model with outrageous prices, going so far as to charge 7 euros for trees or statues in your city. Notice the or in that sentence. Want both trees and statues? That's 14 euros.

It's failing quite hard right now. English servers (4 of them) have 2000ish players online at any given time. Other servers (I think there are 8 or so) have half that. That's 12k players online at any given time, with all servers at low pop, less than a month after release.

 

I hate to hate on games but this is the first game in my entire life where I really hope it fails spectacularly because of it's pricing model. Everything costs at least 50% too much and the game all but tells free players to fuck off elsewhere. Way to fuck up a title with a lot of promise.

 

 

Honestly I don't know what they were thinking. Prices like this are too high for any game. If a game like Starcraft 2 did this, people would be up in arms, and that's a triple A title with way more features. I read a quote somewhere that sums it up perfectly: "Age of Empires online is the most expensive mediocre RTS ever made"

 

 

Just to end it with an image I saw on the official forums:

  Robokapp

Elite Member

Joined: 11/15/09
Posts: 4157

The only luck I had today was to have you as my opponent.

8/28/11 2:11:58 PM#9

cash shop in competitive gaming is something no serious player will ever go for.

 

if it was free without the cash shop or b2p like starcraft the story might've been different. But as it stands, it's simply not the payment model that RTS players want.

 

  Crazylike

Novice Member

Joined: 1/05/06
Posts: 93

8/28/11 2:15:35 PM#10

RTS with items? Crafting? Serious RTS gamers would never care for such silly features. I tried it, was too easy and casual and got boring really fast (yes I was level 40).

  Pilnkplonk

Advanced Member

Joined: 3/02/10
Posts: 1559

8/28/11 2:22:56 PM#11

The "Disney Style stock toothy grins no3" from advertisements drove me off. They reek of cheerful kiddie commercialisation. Pass. This is not the Age of Empires we're looking for.

I might have looked more into the mechanics and all but really it's the mangy disney kiddie psyops graphics style that sent me off screaming into the woods. The only thing missing is the mischevious one eyebrow raised. Ugh....

Oh yes, and the whole F2P + competetive disaster combo... Jeez.. they'd do much better with B2P for 15-20$ + cosmetic shop thing. It's a shame. I can imagine it being a quite an interesting game if it werent for these dumbcrap moves (toothy grins + cash shop = makes me think of used car salesmen)

  ThomasN7

Advanced Member

Joined: 3/17/07
Posts: 6607

"Had to be me. Someone else might have gotten it wrong.” - Mordin Solus

8/28/11 2:24:55 PM#12

They chamged this game from an aweoms pvp game to a pve game. Some things are cool but mostly noone participates in pvp.

  Sulaa

Novice Member

Joined: 7/13/11
Posts: 830

8/28/11 2:40:52 PM#13

I really hope that this kind of games keep going out - then maybe some people will have knack some sense into their heads , that not always f2p is the best solution and that item shops aren't always best idea.

 

Market need both p2p (with not item shops) and f2p and b2p games.

 

Oh I hope AoE Online will fail hard , well seems I don't have to hope as it is failling.

  munsil42

Hard Core Member

Joined: 5/20/04
Posts: 59

I'm still a geek on the inside, that's the important thing.

8/28/11 2:45:44 PM#14

After reading the review on the RTSguru website I decided to stay far far away from this game. Pay2win is like kryptonite to Superman when it comes down to it.

  Varthander

Advanced Member

Joined: 9/19/07
Posts: 434

Forum ranks are useless.

8/28/11 2:51:25 PM#15

i honestly like the game but i wont buy it untill the celtics make appereance, the free to play model is quite wrong in my opinion because its mostly a Demo of the game, but the game generally is pretty good, waiting to end of nations to see how they do.

  eddieg50

Advanced Member

Joined: 6/22/05
Posts: 1469

 
OP  8/28/11 9:15:25 PM#16
Originally posted by Isometrix

It did attract a lot of players.

Half of them jumped ship when they saw the graphics and read the features list (I didn't btw, I like the art style and don't mind the graphics that much).

40% more tried it out, got to level 10, figured they had to pay to be able to have any fun or be competitive and dropped out as soon as they saw the ridiculous prices.

9% kept on going but got bored after level 20, realizing there's really nothing to the PvE other than build up and zerg CPU.

The other 1% are the people still in this game, throwing their money away at it.

 

This game is the biggest scam in history. A pay2win model with outrageous prices, going so far as to charge 7 euros for trees or statues in your city. Notice the or in that sentence. Want both trees and statues? That's 14 euros.

It's failing quite hard right now. English servers (4 of them) have 2000ish players online at any given time. Other servers (I think there are 8 or so) have half that. That's 12k players online at any given time, with all servers at low pop, less than a month after release.

 

I hate to hate on games but this is the first game in my entire life where I really hope it fails spectacularly because of it's pricing model. Everything costs at least 50% too much and the game all but tells free players to fuck off elsewhere. Way to fuck up a title with a lot of promise.

 

 

Honestly I don't know what they were thinking. Prices like this are too high for any game. If a game like Starcraft 2 did this, people would be up in arms, and that's a triple A title with way more features. I read a quote somewhere that sums it up perfectly: "Age of Empires online is the most expensive mediocre RTS ever made"

 

 

Just to end it with an image I saw on the official forums:

      YOu hope it fails, LOL, you sound bitter or something, the game is a breath of fresh air from elvs and such, I am having a fun time , there are so many things to do in the game and for $20 you can create a powerfull nation and hav fun playing PvP, its to bad you are ;missing out

  Elapsed

Advanced Member

Joined: 3/07/04
Posts: 2343

8/28/11 9:58:19 PM#17

The RTS portion of the game is good, but I'm not a fan of all the other junk the stuck in between the fighting. I don't want a capital city, trading, crafting, quests, etc. 

  Corehaven

Apprentice Member

Joined: 7/27/11
Posts: 1574

I swear by my pretty floral bonnet, I will end you.

8/28/11 10:17:03 PM#18

Im not really interested in it and I really like Age of Empires. 

 

I actually know very little of the game, but I guess I was immediately turned off because it looks cartoony.  Thats not really what Im used too in regards to the franchise.  Plus you could always play the Age of Empires game online anyways, so Im still struggling to see the point of this. 

 

Id rather just play Age of Empires 3.   I kind of see Age of Empires Online as kind of pointless, and Im still trying to figure out why they even made it. 

  Wizardry

Elite Member

Joined: 8/27/04
Posts: 6355

Perhaps tomorrow will be better.

8/28/11 10:26:54 PM#19

I felt the same as this last poster,when i saw it was browser based and very cheap looking,i was not giving it  a minute of my time.

http://www.youtube.com/user/Napolianboo#p/u/15/rCYLLQCNc1w
Samoan Diamond

  Omali

Hard Core Member

Joined: 2/16/09
Posts: 1060

8/28/11 10:28:58 PM#20
Originally posted by lizardbones

 


Originally posted by marzatplay
I was going to buy this thining it was going to be a box price, but sadly the item shop has scared me away.




Microsoft said that paying players would have an advantage in fights. It may not be pay to win, but it's definitely pay to be competitive.

This isn't terribly surprising though...Microsoft's business model has always been to charge a premium for mediocre stuff that you may not be able to get elsewhere.

 

It has? Like where else?

4 Pages 1 2 3 4 » Search