| 196 posts found | |
|---|---|
Originally posted by Cristina1
Well, all I can tell you is that I quit and do not plan on returning. As far as the forums are concerned, I know, for a fact, some threads have been merged, or outright closed. A couple of them were mine. Believe what you want... |
|
|
I'll take a stab at this thread. If you look at my previous postings, you might have labelled me a fanboi. And I have written a couple blogs about the game. In my opinion, Darkfall is a fairly good game. I was very much interested in it since 2008. I even intended to start at the North American Server launch, but then, come Christmas, a member of my family gave me an IOU for a year's subscription to Darkfall when it came out. I didn't have the heart to tell my son that the launch was delayed, and only released in Europe, So I started on EU-1 with the expectation for a clean transfer to NA-1 when it goes live. Now to be fair, let me remind you that the game mechanics is pretty good. I had no problem with graphics or PvP. What I did have a problem with was the following: 1. Aventurine, as a company, just plain sucks. They do not give you details, leaving a lot up to speculation. I was recently stunned to hear about the 3 month wait, with no items, with a transfer charge, policy. 2. Every person ends up with all the same skills, maxxed out. I find this boring. I believe that everyone from the beginning should have the ability to choose, but have limits based on their choices. There is no mage, fighter, archer, etc. There's just a bunch of guys running around in full armor with magic wands, with swords, with bows. I do not find this challenging or interesting. 3. Too much nakedness. If the game reduces you to wearing nothing, simply to be safe, then its not much of a game.
And, therefore, I cancelled my subscription about 3 weeks ago. I'll get a chance to see the expansion, but it doesn't really matter. Aventurine, once again, talks about an expansion but gives very few details. I read the 10-question interview with Claus...not impressed...he leaves more to speculation than specifics. My friends. There's a lot of good things that could have been said about Darkfall. I'm just not interested in saying them anymore. You can look at my post history to see how my opinion has evolved. The only thing I'm sorry about is that my son's money got wasted. By the way, if you're a fan of Darkfall, more power to you. My only advice is to keep working at getting Aventurine to communicate with you. |
|
|
I think that Mortal Online should offer a discount to Darkfall Online customers. Basically let them buy your Darkfall Online account and cancel it. In return, they'll give you 2 free months of their game. This is a moment for Mortal Online to take advantage of the bad practices by Aventurine. |
|
|
I don't really agree with the original poster on most of his comments, but I do have a sinking feeling about Darkfall at the moment. I played Darkfall, cancelled a few weeks back. I had no constant server downtimes or anything like that. I just felt the game lacked content.
What's bothering me at the moment, even though I am no longer a subscriber, is how they are implementing the server transfers to the North American server. It makes me glad I left when I did. I don't know anymore...I guess I'll leave the arguing to you guys. I'm sadly disappointed in how AV has handled the game. The mechanics were fine with me... I don't think I ever qualified as a fanboi, but I certainly wasn't a troll. |
|
|
The reason why some people won't be trying it out.
General Discussion « Darkfall 5/12/09 8:27:32 AM
Originally posted by Electriceye
Greetings and thanks for your opinion. My friend, I don't hate you, but I also don't get the impression you actually played the game. Perhaps you are correct that a company with more money could have created a more flawless implemenation and initiation process to market, but I disagree with some of your comments. Markedly, they seemed to overgeneralize Darkfall. The graphics behind Darkfall: if we truly want to discuss this than we're opening a huge debate. You see, it's fundamentally true that Age of Conan has the best graphics quality, but at the same time, Age of Conan is not considered a great game. Furthermore, Age of Conan has proven that cutting edge graphics mean fewer people can play. I believe, ultimately, that you are welcome to complain about the graphics, but there are a few important points with Darkfall that should be give credit. 1. In Darkfall, you can spot someone farther away if they wear metal, because light glints off of it. 2. The graphics are integrated into the concept of hiding and stealth (There is no "hide" skill). Darkfall is doing pretty well on this front, and I've noticed graphic updates in patches. So, what I'm basically eluding to is that a good game is not one with awesome graphics, but one that is graphically consistant. Why? Because graphics are consistantly being changed in every game. As well, you complained about the sound. What really threw me off was your comments about music. My friend, in Darkfall, if you are listening to music, you are probably not playing the game. I have played the game and I can tell you that most people I communicate with wear headphones to determine which directions sounds are coming from. See, here's the problem. In darkfall, the direction of a sound can save your life. I recall once when I was mining ore the soft sound of hooves in the distance. When you wear headphones, you can turn your character in the direction of those hooves to figure out where they are coming from. This is absolutely not possible when music is playing. Those hooves are likely to be raiders and you quickly learn where to hide based on the direction of the thread. So...music? No way. Darkfall sounds are extremely important to stealth and surviveability. This is the main reason I'm not sure you actually tried out the game.
In some ways you are correct. Darkfall has a ways to go. Me personally, I haven't had a problem with the game. I knew upon subscription that they were a small company with little money...that they were the small kids on the block. But, if you think about it, few games continue on without problems. The impression you are putting out is one that I see from a lot of people who do not like the game. They set higher expectations for Darkfall than they would for Blizzard, Funcom, et al. And when Darkfall has issues, they use those moments to ridicule the company and call it a failure. Perhaps in time, you will see that every company has ups and downs and no one is perfect. The only thing I can tell you is that out of all the games I have played, Darkfall is currently the most intensely riveting of them. |
|
|
Tasos wouldn't have thrown a tantrum if EG gave it 10/10
General Discussion « Darkfall 5/11/09 8:21:42 AM
I would expect any company to challenge a 2 out of 10 review. To not dispute such a claim would, in essence, mean that the company accepts the decision imparted to them. Perhaps the manner in which Tasos defended himself bothers you, but I find no fault in a company defending themselves from a 3rd party. |
|
|
Obviously my definition of sandbox differs from others. Darkfall is pretty much a sandbox. The players determine the economy, and since they can create anything in the game, the prices are stabilizing depending the need. One thing I noticed, was how the price or iron ore went up shortly after a patch that caused weapon and armor durabilities to shorten and break. Once again, players determined the pricing. Stealth, in Darkfall, is not a button you can press. It's an act you perform in any way you can. You literally have to create your method of stealth. I'm not about to reveal mine, but some obvious factors are, hugging to shadows, hiding behind bushes and trees, staying out of the periphery of other people. Even the weapon you use becomes important. If you use magic, you'll have a magical glowing aura around you and be much easier to detect. But if you use a bow and arrow, a sniper shot can be near impossible to figure. Therefore, stealth is determined by the player. Politics, in Darkfall, is more complicated than an any other game of played. Now, it doesn't matter who you are simply allied with or at war with. It matters what other people in the area think about you. A clan I'm involved with literally had a meeting with all their allies, simply to determine if moving to another area was worthwhile. They sent "spies" to the are, which was quite a long journey, to gather information about other clans in the area. Troop sizes, races, current warring factions, the availability of resources. And so, political sparring is very much controlled by the players.
Ladies, gentlieman, the game has so far impressed me. What hasn't impressed me, though, is the number of crashes and the hacking. To balance out my "glowing" commentary, those issues absolutely need to be addressed and eradicated. |
|
|
What has been the most boring mmorpg you have ever played/ tried to play? Not the worse, just the most boring to actually PLAY! Which has been the most fun to PLAY?
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 4/15/09 11:33:43 AM
I've played WoW and Runes of Magic. They are extremely similar. Extremely...with the exception that Runes of Magic allows you to dual-class. I ended up leaving those game relatively quick. They were boring for me. These games took all the work out of adventuring. You don't have to search for an adventure, just click the person with the gold exclamation point over his head. What ends up happening is that you become like everyone else. What I hate the worst is that you can simply target the person and from that point on, you'll hit him. Lastly, I find it ridiculous that you can "hide" in plain sight. Anyhow, I gave each game about two months. I returned to World of Warcraft to give The Burning Crusade two months. I decided not to even try Wrath of the Lich King. Runes of Magic, in my opinion, was better than WoW (probably because I didn't have to pay a dime for it), but once you realize that you will never beat a player who "Shops" for his stuff, you realize that the game is pointless. At that point, it's just a shell game. |
|
|
If they don't like your name... YOUR PERMANENTLY BANNED!
General Discussion « Darkfall 4/15/09 11:06:19 AM
Personally, I'm glad they are restricting the names. I saw "Michelle Obama" the other day and rolled my eyes. I don't know if this calls for a ban. Since it's in the EULA, there's no excuse. |
|
Originally posted by Angie-PvP
Tasos: Most of the people posting about cheating in Darkfall aren't even playing the game and are doing so to create an impression. The only way to really know what’s happening in the game is to ask a few players you know for a fact are playing how many times they’ve seen people using exploits since we started banning for it. http://forums.darkfallonline.com/showthread.php?p=3158788#post3158788
If you are contesting my honesty, my character's name is Vhaihl Mhuloch. Obviously, I don't have to tell you which server I'm on. I've personally seen (and been killed) by hacks. Darkfall Online has incredible potential. I love much of the game...but they do need to work on the areas I pointed out or things will go "south" fast. |
|
|
First of all, to the guy who said killing mobs is useless...you are wrong. There's a whole skill, Skinning, that is based entirely on skinning mobs (and not other players, although that would be a good idea). For example, if you skin a goblin, you can get a goblin tooth, or an eyeball...maybe other stuff. Those things can be used in crafting. So yes, you can harvest mobs...with a good reason. NOW, about the state of Darkfall. Darkfall has two real problems that I can identify. One, as of this weekend (and latest patch), the game seems to be crashing a lot. I spent less time playing this week because of it. It was down Friday, nearly all day (U.S.A. time), I believe it was down a few hours on Saturday, Sunday, and is currently down as I speak. Clearly, Darkfall must fix this our they will fail. Secondly, cheaters/hackers. If the Darkfall staff needs to figure out how to clean the hackers out. While aggressive GMing is useful and works, there should also be some automatic checks. Through youtube, you can see "sticky", invisible, superjump, autoloot (which is actually just a macro/script, but still illegal), fighting will in a tree, fighting under the ground, and the malicious "Teleport" hacks. This is just too much. There's no such thing as a fair fight, and furthermore, knowing that cheaters are running around makes you leary of anyone you encounter because you're wondering if they beat you fairly. |
|
|
Greetings, Original Poster. I pretty much concur with all your statements. There are some minor exceptions. The "chat" in Darkfall is about as good as it gets for unregulated chat. That means, all the same crap, but less of the gold selling. Why? Because now you can kill the seller. The one thing that would make it more tolerable would be GM regulation over the chat channels. I believe, at this time, that will not occur. Pretty much you were spot on accurate. I would like to emphasize how strong combat is. Recently, I decided to perch on a ridge and keep an eye out for travelers (I was just seeing how well strategy plays into this game). When a band of "raiders" come into the area, I'm capable of telling the people in my area. What am I getting at? You can literally be a lookout in this game. But it goes much further. If you are caught be surprise, you can literally be engulfed in the "fog of war". In other words, you have no idea who the enemy is...people are running around in a frenzy, some people may even attack the wrong people in return. This is truly warlike, because in war...communication is the key. It's a great strategy based game. IMO, of course. |
|
Originally posted by Katrar
Original Poster, thanks for your comments. Perhaps you are correct that some, or a lot, of the PvE content was intended and is now missing. In all honestly, I don't see it as a problem. The game doesn't appear to be broke, at least, not from the inside. I was never a follower of Darkfall. I listened to the vaporware threads and wondered if it was truly a scam. But, original poster, I think you are wrong this time. The game clearly has a lot of "meat" to it, and more than "meets" the eye. One of the things that impresses me the most is how good a game can be with "friendly fire". In my opinion, it makes the other MMORPG games seem fairly...weak and afraid. Take World of Warcraft, for example. On an instanced run, I could play a Warlock, cast many AOE spells, and never even worry about hurting my allies. Not so in Darkfall. Any spell you cast, and sword cut you make, can hurt those around you. A careless mage or fighter could kill his own party. To me, this makes the battle extremely more cautious. Anyhow, I welcome your thoughts, but just wanted to say that if Darkfall promised PvE, I suppose that they'll have time to throw it in as weeks and months roll by. Either way, I'm extremely happy with what I'm seeing. |
|
|
Original Poster, thanks for the questions. Good luck on your gaming. One of the more interesting aspects of Darkfall is the "friendly fire" concept. Well, it's not actually a concept - it's just that its more realistic. If you cast a spell and hit other people, you'll hurt them. If you swing a sword blinding and a player is between you and the monster, you'll hit him in the back for extra damage. Therein lies the part of the strategy. To use your attacks, you must navigate the "complete" battlefield, not just the where the enemies are. Your defense can be as simple as hiding behind a tree, or standing on top of a rock. All of these things can be used to your advantage. Magic, is still a mystery. Few have excelled at the craft, and much of the lore can only be discovered through experimentation and treasure. What I do know if that you can train your character to cast faster, use less mana, and even work each spell independently in level. For example, I could train my Lesser magic to level 25, but Mana Missile, a Lesser magic spell, could also be trained in 25 levels. Lots of technique is involved in Darkfall combat. A simple trick could be letting your opponent wear himself out. All attacks are initiated with Left-click, but you have a hotbar that you use to queue up different attacks. |
|
Originally posted by merv808
I agree. None of these games can top the immersion of a pen and paper games where everyone imagines the world around them.
You are right on the mark. The Pen and Paper will always be the most dynamic, fluid and interactive. |
|
Originally posted by merv808
But on the same note...persistance. If you kill the dragon, why isn't he dead. Why can you keep coming back and kill him over and over again. |
|
Originally posted by mindw0rk
I completely disagree that graphics causes immersion. It's how the world and people interact that maintains the illusion.
Edit: Age of Conan, based on your statement, would be the best MMO, and I fundamentally disagree. |
|
Originally posted by Schufti
I think the general point of the [Question???] is which came first or who stole from who. It was extremely hard to understand your post. Personally, I believe EQ2 came first. Another poster made a comment I agree with completely: MMO's are not static. They feed off of each other. I find all the posts where "funcom fails" or "darkfall fails" or "War fails" [etc] ridiculous. These games are constantly working to expand and update. And that's what happened with both WoW and EQ2. They expanded and updated. So, eventually, they incorporated things they saw from other companies (adding their own flavor to the system). OP. If english is not your first language, please forgive me. If english is your first language, please use a period once in a while. |
|
|
Problem with todays mmorpgs is too much soloing.
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 4/02/09 8:11:21 AM
Originally posted by Sneakers05
I don't mean to sound derogatory, but at first I thought your comments were sarcastic. I couldn't disagree with the premise more. From WoW, to AoC, to WAR, to CoX, to nearly every MMO I've tried, you will not succeed with solo play. It's all about group mechanics. The funny thing about this thread is that these games TELL you that you'll do better with groups. And what's worse? I don't always play at peak hours, and therefore, I can't find people to group with. No. I have disagree completely. The best game is one where you can play effectively at solo, but also accomodates groups. By "solo", I mean you have multiple interesting things to do...fight, study, craft, spy, learn, train, interact. But note, this does not mean one character can do everything. A mage is still a crappy melee fighter, and a barbarian is a terrible mage. If a quest requires a mage and you are a barbarian, either you cooperate with a mage or you find a work around. In essence, a good solo supportive game while create good group interactivity. As you work on your solo career, you interact with people who have fully worked on theirs. |
|
Originally posted by Mrbloodworth
Little to no personal ethics. An immediate gratification mentality A seemingly passe attitude towards cheating etc...
It can possibly be that the system, and design is not fun. No, that's not it.
/ponder
Actually, it's bias, and nothing more. Some people will ike it, some won't. Ah well.... |
|