<
>

Our-Rating 6.00

6666666666

User Rating 7.09

7.087702109647.087702109647.087702109647.087702109647.087702109647.087702109647.087702109647.087702109647.087702109647.08770210964

Age of Conan

Show Game Details

Age of Conan » General Discussion » Warning - Dont buy into the second wave of hype

Page 2 of 3

1

2

3

 Thread (69 posts)
AOCtester  9/02/08 2:52:52 PM

Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100

Novice Member

Joined: 4/22/08
Posts: 308

Originally posted by Professor78

 

The point being though AOCTester said nothing has changed since day one! But clearly to anyone still playing should know the truth. And as you say most things promised at lauch are now in place,- and I realy agree that yes they most definatly should have been in there at release.

But to try and persuade other people to not play the game because of what happened over the few months prior to the fixes is plain ridiculous.

 

 


 

I still stand by my words of saying nothing has changed.  You know why ?

Its still the same ppl that are developing the game that shipped this game unfinished and did everything possible to hide the state of the game at that time.  I would go ALOT deeper into this part if NDA would be lifted and we were allowed to say what was said between the Closed beta testers and the developers.   Sadly we are not allowed to say much so ... you guys will have to excuse me still trying.

There IS a reason I have spend time watching AOC since retail and warning ppl.  I have been involved in many CBs and even ABs but I have never seen such intent to try to scam ppl into buying a MMO game. 

Thats why I still hang around here.  And if you think I base my info on 3 month old data....  No I don't.  If you are wondering why I then bother to sub if I dont like it ?   Read what I said above.  The makers of this game went FAAAR over the line in what is acceptable to any game developing and marketing.  Everyone needs to know that and hopefully ppl know about it in time to at least take a unbiased disission. 

But hey...  This game will eventually go free trial so if ppl want to test the PVP patch and the "much" improved game - then they can wait for it.  All Im here for is warn them that there will be hype incoming - both from Funcom and from the "fanboys" that will go out of their way to claim things that are in most cases not true.

 
gryjin  9/02/08 2:55:46 PM

Rank: 24/100 Rank: 24/100 Rank: 24/100 Rank: 24/100 Rank: 24/100

Apprentice Member

Joined: 8/30/08
Posts: 128

siege battle mechanics working and a group of people without uberleet computers participating on them isn't a change? the game has problems...but it has fixes occasionally too. its just not enough for me to come back yet.

and don't you dare write me off as a fanboy. i just think blind statements about nothing being fixed are just flat out lies. i'm waiting for the patch when they add the fun though

 
AOCtester  9/02/08 2:58:36 PM

Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100

Novice Member

Joined: 4/22/08
Posts: 308

Originally posted by Mrbloodworth
Originally posted by kaishi00

You gotta love how all the fanboy retorts are in one form or another, involves the future. It's coming, it'll be there, they're planning it, it's in development. In the future one day I'll be king and take over Venus. One of these days that is, when, who knows.

If by fanboi you mean reasonable gamer that doesn’t feel the need to post in extremisms to feel cool. Then sure.

 

Oh, sorry. Here: LOLWTHOMGBBQ, Suxzors, the Fail!.

 

Better?

 


 

So far you have gone out of your way to talk about everything other than the game - including doing your best to insult ppl with coments and picutres that have nothing to do with anything talked about in the topic. 

If you want to talk facts then plz do so.  You could start up by posting the last month of "wednesday" patches in the game if you want to point out how much improved it is.   

 
AOCtester  9/02/08 3:03:01 PM

Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100

Novice Member

Joined: 4/22/08
Posts: 308

Originally posted by gryjin

siege battle mechanics working and a group of people without uberleet computers participating on them isn't a change? the game has problems...but it has fixes occasionally too. its just not enough for me to come back yet.

and don't you dare write me off as a fanboy. i just think blind statements about nothing being fixed are just flat out lies. i'm waiting for the patch when they add the fun though


 

I have never said that nothing has been fixed.

I have on the other hand pointed out that no new content has been added and that the game is still the same.  Same as in the developers using the exact same methods of fooling ppl as they did on day one. 

Not a word about no fixes.  I can tell you that they fixed the missing boy 73 days after I reported it "missing"   It was fixed yes...  The effort was mesured in less than 5 mins of fixing and it took 73 days.

 
gryjin  9/02/08 3:07:09 PM

Rank: 24/100 Rank: 24/100 Rank: 24/100 Rank: 24/100 Rank: 24/100

Apprentice Member

Joined: 8/30/08
Posts: 128

don't get me wrong...i hate funcoms lies...i wanted to siege from day one. i should have been able to. its a bit late, but it is nice to be able to get up on a wall now and rain down death and it actually have a point

 
Mrbloodworth  9/02/08 3:13:11 PM

Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100

Hard Core Member

Joined: 3/20/05
Posts: 2110

"pleasantly paralyzed"

Originally posted by AOCtester
Originally posted by Mrbloodworth
Originally posted by kaishi00

You gotta love how all the fanboy retorts are in one form or another, involves the future. It's coming, it'll be there, they're planning it, it's in development. In the future one day I'll be king and take over Venus. One of these days that is, when, who knows.

If by fanboi you mean reasonable gamer that doesn’t feel the need to post in extremisms to feel cool. Then sure.

 

Oh, sorry. Here: LOLWTHOMGBBQ, Suxzors, the Fail!.

 

Better?

 


 

So far you have gone out of your way to talk about everything other than the game - including doing your best to insult ppl with coments and picutres that have nothing to do with anything talked about in the topic. 

If you want to talk facts then plz do so.  You could start up by posting the last month of "wednesday" patches in the game if you want to point out how much improved it is.   

 

You could also start by reading people’s posts, and not just implying what they are saying, then flaming them for it. 

----------
"Anyone posting on this forum is not an average user, and there for any opinions about the game are going to be overly critical compared to an average users opinions." - Me

"No, your wrong.." - Random user #123

"Hello person posting on a site specifically for MMO's in a thread on a sub forum specifically for a particular game talking about meta features and making comparisons to other titles in the genre, and their meta features.

How are you?" -Me

markyturnip  9/02/08 3:14:35 PM

Rank: 49/100 Rank: 49/100 Rank: 49/100 Rank: 49/100 Rank: 49/100

Advanced Member

Joined: 11/03/05
Posts: 528

Originally posted by Mrbloodworth
Originally posted by kaishi00

You gotta love how all the fanboy retorts are in one form or another, involves the future. It's coming, it'll be there, they're planning it, it's in development. In the future one day I'll be king and take over Venus. One of these days that is, when, who knows.

If by fanboi you mean reasonable gamer that doesn’t feel the need to post in extremisms to feel cool. Then sure.

 

Oh, sorry. Here: LOLWTHOMGBBQ, Suxzors, the Fail!.

 

Better?

 

 

You know, I don't actually see anyone use that stupid phrase, or phrases like it, except when purporting to parody others.

ie No-one really writes that stuff Mr Bloodworth; at least - I have not seen it here from the anti-AoC crowd.

So, you are parodying something that does not exist, in an attempt to denigrate the opposite point of view. It's an old but cheap rhetorical trick - misrepresent someone else, then attack the misrepresentation.

Which said, I do see one person who has used that language in his posts: you. So, in fact, what you are purporting to parody is yourself.

 
Mrbloodworth  9/02/08 3:20:29 PM

Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100

Hard Core Member

Joined: 3/20/05
Posts: 2110

"pleasantly paralyzed"

Originally posted by markyturnip

It's an old but cheap rhetorical trick - misrepresent someone else, then attack the misrepresentation.

 

Exactly what’s going on here, in reference to anyone who posts reasonably about the game. Is it any wonder why I have given up?

I'm just playing to the crowed at this point.

----------
"Anyone posting on this forum is not an average user, and there for any opinions about the game are going to be overly critical compared to an average users opinions." - Me

"No, your wrong.." - Random user #123

"Hello person posting on a site specifically for MMO's in a thread on a sub forum specifically for a particular game talking about meta features and making comparisons to other titles in the genre, and their meta features.

How are you?" -Me

AOCtester  9/02/08 3:27:18 PM

Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100

Novice Member

Joined: 4/22/08
Posts: 308

You could also start by assuming that some ppl have problems playing AOC with ATI cards

http://forums.ageofconan.com/showthread.php?t=23864&page=81

Sorry - but I doubt that the hate lvl of this game took this topic up to 81 pages.

 
Azrile  9/02/08 3:29:44 PM

Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100

Hard Core Member

Joined: 7/29/08
Posts: 1279

Any new or returning player to WOW, send me a PM for some help getting started.

put it this way.  The big selling point to this game was PVP and seiging.   Yet answer this question..  is it possible for a guild to conquer a battlekeep that is being defending by a guild that no longer exists?

There are still battlekeeps that are owned by guilds that no longer exist.   That is just a sad statment about a game that was built around seiging.

Stats still aren't working.... people are saying that stats aren't important... well that is because they don't do anything... of course they are unimportant.   Players are still wearing level 40 gear at endgame because gear doesnt' matter.   Gear still looks all the same despite comments made back in April...

All Funcom does is promises stuff about the future.. same as they they did to beta testers.. 'we'll fix it'.

................................................
Anyone interested in starting in WOW or returning to WOW, send me a PM and I'll help get you going.

Mrbloodworth  9/02/08 3:34:24 PM

Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100 Rank: 70/100

Hard Core Member

Joined: 3/20/05
Posts: 2110

"pleasantly paralyzed"

Originally posted by AOCtester

You could also start by assuming that some ppl have problems playing AOC with ATI cards

http://forums.ageofconan.com/showthread.php?t=23864&page=81

Sorry - but I doubt that the hate lvl of this game took this topic up to 81 pages.

 

 

I’m sure they do, but i didn’t say it didn’t happen. Your lack of being able to understand my post is the issue here. Partly my fault I’m sure. But like I said, you just imply, then attack the implication. Why am i going to clarify?


Just like i said in my post, I don’t know what issue they were having, because they didn’t state it. Then I gave an experience of my own.


You decided to call me a lair and flame me.

 

----------
"Anyone posting on this forum is not an average user, and there for any opinions about the game are going to be overly critical compared to an average users opinions." - Me

"No, your wrong.." - Random user #123

"Hello person posting on a site specifically for MMO's in a thread on a sub forum specifically for a particular game talking about meta features and making comparisons to other titles in the genre, and their meta features.

How are you?" -Me

gryjin  9/02/08 3:34:52 PM

Rank: 24/100 Rank: 24/100 Rank: 24/100 Rank: 24/100 Rank: 24/100

Apprentice Member

Joined: 8/30/08
Posts: 128

Originally posted by Azrile

put it this way.  The big selling point to this game was PVP and seiging.   Yet answer this question..  is it possible for a guild to conquer a battlekeep that is being defending by a guild that no longer exists?

There are still battlekeeps that are owned by guilds that no longer exist.   That is just a sad statment about a game that was built around seiging.

Stats still aren't working.... people are saying that stats aren't important... well that is because they don't do anything... of course they are unimportant.   Players are still wearing level 40 gear at endgame because gear doesnt' matter.   Gear still looks all the same despite comments made back in April...

All Funcom does is promises stuff about the future.. same as they they did to beta testers.. 'we'll fix it'.


 

yeah....about that stat thing...i took off all my rangers armor the other night and did a naked clear of the first villa. the damage is all from the skills it seems.  (i died a bit more often than usual...but the fact that i full cleared it naked means armor needs a massive overhaul) this was done with epics removed actually, since i put all my gemmed gear in the bank due to the upcoming nerf.