Originally posted by lornphoenix

Originally posted by someforumguy

Im not really a Star Trek fan, but like watching the series sometimes. The series wouldnt be the same without the scenes on the ships. I find it a bad move for any development team to not include ship interiors.

The thing is in the shows you are watching the actors play out the plot of that episode... you can't really do that in a game.

Edit: Checked the devs' reasons. To me they appear like devs that avoid any challenge in development and hope the IP will be enough to attract players. Too bad I cant change my choice in the poll.

All things consider, the fact that the game is probably going launch early next year, and only having the license for such a short time, I think the push themselves to get where they are. When PE died I thought STO with them.

 

Yeah , I also thought this thing wasnt going to happen, If it does I want it done right but im not sure about this one, but I will definatelygive it a shot, i best be at least able to access vital areas suh as bridge, med bay, engineer, a holo deck and maybe a cargo bay or a corridor of 2, also the shuttle bay (sorta a plane buff). damn thats like most of the shp.. I just dont want to set up another game on a pedastol so high it disappoints... I want a decent star trek or stargate mmo
 

Originally posted by Lydon

Originally posted by Dameonk

 CrapG-1.

Fail at trying to be witty.

lol yeap, but i was still sorta disappointed when i aw these , but who cares what they look like, its a game, its aboutt the gameplay.

Originally posted by HiGHPLaiNS

Well if your a fan on the TV series we see there is another spin off coming later this year. I hear it sounds almost like a Lost in Space, but not to much detail has been said or even if this is true.

All I known from random website is that we have a Ancient Ship called the Destiny and apparently we are going to pick-up where the Ancients left off on this ship.

It should be alright, but if it gets to populare, it will be like SG1 or atlantis or farscape all over again, it will get good, then when it becomes to expensive to produce anyme, they end the show and cap it off will a dvd movie release

Originally posted by Alxgranger

I dont know where the game Stargate Worlds take place and what season, but apparently we dont have spaceships as of yet.

 

Well from what i've read the game is supposed to take place between seasons eight and nine, b4 all of the major changes take place in the stargate unvierse.

we had spaceships, promethius makes its appearence in  season six, and daedalus in ep one of season 2. Plus im sure there will be plenty of gou'auld ships to hijack,

Totally agree, we need more GOOD sci fi sand box mmos, with both fps aspects, and maybe a space combat/ vehicle combat aspect.

Originally posted by almerel

The state of GW's is alive and healthy. There isn't a game that has a much better storyline than GW. Yes the game is 100% instances except cities and pvp launching areas. The game can be solo'd up to maybe lvl 12-14 with just henchies but then the henchies don't do it anymore imo. You need to get into a guild and/or make a few IG friends. I have both and it makes the game much more enjoyable. 

 

How far did you get in GW? What lvl and city? I may be able to help better with that knowledge.

Agreed, i remeber when I used to play , it was reallyfun, me and about 4 mates started playing it together and it and its expansions kept us entertained for ages, but RL took over, and school, then we lost interest, but GW is still going and its pretty good... Like i like the lack of grind at the story line was pretty good, and it was actually used.

Yes you are.... Nah hahaha im sure there are others out there. But it was a good game I liked it, but not enought to keep playing, if u get a chance you should test it out, its just a different mmo, and those ship to ship battles keep things interesting.

Originally posted by Lydon

Originally posted by Zorndorf 

Thanks for the answers. I'll skip Aion grind, Darkfall hype and the Dutch Spellborn (is out already in EU and it doens't sell one box even).

... and save a few Euros on this one.

Lots of CCG Star Trek cards and I let my brother buy all the videos  

Epic fail.

Aion has been designed not to be a grind, and wtf are you going on about TCoS not selling? Really, you spout your misinformed nonsense somewhere else please. In fact, stay out of the two mention games please. Keep believing your lies.

Burnt, spellborn is actually selling, not as  well as expected, but from what i have read, its selling, ow and i cant wait to give aion a try...

Originally posted by mackdawg19

You have been following this game for a year and didn't notice you fly everywhere? Shocking, to say the least. You might want to actually follow the game if thats your flavor.

Yeah ull mostly have abilities to make up for it, but I still wished their would be mounts, just some wild creatures that you could ride, and it provides a massive number of mother jokes, hahahahaha

Im no hate monger, i mean i might sound like a flammer, now but, pre nge was good, not the greatest but it was good and SoE is mostly a company that looks towards short term financial gains rather than a stable long term finabcial status and it isnt that great too its customers.

Originally posted by Agricola1

I think they need to wait a couple of months for people to renew subscriptions before they declare it a success. It seems SOE deems short term financial gain using smash and grab tactics a success, despite obvious longterm penalties and having thier name dragged through the swill once again.

Smedley just seems to be set on having RMT, and if that means people quit he doesn't care since his new target audience will fill the space. However with EQ 1/2 being a P2P at the sametime I don't see how that is possibile. A game is either P2P or F2P with a cash shop, Smed has created a new catagorey P2P with RMT and TCG. Maximizing profit for the minimum effort, all paid for by the subscriber .... Gotta love that Smedley!

That's true, they aught to wait to see what the long term gains are.. if there are any before they start calling it a success.

Im not going to judge it by what happened in the beta, but i would really love if they offered a trial the cheap bastards...

I think the game would suck, and im not goig to rashly waste my money, so I only wish they had a trial, cause u cant really judge a game by its beta...

This must be a popular troll and flammer thread, I mean it had some things wrong with it, like i hated the grind but it has done some great things for the MMO industry. Sure im over it, I mean the grind got to me, and  I realy didnt like how they didnt use that great storyline they had, they should have made it more story orientated rather then grind orientated.

Wow... 3 years... I could have sworn its been longer.

Yeah customization is really important, as it helps u to sort of bond with your character and really get into the game and since you begin the game , by creating this character, u might as well like what u create, so the customization is very important to me. I just hope its done right, but right now its just hype, so we'll see later.

Originally posted by AlienShirt

I think the "thieves" are former AoC players and wanted to spare anyone else the disappointment and frustration of buying and "playing" AoC. They are actually peforming a community service.

Lol so true

Originally posted by barmbek76

Originally posted by Cbdragon1

I can except the bland landscapes as a sacrifice for mass PvP.  What's confusing is how bad the animations are.  The running annimations for all the Desto. chars I played was very bad.  The spell  and melee animations were really weak too.

As I said, having average graphics is a fair price for working mass PvP, what is annoying is all the fanbois who are trying to convince people that the graphics are "amazing" or "better than wow."

 

Indeed. Mythic seems to have put all energy in the gameplay. So be it. Game's fun in the beginning (playin the 5-Bucks-EU-Preoder to have a look).

But the whole presentation - gfx, artwork, animations, soundeffects, music, lore - is outdated and mediocre at best. Besides Mass-PVP and PQs there is nothing special that makes a difference between WAR and those who were smart enough to copy WAR's (Tabletop) look years before.

Clunky elves, dwarves & orcs.  A polished game for average-joe-fantasy-lover.  But not thaaat special.

I agree, but if I do play any mmo coming out, ot'll be for the story, and the gameplay, graphics arent as important- so long as they are up to standards with the rest of the gen, hell i mean even gw is fine. Im more about what makes it different, pvp, and gameplay.

All those people that are wrongly pre-ordering WAR that wouldnt buy it afterwards, would all just to WARs deffence as fanbois if I said it was shit, but are haappy with not purchasing the coppies they preordered.

Originally posted by Meridion

Just wanted to state that sandbox style gameplay does not need free-looting, it does not need free PvP, it does not even need PvP at all.

Sandboxes can work without actually ever engaging in any form of combat. The problem is that most of the sandbox-fanatics are also hardcore competetive players, people that WANT to be able to kill, burn down, plunder and loot everything.

But looking at the concepts themselves, PvP is NOT necessary for a free sandbox game! Just wanted to let you know ^^

Meridion

Thats ur opinion, but I enjoy PvP, and I want pvp. If I am going to pay for a game, they better have some awesome pvp, or something in itd sted.