Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist
Games:398  Guilds:2,012
Members:1,148,113  Online:0
Guests:0  Posts:3,129,700
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

All Posts by Wintersbite

All Posts by Wintersbite

7 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
135 posts found

Yea. Looks lovely, but that's it.

 

Maybe they will bring out another video at some point addressing the problems and not a fluff video.

Doesn't work for me on FF here.

Doomgourds killed 28/100

 

To many ¬¬

A single months sub is the cheapest form of great entertainment you will find anywhere.

£8.99 a month? I can spend ten times that amount on a single night out and piss it all up the wall, then wake up with a hangover to kill.

To be honest if you can't afford a months sub, you need to re-evalute what/how you play. If you should be playing at all.

 

 

I'm going to put this in the same box as Stargate Worlds I'm afraid. It's just one of those games you really really want but not even god himself will be able to bring this to the table.

It's going to be shit what ever it is.

 

It's one of those things were you are allowed to shoot it down even before you know what it is.

 

In fact it's encouraged.

Originally posted by Angelof2070

If Dark Age of Crapalot isn't completely shut down and dead yet; warhammer will never be.

DAoC is on life-support, and is still going.

Warhammer is doing A LOT better than DAoC. Because even if Warhammer is almost dead, DAoC has been dead and zombified for the last 3 years.

Why would Warhammer get canned but DAoC stay? That is irrational.

Me thinks you make up things too many times

 

Was it necessary to call it Crapalot? You're probably the only person I've seen that doesn't like it as much as you appear to. Get rolled a lot?

 

Warhammer is doing a lot better than DAoC? In what context? WAR will never be anything like DAoC in my opinion, it has no staying power.

Originally posted by SaintViktor

It is nice to see them fix a ton of stuff but with so many bugs it makes me wonder if they should have released when they did. I might check this game out again soon if they keep on improving it.

 

Sometimes though you really need players to find out some bugs rather than a handful of beta testers. I guess either way there would have been bugs though.

 

Kudos for bug fixing though.

Originally posted by Kyleran
Originally posted by coffee
Originally posted by tsukts

What about LFG System? Its not coming in the next patch?:( That was the thing i was looking forward for to get some life back into the classic WoW dungeons thats impossible to find group for on a single server.


 

The new LFG system will be in 3.3.  Surprising this didn'y make the top 5.

Has a LFG system ever really worked in any game? No reason to believe it will be any better this time around either. (Blizzard already tried once before)

 

 

Did DAoC have one? (Pre ToA) I can't remember. Or was it just /who Cleric 40 ? :)

Originally posted by Dragim

Is Dark Age of Camelot now property of EA I would assume?  It is too bad I don't have the money to buy that IP, I would remodle that and rerelease it in a heartbeat.

 

It is a shame indeed. DAoC was my first love. And to be honest still is.

 

I do hope they see the potential in DAoC and do something with it.

 

 

Originally posted by just2duh

 Honestly this is one site I appreiate ads on. There has been countless times i've been so bored and not know what mmo to try next, and simply clicking on an ad would easily subside my boredom. The supplied ads are usually all games worth checking out.

 

^ This.

I've no problem with them at all. I've clicked on a lot of the adds here and actually signed up and played on quite a few.

 

It's advertising and it works.

 

MMORPG maybe you should create ad removal accounts and charge over the odds for it ;)

it's all very well having these incentives to get players to play, but they need a game that will hold on to those players. And WAR doesn't have that AT ALL.

Originally posted by MNZeba

Cryengine is from FARCRY not CRYSIS!

 

Judging by the calibre of your posts I can't tell if you're a troll or not.

 

Although you did say in an Aion thread (since you're a Aion fanboy/girl) that Aion uses the Farcry engine.

 

Just wiki Cryengine and you can then stop making a complete fool of yourself.

Originally posted by Tyvolus1
Originally posted by Eben
Originally posted by supbro

Because 3.5 mill subs in Asia and 500k in the west is pretty niche :)

Their are not many MMOs that can boast this type of following. Expect more servers added in the west once the word gets out how great Aion is. The Koreans have done it again!


 

Give me a definitive link for that 3.5 mill figure, if you don't mind.  I don't even care about the 500k, since I know that won't last.  But I want to see somewhere in writing where NCSoft stated that number.


 

why should he give you anything ?  Find the link yourself (assuming you can manage to pull yourself away from levelling another alt in world of kiddiecraft), the information is out there.  As far as disputing sub numbers, that is a two way street.  Anyone can be just as ignorant as you and accuse Blizzard of making up sub numbers as well.

 

Calm down.

 

When a user throws out a number, it's custom to back up that claim by providing proof, which is what the other user is asking for.

 

Step back and take a deep breath.

Originally posted by erictlewis

And yes were is EQ2, and why is it not on the list.


 

Because it was pre WoW.

The Secret World? Although in light of recent news I have a feeling it may well be more of a 2011 release.

Originally posted by Palebane
Originally posted by comerb

 It''s called World of Darkness.  Purchased by CCP.  Thank god a company that has some balls that will actually do something innovative purchased the IP.

 

Werewolves(the cool badass kind), Vampires, Changlings, Mages... lots of fun to be had.  Add into it all the source material with the different clans and factions and its ripe for an outstanding PvP game.


 

I agree. It would nice to have a good PvP faction-based MMORPG with more than 2-3 factions. WoD would be perfect for that.

 

If it would have good faction based PvP it HAS to be 3 factions. 2 doesn't work.

Originally posted by vladakov
Originally posted by Wintersbite

You start at level 2? Sorry for the inevitable, but why is this?

the tutorial gets you from 1-2 practically :)

 

Thanks for the clarification :)

You start at level 2? Sorry for the inevitable, but why is this?

Oh well, I wasn't sure if I was interested in this game before this. Now I know I can cross it off my list.

7 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 »