MMORPG | Genre:Fantasy | Status:Final (rel 11/08/04) | Pub:Sony Online Entertainment PVP:Yes | Distribution:Download | Retail Price:n/a | Pay Type:Hybrid | Monthly Fee:n/a System Req: | ESRB:T| Out of date info? Let us know!
This latest EverQuest II trailer from Sony Online Entertainment shows off the recently announced Battlegrounds feature, which is set to go live on February 16th.
This latest EverQuest II trailer from Sony Online Entertainment shows off the recently announced Battlegrounds feature, which is set to go live on February 16th.
Duration: 1:14
Views: 4,180 32 comments
Game: EverQuest II
jorcoman2 writes:
Looking good :D
Tue Feb 09 2010 4:05PMReport
CujoSWAoA writes:
I think that was the most intense video I've ever seen in my entire life. Buuuut, giant flashes of color and light don't really make me think that there's anything very fun here. Magic battles aren't that interesting to me. Nicely made video though.
Tue Feb 09 2010 4:19PMReport
Proson writes:
Looks cool, but world pvp is ALOT
Tue Feb 09 2010 4:39PMReport
Proson writes:
Looks cool. but world pvp is ALOT more fun imo. even though i did play to R14 when wow BG's came out. But BG's just makes the games feel more like CoD or something like that.
Sorry dobbel post, pressed enter by mistake.
Tue Feb 09 2010 4:41PMReport
Combspe writes:
Mythic is going to sue Sony.
Tue Feb 09 2010 5:22PMReport
ashfallen writes:
being a long time EQ2 player its still a little hard to wrap my mind around a PVE game trying to do PVP even though its been 3 years since they added PVP servers. My pvp weapon of choice is still Super Street Fighter 2 or Unreal Tourny 2004
Tue Feb 09 2010 6:01PMReport
Game-Wolf writes:
i like PVP so it looks good to me
Tue Feb 09 2010 7:58PMReport
SuperXero89 writes:
I've never really felt that EQ2's combat was all that conducive to PVP, but I suppose this is nice for the people that like this sort of thing.
Tue Feb 09 2010 8:16PMReport
Proson writes:
lol why would mythic sue sony?
Tue Feb 09 2010 8:27PMReport
kevingaily writes:
Looks good to me. This way folks on the PvE servers can mix it up a bit and battle others w/o having to be on the PvP server. I like PvP, but only as side time sink, not constant fighting. This is making me consider coming back....
Tue Feb 09 2010 9:35PMReport
Combspe writes:
Mythic is going to sue Sony because the Term and use of "Battlegrounds" is trade marked by Mythic.
Wed Feb 10 2010 2:10AMReport
TheShimmers writes:
Well looks like I'm coming back to EQ2. I love the PVE in it, but got kinda blah sometimes. PVP to mix it up is going to be just the right combo :)
Wed Feb 10 2010 3:35AMReport
Lyrisius writes:
Really? Mythic? How about World of Warcraft, isn't the word "Battlegrounds" used there too?
Wed Feb 10 2010 3:37AMReport
rlyons38 writes:
Everyone is glowing... is that a healthy glow..?
Wed Feb 10 2010 4:45AMReport
donaldduck writes:
Well as they say "if you cant' beat them, join them"
Wed Feb 10 2010 6:38AMReport
Xersues writes:
Pff, unbalanced PvP can now be on demand! Just play a Brigand. It's a lollerfest.
Wed Feb 10 2010 6:49AMReport
altairr writes:
Very nice made game. They are trying to beat wow in this :) dont have chance. but still their graphic is much better.
Wed Feb 10 2010 8:32AMReport
mindw0rk writes:
Mythic stole battlegrounds idea from Blizzard, just like SOE did
Wed Feb 10 2010 9:44AMReport
tsukts writes:
meh, people still play this ? -.-
Wed Feb 10 2010 9:55AMReport
swtoasty writes:
lool mindw0rk n00b lil gurl, mythic had BGs way before WoW. go back to facerollin the lich king you lil gurl
Wed Feb 10 2010 10:29AMReport
Volgore writes:
Looking like action, but the music also adds up alot to the overall impression.
Up to 48 players? I can imagine the lag...sooner or later everyone will play at lowest settings.
I LOVE eq2, but everytime i resub, it's showing more age..too bad, it's so great.
Wed Feb 10 2010 10:52AMReport
EATtheDEAD writes:
mythic didnt copyright the term "battle gounds" you idiot. Mythic's term is "Realm vs Realm" RVR. hahaha
Wed Feb 10 2010 6:28PMReport
EATtheDEAD writes:
oh. and i meant grounds, not gounds
Wed Feb 10 2010 6:28PMReport
rmk70 writes:
won't change that combat and combat animations in this game are boring.
Wed Feb 10 2010 7:14PMReport
Sinent writes:
i wish eq3 would come along already its time to do over with a clean slate instead of piling on there old stuff that said eq2 will never be as good as eq1 was there was just a feel wow has it eq has it but eq2 never really did.
Wed Feb 10 2010 11:14PMReport
pronet writes:
EQ3?! DOEETNAO
Thu Feb 11 2010 11:58AMReport
Frostbite05 writes:
eq2 is superior to eq in just about every way
Thu Feb 11 2010 2:28PMReport
Korlos writes:
If eq2 is superior then why does eq1 have more subscriptions?
Fri Feb 12 2010 11:52AMReport
bezado writes:
I played both for years, EQ 1 was the better game imo and had more content and fun from the start. EQ2 is kinda linear and the combat gets old fast.
I don't think copying WOW will bring more players to the game as a PVP selling point because EQ2 PVP is lame and unbalanced versus a real balanced working PVP type game like WOW or GW.
Fri Feb 12 2010 2:55PMReport
describable writes:
anyone else thought the third line after "hold the territory" and "hold the relic" was going to be called "hold the flag" .... you kinda giggle at the 'three match styles' with that...
Mon Feb 15 2010 6:11PMReport
midmagic writes:
Intense action...
Almost everyone is standing still aside from the scene where they are chasing the flag carrier?
Fri Mar 12 2010 2:29AMReport
Login or Register to post a comment