Trending Games | WildStar | ArcheAge | Landmark | Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,851,100 Users Online:0
Games:732  Posts:6,224,598
Rift (Rift)
Trion Worlds | Official Site
MMORPG | Genre:Fantasy | Status:Final  (rel 03/01/11)  | Pub:Trion Worlds
PVP:Yes | Distribution:Download | Retail Price:Free | Pay Type:Free | Monthly Fee:Free
System Req: PC | Out of date info? Let us know!

General Discussion Forum » The Pub at MMORPG.COM » Developing MMO's : The System

3 Pages « 1 2 3 » Search
45 posts found
  juggernautJesus

Apprentice Member

Joined: 4/01/12
Posts: 13

 
OP  2/08/13 1:44:40 PM#21
Originally posted by BadSpock
Originally posted by Icewhite
Originally posted by Blasphim

lol as always Ice, your optimism astounds :)

It's the truth, I don't care if Spock thinks it can't work. :shrug:

But the OP is simply wrong.

Developers don't play it safe and follow trends because they are lazy or stupid or lack creativity.

It's because if they are making games that cost 10's of millions of dollars to make, they HAVE to play the numbers game or the game won't get made in the first place.

I figured this was all obvious?

Hahaha, dear god.  How many times are you going to mis-quote my original post?  It doesn't say the developers are lazy, stupid, or lack creativity.  It just lays out a system that they MUST (keyword, MUST, look at the word there it is) follow in order to have low risk in being successful and pull in money.  For fucks sake stop saying things I didn't say, please. It's not hard to read. Read.

  BadSpock

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/21/04
Posts: 7699

Logic be damned!

2/08/13 1:46:19 PM#22
Originally posted by juggernautJesus

Hahaha, dear god.  How many times are you going to mis-quote my original post?  It doesn't say the developers are lazy, stupid, or lack creativity.  It just lays out a system that they must follow in order to have low risk in being successful and pull in money.  For fucks sake stop saying things I didn't say, please. It's not hard to read. Read.

You may not have said the exact words, but the point is all the same.

"Modern day games suck, nothing will ever be as good as UO/DAOC again, nothing is Hardcore... blah blah."

Same ole' thing I've read 10090359382 times on this site.

"gamers will defend it and developers can use it as an excuse when the players realize it's trash."

"The more games they can churn out, the more money they make and the faster they can throw some of those developers onto a new project. Remember that hype, fake journalists, false advertisements, and false promises build up an extraordinary fan base and boost the initial sales tremendously. And INCREDIBLY, people will still defend those developers when their next game comes out, even if they lied about the previous one. This piece I really don't understand fully, I guess it all comes down to people being rather ignorant in general. Then, once the gamers realize how little the game offers, revenue slowly decreases as players leave.  But don't worry!  They're working on the next one!"

"Sacrifice almost all creativity and uniqueness, yet add JUST enough to keep interest, in order to appeal to the generic masses (aka, the WoW crowd). Sadly, this has been the death of MMOs and some of my favorite genres. It's very simple to understand. If you don't appeal to the masses, then you won't make as much money. Ever wonder why we will never get another incredible Ultima Online or Dark Age of Camelot? Because it's too "hardcore". Because it doesn't resemble WoW. Because it won't attract the kids (which are the majority of gamers I believe, no offense to them). There's not enough demand for games like that. The trick is to add just enough of something slightly different or unique to use as your selling/hype point"

"his formula doesn't necessarily mean all the games are utter trash to EVERYONE, as people have different standards.  But I'm sorry, I come from an age where every MMO was extremely unique and creative, and my standards are far too high for the junk that is constantly released today."

Did you read the OP?

Now Playing:
Looking Towards: Destiny

  Icewhite

Made History

Joined: 7/11/11
Posts: 6495

Pink, it's like red but not quite.

2/08/13 1:47:07 PM#23
Originally posted by BadSpock

Developers don't play it safe and follow trends because they are lazy or stupid or lack creativity.

It's because if they are making games that cost 10's of millions of dollars to make, they HAVE to play the numbers game or the game won't get made in the first place.

Well, while western developers continue to miss the boat, some pretty big games are rolling out of the east.

I do hope their business advisors don't keep insisting on huge upfront investments that crash and burn so quickly--or shortly there won't BE big publishers any more.

Perhaps they're copying precisely the wrong business model...

Self-pity imprisons us in the walls of our own self-absorption. The whole world shrinks down to the size of our problem, and the more we dwell on it, the smaller we are and the larger the problem seems to grow.

  BadSpock

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/21/04
Posts: 7699

Logic be damned!

2/08/13 1:49:18 PM#24
Originally posted by Icewhite
Originally posted by BadSpock

Developers don't play it safe and follow trends because they are lazy or stupid or lack creativity.

It's because if they are making games that cost 10's of millions of dollars to make, they HAVE to play the numbers game or the game won't get made in the first place.

Well, while western developers continue to miss the boat, some pretty big games are rolling out of the east.

I do hope their business advisors don't keep insisting on huge upfront investments that crash and burn so quickly--or shortly there won't BE big publishers any more.

This is VERY true.

Western devs have dropped the ball enough times, the dream of a "miracle" game hitting our shores from the East is inching ever closer to perhaps coming true.

Kickstarter and all the indie up-starts using it is a great unknown at this point. Have any of them released or are more than web pages yet?

Now Playing:
Looking Towards: Destiny

  Aeonblades

Hard Core Member

Joined: 10/12/12
Posts: 2123

2/08/13 1:50:53 PM#25
Originally posted by BadSpock
Originally posted by Icewhite
Originally posted by BadSpock

Developers don't play it safe and follow trends because they are lazy or stupid or lack creativity.

It's because if they are making games that cost 10's of millions of dollars to make, they HAVE to play the numbers game or the game won't get made in the first place.

Well, while western developers continue to miss the boat, some pretty big games are rolling out of the east.

I do hope their business advisors don't keep insisting on huge upfront investments that crash and burn so quickly--or shortly there won't BE big publishers any more.

This is VERY true.

Western devs have dropped the ball enough times, the dream of a "miracle" game hitting our shores from the East is inching ever closer to perhaps coming true.

Kickstarter and all the indie up-starts using it is a great unknown at this point. Have any of them released or are more than web pages yet?

I'll believe that when the East releases a game worth playing. The last one was what, original FFXI? Can that be considered East? Lineage 2 was a big success....In asia. Is there a single game from asia that has done good in the west? Curiousity has the best of me.

Currently Playing: ESO and FFXIV
Have played: You name it
If you mention rose tinted glasses, you better be referring to Mitch Hedberg.

  BitterClinger

Advanced Member

Joined: 11/19/12
Posts: 208

2014 Watch List: World of Warships, ArcheAge

2/08/13 1:51:21 PM#26
Originally posted by juggernautJesus
snip...
1) The focus is to get an extremely large amount of money at release (or actually prior to release) and then move on. Any money made afterwards (cash shops, etc) is chump change compared to what they make in initial sales. This applies to the other pieces of the formula. Do you ever wonder why EVERY MMO offers a pre-order (which is ALWAYS full price for the game, making it NOT a pre-order, but a purchase) in order to give access to "closed beta"? Come on...it's so obvious. They now are charging FULL price in order to play the game "prior to release". This is not beta people, this is release.  Beta has become release.  Anybody who cannot recognize this is...well...ya know. Why are they doing this?  Let's list a couple of reasons.

snip...

   b) It creates a feeling of "Oh I have to be the first in the game!  I have to play it before anyone else or I'll be behind!" This increases sales. Nothing more to say here.
 

 

I'm not going to try and respond to all of this, but I'll start by rejecting a premise in your post. Nothing the game developers or publishers do "creates a feeling" of wanting to be first.  MANY, many gamers really want to be first! It's the gamers driving the developers and publishers, not the other way around.

Also, trying to front-load revenues is not something under-handed. As others have pointed out, developing video games is expensive, especially if the developers rely on typical distribution channels (aka marketing, retailers, etc) rather than social media/word of mouth. Accountants look at charts, not games. If the "Revenue" line on the chart does not look like it will soon overtake the "Deferred Liabilities" (aka development, distribution) line on the chart, then they advise the mucky-mucks to kill the project and write it off. Basically, stop the bleeding.  That's why front-loading revenues is important.  It's not some kind of "trick" being played on gamers.

Top Games Played JAN 2014: World of Warplanes, Guild Wars 2, World of Tanks

  juggernautJesus

Apprentice Member

Joined: 4/01/12
Posts: 13

 
OP  2/08/13 1:51:43 PM#27
Originally posted by BadSpock
Originally posted by juggernautJesus

Hahaha, dear god.  How many times are you going to mis-quote my original post?  It doesn't say the developers are lazy, stupid, or lack creativity.  It just lays out a system that they must follow in order to have low risk in being successful and pull in money.  For fucks sake stop saying things I didn't say, please. It's not hard to read. Read.

You may not have said the exact words, but the point is all the same.

"Modern day games suck, nothing will ever be as good as UO/DAOC again, nothing is Hardcore... blah blah."

Same ole' thing I've read 10090359382 times on this site.

 

Wow.  So ignorant to think that's the point. I have a feeling you didn't even read it. You completely missed the point of the post obviously and focused directly on that sentence in my post, then slammed the reply button with your mouse and went on your tangent.

What the hell are you arguing then?  So you agree that the system is there, then what the hell are you arguing? Oh guess then you agree with me.  Christ...

 

Edit: Ya just read those quotes you reposted again. Did I say it was anyone's fault? No, I didn't.  Again you're confusing my anger with the system with me blaming people. You don't understand, just give up or stop trolling or whatever you're trying to accomplish.

  BadSpock

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/21/04
Posts: 7699

Logic be damned!

2/08/13 1:51:44 PM#28
Originally posted by Aeonblades
Originally posted by BadSpock
Originally posted by Icewhite

Well, while western developers continue to miss the boat, some pretty big games are rolling out of the east.

I do hope their business advisors don't keep insisting on huge upfront investments that crash and burn so quickly--or shortly there won't BE big publishers any more.

This is VERY true.

Western devs have dropped the ball enough times, the dream of a "miracle" game hitting our shores from the East is inching ever closer to perhaps coming true.

Kickstarter and all the indie up-starts using it is a great unknown at this point. Have any of them released or are more than web pages yet?

I'll believe that when the East releases a game worth playing. The last one was what, original FFXI? Can that be considered East? Lineage 2 was a big success....In asia. Is there a single game from asia that has done good in America? Curiousity has the best of me.

Time will tell :)

Just like with the Kickstarter trend.

Now Playing:
Looking Towards: Destiny

  Aeonblades

Hard Core Member

Joined: 10/12/12
Posts: 2123

2/08/13 1:53:32 PM#29
Good point I guess, the more we make our TORs the closer they get to having a shot at releasing the big one.

Currently Playing: ESO and FFXIV
Have played: You name it
If you mention rose tinted glasses, you better be referring to Mitch Hedberg.

  BadSpock

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/21/04
Posts: 7699

Logic be damned!

2/08/13 1:55:29 PM#30
Originally posted by juggernautJesus

Wow.  So ignorant to think that's the point. I have a feeling you didn't even read it. You completely missed the point of the post obviously and focused directly on that sentence in my post, then slammed the reply button with your mouse and went on your tangent.

What the hell are you arguing then?  So you agree that the system is there, then what the hell are you arguing? Oh guess then you agree with me.  Christ...

The point is - you are wrong.

You and others on this site might greatly dislike the "modern" MMORPG - and yearn for more classic games.

But the genre has more games, more players, and more success (both financially and critically) than EVER before.

Part of that is because they are spending a boat-load more to make these games so they attract more players, get better hype, and better reviews.

And sadly it has shifted expectations of the playerbase - expectations on quality, on polish, on the amount of content, the number of systems etc.

We want more of everything and we want it better and we want it faster.

The things we love(d) when they were small and niche and few knew of them always, always are looked at fondly when that thing we love(d) get hugely popular and successful - it's almost always "ruined' by its success.

I won't argue that.

But this whole thing is NOTHING more than another "back in my day" argument.

Now Playing:
Looking Towards: Destiny

  Icewhite

Made History

Joined: 7/11/11
Posts: 6495

Pink, it's like red but not quite.

2/08/13 1:59:14 PM#31
Originally posted by Aeonblades

I'll believe that when the East releases a game worth playing. The last one was what, original FFXI? Can that be considered East? Lineage 2 was a big success....In asia. Is there a single game from asia that has done good in the west? Curiousity has the best of me.

By your judgement?

Let's see, wakfu's already successful, as is AA (regardless of their Western performances). I'm hardly an expert on Eastern games, but we've been writing them off so reflexively for so long that we'll probably miss it when it happens.

Of course, unless it competes with YouKnow, a fair number of gamers will write it off, regardless of who made it. or what it does or doesn't do in the market.

GW2? Made a buck, wasn't cheap but didn't cost SWTOR money either, how do we call that one, Spock?

Self-pity imprisons us in the walls of our own self-absorption. The whole world shrinks down to the size of our problem, and the more we dwell on it, the smaller we are and the larger the problem seems to grow.

  juggernautJesus

Apprentice Member

Joined: 4/01/12
Posts: 13

 
OP  2/08/13 2:01:19 PM#32
Originally posted by BadSpock
Originally posted by juggernautJesus

Wow.  So ignorant to think that's the point. I have a feeling you didn't even read it. You completely missed the point of the post obviously and focused directly on that sentence in my post, then slammed the reply button with your mouse and went on your tangent.

What the hell are you arguing then?  So you agree that the system is there, then what the hell are you arguing? Oh guess then you agree with me.  Christ...

The point is - you are wrong.

You and others on this site might greatly dislike the "modern" MMORPG - and yearn for more classic games.

But the genre has more games, more players, and more success (both financially and critically) than EVER before.

Part of that is because they are spending a boat-load more to make these games so they attract more players, get better hype, and better reviews.

And sadly it has shifted expectations of the playerbase - expectations on quality, on polish, on the amount of content, the number of systems etc.

We want more of everything and we want it better and we want it faster.

The things we love(d) when they were small and niche and few knew of them always, always are looked at fondly when that thing we love(d) get hugely popular and successful - it's almost always "ruined' by its success.

I won't argue that.

But this whole thing is NOTHING more than another "back in my day" argument.

/facepalm

I didn't say the genre is financially worse and less successful now. Yes, I agree and didn't say otherwise, it's better. The only arguments you can make on my post is either that the system doesn't exist, or that's not the way it works. And so far you've only said "Yes the system is there, and some of that is the way it works, but THIS is why they have to do it."  Which I agreed with to an extent...

I wasn't arguing anything, except that the system is there and how I thought it worked. It's not a "back in my day" argument.

Allllright, I'm done here. People just look for arguments. Cheers. :/

  Icewhite

Made History

Joined: 7/11/11
Posts: 6495

Pink, it's like red but not quite.

2/08/13 2:04:24 PM#33
Originally posted by juggernautJesus

Allllright, I'm done here. People just look for arguments. Cheers. :/

Yep. Without them, forums don't move very quickly.

Self-pity imprisons us in the walls of our own self-absorption. The whole world shrinks down to the size of our problem, and the more we dwell on it, the smaller we are and the larger the problem seems to grow.

  BadSpock

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/21/04
Posts: 7699

Logic be damned!

2/08/13 2:06:16 PM#34
Originally posted by Icewhite

GW2? Made a buck, wasn't cheap but didn't cost SWTOR money either, how do we call that one, Spock?

Well it was made by a Western developement studio that just so happens to be owned by a Easter publisher.

And if they've sold 3 million copies at say 50$ a pop (random number average for digital vs. box sales) that's 150 million before taking any cash shop sales into account.

Even if the game cost 100 million to make, that's a pretty penny.

Major financial success. Critical success only (I feel) is reflected on a wierd combination of critics reviews, general internet love/hate, popularity of 3rd party sites (fan sites) and social media etc. etc.

Game gets a lot of hate here on MMORPG and on other sandbox-heavy "veteran" hang-outs like Massively, but in general it's a well liked game.

Anet was stupid for trying/saying that they were aiming for WoW-like numbers.

That games is a fluke - outlier - lightning striking twice in the same spot etc.

Now Playing:
Looking Towards: Destiny

  BadSpock

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/21/04
Posts: 7699

Logic be damned!

2/08/13 2:08:10 PM#35
Originally posted by juggernautJesus

/facepalm

I didn't say the genre is financially worse and less successful now. Yes, I agree and didn't say otherwise, it's better. The only arguments you can make on my post is either that the system doesn't exist, or that's not the way it works. And so far you've only said "Yes the system is there, and some of that is the way it works, but THIS is why they have to do it."  Which I agreed with to an extent...

I wasn't arguing anything, except that the system is there and how I thought it worked. It's not a "back in my day" argument.

Allllright, I'm done here. People just look for arguments. Cheers. :/

Go back and re-read the bits I re-posted as quotes from your OP in one of my previous posts in this thread.

You said a LOT about the quality of the games AND the gamers who play them AND the developers who made them.

Don't try and act all innocent.

Own up to what you said and defend it or don't say it.

Now Playing:
Looking Towards: Destiny

  botrytis

Elite Member

Joined: 1/04/05
Posts: 2516

2/08/13 2:08:24 PM#36

JJ,

You are missing BS's point. AAA cost money - loads of money. If you think all those kickstart games will be made and published just with those funds, you are kidding yourself - they are used to show a possible model and then the REAL MONEY gets courted. First and foremost, most game developers are in themselves avid gamers or they wouldn't be in this racket. Second, the companies have to make money on their investments, example is the movie 'Ishtar'. Ever see it? At the time it was one of the highest cost to produce movies and was the biggest flop ever - I mean it had Dustin Hoffman and Warren Beatty. A second wasn't produced and I think the original print was burned (I JEST HERE but it was that bad).

 

This is one of the issues here. Companies want to continue to make games, then they need to make money. The investment pool is not a bottomless pit (unless you think you are making Duke Nukem Forever that is - what a flop that game was). You have to show ROI or you don't get more money for the next game.

 

The attitude you are showing is not one of reality but of ENTITLEMENT. Games like anything else are big business. Do I hope for a small upstart to come through and show all the big guys, SURE I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT. The reality is, not a fat chance right now, with economies around the world so on the verge of collapse. If it was the 1990's boom - I think we would see one or two but not now.

"In 50 years, when I talk to my grandchildren about these days, I'll make sure to mention what an accomplished MMO player I was. They are going to be so proud ..."
by Naqaj - 7/17/2013 MMORPG.com forum

  Darkcrystal

Advanced Member

Joined: 5/06/10
Posts: 763

2/08/13 2:11:30 PM#37
Originally posted by juggernautJesus
Originally posted by BadSpock

How about we talk reality for a minute -

Creating a AAA MMO will cost you probably 50-100 million dollars and 5+ years.

If you sell your game for 60$, you have to sell ~830K copies to make back your 50 million, or 1.6 million copies to make back your 100 million.

And that assumes you get 100% of that 60$ - as in they are online / digital 1st-party only sales.

We all know that doesn't happen.

Let's say because of licensing costs (like you are using a well-known IP to generate interest in your game) and then costs to distributers (like brick+motor stores) you are bring in 60% of that 60$ or 36$.

So in order to make back your 50-100 million dollar investment - you now have to sell ~1.4 million for 50m or ~2.8 million for 100m.

But let's say you sell a pretty good portion yourself online (digital) and you maybe have to sell 1 million to 2 million copies to recoup your investment.

The more digital sales you do, the more you have to have a good infrastructure behind your game (download servers) or you have to pay someone else to host the downloads.

Not to mention processing all of the user informations (credit cards) and storing it, something you already have to do for account information and character data on your servers.

So unless you want to raise your production costs (and thus raise the number of copies you have to sell) then you have to spend less on the actual development of the game.

Which means things like in-house custom tools and engines instead of leasing/buying proven 3rd party tools and engines.

Which maybe a AAA developer can do because they have the talent, but talent costs money to recruit and retain so the cost mights balance out in the end?

So to save money, you cut people (you hire less) which means less content and higher workloads per developer which will probably equate to lower quality and more "shortcuts."

I could go ON and ON and ON.

Point is -

If you are going to spend a LOT of money to make a game, you have to try and get some assurance that you will be able to recoup that investment and make a profit or you are never going to get the money to make the game in the first place.

Kickstarter may be great for 1-2 million dollar budgets and assisting in finance, but you are NEVER going to fully finance a 50-100 million dollar AAA title without investors.

And how do you get assurance people are going to buy your game?

You go with known quantities. Known IPs, known mechanics, known systems.

You take as much risk and chance as you can AFFORD to take.

And you try and be as creative as hell in the application and interpretation of those standards and hope/pray that players don't fear your changes too much.

And here is another fact people on this site tend to overlook - developers are human beings. They are not Gods, they make mistakes, sometimes they can't figure out some ingenius way to make something work so they have to fake it / do something "good enough." They also have lives outside of work, families, require time to sleep and be away from their desks...

Welcome to reality.


Games aren't made in a vacuum. They are made by real people working real jobs and require real money and real infrastructure and services etc. etc.

Every single thing you said in this post ALL assumes that I am bashing the publishers for using this system. Also, you are assuming that I am bashing the developers and journalists.  Read my post again, and rethink your response.  I do not blame anybody, and already understand everything you said in this response. Of course they all do what they must to survive. They are required to play the system. I understand that this system is almost essential to the survival of "AAA" titles.  But as Icewhite said, and it's a good point, many people are happy with more creative and modest titles that don't require an enormous company's wealth.

Please be careful before you come back with a heated response. I am not blaming anybody for the system. Perhaps it was my "I don't like these games anymore" attitude that brought you to thinking I'm blaming somebody.

So thank you for the information, as it's valuable for people to understand that also. But calm down, take a breather, and try to be a little more respectable before going on a tangent.  Thanks.

To OP, you post comes off as blaming DEVS, etc,  because being a DEV I work in the field, We do NOT have much or any say these are facts!!!

 

I do get tired of seeing gamers blaming us, I was a gamer and still i'm, but I went to school and went for my degree got a job etc, and see alot of things you people as gamers don't see.. DEVS aren't at fault period..  I have tolld my boss many times not to release something I was NOT done, and they say make it work we need it by this date no matter what period, and its released even if you know its NOT.

DEVS go on there own alot now a days, I have, because of crap like this, but will I make MMo's NO, why should I?? Gamers attitudes today suck, I did want to, I wrote a few games for an MMo, but after  being in the field, no way, the attitudes from gamers suck, I can make smaller scales games that I like and get better feed back, and more respect from these gamers than MMo players.

Its sad that MMo players think we owe them something, we do not owe you people anything, we make games that we enjoy or would enjoy, and I have even made thread blogs, if I gave a gamer 40 million dollars and said I will get a team and make you a game that you would enjoy, I bet you would still find something to complain and whine about. You know why?? Because gamers today want everything there way, and for nothing.

Most gamers today think making a game is so easy, well if it was everyone would  be doing it.. 

I become a DEV because I loved games so much, but honestly I really see the DEVS side more and more...

  Icewhite

Made History

Joined: 7/11/11
Posts: 6495

Pink, it's like red but not quite.

2/08/13 2:14:18 PM#38
Originally posted by Darkcrystal

I become a DEV because I loved games so much, but honestly I really see the DEVS side more and more...

Normal. Normal to grow much more skeptical of "Banned For No Reason!" posts, too.

Turns out that working for EvilCo doesn't make you evil. Who'd a thunk it?

Self-pity imprisons us in the walls of our own self-absorption. The whole world shrinks down to the size of our problem, and the more we dwell on it, the smaller we are and the larger the problem seems to grow.

  Darkcrystal

Advanced Member

Joined: 5/06/10
Posts: 763

2/08/13 2:15:10 PM#39
Originally posted by botrytis

JJ,

You are missing BS's point. AAA cost money - loads of money. If you think all those kickstart games will be made and published just with those funds, you are kidding yourself - they are used to show a possible model and then the REAL MONEY gets courted. First and foremost, most game developers are in themselves avid gamers or they wouldn't be in this racket. Second, the companies have to make money on their investments, example is the movie 'Ishtar'. Ever see it? At the time it was one of the highest cost to produce movies and was the biggest flop ever - I mean it had Dustin Hoffman and Warren Beatty. A second wasn't produced and I think the original print was burned (I JEST HERE but it was that bad).

 

This is one of the issues here. Companies want to continue to make games, then they need to make money. The investment pool is not a bottomless pit (unless you think you are making Duke Nukem Forever that is - what a flop that game was). You have to show ROI or you don't get more money for the next game.

 

The attitude you are showing is not one of reality but of ENTITLEMENT. Games like anything else are big business. Do I hope for a small upstart to come through and show all the big guys, SURE I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT. The reality is, not a fat chance right now, with economies around the world so on the verge of collapse. If it was the 1990's boom - I think we would see one or two but not now.

Ummm, your wrong my friend, games used to cost a ton,  You know why?? Over head costs etc where a ton, license costs for each program x what ever your team size is, well guess what time has changed, it does not cost as much, Kickstarter is enough, also you can make games today because people are not just learning say 3s modeling, or texturing, they are learning all aspects.

Schools are changing, they not only teach you Game Production, but the buisness aspects , marketing etc which are important, so to this poster , your wrong... I know because I work in the field, and nearly have my master, I work with this stuff 16 hrs a day.. So, your 100% incorrect.

 

But the reason your not seeing as many MMo's being made by non AAA titles because we can make smaller scale games faster and the community for smaller scales games is way better attitude wise.. I can get a Facebook game, Android games done in 3-6 months and make 50k,-100k off of it, each game, and alone... this is a year for each game, so if you have say 3 games there is 150k on the low side, thats some good money there. If I worked for a company which I do as well, you make maybe 50-80k a year if your good maybe less..    Now if I made a MMo, I wouldn't make that and it would take 3-4 years and I would need a team of atleast 10 -15 people, it can be done with less, but its tough. I would need to pay each person and get all of the license's for each program they need, 3ds max, Photoshop, all sorts of plugin's ..the list goes on... I would need to pay for seats for the Game engine, and a program to manage the team, like perforce.

I mean the list goes on, and I would be lucky to make that, and with the way the community today is with all the bad attitudes towards DEVS , why would we want to make you guys a good game???? SO this is the main reason from talking to other DEVS as well....

 

 

PS: The reason Blizzard, Bioware need all that money is because they have many people to pay , license's and overhead costs are super high...

  juggernautJesus

Apprentice Member

Joined: 4/01/12
Posts: 13

 
OP  2/08/13 2:21:15 PM#40
Originally posted by BadSpock
 

Go back and re-read the bits I re-posted as quotes from your OP in one of my previous posts in this thread.

You said a LOT about the quality of the games AND the gamers who play them AND the developers who made them.

Don't try and act all innocent.

Own up to what you said and defend it or don't say it.

Yup.

Quality of the games: What? I stated that I have different standards and said that they're not trash not everyone? So basically I said my opinion is that they are junk, but to others they might not be? Okay...

The gamers who play them: What? Is it that I labeled them as the "generic gamer mainstream crowd" and most of them are "kids" and stated "but no offense to the fact that they're kids"? How is that insulting? Is it that they defend the developers and continue to follow the system because, in a way, they're being tricked? How is that insulting?

The developers who made them: What? That they lie about content to boost sales? Did I condemn them for doing so? Did I say they shouldn't? I simply said it's how the system works.

On top of all of that, how does any of that ^ (even of it was true) make my point "wrong"?  It doesn't, you agreed with my point then created a fake argument out of things I didn't say. You missed the original point. Trust me, I've been well aware of how the gaming industry works these days and why everyone does what they do. I have friends in some of these companies and understand that it's a big system with nobody to blame.

Okay, that's all this time, cheers again. :)

3 Pages « 1 2 3 » Search