<
>

Our-Rating 7.25

7.257.257.257.257.257.257.257.257.257.25

User Rating 7.64

7.641602045087.641602045087.641602045087.641602045087.641602045087.641602045087.641602045087.641602045087.641602045087.64160204508

Dungeons & Dragons Online

Show Game Details

  • Developer: Turbine, Inc.
  • Genre: Fantasy
  • Status: Final
  • Platforms: PC 
  • Website: http://www.ddo.com

D&D Online » Pen & Paper Discussion » Who likes what version of D&D better?

Page 1 of 2

1

2

 Thread (40 posts)
PyscoJuggalo  3/27/06 5:21:45 PM

Rank: 38/100 Rank: 38/100 Rank: 38/100 Rank: 38/100 Rank: 38/100

Apprentice Member

Joined: 10/27/03
Posts: 854

I am an old troll, basically.

As title says, personally I'm an AD&D 2'nd Edition guy.  I hate 3 and 3.5.

 

My reasons:

1- I like complicated rules.  Complexity is fun, when youstreamline things too much, games get boring.

2- AD&D was more about Roleplaying a character, if you had a char with 3 as an ability score, you were forced to role play it.  The new editions are too power gammer focused.

3- I spent a hell of a lot of money on books.

4- I spent a hell of alot of money on Magic cards and the basterds then tell me, "Hey, you can't use them in a tournament!"  Go to hell kiss my power-9 Byaitch!  Timewalk FTW!  BLACK LOTUS!

Forum Poll

What version do you like?

D&D
AD&D
AD&D 2'nd Edition
3
3.5
(login to vote)


--When you resubscribe to SWG, an 18 yearold Stripper finds Jesus, gives up stripping, and moves with a rolex reverend to Hawaii.
--In MMORPG's l007 is the opiate of the masses.
--The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence!

Gorwell  3/30/06 6:49:24 AM

Rank: 11/100 Rank: 11/100 Rank: 11/100 Rank: 11/100 Rank: 11/100

Novice Member

Joined: 1/17/05
Posts: 26

I just bought the 3.5 manuals to gain a better understanding of the D&D online game as well as curiosity, and the PHB is as weighty as the DMG, now how complicated has it got?

I play the 1st ed AD&D with a number of omissions, and some local modifications that have been tweaked over 25 years.

I reckon version 3+ were written so it could be translated to computer easier. Also as a marketing strategy by WotC, and to ensure the brand continues to make money. I remember when White Dwarf was a real magazine, not a Warhammer catalogue, and theres the role model. Another company that change rules regularly in order to maintain profit.

 
Monde  6/02/06 7:07:31 AM

Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100

Novice Member

Joined: 1/28/06
Posts: 133

I loved 2nd Ed but 3rd Ed has made it much simpler and I enjoy playing it more now. 3.5 is just a money making racket and I really hate it.
 
mehmetcingoz  10/11/06 11:16:43 PM

Rank: 32/100 Rank: 32/100 Rank: 32/100 Rank: 32/100 Rank: 32/100

Apprentice Member

Joined: 5/08/06
Posts: 2

absolutely ad&d 2nd edition is the best version ever
 
pashbe1  11/10/06 4:58:00 AM

Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100

Novice Member

Joined: 11/07/06
Posts: 32

I fondly look back on AD&D. At some point I evolved my d6 based  system that was genre-nonspecific. Ultimately roleplaying for me and those who gamed with me was about character and story developement. Genre was irrelevant, and morphed with our interests, but some characters endured. I wish I still had time to GM, and people who appreciated it, because PC based (and online) just can't do what a good imagination can do. 
 
BaronJuJu  11/10/06 9:23:27 AM

Rank: 83/100 Rank: 83/100 Rank: 83/100 Rank: 83/100 Rank: 83/100

Elite Member

Joined: 2/27/04
Posts: 1279

"Just because it happens to you doesn''t make it interesting"

2nd Edition all the way


necrotherion  12/25/06 8:47:10 PM

Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100

Novice Member

Joined: 12/08/06
Posts: 129

"The Pope? How many divisions has he got?" - Joe Stalin

Sadly, I've only ever played 3+. I'm sure that the v2 rules were original and fun, and they severely pique my interest. I'd learn the system, but I simply do not have the money to go out and find some v2 books.

And I completely agree with the post above me, 3.5 is just a money-making racket. I feel sorry for those who spent $180 on their v3 core rulebook collection. I currently have ~500 dollar 3.5 collection, which will become obsolete as soon as v4 comes along.
ironore  1/04/07 2:44:08 PM

Rank: 53/100 Rank: 53/100 Rank: 53/100 Rank: 53/100 Rank: 53/100

Advanced Member

Joined: 6/24/05
Posts: 928

Forging the Future

How did we get from PnP to these INSTANCES??!?!

IronOre - Forging the Future

Malakai  4/13/07 2:28:01 PM

Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100

Novice Member

Joined: 11/09/03
Posts: 148

Call me old school, but I have always prefered the 1st edition of AD&D.  I just liked the feel of it and the way it played better.  I also noticed that in general I always enjoyed the modules done by Gary Gygax himself the most.  I think that the man is absolutely brilliant. .  2nd edition was pretty good too, although I did not like some of the changes, but at least it still felt like D&D to me.  I am not a big fan of 3rd edition.  They changed too much in my opinion. 

I also absolutely HATED the artwork in the 3 rulebooks with a few exceptions.  I thought that the characters looked too punkish.  I wish that they would have went with beautiful high fantasy works of art like they had in previous editions.  On a side note I do like how Wizards of the Coast has been tapping into some older source material lately for some of there newest supplements.  And I will always be grateful that they continue to support D&D's growth so strongly.

Lately I have been play the Castle and Crusades rpg which is a nice bridge between old school AD&D and  3rd edition.  For any that might be interested in it here are a couple links -

www.trolllord.com/newsite/cnc/index.html 

www.trolllord.com/newsite/cnc/why_play_cnc.html

Sulle  5/01/07 5:36:00 PM

Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100

Novice Member

Joined: 4/11/07
Posts: 12

Love first and second edition mself. Have had many great evenings with friends playing those two settings really miss them.
 
ReploidZeroX  5/15/07 10:26:09 AM

Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100 Rank: 1/100

Novice Member

Joined: 5/15/07
Posts: 2

I just went out an upgraded from 3 to 3.5 last week and the changes are welcome. I've got D&D 1st edition from my uncle somewhere in the basement but I haven't had a chance to try it out. I've only ever played 3rd. From how it sounds from you all here I really need to get my hands on 2nd edition.
 
elvenangel  5/15/07 10:31:18 AM

Rank: 35/100 Rank: 35/100 Rank: 35/100 Rank: 35/100 Rank: 35/100

Apprentice Member

Joined: 10/03/04
Posts: 2227

Why So Serious?

I started playing with 2nd Edition using Skills and Powers.  I kind of miss the customization it offered like taking allergies or phobias.  (Nothing like seeing a mage running off screaming when undead rise up because he has an extreme fear of the dead).   But I don't miss the complicated percentile dice rolls. 

I like 3.0 and the changes made for 3.5 were needed so I'm happy with them.   Frankly I just miss playing, having moved away to far away from where my group lives.

Please Refer to Doom Cat with all conspiracies & evil corporation complaints. He'll give you the simple explination of..WE"RE ALL DOOMED!

Rattrap  5/15/07 10:37:05 AM

Rank: 30/100 Rank: 30/100 Rank: 30/100 Rank: 30/100 Rank: 30/100

Apprentice Member

Joined: 9/09/04
Posts: 1594

Freedom of choice
is what you got,
freedom from choice
is what you want!

I voted for 3.5

Ad&D was a beauty and we all love it ... but face it 3.5 is vastly superior
It is easy to learn streamlined , has a lot of tactic posibilities - and D20 is easily applied to any other setting.

AD&D beats it only in nostalgy department


p.s.

The one i really love is D&D original

"Before this battle is over all the world will know that few...stood against many." - King Leonidas