Only reason for me to subscribe again is if they open up a classic pre-AoS shard.

Originally posted by Oyjord

Why on earth the devs didn't create a toggle to play in FPV or TPV is beyond me.  Choice is better for everyone.  Till I get to associate with my avatar by actually SEEING it, I can't consider this game an RPG.

 Agree, a toggle third person view would make the game better.

Originally posted by Garvon3

Originally posted by funkmastaD

Originally posted by Garvon3

Too bad they turned just about everything off to get it to run. 

 

Yeah, great launch. 

I know you don't care and it won't stop you from trolling, but the game is running great with all features turned on.  Thievery is out for balance reasons, not technical reasons.

 

Why are you so angry?

All the features that were in the open beta perhaps, but not all the features we were supposed to have. 

 Read the power point we got way back and you can read there what was supposed to be in at release. We got all that except thievery. We even got more then we were promised so i dont understand what it is your missing?

Maybe you can elaborate on the missing parts?

Originally posted by Tarka

Originally posted by Aragon100

Originally posted by Toferio

http://www.mortalonline.com/forums/43938-forum-change-update.html#post893877

Yes, that means that those who are not subscribers won't be able to even view the subscribers forum (I saw Maerlyn confirming it on IRC). I think there is no other AAA mmos that do the same (correct me if I'm wrong).

 A forum for subscribers and another for others were what Age of Conan had. At least in the beginning. Dont know if it is still that way though.

 Like many other MMO's, AOC has just one forum that both subs and non-subs can view for each different areas of the globe (US, English Speaking Europeans, French, Polish, etc).  However, only subs can post in it.

Ok they changed it then, in the beginning of the game it was closed areas for non subscribers. 

Originally posted by Ozivois

Can someone answer this question for me please?  AoC has stunning graphics, wouldn't want to take a large step down to try this one.

 You cant compare a game like AoC (instanced) with a seamless world like the one MO have.

MO graphic is good but not as good as AoC as i see it. With new trees (speedtree 5.1) it will get very close though.

Originally posted by Toferio

http://www.mortalonline.com/forums/43938-forum-change-update.html#post893877

Yes, that means that those who are not subscribers won't be able to even view the subscribers forum (I saw Maerlyn confirming it on IRC). I think there is no other AAA mmos that do the same (correct me if I'm wrong).

 A forum for subscribers and another for others were what Age of Conan had. At least in the beginning. Dont know if it is still that way though.

Originally posted by indiramourn

Too bad the thunder has only one volume even though lightening flashes are happening both far away and nearby.  Good start though.

 Guess it depends on what sound system you have. My comfy chair started vibrating from those lowest sounds.

Originally posted by Neoptolemus

Originally posted by AllSeeingGuy

HAH where is the dancing bannana now? You are now saying what we (the guys who like MO) have been saying all along. Just wait until launch. Its quite ironic thats all you have to say, its seems as the roles have turned. Xsyon maybe a better forum for you since they seem to be doing pretty bad. Its like shooting fish in a barrel over there.

He's saying that because there's only 3 days left now until the release, not enough time for SV to make any significant changes to the game. Crunch time has arrived in other words, so I wouldn't start claiming victory just yet.

 Played alot today and what i experienced ingame today is already what you claim they cant deliver, a significant change for the better.

So seems to me the game is coming along just nicely.

Originally posted by Thorii

In the center of meduli with all graphic options at the highest I have no fps drop or lag what so ever, brilliant! Although there was only 8 people on the screen we shall see. Can't wait to see the upgraded weather effects taking place.

Yes there is a huge increase in FPS and no drops that interfere with ingame performance, need more people online though. Seem not that many got that last patch yet.

Desync seem to be totally gone which is good cause it was a gamebreaker for me.

Looks really nice.

Lets hope it will be in on release day.

Who knows what surprices they might have for us.

If they would implement a old setting server like Second Age they would get +50 players from our guild jumping right in.

Im still really surpriced they havent already made one?

It's like they dont appreciate our money?

Originally posted by Yamota

Originally posted by Aragon100

 

You can also say that 100% of the reviewers that dislike niche PvP games give those games a bad score, just like Ed did.

Why didnt he play the game before making a review on it?

We both know the answer to that, dont we?

 

Rubbish. His review did not give bad marks to the game because it is a "niche PvP game" but rather because of basic things that it lacked. Like good gfx, controls, good UI, good community etc. Being a "niche PvP game" is no excuse for not having those.

Ed from Eurogamer played the game for 3 hours - so how can he have ANY opinions on it?

The ones he had was false ones. False cause he didnt know the basic game mechanics of the game. Kinda like playing a FPS without using your weapon.

Kinda pathetic, wouldn't you say?

Originally posted by gruminator

yet another fanbot footshot.

according to OP 20% of all that play darkfall gives it under 6 in score.

and thats from the people that plays it!!

20%

thats insane...

if we are saying 15000 people are playing darkfall, 3000 think its mediocre at best.

wow, congrats with yet another awesome victory.

You actually think everyone  voting in that poll is a fanbois? =)

Originally posted by jimmyman99

Originally posted by Aragon100

It's been alot of discussion wether Darkfall is worth a low score or a high one after the Eurogamer review.

There have also been a discussion if the Eurogamer reviewer actually played the game before making his review on Darkfall.

I think that the Eurogamer reviewer didnt enter Darkfall with an open mind. He had his score thought out BEFORE he logged in first time.

What puzzles me is how a reviewer can act like he did.

If he dont have an open mind to Darkfall then he isnt the one that should make this review. He is coloured with his negativism before logging in.

This is how the players of Darkfall rates the game and the result is as you all can see very far from the Eurogamer reviewers score of 2/10 -

http://forums.darkfallonline.com/showthread.php?t=185381

80% of today Darkfall players rate the game btw 6 and 10.

I give Darkfall a 9.

Darkfall isnt for everyone and letting a carebear like this Ed guy from Eurogamer review Darkfall is born to fail. He like carebear games like LOTRO and isnt interested in Darkfall.

It's like letting the devil review the bible.

Worst part of it all is that he didnt even play Darkfall before making his review.

I would be ashamed of myself if i were Ed Zirgon.

 

 

80% of people who regularly eat chicken wings like chicken wings. That statement similar to the statement above and is a logical nonsense.

You can also say that 100% of the reviewers that dislike niche PvP games give those games a bad score, just like Ed did.

Why didnt he play the game before making a review on it?

We both know the answer to that, dont we?

Originally posted by Carl132p

Originally posted by Aragon100

Originally posted by Guillermo197

This poll means jack.

As who will vote on a poll on the official game's forum. A forum that has been banning and still banning any person that has critique and isn't praising the game into the heaven's sky. Exactly, only diehard fans.

 

It would be the same as running a poll on a Fanatic Catholic website about wich religion is better and then posting everywhere that Catholism is the best religion, because the poll on the Fanatic Catholic website said so.

 

Cheers

 

This poll make much more sense then the Eurogamer review made by a carebear that didnt play the game.

The actual player of the game is the best reviewers cause they played the game for a long, long time and have seen the endgame and the complexity of the game.

Ed Zitron from Eurogamer didnt even scratch the surface of the game.

If you're a carebear then Darkfall isnt a game for you. But for the old UO players and other hardcore PvP:ers it's the best thing that happened to the MMO genre since UO.

 

bull this game is nothing like Uo and you know it. your poll makes no sense at all because all the reviewers are wearing rose tinted gogles and are so busy backing up the game they all acted as fanbot for that they would sooner die than rate a bad game with a bad rating.

Have you even played Darkfall?

Have you tried out the endgame skills in PvP?

Do you know how much skills affect the outcome of a battle with hi end characters?

Darkfall is as complex as UO when it comes to skill in PvP when it comes to hi end performance.

I played UO for +10 years and played Darkfall for 6+ months now and seen the similarities btw these games.

A good players wins angainst a bad player, and he wins bigtime.

Come back when you have some experience from hi end performance and the endgame.

Originally posted by Guillermo197

This poll means jack.

As who will vote on a poll on the official game's forum. A forum that has been banning and still banning any person that has critique and isn't praising the game into the heaven's sky. Exactly, only diehard fans.

 

It would be the same as running a poll on a Fanatic Catholic website about wich religion is better and then posting everywhere that Catholism is the best religion, because the poll on the Fanatic Catholic website said so.

 

Cheers

This poll make much more sense then the Eurogamer review made by a carebear that didnt play the game.

The actual player of the game is the best reviewers cause they played the game for a long, long time and have seen the endgame and the complexity of the game.

Ed Zitron from Eurogamer didnt even scratch the surface of the game.

If you're a carebear then Darkfall isnt a game for you. But for the old UO players and other hardcore PvP:ers it's the best thing that happened to the MMO genre since UO.

It's been alot of discussion wether Darkfall is worth a low score or a high one after the Eurogamer review.

There have also been a discussion if the Eurogamer reviewer actually played the game before making his review on Darkfall.

I think that the Eurogamer reviewer didnt enter Darkfall with an open mind. He had his score thought out BEFORE he logged in first time.

What puzzles me is how a reviewer can act like he did.

If he dont have an open mind to Darkfall then he isnt the one that should make this review. He is coloured with his negativism before logging in.

This is how the players of Darkfall rates the game and the result is as you all can see very far from the Eurogamer reviewers score of 2/10 -

http://forums.darkfallonline.com/showthread.php?t=185381

80% of today Darkfall players rate the game btw 6 and 10.

I give Darkfall a 9.

Darkfall isnt for everyone and letting a carebear like this Ed guy from Eurogamer review Darkfall is born to fail. He like carebear games like LOTRO and isnt interested in Darkfall.

It's like letting the devil review the bible.

Worst part of it all is that he didnt even play Darkfall before making his review.

I would be ashamed of myself if i were Ed Zirgon.

Originally posted by Galadourn

Originally posted by Aragon100

People playing Darkfall rate if btw 6-8 on a 10 scale.

 

I've played Darkfall and 2 is a decent score for it. And many old supporters and beta testers agree with this review and the score. Perhaps drop the case?

Latest poll on ratings by ingame players is btw 6-8.

Maybe it's time you realize you didnt like Darkfall but others do.

http://forums.darkfallonline.com/showthread.php?t=185381

Originally posted by huxflux2004

As a member of the Greater Troll Community, I feel proud to have Ed in the press. Keep up the good work, Ed! At last someone who presents games as they should be presented and does not lick the balls of the devs.

 

Gamespot would say something along the lines of  "Although the game is new and has all the maturity problems every MMO has near launch, it nevertheless has a great potential to fill a hard-core niche part of the market. Just as EVE-Online did a couple of years ago." No, Gamespot and Gamespot-lookalikes, DF has no maturity problems. It just is a bad, low quality game made as a side-job by people that were experimenting - and unfortunately were not good at it. And you do not need more that 10 minutes with the game to realize this. Actually, I think that Eurogamer wasted too much time with DF. 2 hours! This is what I call patience and proffesionalism.

 

Keep up the good work Ed. We need to spend our money wisely!

Seems you prefer reviewers that doesn't do his job in a professional way.

People playing Darkfall rate if btw 6-8 on a 10 scale.

That is  fair ratings for Darkfall and making reviews based on nothing as this joke of a reviewer Ed did is hurting the gaming industry.

Originally posted by kishe

Apparently Red Bedlam sent logs to pczone regarding Ed Zitron giving Roma victor a 8% after just few hours of gameplay as well (to be noted, those who read the PCZONE review say DF review was pretty much copy&paste from his roma victor review)

 

Then later he reviewed Dreamlords, giving it 17% causing major uproar from Dreamlords fanbase and...you guessed it! Dreamlords devs giving out logs of him barely touching the game! ...shortly after this the guy "disappeared" from PC Zones review crew.

 

This guy has been caught red handed while writing "reviews" out of his arse three times now...it's miracle anyone gives him any credibility anymore.

 

 

This is disturbing info.

A reviewer that is brownnosing the established large companies and discriminate the small indy companies.

Ed Zitron and Eurogamer credibility is out of the window.