| 24 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Final Fantasy XIV: Site Update: Pugilist & Gladiator
News Discussion « General Discussion 11/15/09 12:36:42 AM
Originally posted by Sah-aum
I believe SE said they were keeping races the same as in FFXI, so vets had an easier time getting adjusted to FFXIV. |
|
|
100% first person view in an MMO just does not work...
General Discussion « Mortal Online 11/07/09 11:57:26 AM
Dead horse is dead folks.
I had a whole post written out, but firefox decided to die and delete it all...
Long post short; they aren't going to change it and getting all worked up won't do anything. |
|
Originally posted by xpiher
FFXI does. Would have assumed you knew that since you have a taru in your sig :P |
|
|
What type of death penalty would you like/want FFXIV to have?
General Discussion « Final Fantasy XIV 11/01/09 5:46:03 PM
I like the current FFXI system.
Anyone who's played knows that the worst sound in the game to hear is when you downlevel. But at the same time, it makes leveling up that much more special. |
|
Originally posted by Douhk
Your logic is pretty fail. They will own all of the servers and push out new content. Those two reasons are why subs are worth it. If they didn't have subs they shouldn't have their own servers either, and just let players host their own dedicated servers. Also, if you really think $12 a month is affordable but $15 isn't, you probably shouldn't be playing p2p MMOs. |
|
|
Why are people so obsessed with calling each other fanbois in mmos? Do they feel more secure about themselves by accusing someone of being a fanboi? Now that person very well may be a fanboi, but why does the accuser get such satisfaction out of calling him out?
|
|
|
Why do people feel like posting in a different color makes them special? I purposely skip all posts posted in a different color.. just cause. |
|
|
Will you play FFXIV if no soloing level similar to FFXI
General Discussion « Final Fantasy XIV 10/14/09 11:16:03 PM
I'd go as far to say I WON'T play it if soloing is too easy and preferable to grouping. I don't mind there being one or two solo classes, like beast master. But they have to actually work to get decent exp.
I actually like WoW, but if FFXIV turns into a WoW2 I won't play it because it will completely ruin the whole concept and theme of Final Fantasy. |
|
the main thing going for eq2 is the engine age very nicelly you ll see what i mean when dx11 is avail then eq2 will be very smooth dont forget no other game work like eq2 they use the processor so the faster the processor the faster and better looking the graphic
Can you repeat that in English? |
|
Originally posted by Sunioj
Do you listen to yourself? Do you not see how selfish you are being?
Beta isn't for people to try out the game for 5 minutes and ditch it after seeing the bugs. It is for TESTING. *gasp* You described the very reason why they decided to attach beta to pre-ordering the game. |
|
|
Stop whining about the casualization of FF
General Discussion « Final Fantasy XIV 6/18/09 12:57:39 AM
Originally posted by Hrayr2148
You make some good points. I agree that some things in FFXI just took too long. But if something doesn't take a lot of effort, it just doesn't feel as rewarding when you finish it. I remember when my friends and I beat the first dragon in the CoP storyline. It was insane! He wiped the floor with us so many times. We had to try a multitude of job combinations and when we finally beat him.. we couldn't believe it. We were so happy :)
Maybe if they kept FFXIV challenging like FFXI, but made it less of a time sink? I just think AF wouldn't feel all that great if anyone could get the whole set in under 2 hours with minimal effort. NM/HNM camping definitely was a time sink and could use a much better implamentation. |
|
|
We want something new! We want innovation! Errr, well not that.....
General Discussion « Star Wars: The Old Republic 6/18/09 12:47:59 AM
This is a semi response to the OP and to one person who said WoW and FFXI were both based on a central story.
Eh. You really can't compare WoW's storyline to FFXI's. Yes WoW has a storyline, but it comes in disjointed bits and chunks and it isn't really comparable to the storylines in FFXI. Don't get me wrong, WoW has some nice quest sequences and the cut scenes they do have (I've only seen the one in northrend) was awesome.
Here is an explation that probably isn't going to do justice to FFXI, but I'll try to summarize it: Take a generic asian grinder MMO. Now add a FF-like single player story line with a multitude of boss and dungeon encounters where you need a group to complete. You slowly progress through the story line and complete more sections as you level up higher. During each section there are a variety of engaging characters that explain the past of Vanadiel along with gripping cutscenes. For some expansion storylines, the more you complete the more areas are unlocked to you for you to explore. Add all of this with one of the best communities I've ever seen, and you have FFXI. :)
If TOR pulls off a great storyline they will have me hooked to the game. :) |
|
|
This seems to have been discussed to death already, but here are my 2c. :P
When I'm in 3rd person view in any game, I tend to stare at my character 95% of the time and not really pay attention to the environment. Some games the environment isn't all that pretty, but in others.. it just makes your jaw drop at how amazing it is. So in games like Fallout 3 or Oblivion, I purposely limit myself to 1st person mode so I actually look around and gaze at the towering mountains, the ancient ruins, or the vast sea. |
|
|
To be honest, I have a hard time imagining playing games like Unreal Tourny, TF2, L4D, etc, in 3rd person. 1st person has a certain added value to immersion. That being said I can see how, with everyone flying around you in jetpacks so fast, a 1st person view would make even the most hardcore FPS player dizzy and confused.
The devs seem to know what they're doing. :) |
|
|
Something to hopefully look forward to
General Discussion « Final Fantasy XIV 6/15/09 10:14:16 PM
Originally posted by Stuckov I agree, if you dont fall in any of the above 3 categories when it comes to what kind of an MMO player you are then I must say its gonna be hard to find something that will fill your void.
I have played all 3 of them and I must say they are the best in their specific fields.
For me, and I'm sure I'm not alone here, I've played all 3 and enjoyed each one a lot. However, none of these games are 'new', and playing the same 3 games for 6 years gets a bit old.
Also, none of the MMOs that have come out recently have lived up to the previous generation of MMOs. Seeing games with so much potential fail is rather disheartening (EQ2, AoC, WAR, DF, etc, etc). Sure they make rebounds but they never really come back, they never really lose the 'failed launch' tag. |
|
|
You guys can argue for days about comparing PS3 specs to PC specs. You won't get anywhere. There is a main difference - OS.
It doesn't matter what OS you use, all of them eat up a crap ton of resources. The PS3 gets away with a lot less ram because of this.
Look at how well the PS3 plays games like assassin's creed. Now get a computer of the exact same specs as the PS3. I highly doubt you could hit 10 fps. |
|
Originally posted by Zandora2018
I didn't mean FF XIV would hit 11 mil subs. If it even hits 1 mil subs and keeps that number for months or even years, it will be a great accomplishment. I think there is a miscommunication between what I think 'copying WoW' is, and what many other people think it means. It does NOT mean copying gameplay such as grinding quests solo just to get the max level as fast as possible, or even layout of the game.
What it means to me, is copying core principles and ideoligies such as:
1) Highly polished game. Not just the bug removal that most MMO's call 'polish'. I mean smooth gameplay, very optomized engine, and great graphics that don't take a non-existent computer to run. 2) Catering to all gamers, hardcore and casuals alike. Many MMOs try to find their own 'niche' in the market - which is perfectly fine. But on games the size of WoW or FF XIV, in terms of budget and staff, they need to cater to a broader audience for the game to truely be profitable. Most of the 'niche' games are run by smaller and often independent companies. This does NOT mean making it a solo fest, but rather have activities in the game that are worthwhile or fun, but only take an hour or two max. 3) Listen to your playerbase, but don't do everything they say. As much as the WoW forums are a stinking pile, there is a certain amount of interaction between the devs and players which goes a long way. However, it only goes so far. You can't have devs with no backbone that cave in to every single demand of their players.
Remember, the more profitable FF XIV is, the better experience it'll be for everyone. SE will hav emore incentive to patch the game regularly and fix bugs as fast as possible.
Bah I've already gotten too excited over this game, lol. Best thing to do is forget about it for a year and wait for it to come out - then judge it. |
|
Originally posted by Cynthe
/agree
You have to remember, FFXI was built for the PS2. So naturally using a controller/gamepad is a lot better.
But, I also was able to use the keyboard very well. :P Oh god switching from FFXI's keyboard style to the standard 'wsad' was hard. |
|
Originally posted by neKrow
You can deny WoW's success all you want, but if any MMO wants to succede, they should at least take a look at why WoW was so successful. Squeenix is first and foremost a company. They are obviously investing huge amounts of time and money into this game, and to see it fail would be a tragedy. WoW did something right that all other MMOs to date have not done. If Sqeenix wants the game to even come close to the playerbase size of WoW, they better take a good hard look at why WoW is doing well. Of course they aren't going to give up the "FF" style. -Partying/grouping will still be a very fundamental part of the game. -There will be all of their classic jobs; white mage, black mage, red mage, warrior, thief, etc. -There will be a great story line, and more story lines added on each expansion.
These 3 points I GUARANTEE YOU will be in the game.
If they do succede it will be from preserving what was good about FFXI and embeleshing it with things from WoW that made WoW successful. |
|
Originally posted by tomstan
I really hope there are at least cruiser and even battlecruiser class ships in this game.
However, it won't be all that bad if all we can fly are fighters. Think about it in terms of cars:
When you get your first car, it is usually a junker that has trouble climbing steep hills. You get more practice and money and eventually you can afford to drive a mediocre, ~$15k range car. Now you can make it up all hills with out trouble. You still can't compete in any drag races, though. You save yet again up and you can afford an expensive car, $50-100k range. You leave most of the competition in the dust, but you still get blown away by the super cars. Finally, by some miracle, you save up enough money to drive a car that is way more expensive and fast than it should be.
My point being, just because all you are flying are fighters, doesn't mean there isn't a whole world of advancement to be had. But instead of cars, you also can advance in weaponry - you can always fit bigger guns. |
|