Games:396  Guilds:1,969
Members:1,132,719  Online:0
Guests:0  Posts:3,081,095

Home Game List Features Forums News Videos Blogs Columns Reviews Photos Guilds Chat! Comics Search

Overview Features Forums Hype Links News Resources Screenshots Videos

Huxley Videos: E3 Interview (4:10)

A video interview with one of the people behind the upcoming MMOFPS.

A video interview with one of the people behind the upcoming MMOFPS.
Duration: 4:10
Views: 10,521 30 comments
Game: Huxley

View More Huxley Videos...

natuxatu writes: Hm sounds cool. I'm not a fan of this kind of game but it does peak my interest. At the very least it should do well as long as it has a smooth launch. Wed Jun 24 2009 6:02PM

Punisher writes: This is absolute garbage of a game. There is nothing MMO about this and the graphics are outdated and have been done over and over. Thid is nothing but a Unreal Tournament wannabe. Yes I have played the game and beta tested it. Worst piece of crap out there. With MW2, BC2 and a ton of other quality fps games comming will just leave Huxley in the dust. The game suffers from outdated gameplay, servere lag and they need to host the games and not have players host them. Im sure Im not the only one here who was utterly disapointed by this game. NEXT! Wed Jun 24 2009 6:07PM

sadeyx writes: yea, ill be giving this one a wide birth also. Wed Jun 24 2009 6:28PM

Ayatora writes: Damn it Ijji is gonna fuck it up Wed Jun 24 2009 6:30PM

drivec writes: just dont like ijji host. i dont like how the server handles lentecy of players. Wed Jun 24 2009 6:30PM

wesjr writes: You beta'd the "lite" version, there was not real PVE content yet... Wed Jun 24 2009 6:36PM

alkennjoi writes: BERTH not birth!!!! one is maneuvers at sea, the other is popping out a baby BERTH! Wed Jun 24 2009 6:37PM

Brif writes: Sounds like unreal tournament with worse graphics and a few very badly done RPG elements. Wed Jun 24 2009 6:53PM

Regok writes: Park your ship in a berth or sleep in one on a ship. Park = moor, but I used park cuz I figured it would make more sense to most folks. Wed Jun 24 2009 6:57PM

Atrayo writes: The moment the project Manager Andy Hong mentioned either local battles of 16 versus 16 or a battlezone of 32 vs. 32 I cringed. Isn't this supposed to be a MMOFPS and not a multiplayer FPS that can already achieve those modest server load numbers. Even if it just doubles a conflict battlezone to 128 players to 64 vs. 64 i would see this as a positive step beyond what we can get in old SOE "Planetside". Wed Jun 24 2009 8:04PM

sanninater writes: ijji is good cause there host of rohan and rohan has everything (exept flying and publicity) Wed Jun 24 2009 8:13PM

Terranah writes: 16 vs 16 and 32 vs 32....this is what we have been reduced to. Wed Jun 24 2009 9:05PM

cerebrix writes: yeah 16 vs 16 = not an mmo. shame i was looking forward to this one. honestly, this should be taken off the site. Unless you guys think they should add, COD4, Team Fortress 2, and Counterstrike: Source to this site. Wed Jun 24 2009 9:32PM

Seolta writes: It's more like a social MMO w FPS instances for PVP and PVE. You can't just walk around in a sandbox shooting ppl...for better or worse. Wed Jun 24 2009 11:39PM

Thadris writes: In my opinion u ppl hav to stop shiting about the game...yeah iv tested it is one of the best mmofps' out there, ijji host arnt that great, i know from experince, but im trying to say dont talk shit bout a game u havent even tryed. Thu Jun 25 2009 4:38AM

Sneaky_Andy writes: played in CBT1 its a good game so far imo. CBT2 starts soon and will involve i think 100v100 battles Thu Jun 25 2009 4:43AM

ricefarmer writes: they said 100v100 along time ago.. wtf now its just 16v16? stupid ass fuck, fuck companies with stupid ass promises Thu Jun 25 2009 7:33AM

hades302 writes: The is nothing Massive about a game when the majority of the game is played peer-to-peer, not to mention only 16-vs-16 and 32-vs-32. Thu Jun 25 2009 8:48AM

Devros writes: There is nothing wrong with a game where many people play, yet confrontations are kept to a minimum amount of players. It is still mmo. You will find this is how most developers must treat any FPS-mmo games. It is impossible to make a game that is true FPS and have hundreds of people running around shooting at each other due to the massive massive processing power needed. That being said, this game has been in dev for years... too many usually means big trouble. Thu Jun 25 2009 10:50AM

onlyfeel writes: its so cool! like E3 plz give me key:( I tried dozens of game style,My game is over the age of 10 year,Have a solid experience. The game( huxley)attracted me;). I will help you to identify the shortcomings of his and bug Thu Jun 25 2009 1:15PM

I.mmo.tal writes: Everything negative said about this game, sadly, is ALL true. I read every comment here, and agree with only the negative ones. Also, wesjr said, "You beta'd the "lite" version, there was not real PVE content yet..." The PVE is horrible...this is a PVP based game. Nobody is going to pay monthly to do FPS PVE only...because the PVP is trash. OH WAIT THAT'S RIGHT! This is going to be an F2P game with a cash shop. This game wont last long after its release. It'll be like every other F2P-MMO with Korean-style elements. 5000 people play it. Thu Jun 25 2009 1:16PM

remyburke writes: Horrendous game. I have had few worse gaming experiences than this one. Thu Jun 25 2009 2:14PM

Teiman writes: "There is nothing wrong with a game where many people play, yet confrontations are kept to a minimum amount of players. It is still mmo. You will find this is how most developers must treat any FPS-mmo games." Did I dream that I played Planetside? because I have played battles in continents, with lots of people, tanks, quads, hovers, mechs.. lots of people fighting, turrets, mines... Twich combat, instakills but fun. I think planetside is some game from the future that use alien technology that is still not feasible or something. I will *not* lower my expectations to fit games that delivered *less* than mmofps like Planetside or FPS like Batlefield 2. Thu Jun 25 2009 8:42PM

wootin writes: Yep, Planetside has already done hundreds vs hundreds in the same zone. I could count a hundred people swarming a single base in the old days (2004-5), and that's only the attackers. Heck, later I belonged to an outfit which, although massively shrunk from the peak days, rolled 80 people at once onto a continent (single zone) in one of their regular weekly raids. So this game is amateured down to suckage play so that the suit's spreadsheet doesn't show a lot of server costs over time. When will they learn that launching a sucky product is a lot harder on the spreadsheet than launching a good one? Thu Jun 25 2009 9:12PM

Taram writes: tried it, didn't enjoy it. 16 vs 16, no real point to PVP at all... just arenas etc. The PVE content is pretty pathetic... Just not a very good game at all. PlanetSide came out years ago now and was a better game at release than this thing is. TBH I'm still not sure why more people don't play PlanetSide. It's still the best MMOFPS by far. Fri Jun 26 2009 8:36AM

utterbaver writes: oh fudge no!.. ijji... alright im not gonna play it Sun Jun 28 2009 3:28PM

davidt2001 writes: If only Sony would make a Planetside 2, but its not gonna happen. I was looking forward to Huxley for 2 or 3 years now, big disappointment, 16 vs 16 is a joke. Mon Jun 29 2009 1:02PM

Wizardry writes: I am a fan of a fps type game ,but trying to make it a MMO is not a good idea.When i played Quake or UT99 as this guy mentions ,the game is like,i never liked too many players. Too many players ,ALWAYS= messy and less skillful.I notice from this short video that the maps are too fake,the surroundings are VERY static and will not play much of a skillful role in the combat.Huxley might be fun to mess around in,but if i see too many players i will not participate. Tue Jun 30 2009 6:33PM

BranX writes: Great game Wed Jul 01 2009 12:20PM

Josexph writes: I'm sick of these games being referred to as MMOs 16vs16 is hardly a scrim. Does every company that makes a class based game have to call themselves an MMO, I mean come on. And most likely Global Agenda (another non-mmo) will rape this game. Thank the lord Diablo is still in its roots as not being a MMO. Thu Sep 03 2009 10:34PM

Hype-level

8.26

Popular Features:

The List : Top 10 MMOs Since WoW Column added on Tuesday October 13

World of Warcraft changed the MMO landscape on November 23rd, 2004, but 174 MMOs have... Read More

The List : Five Scariest MMO Launches Column added on Friday October 30

In honor of Halloween this weekend, we count down five of the scariest MMO launches... Read More

The List : Five Under the Radar MMOs Column added on Tuesday November 03

MMORPG.com's Jon Wood takes over this list this week, taking a look at five MMOs... Read More

The List : Five IPs to Bring in a New Demographic Column added on Tuesday October 20

In this week's list, Jon Wood looks at five IPs that, by taking the focus... Read More

Star Trek Online : Exclusive Screenshots, Part Three Media added on Tuesday November 03

Cryptic provides us with three exclusive peeks at Star Trek Online. This week we get... Read More