|3 posts found|
What was so great about Everquest?
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion
8/31/09 10:51:56 PM
wow so much misinformation and "DO NOT KNOW" in this thread. basically noobs with no clue talking out of their ass.
Everquest was "so great" because of a number of things:
1) for the first time introduced the concept of "grouping" to the masses. you had games like Gauntlet and Diablo where you played BESIDE other players but introducing a game where you actually PARTIED with other players, where you could heal others and division of labor like tank, healer, dps opened the door to another level of player interaction where you were playing the game WITH other players, not just parallel playing along side them.
2) this grouping, and increased player interaction led to a COMMUNITY like none has existed since. you could literally walk into Guk or Seb, meet someone at a camp one night and make a friend for life. back in EQ the player base is literally the top 1% of what you have in WOW. stop a moment and think of the top 5 guilds on your server. then think of the top 5 players in that guild. those 25 players FROM YOUR SERVER are the people you'd meet and group with in EQ. the best of the best.
3) emergence of guilds. previously "guilds" were basically social networks out-of-game for nerds with no IRL friends or RP in-game as in UO. because the importance of grouping in EQ, for the first time guilds became significant for in-game progress of individuals and became extremely important in terms of gameplay. this is where you see the emergence of basically every important first generation guild: Afterlife (inventor of DKP) FOH, LOS.
4) raids. EQ introduced epic encounters with Nag and Lady Vox, and epic quests, and raid zones.
5) truly 3D perspective. other games like M59 had limited Doom-like view but EQ was the first truly open 3d world, emphasized by the first person perspective. visually, there was NO game like it ever seen by the masses.
6) a truly mature, tuned and balanced combat system. 99.9% of the noobs dont know this but EQ was NOT a ground up game. it "borrowed" the combat engine from MUDs which had been refined and balanced for decades. basically they took an existing MUD and put graphics on top of it. in fact it was so similar that Sony (989/Redeye at the time) was sued for using stolen code by the developers of DIKU mud and reached an out of court settlement where Smed and other Sony Interactive execs signed a statement stating they'd used the code. so out of the gate the game was "balanced" something that no subsequent game can say... so EQ was addicting out of the gate
7) unparalleled complex combat/casting system. EQ had 20 years of MUDs to look at and only took the best spells and combat systems from its predecessors. Geoffrey Zakin who was an acknowledged genius singlehanded integrated these spells (along with creating something no one had ever seen: the BARD system) into a rich vein of race/class combinations that was unparallelled in its complexity, balance and intricacy to that time. in many ways the combat system was SUPERIOR to pen and paper systems.... something NO ONE thought possible then or able to replicate today even with 10s of millions of dollars in development investment
8) impact. many games literally stole from EQ. DAOC is one example which the exec producer (mark jacobs in this case) admitted freely they took combat systems, balance, grouping from EQ. Blizzard took it a step farther, actually hiring EQ developers and guild leaders in addition to stealing game components. Pardo, Jeff Kaplan etc were from EQ. Blizzard devs have said numerous times how WOW 's class system and raids are directly from EQ
9) the game was HARD. EQ self-weeded the noobs out. if you met a dude who was a full level 40 or 50 or whatever the max was... you KNEW he was good. noobs simply could NOT MECHANICALLY max out. the game simply would force them out of the game. also the pace of PVP rewarded STRATEGIC thinking... PVP took many many rounds, there were no lucky instagibs or lucky wins... if someone beat you they beat you because THEY WERE BETTER... either their skills, their strats, or a combination of experience and gear they were better. in EQ , if a guy beat you... 9 times out of 10 they would beat you in a rematch... whereas in WOW and other games it comes down to 1)what class you play 2)what consumables/cooldowns you use (wow pvp is fun too... that's why I'm a 2 season gladiatior and old rank 14, but FACTS are that EQ took less luck... in wow a lot comes down to RNG which you do plan around but which is still fucked up)
so you see there's so much that EQ introduced that noobs had never seen. it's like the matrix. some 12 year old might say... "what's so great about the matrix? I've seen that wire-fu on Sci-Fi network blah." but if you're more than 16 years old and know more than 2 things in your life you understand how revolutionary it was when it came out in 1999 and blew ppl's minds. of course if you're another level of intellect you understand how behind that revolutionary impact there's a precedent... Ghost in the Shell, Hong Kong action, Japanese Anime etc etc. (but that's too much to ask of noobs to know)
now for noobs talking out of their asses
I understand how Ultima Online was like the founding fathers of MMORPGs
3 games preceded Ultima Online. Not the least of which was Meridian 59 in 96. Also Ultima Online had no impact on the development of EQ, both of which were in production before the others' release. UO is an outgrowth of the RPG genre gone to an online application. EQ (therefore WOW and Aion) is an outgrowth of the MUD genre. They have nothing in common except for the payment plan which OSI introduced and Sony Interactive copied
What exactly was Evercrack? Was it that this game simply had no competition and was groundbreaking in every catagory...but during a time when there was no real competition?
You've learned today how EQ was in fact groundbreaking in many ways noobs do not realize, and in fact NOT groundbreaking in many ways noobs assume that it was. EQ in fact had numerous sources of competition, including UO which from your post you are at least cognizant of (but like noobs have somehow conveniently "forgotten" as you spew noobsauce). EQ is significant precisely because it EXPANDED the category. Before EQ publishers thought only noobs would be loser enough to pay $10 a month to play online. It's retarded to try to turn the fact that it CREATED some market space by QQing that it "had no competition" lmao. these other games "compete" in the space that EQ CREATED
Then my question is why not go back and play?
You dont need to. If you play WOW or Aion these games are based on EQ. They're basically 2nd and 4th generation iterations of the game (admittedly dumbed down and made more mass-friendly).
Nothing it sucks now and it only had like a year or two of being good before SOE ruined it.
Wrong. 1) The golden age of EQ was SOV which was the 2nd expansion, the best year of EQ was its 3rd year. 2)SOE didn't ruin it. There's nothing about renaming a company that's going to inherently ruin a game
ADMITTEDLY EQ had some issues... sadly MOST of these issues had to do with the fact that John Smedley was a bad manager IRL than with game issues. Smedley was visionary in assembling his team from 96-98 when he developed the game but he couldn't hold on to his talent. Within a couple years he lost EVERY ONE of his key players which in turn seriously weakened the ability sony had to address bugs and game issues as well as seriously devasted sony's ability to deliver quality expansions. In the end Smedley was more concerned with playing with the stock, constantly renaming, reorganizing, spinning off his company from 989 Studios to Redeye to Sony Interactive to Verant to SOE etc etc than in running his game. THAT's what actually killed the game and prevented them from continuing the franchise with EQ2 and onward
In the end what's MOST significant of EQ is its legacy. It occupies that sweet spot of SO FEW GREAT games where its legacy is established and lives to this day. On one hand you have SEMINAL PC games like CIv and Xcom that occupy such a unique space that, while greatness is admitted, no one can really build on those games. On the other hand you have a game like Diablo which was great in many ways but carries such a heavy imprint that every subsequent games appears basically as a "clone" without any significant advancement even 15 years later. EQ on the other hand exists in WOW and now in Aion which their producers all freely admit the inlfuence of EQ, but they're different enough that they exist freely and which will in turn influence more games. EQ is the basis of all that. There's very few games... maybe Doom/Quake off the top of my head which has expanded into FPS via CS and Unreal etc to FPRPG like Halflife etc which has had similar success with its progency
General: Weathers: MMO Booby Prize
News & Features Discussion « General Discussion
8/24/09 7:16:47 PM
wow trash blog with trash talkback revolving around the same hackneyed comments.
the truth is that these female avatars have big boobs for the same reason they have tight asses and strong arms. everyone, men AND WOMEN prefer their characters to look striking and attractive. how many WOMEN played troll females in EQ , what's the ratio of women who play TAUREN females versus NE or BE in WOW? the metrics prove beyond doubt that women themselves prefer these attractive characters OVERWHELMINGLY to a degree equal or passing male preference when they roll these characters.
the same can be said about men. basically MMOers are losers. they might be social but honestly the higher income/athletic/get laid type of male demographic doesn't have the time to play MMOs. likewise human male avatars are strong or intimidating because 180lb 5'9" dudes dont want to log into a game where their guy has a pot belly is bald and looks as lame as they do IRL.
I'm not sure which is more LOL, the fact that Sanya complains about BOOBIES in MMOs as pandering when her very article is doing the same thing... sensationalizing tits to drive eyeballs. except what Blizzard is doing is a hundred million dollar business and her sellout involves like 500 more page hits lol.
this doesn't even ignore the fact that going back 100 years to dime store serials, there's a historical aspect of scantily clad women AND MEN in this genre, this isn't something SOE or Blizzard invented. like class archetypes, random dice rolls, grouping etc it's part and parcel of the genre. if you think BOOBS are why an 16 year old plays WOW... lmfao. guys play MMOs for social grouping, for killing other players, for accumulating digital wealth to compensate for the lack of it IRL etc etc. if you drew a list of things that motivate MMOers, tits would be about 25th on the list.
in truth every MMO from UO to WOW to KOTR SUBLIMATES the inherent sexuality AND violence in the genre. it's a disneyfication of any whisper of sex in a game that involves the SOCIAL INTERACTION of millions of adults. if anything Blizzard and others have purposefully repressed and whisper of sex in the game to move more product and appeal to kids and a wide audience. you have it ass backwards
What game was the king of MMORPG's before WoW?
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion
6/21/09 10:55:19 PM
The most successful game was Everquest by number of subscriptions. And also my influence and impact... every MMO has been heavily heavily influenced by it. EQ introduced the concepts of raiding and grouping (as opposed to solo or "hero" play of RPGs). The developers of WOW such as Rob Pardo and others have publically stated they based their gameplay on EQ and until this year the top 3 guys on the WOW team including Jeff Kaplan got their jobs at Blizzard specifically because of their experiences end-game raiding in WOW (both guildleaders of FOH and LOS got jobs designing the raids in WOW).
UO was also influential. Despite what the cluessless nerd above wrote, UO is the game which introduced subscription based MMOs to the mass market (although primitive pay to play MMOs like Meridian predated both UO and WOW). In fact those of you who have been around and know your history distinctly remember the public dialogue that Starr (Long, the Garriott's right hand man) about pricing plans in UO beta: options being game free, monthly sub. high game price + no sub. etc etc. Obviously they netted out on the option where you pay the box and then also pay out the ass every month... which maximizes revenue but back in 97 most analysts thought the general public was not loser/nerd/desperate enough to actually pay up to $200 a year to play a game that costs them 10 bucks a year to actually run (aside from development costs).
UO is also important because the Koreans ripped it off to make the first Lineage. The entire genre of Korean and Chinese MMOs are basically versions 2,3 and 4 of the UO client. In the US UO gameplay has been heavily dominant in "pvp" MMOs although those have not been successful as a genre. Everything from Shadowbane back in the early 2000s to Mortoal Online which in is development now follow closely the open world/ player driven/ skill based game design of UO.
It's important to note that EQ and UO themselves have totally separate geneology. UO is a direct outgrowth of traditional PC RPGs that were popular in the 80s and 90s... that took the evolutionary step of going online. This is why UO based games stress open gameplay (open classes, skills based leveling instead of classes, interactivity of worlds through housing, etc) all things that popular RPGs stressed. EQ-WOW-Aion is an outgrowth of text-based unix MUDs that go back to the 70s. In fact SOE was sued by DIKUMUD and others for actually stealing code for the combat engine (basically everything in that little "box" that tells you what's going on) from existing MUDs. Going back and stealing class archetypes from past games led to a diversity and complexity in classes that's so good it's still being used as the template for Wow, Warhammer and Aion today and its MUD antecedents are reflected on the stress of distinguishing between range/melee combat, and between spells and melee. Back in the day all you had were words on the screen and keeping the classes distinct was very important. It also is reflected on the emphasis of teamwork/party interaction as the central hub of gameplay (back then all you had to entertain yourself was talking to ppl in your party there were no graphics)