| 394 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Star Trek Online: Exclusive Screenshots, Part 5
News Discussion « General Discussion 12/02/09 11:41:01 AM
Originally posted by permster
|
|
|
Star Trek Online: Exclusive Screenshots, Part 5
News Discussion « General Discussion 12/02/09 11:36:57 AM
Originally posted by Cerion
they could just be in the press release screenshots and not all the game to show off, but how likely is that? |
|
Originally posted by Erxi
You may have saved me 40 euros, thank you.
What I am the most bored of is the tank-assist-dps-healer-CC-template for how combat should work. Sooo boooring. The game genre desperately needs innovation on that area.
if you haven't already check out mortal online (and cross your fingers and hope it delivers) |
|
|
you could always check out the ex p2p games like anarchy online or dungeons and dragons or there are some smaller ones like ryzom(sandbox wow), neocron 2(fpsmmorpg but hard to access outside europe atm because of click2pay) or vendetta(space shooter style) |
|
Originally posted by Diekfoo Well, you can expect the GUI to be improved more. They have a person on it now and it has been improved already a lot, the last 3 weeks and they will improve it more. So within 1 month it will be really good. we can but hope
|
|
Originally posted by Voomek
only lasted 3 days in the wow trial but agree with the rest maybe a sandbox would be worth a go so have you tried eve yet? if not you may be like the rest of us looking for something decent and have our fingers crossed that mortal online or maybe earthrise will deliver |
|
|
Have you tried eve online yet? or maybe earthrise when it arrives will suit you |
|
|
The Engine Work is progressing very well. I was thrilled this week to come back and see proper water technology implemented and LOOKING GREAT in game. Next Friday we will be posting screenshots (at a bare minimum... I am hoping for more) to show the current state of the ongoing work. I am very pleased with the performance level of the current client given that the integration is still ongoing and the optimization efforts have not really begun... I think we can all look forward to reasonably significant performance increases despite the addition of a great new level of visual detail and effects. It is going to be great to finally leave AO's CPU crunching of DX7 behind and take full advantage of todays GFX hardware with proper optimization.
this was from nov 6th if its any help |
|
Originally posted by matrixvs
Tried this game for 3 months and can't say i get it either. Also got a free week so thought i'd check out to see how it had changed in the past 18 months (if anything i think it was better back then) and noticed how empty the game is now. As for the poor animations and character models, apparently these have been complained about since beta with no effect As far as i can tell it's only selling point is that it's set in middle earth, without the lotr lore how many ppl would still be playing? |
|
|
Anyone Else Waiting For A New Sandbox?
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 11/25/09 6:20:14 PM
can i also mention earthrise as it always seems to get leff out of sandbox lists(it's sci-fi not fantasy though) |
|
|
Wait, what? "Pay Type:Subscription" ?
General Discussion « Star Wars: The Old Republic 11/24/09 1:45:18 PM
i think it was rumoured at one time to be subscription + micro transaction, but it was just a rumour |
|
|
Until ccp's offering i think the only current vampire mmorpg is dark eden |
|
|
General: Free Zone: How Helpful Are MMOG Previews
News Discussion « General Discussion 11/23/09 1:14:17 PM
Nice article got to say that i find previews and reviews far less useful for named ip's, such as star wars, star trek and lord of the rings when most of what i read doesn't really tell you anything about the game just that the person writting the preview/review is just wetting themselves to play a lotr/star trek/star wars mmorpg, doesn't even seem to bother them to even look if the game is any good after they see the name in the title |
|
|
Why is no one ever happy? Come in, it's Star Trek!
General Discussion « Star Trek Online 11/23/09 11:58:07 AM
Originally posted by Tycalibur
Point missed, as usual. I'm not saying that at all. If you like it, more power to you. I am stating my opinion in all the posts I've made about this. I'm one person, and if I don't want to play the game after I've tried the beta, then I won't. You do realise I was replying to the original post not yours? whose only real piece of information seems to be that sto uses the co engine that he didn't like and we should all shut up and keep any criticism silent purely because he says so and not because it isn't relevant |
|
sorry but how does swtor fit into this description? form what i've seen looks to be as heavily instanced as ddo maybe mortal online or earthrise would be worth a look |
|
|
Why is no one ever happy? Come in, it's Star Trek!
General Discussion « Star Trek Online 11/22/09 6:26:10 PM
So basically we should all come and play this game, not because it's going to be any good or anything but because it has star trek in the title? Maybe you should suggest this to the marketing team Star Trek online : not very good but it has the star trek name though |
|
|
As far as I can tell Everyone is playing as a starship not really as a captain or any crew member except on away mission the bridge is in there but appears to be the size of a casm is picked from a catalogue and redecorated to suit and essentially glorified player housing, not very star trek in any sense the timeline is mix and match with ships from tos and tng and beyond fighting together. Since there is roughly 100yrs between tos and the game setting this seems a bit daft and again not very star trek. Ground combat consists of standing 3 inches from your opponent and blasting away with a phaser or hitting them over the head with a batleth until one falls over, yet again not very trek ship classes are along the fantasy/ sword and sorcery lines of tank/dps/buff etc and still not very trek what little i've seen of klingon ships they seem to have romulan ship names(warbird, raptor) space is all multi coloured lighting effects and not black with twinkly bits, but this could just be the screens they've released the game seems to be overly combat orientated but then i'm not sure how you'll show things like exploration in a trailer, the genesis engine sounds interesting although not sure what it will deliver sto sounds very heavily instanced almost to the point of being a lobbied multiplayer game rather than an mmo how accurate does this sound? can somebody give any information different or new to contradict? please? or even point out the parts where they have paid attention to the ip rather than just picking bits at random from any star trek show and shoving them in Is this mmorpg just a case of to boldly go where everyone has gone before? |
|
|
1/population isn't awful on any sever as far as i know, but overall isn't anywhere near as high as it should be(around 150k altogether i think) 2/depends what you consider fun. Gameplay is the same dull, plodding ,turn based, zero challenge affair of almost every other mmorpg available but a lot of people like that. You'll have to decide for yourself if you do/don't 3/world is the standard linear style so only as big as your level 4/housing is instanced, endgame is doing the next part of the book they bring out and usually grinding more lvls fyi lotro is a pve based game |
|
|
Star Trek Online: Bridge Gameplay Trailer!
News Discussion « General Discussion 11/20/09 12:23:22 PM
I can't say that I ever remember seing a starship in star trek that has a bridge even close to the size of those in the vid. As to 'bridge' gameplay, apparently you can point at the viewscreen now and again |
|
|
Star Trek Online: Starship Tactics Trailer -- Part One
News Discussion « General Discussion 11/18/09 7:30:24 PM
Originally posted by voodookhan
ALL star fleet ships are science vessels, true that some have more specif designs... but this is not eve, or E&B 2. Its star trek.
Not true. Defiant-class and Prometheus-class, remember? The USS Defiant (prototype) was a ship specifically designed to battle the Borg...no science, no exploration, just killin'. The Federation are more interested in exploration, science, and diplomacy than kickin' butt, yes...but they DID make ships that were most certainly not intended to be science vessels (even though they want to kind of dismiss that aspect of themselves, they can't...not completely). I think the game looks very Star Trek (the battles looked like typical Trekkie space battles to me). The ship customization looks especially interesting. May I take a moment to sound really anal and point out that the defiant was not only fitted with extra firepower but also extra armour not only doing a lot of damage but also taking a lot of punishment thus making it both dps and tank in sto terms and not just dps |
|