| 39 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
1/22/08 9:15:46 AM#21
Originally posted by ShanniaRead the letter posted on the AOC forums about what happened from the lead developer. He explains the process here: http://forums.ageofconan.com/showthread.php?t=52917 Its not as simple as you like to make it and its not that clear cut either. It is not an ethical discussion because no ethics were violated. As far as the devs knew, the plan was MArch 25th. Upon further consideration and TO DO WHATS BEST FOR THE GAME, the decision was made to move the date. MMO dates are never firm until the game goes gold. Period. Don't try and put all the blame on Funcom for something that happens in the corporate world all the time. It happens and we accept it and move on. If its in the best interest for the game then it is for the best. The one thing I wish all companies would do is to stick to the Quarter system (We will release in a certain Quarter) and not give a specfic date. I wish all companies would keep dates to themsleves until its clear when they will release the game. |
|
|
1/22/08 9:16:27 AM#22
They are actualy listening to the beta testers, sorry you dont like that. |
|
|
1/22/08 9:18:12 AM#23
stop all this....just go and stock up on tins red-bull so when the launch comes you dont have to waste time going to the shop.
|
|
|
Shannia
Novice Member
Joined: 11/06/05
"World of WarCraft is held alive solely by the mediocrity of competing products." RendRegen |
Originally posted by Produde The fact they are delaying it is great. The way in which they are communicating with the public is complete b.s. It would have been MUCH better for them to tell the world at their Friday press conference they were delaying instead of preaching the party line of being commited to March 25th when they knew for a fact that was a lie. Again, the delay isn't the problem. It is Funcom's pattern of deceive the community that is my issue.
Fear not fanbois, we are not trolls, let's take off your tin foil hat and learn what VAPORWARE is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaporware "Vaporware is a term used to describe a software or hardware product that is announced by a developer well in advance of release, but which then fails to emerge after having well exceeded the period of development time that was initially claimed or would normally be expected for the development cycle of a similar product." |
|
1/22/08 9:21:22 AM#25
The problem, as I see it, is not that they are delaying AoC. I think that is very wise. The problem, I think, is that they may not be delaying it enough. Based on the descriptions of the features, graphics, and other things in the game now, I suspect that whatever engine they have running it will not be sufficiently optimized to allow the majority of subscribers to actually play the game when the servers are under full load. Funcom is notorious for the poor performance of Anarchy Online. Now, I have heard many people say that Funcom does not want to make the same mistake again. But that does not mean they will not make the same mistake again. And that is what I expect is underway. I would like to see some fully open to the public Stress Test weekends, similar to what WoW provided. Clients provided through Fileplanet and other fast-download service providers. Funcom should find out how AoC performs under real customer loads BEFORE they declare it Gold and ready to sell. Otherwise, it WILL be another Anarchy Online. And no one wants that. |
|
|
1/22/08 9:23:54 AM#26
whens war? :< |
|
|
1/22/08 9:28:07 AM#27
Originally posted by shinkan
Currently Playing: Tabula Rasa |
|
|
1/22/08 9:28:20 AM#28
I would actually be less worried for the game if they were being less than open with the community than if they really did not think there would be a delay until just last week. Covering up the delay until the last possible moment means you could have perfectly competent managers who could have been manipulated by higher brass. Being completely blind-sided by a delay means the managers didn't have their eyes open. Choosing to delay will only help the game, but Funcom does seems to have a habit of waiting to announce push-backs, giving more warning time would soften the blow a bit, I think. |
|
|
1/22/08 9:49:42 AM#29
Originally posted by Shannia I don't think they have been lying. I work in the software business as well, won't tell you which firm or which field of software, but we had a product launch that was due out today pushed back, the announcement was made today, because we noticed a critical fault in the build that needed to be fixed. I would not call release dates being pushed back lying to your customer base, sometimes these decisions truly are last moment and there isn't much you can do about them. |
|
|
1/22/08 10:32:09 AM#30
I agree that pushing the release will be good for bugs, but will it be good for the game? most likely not. Having a release date to close to WAR and Aion will hurt AOC. I wouldnt mind living 8 weeks with some bugs if they patch it 8 weeks later, ive been playing mmos with major bugs a year after release. To be hornest AOC is not only aimning for the MMO crowd but also Console gamers and I think this will hurt AOC gameplay more then anything else do i want to play a linear console game that try to be a MMO or an MMO thats easy and linear like a console game. Will AOC be as linear as a console game with added capture the flag and PvP zones for sieges i think it will Will crafting system offer anything new to MMOs not as far as i can tell. Will AOC be a 2 week experience yes it will because Funcom want a piece of the casual gamer pie. Will AOC Fail imho it will because what i want from a game isnt what AOC offer. ill be looking at WAR if i want PvP and Aion if i want a game i know i wont max my char in 2 weeks.
|
|
|
1/22/08 10:38:42 AM#31
Yah and if they released to soon and the game had a lot of bugs you would be the first person on these forums complaining about it. Grow up. |
|
|
1/22/08 10:45:33 AM#32
Not true i only post here when bored and a bug wont make me bored with a game crappy gameplay will. |
|
|
1/22/08 10:50:03 AM#33
Originally posted by ruffer1980
You obviously don't understand that porting it to console doesn't magically somehow destroy how good it is.
I've played plenty of Console MMO's...in fact its how I got into the genre. EQOA and, to a far lesser degree, PSO. I wouldn't really call PSO an MMO by today's standard though, more like a Diablo type thing with an avatar lobby. Still...EQOA played every bit like every other MMO I have ever tried. In fact...it made the whole game MORE enjoyable because I could sit with the comfort of a controller instead of this stupid bulky keyboard.
Regardless...an MMO is an MMO. I don't think you have anything to fear from "Console" taint. EQOA was a harder game than half the MMO's I've played on PC anyway. |
|
|
1/22/08 11:57:47 AM#34
One things I think a lot of gamers do not realize is that many of these companies rely on investors to finance these games. If you think about it, some of these games take up to 50 mil + to make and that is BEFORE they see any profit. There are not a lot fo game company's that can foot that kind of bill upfront. So these company's have to go to investors. Investors are the ones who set the release date, sometimes the money runs out and they have to release (IE Vangard) Release dates are something that most companies cannot control at all, they have to present good arguments for their investors to deley them. Otherwise they are forced to release the game. |
|
|
1/22/08 12:14:18 PM#35
I think some things have been forgotten here: AoC devs stated last summer that the game was ready and only needed some polish and set October 30th as the GOLD date (ie the official will release date). Most companies give you estimated dates and then post a gold date that most do follow. AoC then set March 25th as the GOLD date, and guess what, just like last time it was anything but gold. The game was obviously not finished last summer as reported. Classe selection has been shrunk once again. Marketing and devs are on two different pages obviously. I have been following AoC for years now. All of this is par for the course it seems with this game. But keep in mind when a company sets a GOLD date that is an official yes it will come out date for all software companies. Funcom has sullied this by constantly moving their GOLD date which is NOT typical for MMOs. Their ESTIMATED release date is what gets moved. Funcom needs to get its affairs sorted and let both hands know what is going on. |
|
|
1/22/08 12:18:58 PM#36
Originally posted by Shannia
Door meet Shannia's rear end.
Seriously I have no clue how people can get upset a MMORPG that has to be pushed back a bit. If it was to the extreme that Darkfail has done then maybe.. But I rather they push it back a few months then release Vanguard version 2 on us. Another thing to consider, unlike most companys Funcom actually has brought us a MMORPG already....Not many of the failures that keep pushing back (erm Darkfall) can say that. ------------------------------ |
|
|
1/22/08 3:27:07 PM#37
Well the problem that i see is they have not been able to fix sliding on the ground. Thats why i think they are trying to fix. |
|
|
1/22/08 3:34:07 PM#38
Originally posted by Shannia Really? I just ordered two collector's editions because they are taking an 8 extra weeks to polish the game. I remember this game.. called.. Ultima 9. It was going to be pushed back for about the 50th time. Developer said it needed more polish. People cried on forums saying release it now and we'll deal with it. So they said ... ok... A couple days later.. "omg why didn't you take time to polish the game". No matter how you try to justify your statement. Any developer that actually takes more time (it actually costs them money to do this.. you do reallize that? That whoever is investing in them.. is letting them take more time with no return..) is doing a good thing.. a rare thing. The game may or may not be good at launch.. but give it a rest... taking more time should ALWAYS be seen as a positive... How many MMO's have been released to early... versus.. to late? and your "outright lie" statement.. is in fact.. you being upset that its going to be an extra.. 8 weeks... omg. *** To be honest I can understand since writers in hollywood are trying to gouge even more money out of the studio's... so there is nothing to watch. |
|
|
1/22/08 3:50:25 PM#39
Originally posted by vmopedAt least this person know what he is talking about. Do you know why they call it gold date? Because the date is "good as gold" for the release. In fact it is synonomus with the day a game releases. IE the game went gold this xx/xx/xxxx date. I am not saying Funcom should or should not have delayed, so all you fanboies don't read into this more than there is. It simply the facts. "Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one ..." - Thomas Paine |
|