Trending Games | WildStar | ArcheAge | Elder Scrolls Online | Guild Wars 2

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,645,875 Users Online:0
Games:687  Posts:6,085,206
Turbine, Inc. | Play Now
MMORPG | Genre:Fantasy | Status:Final  (rel 04/24/07)  | Pub:Midway Games
PVP:Yes | Distribution:Download,Retail | Retail Price:n/a | Pay Type:Hybrid | Monthly Fee:$14.99
System Req: PC Mac | ESRB:TOut of date info? Let us know!

Lord of the Rings Online Forum » General Discussion » Christopher Tolkien speaks out after 40 years...

11 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Last Search
218 posts found
  aspekx

Advanced Member

Joined: 12/24/05
Posts: 2148

 
OP  12/28/12 11:40:29 PM#1

in response to recent convo's that have been bouncing around lately concerning the legitimate interpretation of LotR and the Hobbit i offer this translated article, an interview with Christopher Tolkien:

 

http://www.worldcrunch.com/culture-society/my-father-039-s-quot-eviscerated-quot-work-son-of-hobbit-scribe-j.r.r.-tolkien-finally-speaks-out/hobbit-silmarillion-lord-of-rings/c3s10299/#.UN57kG-AA7V

 

specifically, in response to my critique concerning The Hobbit as a terrific action adventure movie, but not the actual tale of The Hobbit i offer this quote:

 

"Invited to meet Peter Jackson, the Tolkien family preferred not to. Why? "They eviscerated the book by making it an action movie for young people aged 15 to 25," Christopher says regretfully. "And it seems that The Hobbit will be the same kind of film."

"There are at least two kinds of games.
One could be called finite, the other infinite.
A finite game is played for the purpose of winning,
an infinite game for the purpose of continuing play."
Finite and Infinite Games, James Carse

  rounner

Advanced Member

Joined: 9/07/06
Posts: 501

12/28/12 11:45:36 PM#2
Brought to the massess radically boosted book sales, made heaps of money. Being precious to the point of offensive.
  aspekx

Advanced Member

Joined: 12/24/05
Posts: 2148

 
OP  12/28/12 11:48:33 PM#3

did you read the article? if you had you would have understood the limitations of what you are suggesting.

[mod edit] it's an easy out in the world to just blast everything and everyone rather than to try to understand them.

"There are at least two kinds of games.
One could be called finite, the other infinite.
A finite game is played for the purpose of winning,
an infinite game for the purpose of continuing play."
Finite and Infinite Games, James Carse

  Banquetto

Apprentice Member

Joined: 10/06/09
Posts: 1020

12/29/12 12:05:23 AM#4

Well J.R.R. Tolkien's great-grandson Royd Tolkien loved the movies.

"I was beyond excited just to go on set and see behind the scenes. To watch how such a colossal film is so intricately crafted and pieced together was inspirational and planted a seed in me that has since grown into a love of film production and a desire to reach the heights scaled by Peter Jackson. It was one of the best experiences I've ever had."

http://www.smh.com.au/travel/why-i-love-new-zealand-tolkiens-great-grandson-20121217-2bisg.html

Is his opinion less valid than Christopher Tolkien's?

  cpthowdy

Novice Member

Joined: 5/12/07
Posts: 115

12/29/12 12:05:45 AM#5
i read all that crap of an article, have to get near the end to find out why all the bitterness. they own the works but really have no say in how they are presented and they dont make much money from the films and merchandise. they fear the actual works are being overshadowed by the liberal interpretations taken by the movies. something any author has to worry about when converting their work to another medium. JRR was shortsighted when he sold the rights to his works. they were hugely popular during his time, did he think that would lessen over the years? i think that if the family didnt have to sue to get some money from the films then they wouldnt be as negative today. in the end it all comes down to money, whats new?
  grafh

Advanced Member

Joined: 12/06/05
Posts: 306

12/29/12 12:07:26 AM#6

Money isnt everything to some people. I think i would not support any director who would change my story from what it was, to an action flick.

The Hobbit is my favorite book, and i dont want to see the movie cause i know it will dissapoint me if i compare it to the book.

Then again thats just my personal opinion. 

  killion81

Elite Member

Joined: 8/31/06
Posts: 867

12/29/12 12:08:55 AM#7

I'm sure he's just outraged at the destruction of his father's intellectual property.  He could care less about the mountains of money handed to him without ever having to do anything of his own.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Tolkien

In 2008 Christopher Tolkien commenced legal proceedings against New Line Cinema, which he claimed owed his family £80 million in unpaid royalties.[7] In September 2009, he and New Line reached an undisclosed settlement, and he has withdrawn his legal objection to the The Hobbit films.[8]

  Worstluck

Novice Member

Joined: 1/29/11
Posts: 1280

No man controls my destiny... especially not one who attacks downwind and stinks of garlic.

12/29/12 12:12:21 AM#8
Originally posted by chelan

did you read the article? if you had you would have understood the limitations of what you are suggesting.

[mod edit] it's an easy out in the world to just blast everything and everyone rather than to try to understand them.

 

The person you have responded to I believe is from Aus, not sure why you took a jab at America.

 

I think it's widely accepted, well at least to anyone who has the read the books, that the movies are not representative of the books themselves.  I do not blame the Tolkiens for feeling that way.  It's pretty rare that an author is happy with what Hollywood does to their work.  I even read an interview with the author of the novels that inspired the Witcher games, and he really didn't care for the games much, even though the games imo are pretty complimemtary to the books.

  travamars

Apprentice Member

Joined: 11/14/10
Posts: 451

12/29/12 12:28:17 AM#9

Hollywood always has to screw up a good story when they make a movie.

Just look what they did to "I am legend"

  Laughing-man

Hard Core Member

Joined: 4/23/09
Posts: 3185

I thought what I'd do is I'd pretend I was one of those Deaf-mutes.

12/29/12 12:37:35 AM#10
Originally posted by killion81

I'm sure he's just outraged at the destruction of his father's intellectual property.  He could care less about the mountains of money handed to him without ever having to do anything of his own.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Tolkien

In 2008 Christopher Tolkien commenced legal proceedings against New Line Cinema, which he claimed owed his family £80 million in unpaid royalties.[7] In September 2009, he and New Line reached an undisclosed settlement, and he has withdrawn his legal objection to the The Hobbit films.[8]

Yeah, if he was so upset he should have denied them the rights, purchased back the rights, or tied them up in court the rest of his life.

Instead he comes off as a rich spoiled brat who wants his cake and to eat it too.

Poor baby.

  Valentina

Advanced Member

Joined: 5/28/06
Posts: 1651

12/29/12 12:38:31 AM#11
Errmm...i think they stayed pretty true to the story, and none of them are action movies rofl, there's actually relatively little "action" in them. Sounds like an oldn boring, pretentious person to me. Just look at the words used...Haha...
  Rhoklaw

Elite Member

Joined: 1/12/04
Posts: 2906

$500 Backer to 2014's Top New MMO... The Repopulation!

12/29/12 12:51:07 AM#12
Far as I'm concerned, Peter Jackson is a brilliant director and while his movies may be more action oriented then the books portrayed, you can't tell me the movies didn't do the books justice. The amount of detail Peter went to with environment, costumes and story flow is probably as good as your going to get. Christopher is a pompous brat and I hope he chokes on his wad of money.

  Panther2103

Elite Member

Joined: 1/09/08
Posts: 1961

12/29/12 1:47:05 AM#13
The movies had plenty of story involved in them, they had a majority of the action scenes of the books because of the fact that if they made the movie exactly how the book was page for page, it would have been 15 hours long for one book if even that short. So they take the parts of the books, explain the story in a faster manner, and have the major action scenes. I don't see the issue. It wasn't marketed as an action film. I think the hobbit had maybe 4 or 5 actual action scenes that lasted more than 30 seconds. They always have been very slow, and that turns quite a few people I know off of the films. The environments in the films, and the way all of the characters look and act are exactly how I expected them to be in movie form. 
  Corehaven

Apprentice Member

Joined: 7/27/11
Posts: 1574

I swear by my pretty floral bonnet, I will end you.

12/29/12 1:54:22 AM#14

He didn't write the books and he didn't create jack diddly squat. 

 

Personally I don't particularly like the Hobbit only because its full of artificial filler in order to split it into three movies.  But I thought the Lord of the Rings was at least fairly accurate to the books.  How the hell else were they supposed to be filmed?  I'm not really sure what the guy was expecting. 

 

How would he have improved them?  He probably wouldn't have. 

 

Yea he's a lucky guy for being a Tolkien fortune heir.  We should all be so lucky.  However if I was, I probably wouldn't run my mouth and gripe about movies that most would say, honored the Lord of the Ring books fairly well if nothing else. 

  Thillian

Hard Core Member

Joined: 5/31/06
Posts: 3219

12/29/12 1:57:34 AM#15
I always though of the Jackson's films to be action flicks with some predictible epic/romantic scenes now and then. Expensive looking but cheap intellectually. In other words, solid 2 hours of mindless "fun" and nothing more. Lord of the Rings was exactly like that. 

REALITY CHECK

  Coman

Elite Member

Joined: 8/29/04
Posts: 1888

12/29/12 2:04:18 AM#16
Originally posted by Laughing-man
Yeah, if he was so upset he should have denied them the rights, purchased back the rights, or tied them up in court the rest of his life.

Instead he comes off as a rich spoiled brat who wants his cake and to eat it too.

Poor baby.

and to top that off there father sold the rights. It was not stolen or simply taken from him. He sold it for a big sum of money (between the 1 million and 2,5 million dollars worth now depending how you calculate it) and they made a lot of money out of it not only from extra book sales, but also from the movies. His father seemed like a smart and wise man and I am sure he was fully aware of what he signed when he signed the contract. 

  Po_gg

Elite Member

Joined: 5/12/10
Posts: 1767

12/29/12 2:56:16 AM#17

I'm with OP... I like Jackson's work since Braindead and Feebles, the LotR movies are great (I have all of them :) ) but they're not even close to the books in quality.

C.T.'s sadness is not about money, it's about the devaluation of his father's work. Probably OP should've inserted this from the end of the interview as well:

"Tolkien has become a monster, devoured by his own popularity and absorbed into the absurdity of our time," Christopher Tolkien observes sadly. "The chasm between the beauty and seriousness of the work, and what it has become, has overwhelmed me. The commercialization has reduced the aesthetic and philosophical impact of the creation to nothing. There is only one solution for me: to turn my head away."

And to the poster who wrote "He didn't write the books and he didn't create jack diddly squat." -  lol.  (inbetween a <sarcasm></sarcasm> tag, just to make sure)

  tawess

Elite Member

Joined: 3/24/05
Posts: 1718

WoW
WAR
Coh/v
SWG
Eve
Project entropia

12/29/12 3:32:15 AM#18

Well the Hobbit is a childrens book, ofc they would have to op the ante a bit. And the general public seems to like it so i guess they ddi the right choice from a financial point of view.

 

Personally i feel it is a bit disjointed and it would have been much better of as two movies instead of three as it would have had less padding

 

And seriously... Radagast the brown... That was the best they could come up with... .. . *shakes head*

 

But i also feel that they will be better once you have all three movies out and can see them fairly back to back.

This have been a good conversation

  aspekx

Advanced Member

Joined: 12/24/05
Posts: 2148

 
OP  12/29/12 1:10:54 PM#19
Originally posted by Po_gg

I'm with OP... I like Jackson's work since Braindead and Feebles, the LotR movies are great (I have all of them :) ) but they're not even close to the books in quality.

C.T.'s sadness is not about money, it's about the devaluation of his father's work. Probably OP should've inserted this from the end of the interview as well:

"Tolkien has become a monster, devoured by his own popularity and absorbed into the absurdity of our time," Christopher Tolkien observes sadly. "The chasm between the beauty and seriousness of the work, and what it has become, has overwhelmed me. The commercialization has reduced the aesthetic and philosophical impact of the creation to nothing. There is only one solution for me: to turn my head away."

And to the poster who wrote "He didn't write the books and he didn't create jack diddly squat." -  lol.  (inbetween a tag, just to make sure)

thanks. good point about the quote to use.

"There are at least two kinds of games.
One could be called finite, the other infinite.
A finite game is played for the purpose of winning,
an infinite game for the purpose of continuing play."
Finite and Infinite Games, James Carse

  ShakyMo

Apprentice Member

Joined: 11/21/11
Posts: 7246

12/29/12 1:28:27 PM#20
I prefer the films to the books to be honest, less twee, with more well rounded female characters.
11 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Last Search