| 1086 posts found | |
|---|---|
Originally posted by cali59
I like that idea. In the past I've been a very supportive gamer...saving people left and right as I ran about the world. To think I'd actually GAIN something from it tickles me. ALOT. |
|
Originally posted by Ceridith
I pine for the days when gamers finally realise that terms such as "inflation" and "Market" have no meaning in a game where money is conjured from thin air and has no flush for it. In fact...RMT actually allows FOR a true market, as real money is finite and established. |
|
|
Pay 2 win becoming legitimate? Have we really lost our way this much?
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 8/08/11 10:39:57 AM
Originally posted by Wickedjelly
God I hope so. The video game world is so blah these days...I rather enjoy the prospect of being paid to play them. Especially MMO's....the little rats are basically second jobs anyway. Might as well get paid for em, I say. |
|
|
Pay 2 win becoming legitimate? Have we really lost our way this much?
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 8/08/11 8:58:59 AM
Originally posted by Xzen
AMEN D3 is get PAID to win as far as I'm concerned. If they would only allow offline play....but I can see why they don't. Harder to mod and hack the game files if it has to be online and monitored all the time. With the RMT built in...thats a real concern. |
|
Originally posted by pyrofreak
My first thought was: "Why in gods name are they trying to warn me of something in my spam box?" And why would their own mails BE unverified...I'd suspect the website could at least verify ITSELF. |
|
|
This is gonna sound stupid, and doesn't come really recommended NOW...but Flyff had the best support class I've ever played. Assists basically turned you overpowered by jacking your attack speed and stats way up and then doubling your attacks. I've never enjoyed being support more than I did playing THAT. I would just go to newbie areas when bored and buff the hell outta them and watch as I halved their kill times. I was like a personal XP doubler. You were wanted, loved, and required for high end gaming...even level grinding. Granted, you didn't need an assist to KILL things per se...but without one the massive xp to level totals at the end were unbearable. |
|
|
GW1 didnt have Tank, but had Healer. Did GW1 PvE do better than most Trinity MMO? well GW2, wont have Tanks nor Healers. So Now what?
General Discussion « Guild Wars 2 8/07/11 12:06:49 PM
Thats a loosely defined "touch of class" as well. |
|
Originally posted by Meowhead
This does not fit the criteria provided. That game requires heavy skill grinind in both "Buy or Create Sustenance", and "Don't get mauled to hell by bears" talents to even hope to play it. THey said NO LEVELLING. You'd have to level strength and Endurance substantially to play THIS game for more than a few minutes...certainly for a few months. |
|
|
Please set your personal mails to us in the actual inbox instead of the unverified. I never look in my unverified, as it is almost always spam and wastes the time it takes to load the screen to view it. Thank you. |
|
Originally posted by evilwishs
People aren't bright. Its a thing around here. Even when applied to an MMORPG the model presented here is a very good ideal, and one that would not only impact the game nearly NOT AT ALL...but also provide a nice sorce or secondary income for people. I'd like that right not...im in a seasonal layoff so I have more game time but less money. This whole thing would benefit me greatly. |
|
Originally posted by Yaruna I'll bite. I would imagine, in a literal sense, anyone how was both alive this, and last, year could probably draw some conclusions about what last year was. Also, I see no reason to hold respect for opinions which, in design, are meant to be disrespectful anyway. Its the difference in saying, "I hate Final Fantasy 11 because I'm not enjoying the menu based combat and find the largely asian playerbase a tad alien to me" and saying "Final Fantasy 11 is such a steaming pile of crap. It looks like crap and there's nothing to do.".
Both of those are opinions. One, however, is logical and the other is nearly pure vitriol and ignorance. The first one is actually how i feel about that game (or did rather). The second is the kind of garbage I hear around here. A price you pay when you can't screen members as deeply as I'd like. |
|
Originally posted by Chilliesauce Sure it is. You have to realise that an opinion which is logical must be based on some measure of reason and intelligence. Saying, "It does not suit my taste" is certainly a fair and honest statement. Giving solid reasons why it does not suit taste is also logical. But when those reasons DEFY logic...it is not. Calling the Eiffle Tower bland metal is illogical because there is far more to that construction that just its metal...even if you were to establish any measure on honesty to how bland it may be. Its ignoring the actual for the sake of the subjective. The hope is often that, by verbal slight of hand, you can distract the reader and ignore the value of a thing.
I digress, however, that in this particular case, its mostly that the poster wanted a full looking post and there were not enough pong comment to fill it. |
|
|
Blizzard Defends Always-Online Requirement For Diablo III
General Gaming « General Discussion 8/07/11 4:01:40 AM
Originally posted by Chilliesauce Its fair that you do not care. You clearly desktop game, and do so from your home. I'm a father and tend to travel a bit. I have to be more mobile in my gaming and that sometimes requires offline gaming. For me, its a useless step that does more to encourge my personal piracy than deter me. I honestly would rather own every game I love. I have, to this point. I won't say I've not, "tested some waters" before buying. But I like to make sure the people that make things I enjoy can afford to keep doing so. Also cracked games tend to be unstable or viral.
In your case I'd imagine its the mod support that sucks. |
|
Originally posted by Chilliesauce The eiffle tower is just a stack of bland metal is also just a personal opinion. Its just a horribly illogical one, and also one we might have a chuckle at from our mighty thrones of self-importance. |
|
|
Been back to City of Heroes tons of times. That game is getting aged for sure. Still a blast. |
|
Originally posted by Chilliesauce Because this is a neutral topic. The poster isn't biasing here. They found funnies...and shared them. With success, since those posts are great fun. Like the runescape pong one...spot on that one. Loved it. But YOUUUUUUUU are not great fun. You are either malicious in nature through trolling...or just incredibly base and dull, and in either case I find you in distaste. You managed to find fault in funny and that is so incredibly LAST YEAR. |
|
|
Blizzard Defends Always-Online Requirement For Diablo III
General Gaming « General Discussion 8/07/11 3:35:24 AM
Originally posted by arctarus Yes and no. You had to have an active battlenet account...and it would check that regularly. But you could play it offline. I did. Ironically, the very thing they think is going to stop piracy will be the very reason I do it. I won't be told where I can play games I pay for. Not everywhere my laptop goes is a place the internet is found. So i will probably have to have a legit copy AND a crack copy. Or just Torchlight. You know...whatever works and such. |
|
|
Why Diablo 3 is the future and you should get on board!
General Gaming « General Discussion 8/07/11 3:22:03 AM
Originally posted by bdew
No offline play is the true demon here. Welcome to why I gave up PC gaming. Giant money sinks with horrid DRM. No thank you. I dont want to have a forced need for net to play single player games lol. I use a lappy, not everywhere it goes doth go the web also. I will not invest in that which i cannot play. |
|
|
Why Diablo 3 is the future and you should get on board!
General Gaming « General Discussion 8/07/11 12:10:06 AM
Originally posted by Starpower I see the issue. How you define competition is vastly different than...well...anyone that enjoys competing. To you, the competition was "who got the luck of the draw first". Because thats all gear in these games is...luck. Did it drop, were you there, did your guild allow you to have a chance at it, did you win your chance...ect..ect..ect. To ME...competition is making use of your available tools to achieve victory over comparable opponents. To put it simply...if you are a heavily geared player, anyone less so is shooting fish in a barrel. Not really competitive, or even in the ballpark. And you can't really use the "earned it" excuse...a football player earned his skill through rigorous training and years of devotion. A gamer just spent some time and got lucky....sorta like a lottery player. Even the poker player does more to qualify earning his glory. RMT doesn't do anything to remove competitive gaming...what it does do is remove YOU from the equation. You know...the guy on top who got lucky 5 times more than everyone else . I just don't understand...outside of PvP, what are you competing for? Who has the best gear? Thats pretty dumb...and stops being a competition a year into the game when everyone has the best gear any dang way. If it IS PvP...then RMT hasn't hurt the competition...its merely removed luck from the equation. I struggle to see what RMT has done to harm your competitive nature. I can, however, see how its managed to harm your asshat nature...in needing to feel good about yourself over the most trivial of things.
Don't get me wrong...I'd like games to just be games. The world aint that place no more...boss. |
|
Originally posted by Unlight I totally challenge you to some leet globby dragon pong! |
|