| 165 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Basically due to the large number of flaws in the game & gameplay any game you pick to compare it too will be better in more catagories. But again back to the main topic. While I have brought up points and examples of how the game is bad. All responses have been unable to bring up positive qualities of the game. So for what ever reason you are tring to defend the game, you have been unable to bring forward any vailid points to suport your view. So while I can understand why some people would want to defend a game, because I can bring up points on how the games is bad and will all the posts with no points of how the game is good in any way, it only supports the view that the game is The Worse Game Ever. If you want to try to support your view of the game you should go through the proper steps to do so. Sp list the pro's & con's of the game then go through the list and make an argument againist the game and then a argument for the game and then try to point out how your view is the right. But when you do this don't be surprised if you do this and find the side againist the game is stronger. The game is not good at all. |
|
|
The point is if you don't go through want is wrong with the game it can't be fixed. However if you go through the list of things that need improvement or need to be reworked. You will find all that is left is the graphics and graphics alone does not make a game. So the problems are so extentsive that the game would have to be completely reworked. So much so that it is unlikely that the dev will be able to do so.
|
|
|
Jodando
Novice Member
Joined: 1/13/06
"That looks great. But uh... who are the Chefs?" "...Great googly moogly..." |
6/30/06 3:36:19 PM#28
Well you still haven't answered my question. You say we don't provide any good qualities of the game, but you yourself haven't provided any good examples in other games. Which leads us to think that what you want may be improbable or impossible. Maybe you're just being to picky, eh? No? Give us an example. |
|
6/30/06 6:36:18 PM#29
many f2p games are cropping up globably to compete with p2p, and I say we need more of them! Being forced to pay for a game more than once is insulting, and that's what monthly fees are all about. I've gladly shelled out cash in games that have a cash item store instead of monthly fees. It allows you to show your appreciation of the game on your terms. Worst game Ever? I hardly think so. I've played much worse, and while this game is not original by far, it has some points over similar games. 1) Pet system: Nice variety, although could be larger... then again, it's still in BETA. Being able to buy a horse from NPC, or a captured pet adds a little flavor to the game. Class specific mounts are nice, although seeing an overseer/hunter on a reindeer reminds me of Santa Claus. Best of all, they don't vanish after a certain period of time, they die, or unmount it. 2) Parties: Ok, no big deal here, but I like the fact that item drops are shared. Plenty of gamers out there may complain about it, but a shared item system is better than racing to an item to see who gets it first. You can always trade items with each other later. It's call TEAMWORK and COOPERATION. 3) PvP/War zones: Don't have to worry about some high level noob waiting outside of town for any lowbies to come out and be slaughtered. You want to fight? Go to a warzone and get pwned like the noob you are. 'Nuff said. 4) Storyline: Nothing out of the ordinary, but it's not blah either. It has many elements from asian mythology, and it's written by established martial art novelists. Don't just download the client and get into the grind, read the story behind the game. Anybody can point and click. Few will take the time to learn what it's all about. 5) Fun Factor: Is it fun for you? Is it fun for your friends? If it is, it can't be all that bad. If it's not, don't waste your time playing it, and go find something else to do with your time... like flame that game you hate so much in a forum, play basketball, watch TV... or *gasp!* get a job... #5 in my humble opinion, is the most important. If a game isn't fun for me, there's no point in playing it. In fact, there's no point in talking or thinking about it. Just put it in the past and move on to the next. There's always a new game around the next click. ;) |
|
|
|
|
Vhaln
Elite Member
Joined: 7/07/05
Love the genre, just not how slowly it's growing out of its formulaic infancy. |
7/02/06 4:18:11 PM#31
Maybe there's nothing wrong with having a grind, but what else is there? Is the game anything other than just a levelling treadmill? If I explore, will I find anything more interesting than higher con mobs, with no reason to exist other than grinding? Is there any reason to socialize other than to farm those mobs? A fan of games I like, not the other way round. |
|
7/02/06 5:07:45 PM#32
--- |
|
|
naldric
Novice Member
Joined: 10/01/02
If anything is worth doing, do it with all your heart. (The Dhammapada, Buddha) |
7/02/06 6:56:59 PM#33
This game really cant be the worst game ever since DnL already got that throne, and it is selling for full price...
|
|
7/03/06 5:48:01 AM#34
There is no worst game ever in the list on this forum, what games from the 80ies did you play to compare them here. Fact is that DnL has monthly fees, now let see the rating if HO would cost the same every month. The game still has not any pvp implemented and some players already lvl 40...how is that fun. DnL has a lot more game content, but got the bad reputation cause of the bugs and tiny content in comparison to high quality games. Ho are for sure not in the list to compare with high quality games and monthly fees. |
|
|
Jodando
Novice Member
Joined: 1/13/06
"That looks great. But uh... who are the Chefs?" "...Great googly moogly..." |
7/03/06 4:23:41 PM#35
You guys keep stating the flaws of this game, but I STILL have yet to see a suggestion for a game that DOES incorporate all the features you desire. Examples, please! So we DO have something to compare to. If Hero isn't doing things right, tell us who is!
|
|
archroid
Novice Member
Joined: 7/02/06
Diego Armando Maradona Scored the best World Cup goal ever. |
7/03/06 5:45:54 PM#36
|
|
Jodando
Novice Member
Joined: 1/13/06
"That looks great. But uh... who are the Chefs?" "...Great googly moogly..." |
7/03/06 5:58:54 PM#37
...If you press z, you go into meditation mode... which essentially is the same as "sit to recover HP+MP." But if you had played for more than a few minutes, you might've known that. |
|
7/04/06 1:29:39 AM#38
But, from a personal standpoint, games that have done things correctly OR have at least attempted to break the mold in some fashion include: Ultima Online(PRE-EA/TRAMMEL) - Completely skill based system. Geographical housing. Open PVP heavily dependant on the player's skill with the keyboard, mouse, understanding of macros as well as their character's skillset. You are not locked into a class, however you can only master 7 skills on one character. Eve Online - Zero effort required for character development. No levels. Everything is skill based. It is technically possible to learn every skill in the game. You are not locked into a class. You play the game to socialize, earn money, participate in battles and to generally have fun- NOT to work on character development by doing mindless tasks over and over and over again. Why do people sometimes resort to using bots, even if they have plenty of time to play a game? Saga of Ryzom - Skill based system divided into four arts. Extremely unique and innovative method of handling skills and actions- Players create their own attacks and spells, similarily to the Elder Scroll series. No levels. You are not locked into a class. Create a character, step outside of town, kill something, repeat for a week, upgrade equipment, move to town 2, kill something, repeat for a month, upgrade equipment, move to town 3, kill something, repeat for a year, upgrade your equipment, sell your account on ebay. That personally doesn't sound as fun, nor as gratifying as other MMOs with actual depth that are worth playing.
I know you've seen this happen at least once to another player, if not to yourself. "LOL noob i totally pwnzed you cuz i pwn go learn2play"- level 99 warrior with +999999999 PVP mace. --- |
|
|
Vhaln
Elite Member
Joined: 7/07/05
Love the genre, just not how slowly it's growing out of its formulaic infancy. |
7/04/06 11:57:42 AM#39
This got me thinking about DAOC, and why it felt better to me. In some ways Hero Online's combat is more entertaining, but that might just be because it's a bit more flashy and non-stop. Mostly, though, DAOC is pure grind, too. There's RVR and crafting, but the vast majority of the time was spent grinding, especially in its early days. I think it may be that character development made a huge difference. I know my DAOC characters were not unique, but they did feel personalized, both in appearance, and in performance. They didn't feel so cookie-cutter, and that made it more fun for me to see how they'd turn out and perform in the end-game, and it made socializing through them more fun, becuase they were known for the things that made them who they were. The choices I'd made for them, creating thier strengths, weaknesses, and appearance. In Hero Online, and most other Korean MMOs, it's not like that at all. Character development is much more simplistic and linear. To me, that makes it much more boring. It puts the entire emphasis on levels as the only differentiation from one character to the next, and the only point of playing at all. A fan of games I like, not the other way round. |
|
7/04/06 7:52:17 PM#40
Worst game?? Think I can imagine some really rubbish from the history of games. I lokked at it, read about it and saw the movie and screenshots. GW got a better graphic, but GW is boring. It is more a movie than a game... Very stunning graphic almost made me cry when you see how the light plays through the window in pre-Ascelon. WoW, Great graphic, good gameplay. But the char-creation is too limited (not as limited as GW). lots of items, but it becomes a bit dull. But WoW is the best MMO as far as I see.. No RP of course... not even close... (Don't tell me there is RP-serves... the only good thing about those servers are the name restriction... but then again pick a foreign language and you can call youself (Fuckyourmother)) CoH/CoV... To games who might seems like one, but they are different. But here is the problem that it is not as stunning as GW and WoW, and first when you reach beyond lvl 15 It begins to catch. No probs with the Char-creation they got the best char-creation. A huge city and some fair missions. Hero Online: Still waiting to get in, But hey it is an Oriental game, I have waited for such game for long now... There is of course a few thing that they miss, but I think they'll get it done before release. It is of course only beta. I remember how WoW was in the beta-proccess, not as pretty as now. |
|
|
7/04/06 8:05:52 PM#41
|
|
|
7/04/06 8:17:02 PM#42
That is deb and so right... Bad gramma=age?? No you must be the jerk.. this is not a English-talking-ppl-site-only... He could be, as I, an foreigner. So well you must be bored or have hard time focusing, it is the game we talk about not his nor my spelling or gramma! If you cant understand it j03s0m3b0dy plz tell us. He might have a different view on the game and might not be fair when calling it THE WORST GAME EVER. But he do have some good points. Just way to negative... only a game.. play it or leave it.. |
|
|
Jodando
Novice Member
Joined: 1/13/06
"That looks great. But uh... who are the Chefs?" "...Great googly moogly..." |
7/05/06 6:20:35 PM#43
|
|
7/05/06 7:40:23 PM#44
The game has a good feel to it. It sucked from levels 1-9 but when i hit 10 it started going better. Only bad thing is you can be one of four characters. Just 4, lol it made me laugh.
|
|
|
7/05/06 8:07:38 PM#45
clone army!!! cant custimize characters rofl. neways im just gonna play this untill 9dragons beta comes till then ill be part of a clone army : D |
|
|
7/05/06 10:02:28 PM#46
some monkey in a cheap suit said:
This is a perfect example of a classical falisy. Attacking or insulting the person rather then addressing the issue. If you look through the reply's on the list here you will see no acutal resposne that would support any thing other then that the game is flawed and a bad game. You would do better by going through and finding thing that actualy
support your view. But then again you will not find any because the
game is truely flawed and bad. There has also been bug and reports on
them that have never been address and it is my belief that you will
find the game company ingoring them as they are looking for the small
profit the game can turn out and not actually try to make a great game.
Uhh err, actually buddy, if you think this is the "worsest" game ever, why do so many people still play ragnarok online? this game has all the trappings of RO, and yet much better(er?) graphics. the quests actually do have a lot more to them than your attention span can handle, like the first "story" quest. besides, if you don't think this game has storyline, you are not even really paying attention to the game you are just whining and complaining and being generally newblike. No game is "flawed" or "BAD" it just may not appeal to your particular taste, meaning your tastes are "BAD". oh and by the way the word is FALLACY. N00|3tard, P.S. they fixed most of the grouping bugs, so there goes that "falisy" too. |
|
|
7/06/06 10:06:42 PM#47
--- |
|
|
7/06/06 10:06:45 PM#48
(double posted) --- |
|
|
Jodando
Novice Member
Joined: 1/13/06
"That looks great. But uh... who are the Chefs?" "...Great googly moogly..." |
7/07/06 5:28:48 PM#49
I hope that my response did not come off as a personal attack to your opinion. If it wasn't obvious enough for you, I was also simply stating my own personal opinions. And whatever animosity you may have received from it was most likely animosity directed at the OP, who DOESN'T seem to take into account other people's opinions. This wasn't addressed solely at you. Rather, I had the intention of trying to show Feldron that other ways of gaming exist. So what WE have here is a clash of opinions, which is completely natural and fine. What I have against Feldron, on the other hand, is his intention to come here to yell at how everyone is stupid and that their opinion is false. Sorry for trying to kill two birds with one stone. Should have made that clear. |
|
Arcken
Apprentice Member
Joined: 8/14/04
Lets face it, MMOs today are turning into single player console games with a chat box included. |
7/09/06 9:28:07 PM#50
This game is a crock, what does it offer that really is all that different from every other mmo out there? I mean there are very few classes, very few skills for those classes, the entire game is a grind, all you do is kill monsters and do the occasional very mundane quest. then you get to listen to the WoW kids rattle off dudespeak and fire insults at each other in Lions Roar all day long. I played to 40 in closed beta, and am now 35 in open beta, I have more experience with this game than most on this forum, and frankly i think it does suck. Its very 1 dimensional, and really the only thing about it that stands out are the pets. Say what you will, but I personally know this game is pretty boring, and when I did the pvp with the GMs on Mudo Island, it was lame. Everyone spams potions, and just gangs up on a couple of people. lets face it, its the long lost twin brother to Silk Road Online. Dont kid yourself fanbois this game rankles. course Ill still play it for a while, its free, and there isnt anything else out there that I feel like paying for. so I spose ill suck it up and hang out with the kids a little longer |