| 107 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
7/05/09 11:20:57 PM#101
Originally posted by Holgranth
I for one don't really consider it an expansion unless it is adding a LARGE new Landmass new race/classes or other suitably big content updates. I'm sure there will be heated arguments about what exactly it is tomorrow IF it goes live. Big IF in my opinion.
It's just more marketing spin and BS from them. |
|
|
7/06/09 12:24:45 AM#102
Originally posted by Fariic
About 2 weeks ago, quite coincidentally, I reinstalled this game called Neverwinter Nights. I kid you not. I really did. Yes, I threw up a little when I read that you've taken a break from DFO to play with NwN. So, NwN was made by this studio called Bioware. Care to say again that you aren't impressed with big studio games? You're also wrong. More money often means better games, but doesn't always guarantee it. CAUSE THEY HAVE MORE MONEY. DFO is crap because it's crap. Av is a horrible company that produced a bad game. Give them more money and they would be a horrible company with more money to produce a bad game. Money has nothing to do with Av producing a bad game. A little or a lot, the game is the game, and it sucks. And it's not an expansion. It's a patch. ROFL! Funny you just happened to mention the three games I just recently dusted off and reinstalled :} BG1-2 And NWN lol. Got tired of FO2, the lost content mod is nice thought if you havnt tried it, it introduced content that didnt make the game release. |
|
|
7/06/09 6:21:54 AM#103
Originally posted by WSIMike
I'm glad the general populace isn't letting Tasos lipservice stand. Darkfall does not have an expansion.. it's a patch and a new server. Big deal.
|
|
|
7/06/09 6:29:01 AM#104
Originally posted by junzo316 I think because Tasos explained that the reason that there will be a charge for the NA client is because there is a different publisher, so licensing and such is added in. If there is no new publisher, then Tasos has lied yet again and this just becomes a money grab.
They probably in the hasty process of registering a phony bussiness to cover that up and pretend there is a different publisher.. but the registration process takes longer then expected and so they are forced to delay. Now that would be a good one. But frankly I would even be suprised one bit, as it would be totally in the deceiving style of Tasos and Co. Cheers |
|
|
7/06/09 8:07:06 AM#105
Originally posted by shukes33
|
|
|
7/06/09 9:57:44 AM#106
As of yet there is STILL no info on the main site regarding the upcoming "expansion". However there IS a increasingly large number of Locked threads demanding "Somthing!, Anything!" about it and rehashing what is already known. As other people have more or less said"Expansion" adding "All new content" and "Redefining the game" sounds a lot more exciting than "Largish patch to put in some (but not all) of the stuff we pretended to have up and running right up to launch." And while the big "E" word might draw a few people back and make others look into the game unless it truely DOSE redefine the game they won't be staying long. Especially if the NA launch is PLAGUED by the sort of buggyness that large patches are prone to having even WITH copious amounts of public testing. Blizzard I seem to remember pushed the massive PvE/PvP rebalancing patch 3.03 MONTHS before the release of Wrath of the Litch King. Public tested the snot out of Litch King and still had to apply a fair number of bandaids in short order to both the patch and the expansion. And they have A LOT more experience and rescources to bring to bear on fixing things. Good luck Aventurine Fools may walk where Angels dare not tread. Dem hibbies! Dey be wrong! |
|
|
7/06/09 1:57:19 PM#107
Originally posted by Holgranth
|
|