| 421 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
I certainly wont say WOW had the best or most balanced pvp system out there, but franky neither does GW2 if I am just comparing Bgs vs Spvp I have to give it to WOW hands down. GW2 maps are not only small the spam fest they call a combat system shrinks the map even more.
|
|
|
Star Wars: The Old Republic: Cathar Playable Race Preview
News & Features Discussion « General Discussion 4/29/13 10:54:49 PM
I know some people will say anything is just reskinned anyway, however people pay for lore and atmosphere they are not after all playing a DotA clone, or some Diablo clone. They could throw an apple or two for people that like slightly offbeat races like Ithorians, Bith , Manaan that Bioware actually created for KOTOR or Basically any race you would see at the Jek Jek Tar Bar.
|
|
|
Ragnarok Online II: Retail Launch Coming On May 1st
News & Features Discussion « General Discussion 4/28/13 4:48:25 PM
I have heard that Ragnorak online 2 is to Ragnorak, what GW2 is to GW. An oversimplified arcade game. They should start selling these new games with PS2 controllers. |
|
|
Star Wars: The Old Republic: Cathar Playable Race Preview
News & Features Discussion « General Discussion 4/28/13 4:45:45 PM
Another reskinned human called a "race". Maybe some more races that don't you know, look just like humans. |
|
|
Enjoyed this amazing game that is... until today
General Discussion « Guild Wars 2 4/27/13 6:40:19 AM
One of my main gripes with GW2 was the feeling of sameness every player has to another toon even from one class to another. It didn't have anything to do with not having holy trinity rather that they focussed so much on making all the so called hybrids focus on pure DPS so much. I think the combat is an uninspired arcade shooter with prefab weapon attacks and a limited and highly controlled skill selection all of which are essentially spammy fast effects, its very A D D.
Fun factor and replay value in pvp is dead because the pvp maps are small and boring and WvW is just bad because even if they improved it the combat system is simply too simple and spammy to support that kind of pvp I could make it work and even do well at it, I just didn't want to.
I imagine PVE is much the same story since most things are cosmetic you get the feeling that nothing you do matters becuase your killing some monster to attain a bag of halloween candy. It seems like they got rid of the grind but didnt replace it with anything. It was a good thought but too minimalistic you can only dumb down these games so much if you want to keep adults interested and there would have to be a whole lot more sandbox implementation, much better WvW and some actual care n the pvp to get this game to a more standing order. Too cookie cutter and meaningless achievements. Its just an empty feeling altogether, a nice looking empty feeling though. |
|
Originally posted by Fendel84M So basically its GW2 reskinned? That was the impression I got from watching the combat that LOOKS spammy. |
|
|
Gw2 pvp is like playing soccer inside of a 4 foot square box.
|
|
|
Has PVP improved? Is it still block until attack then block?
General Discussion « DC Universe 4/13/13 1:06:10 AM
I got bored and tried the game, the combat system itself is not bad. However their is a decided lack of options and flexibility, some degree of blocking is just smart, but I did notice their are a handful of builds running around that are obviously better suited to pvp, a bunch of one handed Deathstroke the Terminator builds, green lantern clones, a few more very common builds. Besides the other problems I have with the game those are some of the most annoying. Considering I liked Sorcery a lot but they pigionhole the power types into roles. Very annoying, not to mention stupid. I see why it didnt go over well on release. Also character creation,./... yeh.
|
|
|
I played from Vanilla until patch 3.2 left a few weeks before the pre Cat patch never went back. I thought WOTLK was a horrid expansion with bad class ideas from Ghostcrawler and company and all I saw over the horizon was more garbage.
|
|
Originally posted by dauntSilver If you want to know if the pvp ever gets more interesting or if you can play something other than a DPS spam "hybrid" the answer is no. Does the world get more interactive as you progress and do your deeds have lasting effects, no. Are DEs just repeatable quests that dont require a que, yes. In order to "enjoy" this game you have to have attention deficit disorder, and like rapidly spamming buttons with few skil choices, you have to want to clear what can be loosely called content as fast as possible and many times as you can a day and enjoy every second of it. Also WvW is terrible and you will have little interaction with others outside of grinding a few DEs in lower levels. The game world itself is somehow lacking, it feels meaningless to complete story lines or attain anything, an incredibly segregated and souless community. Its like one giant never ending Daily quest. |
|
|
World of darkness demonstration on April
General Discussion « World of Darkness 3/05/13 3:55:41 AM
Originally posted by Warmaker If the mmo is anything remotely like Bloodlines I will be a happy camper. |
|
|
World of darkness demonstration on April
General Discussion « World of Darkness 3/05/13 3:53:37 AM
Originally posted by RelGn At this point anything without a 2 or 3 faction system, phat loot drops in dungeons and some kind of gimmicky and ezmode spam whack a mole combat system is fine with me.
But yeh the only game I am waiting for, could care less about the WOW, GW2, DAOC clone gimmick games out there coming out. |
|
|
I have played every Elder Scrolls game and as a fan of the series am totally unimpressed or awaiting this " title" in any way. This is an attempt to get DOAC and WAR refugees and a few WOW players on the fence for a few months so they can cash in like GW2 and TOR did, this game will most likely be a lot like those two games and equally as dissapointing. To say its not just another treadmill WOW clone is laughable at best, Then again there are people who think TOR is an original concept.
PASS. |
|
|
[Column] General: The Case for Never-ending Progression
News & Features Discussion « General Discussion 1/17/13 11:58:48 PM
It's called MU online, welcome to never ending hell.
|
|
|
They would have to make pvp enjoyable in the vanilla release before I ever considered an expansion. Not too fond of their new grinding fetish either, didnt start playing the game for fractals and grinding, much less boring pvp. .. but this is why I quit.
|
|
|
Yep same downward spiral trend as SWTOR had, next thing the boxes will start backlogging and the price will drop another 5 to ten dollars. THEN they break out the cash shop and area locks in the FTP model and the whole FTP is the future crap of course the fanatics will all beleive it to until the bitter end.
That one looked like a holiday special deal. http://www.simplygames.com/info/19709/Guild-Wars-2-PC/ On a few sites, probably out of stock until their next bait and switch. |
|
|
They have a forum thread on this on the official site, over what to call the game.
http://forums.thewarz.com/showthread.php?83903-What-name-you-want-for-the-WarZ&p=1298121&posted=1#post1298121
I made a forum account just to throw in my idea, HaxxorZ. |
|
|
why do people claim this game is best for pvp?
General Discussion « Guild Wars 2 12/17/12 12:43:43 AM
Originally posted by SirFubar It wasn't just balanced it had massive build diversity, something sorely lacking in GW2. |
|
|
why do people claim this game is best for pvp?
General Discussion « Guild Wars 2 12/17/12 12:41:56 AM
Originally posted by SirFubar Are they more balanced or better at pvp of course not well except EVE, EVE blows GW2 out of the water, TSW doesn't even have pvp, or any worth playing, but as far as class diversity, its no contest. My point however was not how good the pvp was but how much better the overall games were since people had more options.All the balance in the world wont make a dull lifeless game worth playing, there is just no diversity or life int he pvp. And 99 percent is way too high, GW2 is ok but its nowhere near that good. There are plenty of other games that have massively better pvp than GW2 most of them older some of them newer, but I was comparing to the current generation of games, but GW2 has no business comparing itself to AC, DOAC, UO, L2 and certainly will never be an Esport, not one that anyone will play enough to matter. |
|
|
why do people claim this game is best for pvp?
General Discussion « Guild Wars 2 12/16/12 8:53:58 PM
Originally posted by SirFubar
What do you mean, you people? Of course more choices are harder to balance that doesnt meat two choices are better than 20. Point 3 is just make believe or a talking point one, dont know which. 4. so basically you agree that the maps suck and in the same sentance try con convice people that they are better than the WOW battleground or AV maps., give me a break the GW2 maps barely have the interest level of Warsong Gulch and are about as small.
99% is aiming WAY too high. It might be better than most ftp asian grinders, but its not better than EVE, its not better than WOW, TERA or Secret World, it IS better than TOR but thats not saying alot. Its ok towards a certain audience but its not all that. |
|