| 44 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Reizla
Elite Member
Joined: 12/09/08
MMORPGs are no longer about the mass multi-user anymore *sadly* |
7/19/12 3:40:25 PM#21
Let me grab 2 old blog-posts I made back in 2010 about a cash shop in TERA: http://www.pagesfromsages.com/?action=showentry&entry=636 Noo, I was wrong, ppl bashed me for posting this, and even EnMasse made an official statement about NOT ADDING a cash shop to TERA: http://www.pagesfromsages.com/?action=showentry&entry=638 It's always funny to see that I'm right 2 years later, when we're not even half a year after TERA's release... Any (MMO) publisher using Digital Rivers is gonna use cash shop / micro payments.... Demigoth's RPG adventures ~ My blog ASUS M4N72-E |
|
Kyleran
Bitter Vet™
Joined: 9/13/06
Fools find no pleasure in understanding, but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV |
7/19/12 4:20:11 PM#22
Originally posted by Reizla ER...that 2nd link you posted, has the following statements clearly in it (despite the title/contradictory statements) "TERA will have paid services, which could include character transfer, name change and gender change. We do not have a complete list of these services yet, but we will let you know as we confirm them - those services will likely be available inside the game. So these both point to what was actually delivered. I think they have a different defintion between what they consider to be a "cash shop" and what they term as a microtransaction payment model. Hence their comment about requiring major changes to support microtransactions, meaning changing the game mechanics to strongly encourage players to purchase from the cash shop via items of power or faster leveling. So in their mind, having an in game store does not equate to a microtransaction payment model, even though both use a shop to sell additional items to their customers. "What gamers want ... is new game play patterns different from what they've experienced before" - Axehilt |
|
7/19/12 7:34:47 PM#23
Originally posted by Praetalus Would it bother you if they added cash shop items to the game for those of us that dont want to pay more then we feel we should? if we bought the game and pay a monthly sub shouldent we get the right to access to everything in the game? |
|
|
7/19/12 7:37:35 PM#24
Originally posted by Kyleran i dont understand what the differance is? If im missing something please let me know but imo there is no differeance.
|
|
|
7/19/12 8:28:38 PM#25
If it's items that have no clear advantage other than cosmetic then I don't really see an issue. If it becomes that the items in the cash shop give an advantage over the sub alone then I'll join whatever picket line is going on, since I'm a newcomer to Tera. The way I figure it and know it to be the team that makes items for the cash shop won't be taken from the team that maintains the game, so therefore have no issue. It's up to other ppl what they want to spend their money on. I don't have to buy anything. It's a simple matter of choice. |
|
|
TheBigDRC
Advanced Member
Joined: 7/17/12
I popped too many blood vessels to give a damn anymore. |
7/19/12 8:50:27 PM#26
Hmm, so long as the cash shop only offers fluff goods and nothing more, I'm ok with it. At that point it'll either have limited or no effect on playing the game. You know what's fun about chaos? I do, but I won't tell. |
|
7/20/12 7:12:14 AM#27
Cash shop bothers some people even if it is cosmetics but if it really does bother the majority, let the money do the speaking. Unfortunately the ones who do complain are most likely the minority since I see a lot of people running around with the mounts and weapon skins.
|
|
|
7/20/12 10:39:43 AM#28
Originally posted by Arletta Well i like to have cosmetic items just as much as the next guy so i do see a problem with it. Has nothing to do with taking people off a team to make this or that and the other. It has to do with giving me the same opportunity to gain items being sold in the cahs shop in game.
Let those that want to [mod edit] get there cosmetic gear or mounts or w/e they want from the cash shops. But atleast give people the choice to find those items in game without the cash shop option. |
|
|
7/20/12 10:43:40 AM#29
I'm going to go out on a limb and say because it's not a human... The scary part is one day the world will be run by adults who were never spanked as kids and got trophies just for participating. |
|
|
7/20/12 10:56:11 AM#30
Originally posted by kantseemeOriginally posted by Arletta I'm going to quote a forum user. You might recognize him: "The level of entitlement on these forums is staggering." |
|
|
7/20/12 11:03:15 AM#31
The scary part is one day the world will be run by adults who were never spanked as kids and got trophies just for participating. |
|
|
7/20/12 11:22:13 AM#32
Originally posted by GrumpyCharr Answered in the quote. - If games want to generate revenue, then just offer a cash shop, or stick w/ the subscription model. Again, there is absolutely NO reason to have both. If they can get people to just throw money at them, then good for them. But if you honestly think that you are either paying for an artist's lunch money, or keeping the game afloat by buying mini-pets, you're not. You're filling their coffers. I'm all for supporting studios you respect, but at least understand the business model before you do. Again, this isn't something they are doing out of necessity. They can generate enough revenue off of either business model (sub OR cash shop). By choosing to have both they are double dipping their profits. There's no way around that unless you are a big fan of dimentia. If someone else wants to throw their money at the monitor for every shiny new game, then that's their right. However, I don't think it's morally justified on any level, and is not a business practice I would love to see repeatedly. Sadly, not only is it already being repeated, but a shocking number of people on this forums seemed to transition awfully quick from 'all cash shops are evil! and we will not support them!' to 'I love paying a subscription AND having a cash shop! This is the greatest thing ever!'. Plato would be proud. |
|
|
7/20/12 11:23:59 AM#33
Originally posted by strangepower Truth^ People get rich by being good at making money, investing, and hanging on to the money they already have. There will always be the paris hilton's of the world, but those aren't the people who getting wealthy, those are the ones who are draining someone else's hard work. |
|
|
7/20/12 12:41:55 PM#34
Originally posted by Reas43 Im flattered that you chose to use a quote on mine to try and belittle the situation. The fact remaines that I spent money to own the game. Then i spent money to play the game.
I shouldent have to yet again spend more money to get items from the game i spent money to get and now spent money to play. Who cares if there fluff items or not. thats not the point.
The point is we should be givin access to ALL of these items IF were paying a monthly sub. So yes if i bought a game i should be entitled to the opportunity to gain these items without the use of a cash shop. |
|
|
7/20/12 12:48:30 PM#35
Can we all atleast agree that items sold in a cash shop should also be made available to those in game that do not wish to use said cash shop? |
|
|
7/20/12 1:02:46 PM#36
Originally posted by kantseeme
I was thinking the same thing. If they want to keep the CS and not make it look like a money grab just add in game versions. They could be account bound and a good in game currency sink. |
|
|
7/20/12 2:17:25 PM#37
I know what you were inferring... so if one works nine hours a day, plus commute, five days a week... get's home in the evening...takes care of RL obligations: THEN chooses to fire up the game and buy with their earned income cosmetic items instead of grinding them out until the wee hours of the morning before having to go to work again is a "lazy shit"? Help me understand this, how do you not equate time for money? It's not being "lazy shits" in game, its a case of not having the extended amount of free time to blow. So as you would have it hard working individuals would actually be penalized and you would undermine the additional revenue for the development house. The scary part is one day the world will be run by adults who were never spanked as kids and got trophies just for participating. |
|
|
7/20/12 2:28:14 PM#38
I am okay with cash shops in any game. I am responsible for my money. I can spend it how I want to. If I want to buy items then I can do so. I do not like to see lottery items, enchanting success items, or gear sets that give stat increases in those cash shops. Cosmetic items, mounts, even extra experience items do not bother me much provided the game is not a year long grind without the cash shop item, but a 30 day grind with the cash shop item. Many free to play games revolve around the sale of these items to make up for not having sub fees. I do not like seeing inventory and bank or warehouse items sold in cash shops if the game has a sub. That seems like an unfair cash grab in my opinion. |
|
|
7/20/12 3:18:09 PM#39
Originally posted by strangepower That makes no sence what so ever in the context of whats being talked about here. Time is money yes when your at work. not while your gaming. Unless your getting paid for gaming then good on ya.
And if your working 9 hours a day, plus communte, five days a week plus RL obligations, perhaps MMOs arent what you should be playing. Perhaps a nice Console RPG that can be turned off and restarted w/ you need. Or an CO-OP FPS like Halo or Black Ops. Get in, get some quick game play in then off to bed.
MMOs are time sicks of the worst kind yet you think you should be able to get everything in the allotted time frame your life dictates you have to game. And its one of many reasons of whats is killing the genre. COs are slowly changing MMOs into lobby co-op single player games and slapping an MMO tag on them.
[mod edit] Hard working individuals arent penalized for anything. They just dont have as much time to do things that someone that might not be working as hard as that individual does. Doesent mean that person cant have things. It means it will just take them longer to get. Will it bother you that someone got something ingame before you did?
These cash shops are just another way for them to squeeze even more money out of the consumer and its so common place now a days that we as consumers are starting to think its buissness as usual. Its a shame WE have allowed it to get this out of hand.
WE = Consumers
|
|
|
Kyleran
Bitter Vet™
Joined: 9/13/06
Fools find no pleasure in understanding, but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV |
7/20/12 3:27:16 PM#40
Originally posted by kantseeme In a micro transaction title the gameplay is actually designed to be punishing to those who don't partake of the advantages the cash shop offers (could be exp boosters, actual items of power, fast mounts whatever). While it's possible to skip buying these items, most sane players won't be be easily able to without greatly reducing their enjoyment of the game. Think of it sort of as extortion. Contrast that with a cash shop like Tera offers. It has cosmetic items only, and the entire gameplay is designed without a thought of creating mechanics that would encourage someone to buy something to improve the efficiency of their gameplay. If you never partake of the Tera cash shop you will not be disadvantaged in any way (in fact, you can even pay for your sub with in game gold) while in a title such as ROM or Alloids you won't have a chance (at least in PVP) if you aren't freely spending in the cash shop, because they are designed inherently to require it. If you still don't see the difference, then I suggest you try both titles and it should clear things up for you.
"What gamers want ... is new game play patterns different from what they've experienced before" - Axehilt |