| 34 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
2/04/11 9:59:50 AM#21
Originally posted by Gruug I was addressing that by "analogous to class-based toons in other MMOs", i.e. what you get for free with CO, in terms of build systems, isn't noticeably of less value than what you'd pay for in an average MMO (i.e. the ATs, which amount to a fairly normal "class-based" build system) - plus you get sufficient content to level along with that. I'd agree that the Freeform system is cool, and worth subscribing for too, but it's like something extra - the build system actually a bit more interesting than the average MMO in many ways. Whereas what you get for free is about comparable. (So the relevance of content: content is really what let CO down compared to other MMOs, because on other levels of comparison it comes out pretty well.) |
|
|
2/04/11 10:00:10 AM#22
Why should Cryptic give former subscribers freeform characters? Former subscribers are the people who left the game and quit paying for it. There's no mystery as to why they chose the Pay Options they did. It's the only thing they could possibly charge for. There's also no mystery about what's free and what's not. It's all on the website. Join the League For Gamers. |
|
|
Gruug
Hard Core Member
Joined: 4/03/08
The more you know, the more you know you don't know. |
2/04/11 10:23:42 AM#23
Originally posted by gurugeorge That is my point, I would not wish to play CO with characters that are simply "class based" cookie cutter characters. What makes CO unique is that amount of variation that can go into those free-form characters. FOR ME, it is the free-form that makes the game fun. Yes, you can play with cookie cutter characters....but it just is not as much fun. Therefore, TO ME, I would not play CO under the current so-called "f2p" model. Again, if I were to pay for a subscription or pay for the ability to make all my characters not free-form, I would do that....if I were able to go back CO. But then again, if I did that then my game would no longer be "f2p". Let's party like it is 1863! |
|
Vesavius
Old School
Joined: 3/08/04
Players come for the game, but they stay for the people- Most Devs have forgotten this. |
2/04/11 11:09:08 AM#24
Originally posted by gurugeorge |
|
2/04/11 11:23:12 AM#25
All the old players who stopped paying for the game? All the ones who quit? They'd be much better off getting good will from new players who aren't going to whine incessantly about how they have to pay for the freeform characters that everyone else would have to pay for. * addendum * How about you get your freeform characters, but only for 3 months. That's about what everyone else could have freeform characters if they spent as much as the box price. Then you'd be on-par with everyone else. Join the League For Gamers. |
|
|
Vannor
Hard Core Member
Joined: 8/11/03
Willfully turning |
2/04/11 11:28:03 AM#26
hopefully they will add an option to the store to allow a chosen character(s) to have an open open framework. From the feedback they are getting they would be stupid not to do it. |
|
2/04/11 11:29:17 AM#27
I started downloading Champions again until I found out that I would not be able to create my character the way I want. I immediately canceled the download and never looked back. Being able to create your hero the way you want was the best feature of that game. If they don't want to recognize that, and make that part of the free-to-play model, they won't get as many people joining.
Successful F2P games make their best features, and core gameplay accessible to free players. They add other things to encourage you to spend money on the game. At the very least, the best features are partially accessible by F2P players. Since they couldn't do that, Champions lost my dollar, again. |
|
|
Vesavius
Old School
Joined: 3/08/04
Players come for the game, but they stay for the people- Most Devs have forgotten this. |
2/04/11 11:30:30 AM#28
Originally posted by lizardbones Yes, all those that quit that I would assume that Crytpic want to come back. All the ones who quit? Yes, the ones that quit, after buying the box and funding the game for ongoing development, allowing it to survive even to this stage. They'd be much better off getting good will from new players. I very much doubt that Cryptic would say no to anyone who played the game before resubbing. In fact I am sure they would be glad to have our money, hence that it would have been in their interest to generate our good will.And please, don't try to insult other forum users, we are just just talking about games :) |
|
2/04/11 11:40:17 AM#29
Originally posted by vesavius Well yeah, you've paid already and you had x amount of fun for your money. Why should you get exactly the gameplay you had before - but now for nothing? I can understand the "courtesy" argument, and agree maybe one or two old toons for previous subscibers should have been allowed to keep Freeform. Either that or give pre-f2p-ex-subscribers an extra slot or two over and above whatever they had before (if their slots were filled up), so they can immediately jump in and make an AT to play with, without having to worry about what old toon to sacrifice or convert. But it would be really going too far to expect Cryptic to let you play nonchalantly as if you were still a subscriber, while not being a subscriber anymore. Anyway, for my not-money, the game is still decent fun even while playing an AT. It's not quite as good as Freeform and the in-depth beard-stroking one can get into with the cool build system, but it's still enjoyable for a blast now and then, and one might even say there are advantages to not having to think about build too much, and being more interdependent with other toons for teaming, so far as ATs are concerned. And playing the game again is making me think of subbing again for that Freeform goodness (I've already got a couple of concepts I want to try out :) ) so Cryptic have worked their evil ways with me again *shakes fist at Cryptic* |
|
Originally posted by tifalockhart Am playing on my brothers life time account and am enjoying it aswell :)
though , if you want to keep playing your character in this FTP game you ll have to pay
Renting characters is a very bad FTP concept i reckon
I feel they not thinking longterm , to get more players , they just want more subscribers.....and are not going to have succes like FTP bussines model Turbine has i d bet my brothters lifetime account on that :) |
|
|
2/08/11 12:00:27 PM#31
Of course Cryptic is not going to say no to new subscribers, but giving a player a freeform character at no charge doesn't generate a new subscriber. It just generates someone who got something for nothing. It's just another free account. Join the League For Gamers. |
|
|
2/10/11 10:43:41 AM#32
you know i kinda miss playing CO and i think i'll give it another try. DCUO is a great game CO is to. both games has something the other doesn't (figure it out) and i've thought long and hard whether i should be loyal to one or the other but it's kinda impossible right now for me . been playing only DCUO since beta and it's rich in content . character creation is limited at the beginning but afterwards you can add on. if CO can match or even outdo the content in DCUO , CO would be a killer i believe. |
|
|
2/12/11 2:30:01 AM#33
Originally posted by samuel130 i thought it is the other way round? |
|
|
2/12/11 6:55:55 AM#34
Originally posted by binary_0011 Putting PvP content aside and just speaking PvE, CO is the better game if you subscribe. So many more powers to choose from the get go in CO and thats what takes the cake. Both game quest systems are similar, just different mobs and zones. I got bored faster in DCUO allot faster then in CO. |
|