| 51 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Why do classes NEED to be balanced?
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 3/17/09 7:59:09 AM
Originally posted by donaldduck
There's some people that, if they don't know, you just can't tell 'em. Not only does he not understand game balance, he doesn't understand economics. |
|
|
The perfect MMO utopia wishlist ^^
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 3/16/09 8:07:43 AM
Originally posted by Z3R01
Z! not everyone wants to play WoW. WoW's been out for five years? maybe the guy already played it to death? Why troll the guy and tell him to open his eyes? People want so many different things out of a MMO not even WoW could full fill all of that. It's almost like people need to play more then one MMO to get everything they want, so give the guy a break and stop pushing WoW at him like some Blizzard Sales rep trying to make a commision.
Yeah, what you said. WoW is so generic it now comes in a plain white box with black lettering. (Just about all of you are too young to remember generic branding from the mid-80's. You haven't lived until you've bought a can of "Green Beans" produced by "Factory 52.") |
|
|
Why does no MMO escape the endless "LFG" downtime - curse?
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 3/15/09 3:56:27 PM
Originally posted by Dibdabs Oh god, not this again! Look, MMOs have flourishing auction houses/bazaars, Holiday events, players/friends who craft things for you to specification, or gather resources you need or enchant things you need, a chat system to communicate with friends, GMs to help with issues and problems, a mail system to send stuff to friends/alts and vice versa - single-player games do not have all these features. Is that explicit enough for you? For hopefully the last time - "Massively Multiplayer Online" does not mean "Players have to group". Accept it and stop plaintively wailing about it. No wonder I don't PUG any more! I second that. Apparently some people think that when they go to the mall they're shopping "with" 2,000 other people, instead of shopping "at the same time as" 2,000 other people. There are other reasons, too, and one of them is even more basic than what you point out: if I want to play a modern computer game in which I'm a superhero, right now I have to play CoH. There's no other venue, online or otherwise. available. If I want to play in a large persistent world based on D&D or LoTR, I have to play DDO or LoTRO. PUGs are evil, pure evil. Would you grab the first five people who will say "yes" to have them work on your car? Repair your home? Cater your next party? I don't think so. In the words of Lex Luthor (The Kingdom, DC Comics): "I don't like working in groups. Everybody has an opinion." You'll hear the same opinion from Batman. It takes a certain quality and strength of character to be able to solo. Some people just don't have it.
|
|
|
I never take seriously the opinion of someone whose name is "<stolen part from one genre or property><stolen part from another genre or property>." Likewise other pastiches like "Captain Bart Sparrow."
|
|
Originally posted by colonnelli71 Just think--you can spend all your newly-found free time practicing your written literacy skills! |
|
|
As I understand HTTP protocol (and I work with it every day), the slash makes no difference. I tested with the trailing slash nonetheless and I still can't get there. From here it looks (with traceroute, that is) like things go into the weeds in Phoenix at PureGig.net. If everyone else can get to it, I'm good with that. |
|
|
Good. It's probably some upstream switch issue at Level 3 in Atlanta or something equally silly. There's still hope that the game will hit the street sometime this decade, then. |
|
|
Well, at least from here, I can't reach http://www.stargateworlds.com. It's been 118 days since the devs have been paid out there, according to the "Days Since..." page. Can anyone reach it? Has anyone heard anything? Not meaning to jump to conclusions or anything, but it has been looking like the thing was going under. Of course, for all I know they're doing site maintenance. |
|
|
Pedophile Used World of Warcraft to Meet Underage Girl
General Discussion « World of Warcraft 2/12/09 8:15:55 AM
Originally posted by spades07
I can think of a lot of other reasons, too, and not just for WoW. |
|
|
Wendsday? What the hell is Wendsday? Does anyone copy edit anymore? |
|
|
Captain or not to Captain...that is the question.
General Discussion « Star Trek Online 2/10/09 6:31:32 AM
Originally posted by vvistovv
If the exec isn't human, you might have to order them to take a #3. |
|
|
1) This is why I don't play EVE. I already have a low opinion of the human species, and this isn't doing anything to improve it. 2) Do you people understand the definition of "epic," or are you using it because someone else used it? 3) I hope everyone involved is happy with the way things turned out, because EVE is supposed to be a GAME--or it was at one time. It's now graduated to the status of sociological experiment, and the early results aren't promising. |
|
|
Do you play Free 2 play MMORPG games or Pay 2 play MMORPGs? Compare the % of the community!
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 2/08/09 8:36:38 AM
Originally posted by Fuatia
I've tried many F2P games, and found them lacking. I'll stipulate to being pickier than the next guy, so that probably disqualifies a lot of games that might otherwise be objectively interesting or worthwhile. Still, there's something about F2P that bothers me. Ever heard of a "honey trap?" A honey trap captures insects by offering them something sweet for no investment (or no perceived danger). They become trapped in the honey, and *boom*. Likewise, a F2P game lures you in because it's "free." It can't be free. Bandwidth costs money, servers cost money, and presumably, the people who wrote and now maintain the game like to eat and have shelter. The game has to have revenue. So, either you see a lot of ad-driven content (an unreliable revenue stream), or there's another, sneaker revenue stream lurking somewhere. Hmm. What could that be? Could it be--item malls? F2P costs more than P2P when you factor in item malls. If you don't pay out for the item malls, then you limit your participation in the game, and presumably, that isn't something you like. If true advancement in the game relies on purchasing the Crystal Loincloth of Smargafargabargadar, then eventually you'll pay. And you'll pay real money, not some faux currency--because you either take a direct hit to the wallet, or you bought interior currency with real currency. I often wonder whether or not dedicated F2P players--most of whom probably don't have meaningful employment--have ever studied economics. I certtainly would never go to a local restaurant I like and demand that they feed me for free unless I happen to order some particular menu item. I pay to play because I like to get paid to work--and for someone, writing and maintaining an MMORPG is work. So, as near as I can factor it out, either you pay them through item malls or you pay them through monthly dunnage. I like monthly dunnage. It's regular, it's easy to budget, and there's no chance I'll overspend just to get that Crystal Loincloth and then have to explain where the money went when the rent comes due. If that doesn't make sense to you, then...maybe you think other people are idiots.
|
|
|
A challenge to MMO players and developers.
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 2/05/09 10:44:51 PM
Originally posted by Quizzical
Well, I've seen games where the fun level stayed about the same from end to end--but that might support your hypothesis more than contradict it. There's also DAoC, where everyone told me that the real game began at 50. I never did understand why those other 49 levels were there as preamble. I didn't get past about level 20 before I gave up in despair. My own opinion is that as long as you can continue to grow and develop the character, the game remains interesting. Once that growth stops, or gets to a stage in which further growth is meaningless, then it's game over. That being said, I'm not disagreeing with you in principle. If the low level experience isn't fun, why bother trying to slog through the swamp to get to the "real fun?" |
|
|
A challenge to MMO players and developers.
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 2/05/09 10:32:10 PM
Honestly, I just read the site and it doesn't look all that new, innovative, or more interesting than any other Mystic Age of Loincloths MMORPG out there. From what I can see, it's just another product from a bunch of guys who apparently don't understand the meaning of the word "final." |
|
|
Captain or not to Captain...that is the question.
General Discussion « Star Trek Online 2/05/09 9:39:29 PM
Of course, I've thought about being the Captain, or the Exec, or the Science Officer, or even the Chief Engineer. But what I really want to be is...a lumberjack! Leaping from tree to tree as they float down the mighty rivers of British Columbia! The Fir! The Larch! The Redwood! The mighty Scots Pine! The plucky little Aspen! The great limping rude tree of Nigeria! The smell of fresh-cut timber! The crash of mighty trees! With my best gal by my side, we'd sing, SING...
|
|
|
Like I said getting bought out by EA is never a good thing, EVER
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 2/05/09 8:10:45 AM
It isn't just EA. A company I helped get off the ground was bought by a large three-letter corporation (not IBM, I hasten to say) and they've done nothing but alienate our customers, misunderstand the marketplace, and contribute to brain-drain as just about all the people (other than myself) with any skills at all have left. I'm still there because I'm getting a little old to go job hunting--but who knows? If the idiocy continues, I'm going to have to leave. |
|
|
Hey, none of the game toons is going to look like any of you guys, so what's the beef? Maybe there were issues getting licenses to use the particular actor's likenesses. Could just be a legal thing. I wouldn't read too much into it. "CrapG-1" indeed, Aren't you the clever boy? |
|
|
Now we're talkin'! What's not to like about this announcement? |
|
|
Age Restriction, Pros & Cons, Voice your opinions here!
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 12/31/08 8:40:48 AM
Originally posted by JustTalking
Oh, I don't know about that. Kids can easily be detected because of their tendency to use sub-par English while chatting. They can't seem to spell the word "you" with more than one letter. Phrases like "sry i gtg" are a dead giveaway. Inability to use apostrophes and correct capitalization would shine the spotlight on them. At that point, the player community simply tags them and off they go into the digital ether! Now, you're going to counter that the little snots could hide themselves by improving the quality of their written language so that they weren't detectable. I'd call that a win-win.
|
|