I like character customization. I might actually play this game for a month now.

AoC, is like the father that says he is going to come home but never does and always disappoints his child.  It's good that they want to make a polished game... but every time I see a release date I am like Woohoo!  I can finally play this game... then bam... shot down again.

Looks real cool! I am downloading the demo now.  Wish I would have played the first one... kinda feel like I am missing something when I join sequels.

Maybe in the future kids will be able to go to school in a MMO.

Sorry had to erase what I said....

This game is $10 bucks at gamestop...nuff said.

Originally posted by alakram

I left this game cose of that, it's just leveling.

LOL, so do you leave all other MMOs for the same reason?

I am not putting my hopes up that any of those games will be released this year.  Maybe in 2009.

The only thing that is wrong with Vista, is the user.  I say go for it and get Vista 64, it only makes sense because your going to have a 64bit processor.  Vista, at first install you will have to disable a couple built in security features but after that your system will be rocking!  If all possible, I would get the 32bit and send in $10 dollars for the 64bit and then dual boot your rig to use both or just get the OEM versions 32bit and 64bit cheaper.

I have no problems with Vista at all.  My system runs allot better than I can remember with XP.  Like I said, the only thing that is wrong with Vista is the user.

The game runs fine for me.  I get better FPS less lag and real good performance.  I even run the game at 3840x1024 resolution on Very High, Ultra High settings. My frames range from 20 cities, 40-60FPS everywhere else.  My pc is 6 months old.  It runs fine. 

OP, must have too much porn bogging down his computer....

Nice 10 minutes, you made it further than me... I think I made it to like 3-4 minutes.

TR sure is plummeting fast into deep void flopped mmos.  What's sad is I purchased The Matrix Online for $5 dollars and played it... and I wouldn't buy TR if it was even $5 dollars.  FANBOI ATTACK NOW!!!!

Wow, it does look like WoW.  The quest display and everything... even that bear in that screen shot.  I think this game wins the official "We ripped off WoW" title.

Jean-Luc Picard, IMO is the best Star Trek Captain of all!  The most politically sound and the most professionally carried personally that Captains should portray.  A very commanding role model and very intimidating presence.  I am a TNG fan obviously. 

I like Star Wars, but I was never and am still not a big Star Wars, fan. I did play SWG, and to me every state of SWG, preCU, pre this.. pre that and NGE, and after was one big flop from the first conceptual drawing.  The only real thing that keeps SWG, alive is the SW fans obviously.  I would have to say that the MMO game design plan is to blame for the failure of SWG, and SOE+LA, are the architects that built that games failure.  Failure on a title this culturally sensitive is destined for ridicule, condemnation and criticism, no matter what you do to make it better.  I don't really have any built up anger or self afflicted rage against SOE, so I can't say they suck either.

Codemasters, I have only played 1 or 2 of their games and on each of those games I lost interest and became extremely bored or frustrated with.  I still don't think that Codemasters sucks, they just haven't been rounded up into the heard of the mainstream cash cows of the American market yet.

Originally posted by Desetes

 

Originally posted by OrionStar

Either your system is configured wrong in the BIOS or your hardware drivers are not configured right or it could simply just be the hardware... AMD.  Sorry to say.  Crysis, was optimized for Intel C2 and Nvidia. EVE was optimized for NVidia GeForce series cards as well.  I know AMD and ATI can run these games too but Intel and Nvidia, own the benchmarkds right now. 

Is your system a retail store mass produced product?  If so that could be another problem because retail companies use low quality parts in their systems.  I don't mean to come on this thread with a big "epeen" post... I am just curious why your experiencing such horrible performance?

Read my previous post

 

"Ok, I put shadows on normal and now at 1280x1024 with 4x AA I get 80-120 FPS near space stations."

And I don't know where you got that I'm getting problems in crysis. I run it on high with shadows at medium and physics on very high and the ra_usefakeAA=2 command at 1280x1024 with 25-40FPS.

And my AMD processor is the equivalent to your E6600 but costs $80 less.

Well I just assumed you where having troubles in Crysis because the title of this thread is "New graphics runs worse then Crysis".  So...

Originally posted by boognish75

Q: What does the star trek enterprise and toilet paper have in common?

A: They both circle around uranus and pick off klingons.

LMAOROTFLWLOLFTW!!!

Either your system is configured wrong in the BIOS or your hardware drivers are not configured right or it could simply just be the hardware... AMD.  Sorry to say.  Crysis, was optimized for Intel C2 and Nvidia. EVE was optimized for NVidia GeForce series cards as well.  I know AMD and ATI can run these games too but Intel and Nvidia, own the benchmarkds right now. 

Is your system a retail store mass produced product?  If so that could be another problem because retail companies use low quality parts in their systems.  I don't mean to come on this thread with a big "epeen" post... I am just curious why your experiencing such horrible performance?

As long as the game servers are still running 2 years from now. Yes, Yes and Yes.

It's a fun game, you have nothing to lose except your time.  Try it make your own opinion.