Ah... Ok...

Aren't they the same game?

What...?

What do you mean Activision? Are they apart of the Vivendi group?

Originally posted by Bakoryo

 

Originally posted by putridmist

Blizzard was hiring, and still are for a new "Next-Gen MMO" that's very hush-hush.

There were many debates on what this could be and those are:

1. "Diablo 3"

2. Some kind of "Super World of Warcraft Expansion"

3. "World of Warcraft 2"
No connection to the first one meaning new engine, graphics, gameplay.
(Many people said this is stupid because they would be competing with themselves over subscriptions)

My personal favourite:
4. "Starcraft MMO" I so want this. I want to be a Apprentice Dark Templar ninjaing little linglings.

5. New lore. Not any of the previous lore's Blizzard is famous for. (Warcraft, Starcraft, Diablo)

I'm sure it could be anything. MMO doesn't have to be a RPG.

 

Please don't write one sentence replies such as "OH EM GEE DIABLO 33333?!?!"

If you'd like to contribute ideas you may but, please keep it reasonable. (Such as between the 3 lores)

Also some real information would be greatly appreciated. (e.g interviews with clues, articles, etc, etc.)

Thanks.

 

 

Update - Please Delete, Similar Thread Exists.

(But that other thread is so useless in my opinion, just "My friend works at Blizz and he/she says its Diablo3/Starcraft Related" posts.)

1; meh. blizzard north does not exist anymore so D3 would not even be as good as the previous ones.

 

2; World of warcraft; Wrath of the lich king. <--

3;Won't come in the near future or ever. Why compete with their own game?

4;Won't come aswell. Check no3

5;I seriously doubt that.

 

But in general. They wont compete with their own game, they won't make a new game. Everytime they have tried it (sc: Ghost anyone?) It failed apparently. I would love a D3, but only made by the former group of blizz north.

So what would it be? You didn't really say what it would be.

"they won't make a new game..."

If they aren't making a new game why would they hire people on the pretense of a "Next-Gen MMO".

Also, they announced (I believe) that the "Next-Gen MMO" is NOT "Wrath of the Lich King.

I'm sure that it's either Diablo lore or a new lore. (Or no lore at all)

The people who created Diablo II are gone. "Hellgate : London" Is by the creators who created Diablo II and in my opinion not that great.

http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/vivendi-says-diablo-3-a-mmo/

-Vivendi the parent company of Blizzard announces that Diablo 3, (whenever it comes out) it will definitely be a MMORPG. (A lot of people are hating this idea as Diablo II is a hack and slash, which I agree with)

Blizzard is making a new MMO. I wonder...

Blizzard was hiring, and still are for a new "Next-Gen MMO" that's very hush-hush.

There were many debates on what this could be and those are:

1. "Diablo 3"

2. Some kind of "Super World of Warcraft Expansion"

3. "World of Warcraft 2"
No connection to the first one meaning new engine, graphics, gameplay.
(Many people said this is stupid because they would be competing with themselves over subscriptions)

My personal favourite:
4. "Starcraft MMO" I so want this. I want to be a Apprentice Dark Templar ninjaing little linglings.

5. New lore. Not any of the previous lore's Blizzard is famous for. (Warcraft, Starcraft, Diablo)

I'm sure it could be anything. MMO doesn't have to be a RPG.

Please don't write one sentence replies such as "OH EM GEE DIABLO 33333?!?!"

If you'd like to contribute ideas you may but, please keep it reasonable. (Such as between the 3 lores)

Also some real information would be greatly appreciated. (e.g interviews with clues, articles, etc, etc.)

Thanks.

Update - Please Delete, Similar Thread Exists.

(But that other thread is so useless in my opinion, just "My friend works at Blizz and he/she says its Diablo3/Starcraft Related" posts.)

My mistake, let me clarify.

If WASD function is the only reason you don't want to play this game I doubt you'd enjoy the game that much to begin with.

What I meant by low-budget is that because they are low-budge they can't change the programming so easily.

This game is pretty old. Not that old but somewhat. To ask it to change its basic engine so it works with WASD would require "something" that I do not know.

But, they could who knows. There is no fault in asking. Did you try to send an e-mail to the game developers?

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear, Mabinogi Developers

LF WASD PST

-Gamer

---------------------------------------------------------------------

re: WASD??!?

Dear, Gamer

rgr rgr.

-Mabinogi Managment

---------------------------------------------------------------------

If they thought it was valuable to the players to have WASD I'm sure they would have already made it possible.

Most Korean people don't play FPS's and that's probably why WASD wasn't implemented. They like clickitty-click. (I are Koreans. I hate clickitty-click Diablo II was fine though)

Summarization-

Azn pplz =/= WASD. (Not that they don't like it but they are not familiar with it, thus it is not a necessity)

I don't think it has anything to do with what year or century it is. In fact WASD existed before 1998 I believe?

DOOM 3D, Duke Nukem, Wolfenstein 3D they had WASD. Back then it was called "Up Down Left Right" Key or arrows.

Originally posted by Cypt1

I hardly think that complaining about the lack of a basic mechanic such as WASD movement is unacceptable; after all, many other "low-budget" games provide the users with such an option (e.g. DOMO).

They programed the game to work that way in the beginning. Changing the programing would probably mean a very long downtime (if it were possible) for the current players.

 - I stopped playing this game because they controlled how many hours I get to play. Two hours limit then you'd have to pay or wait next day. That was the Korean version, I don't know about this one)

Originally posted by truerune777

Originally posted by crunchyblack

played this game for a couple of days...... i agree fith the thread title, only i hate THIS game

was just crummy on all levels except the graphics are decent

was unable to join most games

found that really only one strategy exists, runa away or run at something, it reminded me of tag in some messed up form, i was either chasing someone, yawn, or being chased

some people really like this game, im just not one of em

Dude those arent the only methods of playing this game.Theres the sniper style of playing,where you can hide or stay distant with the archer character and basically snipe your enemies for your teammates or for yourself.Another method is to fight someone in a basic battle where you slash,block,grapple etc. Trust me,theres WAY more to this game than run,hack & slash,run

If you did that is, ask me...

[Warning Rant Approaching!]

Honestly gaming industry is dying man.

Everyday worse and worse games come on the market and they pass off as "games" when all they are generic piece of shet. Only way they sell their games is through hype hype and more hype.

Assassin's Creed was a joke.

COD4 is just another FPS clone. (SIngle Player was the bomb though. That sniping level made me drool. Too short nevertheless)

Only decent game I have played in a while that IENJOYED was.... God I don't even remember.

WoW is just... I don't even know how to describe it.

I hate that game but I'm so utterly drawn to it everytime I quit.

Gears of War was fun while it lasted. I wouldn't buy it.

I'm so desperate for a good, fun, exciting, addictive game right now. I'm just waiting. I'm so desperate I'm playing FF7, FF9, Brave Fencer Musashi, and Threads of Fate.(PSX emulated)

God, it seems like all the gaming companies/developers only care about how the game looks. Timeshift looked.... detailed... maybe too detailed but core gameplay was just "Ugh".

Whatever.

I played Rakion before, didn't really like it.

It would have been awesome if it was PvE and not PvP every time. I'd love to chase little monsters and bash em with a huge sledgehammer.

[/rant]

Kinda stupid though don't you think?

Only reason Diablo II isn't an MMO is because it only allows 8 people in one room.

Let's look at Maple Story. (Maple story sucks don't play it)

You can have more than 8 people in one area, but it has no purpose. At all.

Let's look at an FPS.

CS, COD4, etc etc.

This means an FPS has more chance of being called MMO by those rules. Rofls.

Lol maybe because this game is pretty old?

I don't know anything about programing but I'm sure to make characters move with keys require them to change something and that's epic-number crunching. Stop comparing low budget games with games like WoW.