| 36 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
XAPGames
Elite Member
Joined: 3/30/10
Don't expect great artwork from a coder. It just doesn't happen. |
10/26/11 7:31:12 PM#21
Originally posted by nomss I'm fairly sure it won't. It's been less than a year since Cata, and even if they reduce the development time like was talked about, we're looking at June next year. Currently in development Wizards and Champions (formerly ActionMMORPG) |
|
10/26/11 7:42:07 PM#22
Everyone just says something like "don't plan on flying until max level". Which could be taken several different ways. It's possible that MoP will be just like previous expansions, and you just won't be able to fly in the newly added areas until you get the new flying skill at max level. Sorry I added to the confusion. IF anyone find a more clear explanation of what's happening with flying in MoP, I'd be interested to hear it. |
|
|
10/26/11 7:50:31 PM#23
I don't know what game you've been playing but in my world gnomes and goblins (who are nothing but a fat comic relief) are far worse. I actually like the pandaren, they are somewhat refreshing. |
|
|
10/26/11 7:58:49 PM#24
Given I'm an x-wow player... I must say the next exansion... eh... Pros: 1.) Oriental Zones do add variety and In my Opinion, aren't a bad touch. 2.) Pandarien (despite much redicule) are actually a nice addition to a race. They are part of the Warcraft universe by far and having them in won't be a bad thing. 3.) Monk class is interesting, seems to be shying away from the 'hero' classes they were big on though... guess that got ditched, but eh, I didn't like hero class anyways, a bit flawed concept where you are purposely 'avoiding' gameplay. 4.) "Time trials/Pet Battles": Figure I'd add this cause its not a bad thing at all. Its nothing that amazing but it gives something else to work for and it could be entertaining. More 'things to do' which is a pro though not really one you can call 'game changing'. Cons:
2.) Zones. Having them all keep a more oriental theme (as far as I see), it just loses flavor. Variety is the best way to make things look interesting and the design just seems lack luster to have it tossed in such a large amount of that oriental feel that its probably going to drown out and lose its touch. 3.) "Goal" Sorry, but as soon as you make a trailer that hypes up how amazing and tough your journey was and then suddenly throw into 'welcome to casual world!" You really downplay the game and take away any sense of accomplishment. Who wants to really play a game that they have nothing to look forward or work for. You played BC hoping to take on illidan. Wotlk you wanted to take down arthus. Cataclysm its Deathwing. Without a goal, it feels lack luster and in a game dependant on end game, your just burrying yourself. 4.) Talent system 2.0: Holy **** of bad design choices. Your attempt to remove 'cookie cutter' builds is going to end up making them that much more common. Your going to likely have things more similiar or hopefully you manage to keep it the same. What is the worst part though? You pretty much made leveling feel even less like you accomplish something then before. Talents give you something to feel like your progressing forward and let you feel like your 'customizing' your character. Now you pretty much level and nothing happens which just makes WoW's leveling grind actually worst off.
Yes, my cons are much more details and do stick out a lot greater then the pros. I would play the Panda, yes I said it, I would and I'd like it. Theres a lot more flaws to this expansion that are really getting downplayed for Pandas which is a bit sad people are so blinded by it that they see things in such a vague fashion. I could bet that a lot of gamers who would be given a solid teddy bear of gold for free would shove it away because its to 'kiddy' for them despite being very valuable. |
|
|
10/26/11 8:19:43 PM#25
I actually would like to play a Pandaren Monk with healing spec. The only thing I'm concerned about with this expansion is the changes to the talent system.
OP's remark on ''mature people not wanting to play a panda'' and another poster's remark ''panda is only appealing to Asian market''.. well I'm 28 years old, and I may be a little immature for my age, I still enjoy videogames in fantasy settings. I think the Pandaren are more mature than Gnomes. And I'm American, with Dutch-Irish lineage, so there's at least one semi-mature non-asian interested in the new race.
After WoW released, a friend of mine talked about how he wanted to play as a Pandaren character. This was several years prior to the existence of any Kung Fu Panda movies. Pandaren have been around for a long time. It is entirely possible that Blizzard is taking advantage of the popularity of Kung Fu Panda, but they're also giving a lot of existing fans what they've been asking for for years.
To each their own.
No pleasure, no rapture, no exquisite sin greater... than central air. |
|
|
10/26/11 8:26:35 PM#26
I wouldn't be happy if I still play the game. I'm happy because I don't. :) |
|
|
10/26/11 8:32:28 PM#27
Originally posted by Fozzik I kinda see why they wouldnt want people flying over the new content but no flying at all anywhere would be a bit harsh. I will say that flying at 60 pretty much ruined Outland for new players and anyone leveling an alt but taking it away is just taking something away that was already earned. |
|
|
10/26/11 9:23:31 PM#28
Flying isn't restricted until you get to Panderia. Before that you can fly everywhere else, just like you always could before. From the Q&A Panel: Q: Will players be allowed to fly in Pandaria? Upon arrival in Pandaria, players will be restricted from flying until they reach a certain point in their quest progression. While the ability to fly is a great convenience for players once they have completed content, we can provide a much more enjoyable, rewarding, and varied questing experience if players are (mostly) grounded while the story of Pandaria unfolds. Join the League For Gamers. |
|
|
rojo6934
Hard Core Member
Joined: 8/13/09
"It is double pleasure to deceive the deceiver". - Niccolo Machiavelli |
10/26/11 9:34:51 PM#29
Originally posted by gabox yes mature players can still have the game and enjoy a panda in WoW.... what is more fun for a mature person: A) roll a panda in a video game. B) go out with a poodle in real life and have to grab its poo on every grass its step on..... ill stay with the panda... if you think pandas in WoW are for kids, then i wonder how many kids are ruling the asian continent which is full of pandas... mmmh |
|
10/26/11 9:39:20 PM#30
Originally posted by gabox That is the nice thing about MMO's, If you like a race you can play it, if you don't; then you don't. I am going to try out the Pandas, I like expiriencing the new starting areas. but for those Mature players; they don't have to play a Panda. The Pandas can just be NPC's quest givers for them.
However, I find it odd that in a game that has space goats, people are in an uproar about Panda's. WoW has never stuck to a tratitional fantasy setting, I have flown in planes, fired machine guns, I have been asked by Jack Bouden to dissarm a BOMB that is going to explode! I have used a Jet pack to fly over to an enemy gun ship, I have met a pacifist Ogre and a Dwarf that wants to Punch a Dragon in the Face! But a Panda? Oh; there I draw the line! *Sarcasm* |
|
|
10/26/11 9:49:32 PM#31
Originally posted by lizardbones Ok. That makes sense. Same thing happened in Northrend with the cold weather flying. |
|
|
Dudek28
Apprentice Member
Joined: 8/13/04
There is nothing like a trail of blood to find your way back home. |
10/26/11 9:52:31 PM#32
Cant be worse then the Lich King xpack. |
|
10/26/11 11:07:57 PM#33
I'm coming back for 1 reason...
Battlegrounds with my mage. My mage is my only 85, and only 85 i'll ever have.. I truely love playing BG's in wow, but thats as far as it goes Currently Playing: lotro,BC2 Trying out Vanguard Looking forward to: GW2, BF3 Retired from: wow, eve, rift, FFXI |
|
|
10/26/11 11:14:54 PM#34
im fine with pandas. i dont really know enough about how the rest is going to play out. overall its a very different game for me these days. while i prefer vanilla, why play a clone? so i'll keep playing, occasionally, until the industry comes up with something that is more than just another wow clones. not holding my breath. LFD tools are great for cramming people into content, but quality > quantity. |
|
|
10/27/11 5:13:11 AM#35
The funny thing is, right now everyone is saying MoP sucks, Blizzard is crazy and half the player base is going to quit. This is the End of WoW, all the Gamers are going to play SW:TOR or GW2. Blizzard just killed WoW. But after MoP comes out and it sells like crazy those same people are going to say: Success means nothing, I don't care how many new players are playing WoW, after all look how successful Britney spears is and she sucks. Lowest common denominator, Lowest common denominator. (And then there will be a bunch of finger pointing) Just you wait.
|
|
|
10/27/11 3:14:00 PM#36
I will play the expansion. What's your point? |
|