| 79 posts found | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
"This is killing me, are we ever going to get any official info about the state of a PvP server/system? http://www.vanguardsoh.com/forums/showthread.php?t=69240 "Vanguard is not a PvP based game, it is designed to be PvE. It has been stated there will be a PvP ruleset server on launch, but that is about the extent of the information. http://www.vanguardsoh.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1405381#post1405381 They're in Beta 3 and STILL no testing of PVP. The vanboi community sneers at PVP. There's no real info on how PVP will work on the PVP servers. Sounds like it's a VERY low priority. If you love PVP, you won't be happy in Vanguard. That's my prediction. And I'm stickin to it. |
|||
|
8/31/06 3:56:38 PM#2
|
|||
|
8/31/06 3:58:58 PM#3
It's a PvE loot fest for people who enjoy their mmorpgs bland and unoriginal. Of course pvp is gonna be an afterthought and done half azzed. |
|||
yup |
|||
|
8/31/06 4:22:52 PM#5
I would advise checking out AoC if you want pvp that badly. I would guess that Vanguards system will be somewhat close to what EQ2 has. But that is speculation
|
|||
|
8/31/06 4:25:17 PM#6
I'm not too much of an PvP MMO fan, so I cannot be for the PvP crowd on this. I will say though, they have stated that they will have atleast 1 special rules server at launch and that it is going to be pvp (i think pvp is what they said) But sense it is mostly targeted towards a PvE experiance, I'm sure they will focus on that way before they start doing anything whatsoever about PvP. If I was a Dev and was making a PvE targeted game, then thats what i would focus on first as well. It's a PvE loot fest for people who enjoy their mmorpgs bland and unoriginal. Of course pvp is gonna be an afterthought and done half azzed. (By Trendson) If thats how you see Vanguard then you're right. But from what they have stated and what they say are in the game/ will be in the game, it has alot more than any PvE MMO i've seen or played. In my experiance I have not played a single MMO that was awesome (played good ones, but none that were awesome) so i don't expect Vanguard to be awesome either. I just am waiting for the game to come out so i can read a good, honost review to see if it is what i want to play. I've been waiting for a new MMO sense EQ, which has held my attention far longer than any other MMO till this day. If it ends up not being something i'd want to play then i will not. But all this PvP stuff should be common sense since PvP is not a main focus of the game. I'm sorry if thats not what people want to here but it is true. However, all PvE games i've played that have special PvP server, have had some pretty good ones. EQ2's PvP servers were a blast too me, as well as the Good vs neutral vs. evil EQ PvP server. (until everyone could just port to every zone thorugh PoK lol).
Current MMO of interest: Vanguard: Saga of Heroes |
|||
|
Vanguard's lack of focus on pvp just shows how insanely out of touch they are. They still think it's 1999. Hello? McFly? An MMO without rockin PVP is unacceptable in the year 2006. And you can't just jam in pvp as an afterthought, otherwise, it will suck hard. But what do you expect with the half-a$$ed effort being made by the Vanguard dev team? |
|||
|
8/31/06 4:43:51 PM#8
Current MMO of interest: Vanguard: Saga of Heroes |
|||
|
8/31/06 5:09:40 PM#9
yes we know jonaku, if the game isn't being made just for you it will suck....we get that now. not everybody likes pvp like you do, i know hard to believe isn't it? yes the pvp wont be that great in a pve-centric game, there are other games that have pvp as their main focus why must vaguard also be pvp-centric? BTW jonaku, i am a avid pvp'er and i sure as hell wont be playing vanguard to get that fix. i will be looking to play AOC or warhammer for that....that is the beauty of having different types of games to chose from. this is extremely old news that you posted here, its been known for quite some time that vanguard will not be catering to pvp'ers.... i know its just flame bait just like every other thread you make but this is getting ridiculous. |
|||
thank you for confirming that pvp in vanguard won't rock. and this coming from a vanboi. Q. E. D. |
|||
|
8/31/06 7:40:32 PM#11
thank you for confirming that pvp in vanguard won't rock. and this coming from a vanboi. Q. E. D. So, you hate absolutely everything about Vanguard yet you continue to plague this board like a bad case of jock itch. What a sad pittiful little life you must lead if you have nothing to do but troll boards for a game you hate.
|
|||
|
8/31/06 8:10:28 PM#12
thank you for confirming that pvp in vanguard won't rock. and this coming from a vanboi. Q. E. D. Well, here i go again... (I know you all are getting tired of me, but i'm sure everyone is tired of a few others here as well haha). I don't think Baphamet is right. It may not be so glorious at first, It may not be there at first period. But i'm pretty sure that eventually VG will come out with some sort of PvP style server that will be very fun and interesting. Assuming Vanguard is successful as a game of course. Again i'll use EQ2 as an example, I love the PvP in EQ2 even though it is strictly my opinion, I think it is funner than most PvP oriented games. Giving that Brad has stated several times that he is a huge fan of special rules server, I'm guessing that he has a few ideas about a good pvp system. I still want Arenas and duels in the PvE part of the game.... LoL.
Current MMO of interest: Vanguard: Saga of Heroes |
|||
|
8/31/06 8:24:20 PM#13
Wrong. The devs go where the money is. And their are alot more people willing to pay for PVE than PvP. Look around you. Where are all the PvP games? Exactly. |
|||
|
9/01/06 12:06:37 AM#14
and i would also like to add that while you love to generalize and put people in groups like calling me a "vabboi" the reality is i like all sorts of different type of games not just vanguard. yes i think pvp in vanguard wont be the best in the world as far as the combat goes. i think there will be far better games on the market and being developed with better pvp content, i also think that if a player plays mmog's just to pvp that they will probably not like vanguard. what are you really trying to prove here? do you think this is some sort of victory because you provided common knowledge that has been known for a long time? old news jonaku.. |
|||
|
9/01/06 12:17:10 AM#15
hold on now, i don't think vanguards pvp wont be fun or intresting....i played eq and eq2 on a teams pvp server and i love it. my point is vanguard will not be balanced for pvp as well as some of the other games that have pvp as a main focus, vanguard will obviously have less pvp content as well. pvp will be fun and interesting in vanguard, just not as much content and as balanced as some other games out there. i do think they could come out with expansions in the future and add more pvp content but as of right now, from what i have read it wont be at launch, just at least one server. |
|||
|
Anofalye
Apprentice Member
Joined: 11/19/03
The enemy is so dumb! They believe that WE are the enemy! - A famous orc commander. |
9/01/06 1:53:37 AM#16
PvP can be "fun" in Vanguard. Class won't be balanced for PvP, yet that doesn't rule out all PvP. A group vs group or RvR might be far more interesting than the individual needs for balance. Guilds fighting each other will require some amount of adjustment, some consideration. I wouldn't rule it as not happy. Small groups and solo PvP will prolly be extremely painful in Vanguard, but big groups and guilds PvP, I think there is something there... Is that enough for you? I dunno, it is a LOT, yet it is not everything...it really depend on which part of PvP you are looking for, as PvP is such a general term...PvP can be divided just as PvE, into casual, grouping and raiding. Casual PvP = run away in vanguard. Group PvP = midly interesting. Raid PvP = I see no reason why individual balancing should matter, it would prolly be ideal for epic battles, if the players are in for it...I am sure whichever guild will hold the land will have a huge edges in a non-instanced world to acquire the loot from the rare spawns. The only thing that would be needed to make it more interesting, is to "help" the underdog developp and obtain some stuff, since in such a setting, a side wins and master the game henceforth...it just require some encouragement for the underdog...I am not PvP-oriented myself...I honestly don't know how this can be done, but the game has everything in place for the winning side...you just have to keep the losing sides motivated and interested (still can add a little something for the winners to gloat openly about...yet the losers must be able to progress as well even if slower, just not gloat). - "If I understand you well, you are telling me until next time. " - René Levesque about the denial NO on the poll to his dream, project and goal. (Free translation) |
||
|
9/01/06 3:19:09 AM#17
I read these boards often though i rarely post, but this is just getting out of hand. I mean how many times will there be some whiner come on a Vanguard board (not just these) and bash the game because it isnt being made specificly for they're prefered play style? PvP (generel as the term is) is not something the average Vanguard player is likely to have much interest in. Not saying by any means that all Vanguard players dont want/like PvP, but if your a fan then you likely know thats not what this game is all about. There are plenty of games out there with more PvP/high end raiding/solo content than you can shake a rusty sword at. So why come here a piss and moan just because VG isnt being made JUST for YOU? You want PvP try WoW,DAoC,RF Online, or many others. Want TONS of high end raid content, then try EQ1, or likely many other agmes, though i cant name any off the top of my head. Just quit comming around VG fan boards to bash on a game that does not cater to YOU, because it likely does cater to many others. People need to remember, just because you can express your opnion, dont make your opnion right.
|
|||
|
9/01/06 7:50:47 AM#18
Actually, Vanguard may turn out to be much more balanced in PvP than many other games. In Vanguard, they built in the ability to tune PvP and PvE seperately. They can make spells and abilities function differently in PvP and PvE. So they don't have to worry that some spell needed for PvE is grossly overpowered in PvP, or that some good PvE style is totally useless in PvP. That, along with the fact that classes are more diverse (healers are actually damage dealers too) means that the game may very well not have any really gimp PvP classes. They also have said they have some ideas for unique PvP servers and that they were working on making PvP meaningful (whatever that may mean). So, while the game is built first and foremost to be a PvE game, it may very well have some great PvP and PvP servers. And for anyone who has played EQ, you have to love the idea of being able to balance PvP without effecting PvE at all (and the other way around as well).
|
|||
|
9/01/06 9:20:22 AM#19
pvp in this game really is going to suck. but also from experience i know that its how you play. so just because its sucks doesnt mean its going to suck. no clue what i just said =P
|
|||
|
9/01/06 10:32:31 AM#20
/shrug The majority of WoW's server rulesets are Normal, limited PvP...not sure why the demographics would be any different. I would expect limited PvP with some PvP flagged zones on normal servers, and a couple different types of PvP servers including an FFA, Faction Based, and possibly even an Ironman server.
|
|||