Trending Games | Elder Scrolls Online | Guild Wars 2 | WildStar | Rift

  Network:  Gamertube FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Funcom | Play Now
MMORPG | Genre:Real Life | Status:Final  (rel 07/03/12)  | Pub:Funcom
PVP:Yes | Distribution:Download,Retail | Retail Price:$30.00 | Pay Type:Hybrid | Monthly Fee:n/a
System Req: PC | Out of date info? Let us know!

The Secret World Forum » General Discussion » TSW might go f2p according to FC

14 posts found
  QSatu

Hard Core Member

Joined: 10/14/06
Posts: 1710

 
9/17/12 8:10:48 AM#1
  Opapanax

Hard Core Member

Joined: 10/29/11
Posts: 799

Most Morbid One

9/17/12 8:11:35 AM#2
You're on the ball but the article is already up here at MMORPG..


PM before you report at least or you could just block.

  QSatu

Hard Core Member

Joined: 10/14/06
Posts: 1710

 
9/17/12 8:13:59 AM#3
really? I didn't see it. Mods pls close this thread then.
  Opapanax

Hard Core Member

Joined: 10/29/11
Posts: 799

Most Morbid One

9/17/12 8:15:16 AM#4

http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/post/5303925#5303925

They probably went up at the same time.. I was surfing both sites and seems so..


PM before you report at least or you could just block.

  MeGaTronPower

Apprentice Member

Joined: 9/09/12
Posts: 83

9/17/12 8:41:17 AM#5
I sense a great disturbance in the force, as if thousands of lifetime subscribers cried out in rage.
  Agent_Joseph

Hard Core Member

Joined: 11/11/06
Posts: 398

9/17/12 9:59:39 AM#6

I am lifer & suporting game monthly with 10$ via FC points,i ll continue with  suport TSW ,   one of  best mmorpg's when  come F2P.

Nothing wrong with F2P for me,i ll get  full acces in game,and not yet spend any FC point,F2P is illusion it ll be P2W ,as usual happen

only EVE is real MMO...but I am impressive with TSW

  Chtuga

Novice Member

Joined: 8/04/09
Posts: 103

9/17/12 10:17:51 AM#7

As a lifesubscriber myself, I see no reason at all to be angry about it. 

Funcom will most likely do exactly the same as AoC and AO. Give some content for free, but keep the endgame for subscribers. So I will probably always get my moneys worth.

And since I really love this game, my most important focus is to be able to actually keep playing the game and having a healthy community here.

If Funcom finds that goind into some kind of F2P model is best for the game, then I still get to play my game and thats whats most important. For me anything that doesnt end with the game shutting down is good.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  kevjards

Elite Member

Joined: 9/27/10
Posts: 1364

9/17/12 10:23:49 AM#8

i,m a lifer and i dont mind at all if it goes f2p..i have nothing against a f2p community at all..it worked out quite well for lotro ..only thing i would say is make it a lot more f2p friendly .what i mean is look at lotro's has way to do it.

what i do like is the comment where he says it is now profitable because of restructuring(job losses).sad to see anyone lose a job.but in things like this its inevetable.

  Zarriya

Apprentice Member

Joined: 9/03/10
Posts: 153

9/17/12 10:24:04 AM#9

Shame on you OP for a misleading title.  Any game has the potential to go F2P these days  If you actually read the article they said that for now thy are a sub game,

"Ole Schreiner: After the recent re-structuring of our internal teams, The Secret World is now a profitable operation and we expect it to be so for the foreseeable future. That's also why we are committing to the ambitious post-launch update plan. Of course, operating in the MMO business means you have to stay adaptive and evaluate yourself, your community and your competition, so we can't rule out a change in direction somewhere down the line. But we're quite comfortable with where we are now and what we're providing our players."

 

  Yalexy

Elite Member

Joined: 12/17/10
Posts: 904

9/17/12 11:15:47 AM#10

As a lifer I'll still get anything for free basically once they move to the F2P-model.

TSW is really good when talking about dungeons and questing. The only problem as allways is the bugs Funcom doesn't fix fast enough.

  ShakyMo

Elite Member

Joined: 11/21/11
Posts: 6907

9/17/12 11:17:09 AM#11
I think with hindsight, they would have been better making it a coorpg instead of a mmo.

E.g. you pick a campaign - new englabd, Egypt or transylvania. You can invite upto 3 players into your campaign with you. They could have then pushed the horror atmosphere and tension more and had a cheaper to run game. You could have gone the dungeons from a lobby. They could also have done 2nd runs of the campaigns depending on users society, e.g. templars nuke kingsmouth, if you go join templar players 2nd run its a waste land. Lumies start weaponising the zombies but it goes wrong etc..
  ShakyMo

Elite Member

Joined: 11/21/11
Posts: 6907

9/17/12 11:19:16 AM#12
Would have also saved tsw inherited flak from swtor about story square peg in mmo round hole, although I think tsw mostly pulls it off, potential buyers preconceptions won't have thought that.
  AmbrosiaAmor

Advanced Member

Joined: 11/24/10
Posts: 442

9/17/12 11:41:03 AM#13

Well when it goes F2P I guess I could go back and tackle the PVE story aspect of the game. I might even do that for SWTOR as well. I want to finish my Bounty Hunter and Agent storylines.

  fallenlords

Hard Core Member

Joined: 5/16/10
Posts: 692

9/17/12 11:50:01 AM#14

The guy in charge must be an idiot to even mention F2P at this point in time.   He has now fundamentally said to people don't buy TSW.  If he had to mention F2P at all, he should have at least hinted in the same breath at some sort of mega deal for subscribers and lifetime subs.   

 

It's not a question of facing up to the realities of the situation, it's about shooting yourself in the foot.  He has now said this game is made to go F2P.  So now everybody will wait for it to go F2P.  Which begs the question why on earth Funcom didn't you just launch it F2P? Oh yeah ... greed.