| 566 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
General: Five Reasons to Attend New York Comicon
News Discussion « General Discussion 10/04/11 12:35:39 PM
Though none of those reasons outweigh one reason to not go: It's been hijacked by everything non-comic related. |
|
|
Wow has 11 million subs? not a chance...
General Discussion « World of Warcraft 9/15/11 11:24:18 AM
Originally posted by VoIgore (mod edit) Not a fan boy. Don't really care how many subs they have. I just don't see what's so hard to understand about the situation. What would the end game be for Activision Blizzard? Why would they continue to operate 900+ servers for a population of 4-5 million? If what you claim is true, why would they have opened that many in the first place? You don't buy and maintain that much equipment for 12.5 million people spread over 8 years. |
|
|
Wow has 11 million subs? not a chance...
General Discussion « World of Warcraft 9/15/11 11:17:17 AM
Originally posted by trash656
|
|
|
Wow has 11 million subs? not a chance...
General Discussion « World of Warcraft 9/15/11 10:39:58 AM
Originally posted by trash656 That is a patently false statement. |
|
|
No. It's not an MMORPG according to its developers so it doesn't belong here. Same with GW and a number of other games. |
|
|
Star Wars: The Old Republic: 17 Now, 500 in 2025
News Discussion « General Discussion 7/25/11 11:16:56 AM
They would likely be nothing more than the instances that pass as planets in STO. Odds are most planets in the game will be that way anyway regardless of how many they have. Hence the mention of major planets vs minor ones. Even if they were large planets that are fully fleshed out, what would the value of those planets actually be? Unless there were incredibly large numbers fo players on each server people would be spread so thin you may as well play a single player game. |
|
|
World of Warcraft: Rage of the Firelands Patch 4.2 Trailer
News Discussion « General Discussion 6/20/11 9:05:54 PM
Whenever I hear the title of this patch all I can think of is the area of Ohio I'm from... |
|
|
Don't play RIFT; don't have any interest in it. That said, I strongly believe this is the new normal. When all you had was EQ, DAoC, and AC, the market was pretty small, players trickled in over time. Today, at launch, you've got a few hundred thousand people banging on your door if your game is high profile. Rather than players coming in over a very long period of time you've got everyone front loaded. Of course there is a going to be a huge spike then a drop. |
|
|
Rift: Free Mobile Authenticator for Droid
News Discussion « General Discussion 3/30/11 9:14:57 AM
Originally posted by Ikeda You don't have to worry about malicious programs on the App Store? Why? If you think a tester poking around with something for--at most--an hour is going to root out every piece of malware, you're sadly mistaken. Also, your post amounts to saying that Trion would intentionally create a piece of malware with the hope that none of their users would ever figure out the program is doing more than just providing a login code. Anyway, I wish more companies would provide these for their games. I'm surprised we haven't seen one for EVE... |
|
|
Lord of the Rings Online: The Way Back Machine: LotRO's E3 2006 Preview
News Discussion « General Discussion 3/28/11 11:23:40 AM
Way back when, LotRO was going to have a time-based skill advancement system perhaps similar to EVE's. |
|
This is completely false. You're thinking more along the lines of investors...and there's nothing wrong with wanting a good ROI. |
|
|
Lord of the Rings Online: Returning to LOTRO Part 3
News Discussion « General Discussion 1/03/11 10:40:33 AM
Originally posted by erictlewis I[object Window]m sure he was referring to the books being the grandaddy of the fantasy genre. |
|
|
Why Is It...I love Star Trek...I love MMOs...but dislike this game?
General Discussion « Star Trek Online 1/02/11 1:24:10 PM
Originally posted by Phry Question: Why would going F2P give hope for the future of STO? I guess it gives hope to those who do like STO but to those who don[object Window]t like it, won[object Window]t like it even after it[object Window]s F2P. |
|
|
Why Is It...I love Star Trek...I love MMOs...but dislike this game?
General Discussion « Star Trek Online 1/02/11 1:21:03 PM
Originally posted by AG-Vuk I knew when I was typing that in that I shouldn[object Window]t call it an MMORPG. So, STO is an absolutely terrible game. I even hesitate to call it a game... |
|
Originally posted by lostscout5 Well, I did say reasons and not a reason. |
|
Originally posted by DoomsDay01 Those who care are the folks who play a profitable game that gets shut down (or flushed down the toilet in SWG's case) because the game isn't profitable enough. I'm not saying it will happen to STO (nor am I saying it won't), I'm simply saying it happens. From a gamer perspective, you should want games you like to continue operating, therefore, you should care. |
|
Originally posted by DoomsDay01 That's not necessarily true. There is a difference between profitable and profitable enough. |
|
|
Another (but different) "what if" thread
General Discussion « Star Wars Galaxies 12/29/10 12:35:07 PM
Originally posted by TUX426 I concur. |
|
|
I've played it. I'll spare you a tirade and give you my top gripes:
|
|
|
Every second of SWG playtime was more enjoyable than the best moments in any other game. The lowest lows in SWG were leaps and bounds beyond the highest highs in any other game. |
|