| 17 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
What exact legal reasons are there for not discussing a ban in public?
General Discussion « Star Wars: The Old Republic 1/02/12 10:29:02 AM
Originally posted by Malaksbane You're actually wrong here. Courts have allowed EULA to be binding, even if it's after the sale of the good as long as it's before you use the product for online goods.
It used to be how you stated, but the laws and courts have changed with more and more software and online products coming to the market. So the EULA is not void or meaningless. |
|
|
A friend is doing her Doctoral Thesis on Gamers and needs some people to fill out her survey. Please take 10-15 min to fill it out. It's very short and east and completely anonymous.
http://php.york.ac.uk/depts/psych/survey/index.php?sid=62633&newtest=Y&lang=en |
|
|
I just started again... after trying the trial, I bought the Ultimate Collection and had to start over. Are there any LinkShells for new players on Asura?
I've never been higher than level 10, but I just hit level 10 as a War today, so I'd love to learn where to go and what to see.
Brabs |
|
|
Play Online and Final Fantasy XI/XIV
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 11/12/09 9:44:49 AM
I think I remember seeing somewhere that PlayOnline will not be used for FFXIV. |
|
|
I want to like this game, but everyone seems to be a mime
The Airship (General) « Final Fantasy XI 10/27/09 3:02:39 PM
Originally posted by Khrymson
Then change some info up, I've done it over a dozen times and it worked just fine. How would I go about changing information on an account to pay for it? If something isn't right, it won't process payment. So that would leave me in the same boat.... no account. I think I'll probably wait for FFXIV where this payment system isn't used. |
|
|
I want to like this game, but everyone seems to be a mime
The Airship (General) « Final Fantasy XI 10/27/09 9:23:18 AM
They do not allow it. I tried way back when I first tried the game with an email. Then I came back about 6 months later and when I put in a new email, they banned my account a week later due to having the same information on the new account but a different email. So once you try, you're bound to keep the 1st account or they ban you. As for my account now... I don't know what's going on. Like I said I played for 2 months, left for 3, came back and banned. No reason given, and now I can't get a new account. |
|
|
I want to like this game, but everyone seems to be a mime
The Airship (General) « Final Fantasy XI 10/18/09 5:58:35 PM
Well I decided to give it another try. I log on... and find my account is banned. Why? I don't know. I was a member for 3 months, cancelled my sub cause I got bored soloing, come back 2 mo. later, and it's banned. Ok, whatever, I didn't lose much I was only level 12 in 2 jobs. So I go to try to start a new account...says I can't with my code. Fine, I'll get a trial account and then subscribe. Nope, won't let me do that either, says my email is already associated with an account.
So... I guess FFXI isn't the game for me. |
|
|
I want to like this game, but everyone seems to be a mime
The Airship (General) « Final Fantasy XI 10/12/09 4:24:15 PM
I've tried this game several times, never making it past level 15 on 1 class, and I really like this game, but it's almost a 1 player game. I've seen players running around in the lower level areas, but everytime I try to talk to them they just run by. It's a very hard game to understand and get into, and I really want to, but the community of this game makes it very hard. Not to mention linkshells seem to be the only global chat or new help, but without knowing how to get one or how they work, it defeats the purpose of being a place to go for help.
If I were to try 1 more time.... any servers out there that are newbie friendly and will help a new player learn how to play? |
|
Originally posted by Neanderthal
If they couldn't come up with things for five or six people (playing different roles) to do then they are pretty pathetic as game developers. As someone else pointed out, what's the difference between this and the typical sort of game with tanks, healers, buffers, etc.? You can't think of anything? The devs can't think of anything? Ok, just off the top of my head here are some ideas. Helmsman---flies the ship. Controls speed and positioning. Tries to avoid enemy fire while positioning his ship so that the tactical officer can fire at vulnerable points on the enemy. Tactical---Aims and fires the weapons. Decides which areas of the sheilds get how much of the power alloted to the shields. Science officer---Uses sensors to detect weakness in enemy sheilds and vulnerble points on enemy ship. Spots stealthed ships. Jams enemy sensors. Detects if enemy sheilds have "phased" to a different "frequency" or some such. The tactical officer will rely on the science officer to inform him where the best targeting points are. Also detects incoming fire, the helmsman will rely on him to advise evasive action. Engineer----Directs repair crews to various parts of the ship that are damaged. Has to decide which repairs are most critical. Controls overall power allotments....30% to weapons, 20% to sensors, 10% to lifesupport, 20% to sheilds, 20% to engines...that sort of thing. If he gives 20% to sheilds the tactical officer then decides how to split that 20% between forward, aft, etc. sheilds. Ok, that's four right there off the top of my head. So how would it play out in a battle? You are fired on by an enemy ship. The science officer sceams, "Incoming from 45 degrees!" (meaning the front right side). The helmsman kicks the ship in the ass forward and vears left then tries to bring it around so the weapons can bear on the enemy ship while avoiding further fire. But you take some hits as he brings it around. The engineer is deploying repair crews but the power is dropping so he cuts power to the engines and diverts it to weapons so you can hit the enemy hard on the first pass. The science officers determines that the lower aft center shields of the enemy ship are weakest and informs tactical. Tactical screams, "I can't hit it from this angle! Take us below and turn the f-ck around when we get behind him!" The helmsman screams, "Engine power is too low! I can't get behind unless I get some speed. Engineer wake the hell up!!" The engineer screams, "Ok, damn it! But you canna have full power for all systems when we've ony got 70% power left! Cutting power to shields. Full impulse...NOW!" ZOOMMM....the helmsman sweeps under and behind the enemy and turns about. While he's doing this the tactical officer diverts all shield power to the topside shields (because you're going under the enemy ship). BOOM---KABOOM...everyone leans hard to the left for a few seconds. But it's not as bad as it could have been because the science officer was jaming their sensors and they couldn't tell that they should have targeted the very rear of the ship instead of the top center. The engineer screams, "They just took out our main phaser array!" Tactical--"I'll have to use photons and the secondary array! Give me all you've got RIGHT NOW! Engineering--diverts all power to weapons just as the helmsman gets the ship into position and the science officer verifies the exact spot to target. Tactical targets...fires all weapons. KABLEWY, the enemy ship explodes in a pretty fireworks display. Now wouldn't that be a heck of a lot more fun than having mindless NPCs automatically doing everything for you? And what does the Captain do in your scenario? The problem is... everyone will want to be the captain, or even the Pilot. What if you pilot flies all over the place and refuses to listen to the Captain? Then what? If you say the Captain has all the power, well then what's the difference between the captain having the power over PC's or just being the Captain of your ship? Many people would rather just be the captain of their own ship there. If you say there's nothing they can do, well then what fun is it if you're at the mercy of just 1 person? And if that's the case, why would anyone want to be anything other than the pilot? |
|
|
I think this game deserves a second chans!
General Discussion « Pirates of the Burning Sea 6/30/09 9:49:20 AM
I'm not one to comment much...but please tell me you're not from the US. If you are, our school system is failing us worse than we realized.
|
|
|
Still waiting on a diskworld MMO..... |
|
|
Bioware into a world of hurt - opened Pandora's box
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 7/18/08 7:51:38 AM
you do know it's bioware and EA doing this game...not bioware and SOE.... so .. umm... yeah, you and any other CU Vet who thinks they're owed something on this game are wrong. Wrong company... stop trying to say ANY Star Wars IP owes you something. |
|
|
Is it just me or does it not seem to ever work? I know my username...and password... and I even changed it to make sure, but it still says I can not log in 1 of 5 before locked out. What the heck? Why have the forums if you can't log into them and use them? |
|
|
The closer we get to 8GMT the less likely it is that it will be ready on time. The reason is, most companies do, or at least SHOULD, estimate longer than needed. If you need 3 hours, tell them 4-6. If you need 2, tell them 3. Well... it's been almost 2.5 hours now and no update... not looking good to me |
|
|
In 3 hours they will post a note saying EA has been pushed back until the 20th. Thank you for your understanding as we continue to test our servers and make tweaks. |
|
|
EvE -vs- POTBS, winner is....
General Discussion « Pirates of the Burning Sea 2/13/08 8:00:33 AM
Originally posted by KyleranThis is wrong.... they reset MOST of the ports back to the original owners... MOST not ALL. Chars stay the same, they keep all their goods, winners get a certificate to buy better ships and stuff like that, the losers get more ports so it's easier for them to win the next time.
Chars stay the same... it's a shame when people make stuff up about a game just because it is not their cup of tea. If you don't like it that's fine, you don't like it... no point in lying about it to make you feel better. |
|
Originally posted by forest-nlWow.... I can not read what you wrote at all. You would think playing games that require you to read and write that you would know proper grammar and spelling. I guess not, but to help you out some:
He HAS Uber... not He HAVE Uber because... not becouse because he plays a lot... not because he play alot.
Wana, or Want to not Wanne... Have also uber gear? I have nothing on that it's really sad this crying .... not its realy sad this crying It's never an excuse... not its never excuse allowed not aloud
|
|
| 1 Page | 1 |