| 432 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
It's unfortunate, but the more I play, the more I think...
General Discussion « Diablo 3 5/27/12 2:09:06 PM
Originally posted by just1opinion A - freaking - men. |
|
|
I've been searching for a satisfying mmo since the days of pre-NGE SWG and I think I've finally found the one for me - Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted (AKA Horizons). It's not very well known (at least not anymore, under it's new name) and the population is on the small side, but it still has devoted devs and it's offers an amount of variety and freedom that you don't find very often in 3D mmos. As a "niche" gamer of sorts, it's gets the job done for me. I made a thread and video of what I've learned about the game (since I started playing it) if any of you want to check it out. |
|
Originally posted by Aori Well, in all fairness, it's his opinion, and I happen to agree with him. Perhaps he could have elaborated a bit more, but regardless, he's entitled to feel that way he wants about it. That might be the general inclination here on the mmorpg forums, but from what I've seen on the official forums, they don't seem any more hateful than any other gaming community. I doubt the D3 community is all that different in itself. I've seen more than a fair amount of hate-mongering towards PoE from the D3 crowd as well. That said, I'm also sorry for personal attacks that I throw in my posts from time to time. I think this is a situation where we just need to agree to disagree and call it a day. |
|
Originally posted by Aori If you had actually read what I wrote, you'd see the "rocky transitions" part of my post. I'm well aware of what it went through, but the fact remains, it's still around, it's F2P, and it's still going strong. Obviously, an indie developer is at a loss in just about every way when going into an endeavour like this, but that's more the reason why I respect them over a company like Blizzard, who despite being able to pour countless resources into a mainstream title like D3, came out with what I feel is a lackluster product, even next to an indie developed game like PoE or FE. I also disagree that without steam FE would have failed, as it had a decent sized population even before it started being sold there, but I'm not getting into that here. So yeah, you can continue to recite your "doom and gloom" speak towards any game that doesn't get your seal of approval, that's cool. I'll keep on playing underdog games like FE and Istaria that I feel are far superior to many of those polished pieces of sh*t that are backed by million dollar investors. If they bite the bullet then whatever, I'll enjoy and support them while they're here.
|
|
Originally posted by IrishChai Agreed. I'll admit that I get a bit too personal at times but in the end, I acknowledge the fact that people have different tastes and that's just how it is. That said, I've stated my mind about my feelings on D3, so I don't plan on posting over on that board much anymore. In a situation like this, where two games are competing in a similar market, conversation of the two typically tend to degrade down to a "I'm right and you're an idiot" slugfest on both sides. I'm done with taking part in that atmosphere. |
|
Originally posted by Aori Your opinion of a gaming companies situation isn't being "realistic". What exactly do you know about them and their plans, or even their overall financial situation, apart from what they've made known? I'm sure you're not anymore enlightened than the rest of us. Fallen Earth was also an indie developed game, and aside from going through some rocky transitions, is still running strong (better than ever even) with their new F2P hybrid system. The population seems very constant from what I've observed and it's considered a niche game, so there's a bigger market for gamers like us than you might care to believe. That's only one example. If you really wished it well, you wouldn't make condescending, troll bait posts like that in the first place. Yeah, I've made several comments in the Diablo 3 forums, but it's normally only to rebuke mis-information or biased attacks on a game I happen to think doesn't get the credit it deserves - I even give D3 credit for what I feel it does right. I don't, however, make posts that do nothing but attack the quality and well-being of a game simply out of spite or because I think my opinion somehow out-weighs other's that don't share my own. That's more than I can say about several of the posts I've seen made by you in recent days.
|
|
Originally posted by Aori Whatever you have to tell yourself to feel validated in your crusade for Diablo 3 I guess. It must kill your ego to see other people enjoying something that you seem to despise. I've played both, and it's no contest for me - PoE is the superior product in my eyes. The sooner you come to the realization that your opinion isn't the gospel, the better. |
|
Originally posted by Aori Some of you people must seriously be blind; either that or ad hominem is your thing. |
|
Originally posted by wrightstuf You giving me your subjective opinion about something doesn't answer my question. Personally, I greatly prefer the art style of PoE to D3, because I like grittier over cartoon-ish. As for the story, they're are still working on a lot of stuff, but from what I've seen I disagree with your point on this too. The game is still in closed beta stage, and they're working with a much more limited funding, so naturally there are some things they still need to work on. So yeah, all things considered, I still fail to see what's so much cripplingly worse about PoE. You might not personally like the style of it, among other things, but that doesn't make it "awful" compared to the others. People need to get over themselves and realize that their opinion isn't the gospel. |
|
Originally posted by BartDaCat I'm a fan of PoE, and I agree with this completely. Seriously guys, stop trolling every single D3 thread with PoE comparisons and whatnot. Both games have their pros and cons and there's nothing wrong with liking and playing both of them. |
|
Originally posted by sadeyx At the risk of de-railing it even further, what exactly makes PoE awful compared to the others? It's pointless saying sh*t like that without giving any reasoning behind it. So what makes the game seem so terrible for you? |
|
Originally posted by spikers14 Not sure if you were asking for the TQ original game specifically, but as far as TQIT goes, there's still hundreds of people that play it online. I was just on earlier this morning (probably the opposite of peak times for the US playerbase at least), and there was about 180-200 people. During peak times that's probably about double. All in all, it's pretty impressive, especially for an ARPG that came out in '06. I'm planning to start playing it pretty actively, at least until PoE is released. |
|
|
Almost 60 billion build possibilities isn't enough?
General Discussion « Diablo 3 4/24/12 3:11:55 PM
Originally posted by dotdotdash Not at all, not sure why you think that. Well, either I only joined groups that were the exception to the rule, or I had a build close enough to cookie cutter parameters to be considered acceptable, because I never had any problems in D2, regardless of the difficulty (I never played hardcore though, so I don't doubt how strict people are there). Even if anyone had said anything, at least I would have had the defense/leverage of, "well, it's a pain in the ass to respec, so give me a shot the way I am and see how it works out," With D3, there wouldn't be any good excuse for keeping the build you actually like using, because due to the ease of it, you will be expected to respec whenever necessary, and I really hate that. Again I ask, why even have builds at all? If you can't keep a certain kind of "build identity" to your character, what's even the point? Just like your last example, why even have any choice at all with a system like this? The game might as well just pick what's best for you depending on what you're doing since you're going to have to do that anyway. Also, I'll believe the "MORE right specs" when I actually see them in practice. Things can sometimes play out differently on the field, especially in each respective situation (boss fights for example). |
|
Originally posted by Torqia Well, I'm not personally a fan of cash shop games either, but I understand that they need to make money somehow. For me, nothing they're planning to offer in the shop is game breaking, so I don't mind it. Besides, if you don't mind forking over 15 a month like you would with a p2p game, you'd still be able to get most of what would even be considered "essential" like extra space and whatnot. Overall, when it comes to things that are truly important to me (like customization and art style) PoE gets my vote, so I can handle the negatives. If I need to pay a little to get the more "essential" addons, while at the same time helping to support a bold indie developer in this market of giants, in order to play an interesting game, I'm cool with that too. |
|
Originally posted by alacres
From what I understand, most of the items in PoE's cash shop will be cosmetic and storage type stuff. The Devs themselves have already stated their dislike for P2W, and as far as I can see, have no intention on restricting content either. Here is a list of what they say will be available in Open beta (and most likely when it hits live) - Public stash tabs (viewable to other players for trade purposes) As for the other game you mentioned, I don't know anything about it, and I don't really see the point in referencing it here. |
|
Originally posted by Torqia From what I understand, most of the items in PoE's cash shop will be cosmetic and storage type stuff. The company themselves have already stated their dislike for P2W, and as far as I can see, have no intention on restricting content either. Here is a list of what they say will be available in Open beta (and most likely when it hits live) - Public stash tabs (viewable to other players for trade purposes) As for the other game you mentioned, I don't know anything about it, and I don't really see the point in referencing it here.
|
|
Originally posted by GoldenArrow Ok, what exactly makes it suck? Please, enlighten us. |
|
Originally posted by wrightstuf Wow, what are you smoking exactly? It's already in closed beta, and will be going open in June. The release date probably won't be long after. I don't know if you're trolling or just genuinely ignorant.
|
|
|
Almost 60 billion build possibilities isn't enough?
General Discussion « Diablo 3 4/24/12 1:28:39 PM
Originally posted by dotdotdash I'd normally agree with that, but with a game that involves playing with random people (unless you just happen to have a few friends that play at the exact same times and you only play with them), you're most likely going to run into people who won't group with you (or kick you) for not playing as efficiently as possible. In a game where respeccing isn't an instant swap (like D2), you had more leverage, but in a game where you can swap out at anytime, people will expect you do what's considered "best", and why wouldn't you if it can be done instantly/effortlessly? But sure, restricting yourself is fine if you only play with friends/people you know, and/or you don't care about getting kicked by randoms when they realize you're not going to play the way the mathematicians recommend. |
|
Originally posted by DarkPony I agree TQ is severely under-rated, and I was surprised to see how great it still looks, when I played it on my new HDTV. It was so fluid it almost looked life-like. I'm still a little undecided on a class though. I was messing around on my Templar (he's only 10) and although I feel like he will be a powerful character later on, he really bores the crap out of me. Even once I get higher level, I won't have many active abilities, due to all the synergies I went with to make the build survivable. I'd like to find something that has decent survivability, uses a shield, and has a good amount of activity in battle, but you always have to compromise somewhere it seems :p. Btw, any suggestions on mods? I don't want anything that gives an advantage, but I noticed people talking about a "fan patch" that fixes certain bugs in the game, but makes it impossible to play with those who don't use it. Is that still recommmended?
|
|