Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist
Games:397  Guilds:2,005
Members:1,145,098  Online:0
Guests:0  Posts:3,119,924
<a href="http://www.gameads.com/" target=_blank>Game Ads</a> banner requires iframes.
Cryptic Studios | http://www.startrekonline.com
RPG | Genre:Sci-Fi | Status:Beta Testing  (est.rel 02/02/10) | Publisher:Atari | Has PVP:Yes
Distribution:Retail | Retail Price:n/a | Pay Type:Subscription
Desktop Client | System Req: PC 

Star Trek Online Forum » General Discussion » The new movie DOES have an effect on the game

8 posts found
ktanner3

Master

Joined: 3/19/06
Posts: 839

 
6/14/09 10:35:15 PM#1

http://www.startrekonline.com/startrek_xi

 

2389 Romulus destroyed and alternate time line created

2399 Peace Treaty between Klingons and Federation dissolves

2409 STO begins

There's a nice graph in the link.

"Star Trek (the new movie) takes place in this alternate reality. This is explained in the film in a conversation between Uhura and Spock on the bridge of the Enterprise.

Star Trek Online is set in the "prime" Star Trek reality. This is the timeline of the five television series and the first 10 movies. It is the world in which the Gorn attacked Cestus III, Kirk fought Khan in the Mutara Nebula, Picard explored the galaxy, the Federation fought the Dominion War, Voyager was stranded in the Delta Quadrant and Captain Archer and the crew of the NX-01 showed us how it all began.

Events in the movie that happened in the prime timeline (the destruction of Romulus, and the disappearance of Spock and Nero) have affected STO. "
 

If you don't want to play the game, don't bore everyone by stating as much. Just don't play and move on because nobody cares to hear a soapbox.

law573

Apprentice Member

Joined: 5/09/06
Posts: 81

7/03/09 12:27:18 AM#2

I think they pulled little movie stunt so that they could do whatever they wanted with future movies. Basically it's like starting the 3rd season of a show with "the entire second season was a dream" garbage.

You are playing a video game. By definition that means you are not hardcore.

User Deleted
7/03/09 12:44:11 AM#3
Originally posted by law573

I think they pulled little movie stunt so that they could do whatever they wanted with future movies. Basically it's like starting the 3rd season of a show with "the entire second season was a dream" garbage.


 

Pretty much. As a sci-fi flick, it's okay. As a Star Trek "prologue" film, it sucks.

gamerman98

Novice Member

Joined: 10/13/04
Posts: 772

7/03/09 12:57:48 AM#4


Originally posted by Zorvan

Originally posted by law573

I think they pulled little movie stunt so that they could do whatever they wanted with future movies. Basically it's like starting the 3rd season of a show with "the entire second season was a dream" garbage.


 
Pretty much. As a sci-fi flick, it's okay. As a Star Trek "prologue" film, it sucks.



for me as a Star Trek film it just sucked period. It had no reason to even be considered in the ST universe, alternate reality or not. and NO it does not affect STO really.

SEANMCAD

Apprentice Member

Joined: 3/22/09
Posts: 531

7/03/09 1:05:10 AM#5

To OP in general
Ok I know I am going to get flamed for this so I will try to be careful as I can.
Although the Star Trek movie had good characterization (and I agree that it did) as well as good wholesome action fun and as far as Star Trek movies go is was one of the best,


The actual plot and dialogue could have been covered in about 15 minutes.
I think the conversation you are speaking of is about the only conversation that actually happened in that movie.

 

Stellos

Advanced Member

Joined: 9/15/06
Posts: 1260

If you're going to stick it out there, don't be afraid if you get it cut off.

7/03/09 9:45:44 AM#6

As someone who was not a true trekkie, I can say that I loved the movie and it definitely got me more interesed in STO.  I can't wait for the next movie and to see what happens with STO.

karat76

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/22/06
Posts: 376

Greatest threat to society is letting casualties of puberty reproduce.

7/03/09 9:52:56 AM#7

 Well the movie was better than any of the next generation movies but that isn't saying much.

ktanner3

Master

Joined: 3/19/06
Posts: 839

 
7/03/09 5:28:07 PM#8
Originally posted by gamerman98

 


Originally posted by Zorvan

Originally posted by law573

 

I think they pulled little movie stunt so that they could do whatever they wanted with future movies. Basically it's like starting the 3rd season of a show with "the entire second season was a dream" garbage.


 

 
Pretty much. As a sci-fi flick, it's okay. As a Star Trek "prologue" film, it sucks.


 


for me as a Star Trek film it just sucked period. It had no reason to even be considered in the ST universe, alternate reality or not. and NO it does not affect STO really.

 

Perhaps I read this part too literally..

"Events in the movie that happened in the prime timeline (the destruction of Romulus, and the disappearance of Spock and Nero) have affected STO. "

If you don't want to play the game, don't bore everyone by stating as much. Just don't play and move on because nobody cares to hear a soapbox.