|
|
5/14/08 11:20 AM
|
|
Viewed 2063, Replies 59
|
|
Originally posted by Obraik Well that is my point Obriak. You cannot say what the capacity of the event was, so saying it's fully booked doesn't mean anything. The event may have only been set for a capacity of 50 people, so a fully booked event doesn't mean much does it? However, saying it is fully booked sounds like you're trying to imply that it was a massive success - which judging from the pictures seems to be in complete contrast. |
|
|
|
5/14/08 10:23 AM
|
|
Viewed 2063, Replies 59
|
|
Originally posted by Obraik Regardless of the accusations being thrown around about who is or who isn't a paid employee of SoE your original comment here was regarding the full booking of this event. Do you not see how these pictures inply a poor showing regardless of the full booking - and what was the capacity for that booking anyway? Your comment appeared to be very misleading IMO as you never awknowledged the capacity nor had you awknowledged the lack of people in those pictures - expecially compared to past events. |
|
|
|
5/14/08 7:49 AM
|
|
Viewed 2063, Replies 59
|
|
Originally posted by Obraik Ok, so the booking was full. How many does it take to have a full booking at a bar? |
|
|
|
5/14/08 6:49 AM
|
|
Viewed 753, Replies 16
|
|
|
Maybe they could get some of the paid shills to show up as "attendees" ;) |
|
|
|
5/14/08 6:46 AM
|
|
Viewed 2063, Replies 59
|
|
|
I've had busier Tuesday nights hanging out at a coffee shop with friends. Next year it'll probably be held in the back of a van in the SoE parking lot :P |
|
|
|
5/12/08 11:42 AM
|
|
Viewed 1992, Replies 67
|
|
Originally posted by seansean
|
|
|
|
5/10/08 11:26 PM
|
|
Viewed 1423, Replies 28
|
|
Originally posted by Torak Sadly this is true.... But developrers need to focus on the ncihe crowd, and if the game is any good it'll expand beyond that IMO. |
|
|
|
5/10/08 10:58 PM
|
|
Viewed 1819, Replies 61
|
|
|
Originally posted by suske
Unfortunely "The bird" is facing the limitations of popular exposure thru mainstream media. It will do well within those who know of it, but has little to know chance beyond those numbers IMO - sadly. |
|
|
|
5/10/08 10:34 PM
|
|
Viewed 1423, Replies 28
|
|
Originally posted by Gutboy
|
|
|
|
5/10/08 4:47 PM
|
|
Viewed 1819, Replies 61
|
|
|
I'm shocked no one yet has copied the entire resource/crafting system of SWG. That IMO has been one of the really outstanding aspects of SWG. |
|
|
|
5/09/08 1:45 PM
|
|
Viewed 584, Replies 21
|
|
Originally posted by Bob_Blawblaw Sure, but to remain incognito on these forums it's mandatory to wear one of these.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groucho_glasses
|
|
|
|
5/09/08 10:23 AM
|
|
Viewed 584, Replies 21
|
|
Originally posted by Gutboy lol that's awsome. Apparently you think I'm good enough to be a paid shill - so if anyone out there wants to hire me I'll consider it. :) I've never claimed any inside knowledge Gutboy. I'm just speculating as much as anyone else, so I suppose if I am right then I'll have even more explaining to do? :) |
|
|
|
5/09/08 9:58 AM
|
|
Viewed 584, Replies 21
|
|
Originally posted by Bob_Blawblaw I completely agree as this was exactly what I was thinking too. And the reason I think there may already be something in the works (possibly a BW project - or something else thats been in secret development) is that it would be an awful waste of an opportunity to not have something released to coincide with the new SW T.V. show. Who knows, maybe the whole Agency thing is a red herring and in fact it'll be a SW micro-transaction based game :P |
|
|
|
5/09/08 8:57 AM
|
|
Viewed 1813, Replies 77
|
|
|
Rollotamasi makes a good point, it can seem that it's more of an anti-SoE thing. But for me specifically I'm just as cautious with Funcom as I am with SoE when it comes to their interests in RMT's. However it is SoE that wants the fame of bringing RMT's to the west, and given my past experiences in regards to questionable ethics with SoE I tend to think more about the possible methods of exploitation then I would have with another company. Essentially SoE has opened my eyes and gave me reason to pause and think about these things. Just as Smed has claimed he's learned from SWG's past so have I. |
|
|
|
5/09/08 7:26 AM
|
|
Viewed 1813, Replies 77
|
|
Originally posted by boognish75 Wait a sec. You're giving this guy crap by claiming he didn't "lose" anything, then you tell him that you think the term "gained" should replace the word "earned"? How can you not "lose" something when you're are able to "gain" something in the same context? |
|
|
|
5/09/08 6:44 AM
|
|
Viewed 1813, Replies 77
|
|
Originally posted by tman5 I agree that a lot of the responsability is the parents, but the reality is there are just an awful lot of parents that will throw money to their kids to keep them happy and occupied. Besides which it places the parent in the position of having to be the "bad parent" in saying no everytime the child wants something. I'm sure that is something that companies take into account when directly marketting towards kids. But regardless of who this game is marketted to the ingame environment will be designed for easy and quickly accessable transactions that encourge immediate familiarity there by increasing your comfort with spending. And thus begins the slippery slope of microtransactions. You start justifing purchases by thinking 'well, it's only 3 dollars', and suddenly find yourself nickle and dimed to virtual death. Especially if you want to compete with others. |
|
|
|
5/08/08 7:47 PM
|
|
Viewed 584, Replies 21
|
|
|
To be absolutely honest though I believe it's inevitable for there to be another SW MMO. Whether it will be good or not depends on what those developers have learned from this fiasco. With any luck they'll learn the most important lesson that a sense of community is everything - at least IMO it is. |
|
|
|
5/08/08 7:27 PM
|
|
Viewed 584, Replies 21
|
|
|
I'd be happy with any MMO worth a damn.
Although I would like to try EVE. |
|
|
|
5/08/08 2:52 PM
|
|
Viewed 1813, Replies 77
|
|
Originally posted by Reklaw Yeah, I'm pretty sure it was announced that it was an RMT game. One of my biggest concerns regarding RMT's is the simple fact that it's designed to make more profit then they are now. That doesn't sound like a bad thing at first but you have to consider Beatnik's analogy of a casino. Essentially the consumer will start of innocently enough by purchasing only a few items to "get by". This is the beginning of raising your comfort level of purchasing more and more items (or gambling to use the casino as an example). I'm sure we've all experienced something like spending more then we thought we would at a casino because of the "rush", or spending more on iTunes than anticipated because of it's ease of use and accessability. It's all desinged to make you comfortable in spending money, and to direct that kind of marketting to 10 year olds is nothing short of exploitation IMO. I don't know if I'm accurately getting my concerns across but I hope this is a start. |
|
|
|
5/08/08 11:16 AM
|
|
Viewed 1813, Replies 77
|
|
Originally posted by Beatnik59 Very good points Beatnik! I particularily liked your analogy of 24 hour casinos as this is precisely what RMT's feel like to me. |
|