| 98 posts found | |
|---|---|
Originally posted by jabombadus No. WoW is the Wordpad of the MMO genre. It runs on any PC. It's prettier than the bare-bones Notepad, but not impressive. People who've only ever used Wordpad don't understand why there's a need for any other document program. Sure, it is accessible, popular, and will probably be around a long time. That doesn't make it great and it doesn't make innovation for better document programs unnecessary. Once you've learned how to type, change fonts, use bullets, and play with colors... it's time to move on to a more complicated program. People will laugh at you if you go around sneering that other programs that also let you change fonts are just copying Wordpad.
One of the most annoying parts of hunting for a new MMO is reading the same "but but but WoW does....!" posts on forums for the umpteenth time. The influx of WoW players all expecting the new game be WoW in space, or WoW with Hobbits, or WoW with RvR is beyond grating. I hope they keep the WoW servers live forever so the fanboys can stay there. |
|
|
I pretty much entirely disagree. Do people still think these developers give a crap if you unsub? It's a dead horse, but again, look at SWG. A mass exodus from that game and SoE gave a collective "meh." How long has a significant portion of the MMO community been begging for more sandbox and less theme park rails? Has that materialized just because you didn't buy the lifetime from LOTRO? Players opinions are the lowest on the totem pole cause developers have bean-counters to answer to. As long as WoW keeps boasting millions of subs, companies are going to chase it with imitation. If you can find a game you'll like and play for more than 12 months, save yourself a few bucks and buy the lifetime. Spending more than you have to under the dillusion that a company will care what you think or if you unsub is foolishness. They just pocket more of your money while doing what they were going to do anyway. |
|
|
Gawd, I am really developing aggressions against LOTRO
General Discussion « Lord of the Rings Online 4/07/09 11:20:27 AM
Originally posted by Thradar
I hate this mentality. I hate people who think everyone plays games exactly like they do. Some people don't have time to level to 50 in a month, or blitz through Moria in 7 days. There are a lot of people who lag behind the blitz and have to beg, plead, and grovel to get people to help them with quests...kin, ingame "friends," or not. Some of you guys just don't get the fact that some of us have lives and can't log in 5 minutes after they apply a patch/expansion to rush through content while a large group of others do the same. All we're asking is that you stop being selfish and take 15 minutes to help us with a hard quest when you see us ask in LFF channel. I guarantee you that at the end of the day both you and I will be better off for it. Argh, responses like this really chap my ass.
Who said joining a kin or doing new content requires a player to be hardcore? And let's talk about who is being selfish in this scenario. You choose to isolate yourself by being guildless, but the random strangers in the zone are supposed to drop what they are doing so you can get what you want when you want it? It's everyone else's obligation to get you through content? To hell with making friends, other players are simply a means to an end? Shockingly enough, I don't play games exactly like you do. I don't like pugs. In my experience, joining a pug is asking for fights over loot, clumsy battles, and afkers on /follow to leech credit. I've got my kin and my alliance of players that I can run with. That's how I enjoy MMOs. Some of you guys just don't get the fact that your attitudes are a part of the problem. Some of you are the reason I joined a guild so I could avoid pugs indefinitely. |
|
Originally posted by Samira24
Try holding your breath until you find a game where you never encounter jerks when PUGing and let us know how that turns out. PEBCAK. |
|
|
Elendilmir is a pretty hoppin' server. Got a decent mix of gamers and RPers, so there are lots of people at every level. |
|
|
Is There A Free Trial Still For LotRO?
General Discussion « Lord of the Rings Online 10/20/08 11:08:31 AM
I've sent keys to everyone that's PMed me with an email addy. If anyone goes to Elendilmir and is looking for a casual friendly group, look me up. Chars: Solinar and Gwyndolyn. |
|
|
Is There A Free Trial Still For LotRO?
General Discussion « Lord of the Rings Online 10/19/08 7:39:43 PM
Invite sent. Enjoy! |
|
|
Is There A Free Trial Still For LotRO?
General Discussion « Lord of the Rings Online 10/19/08 6:23:40 PM
Codemasters doesn't distribute the US client. You have to get that from Turbine. Turbine has temporarily closed their open trials. They want people to buy the expansion. But, current players can still email out referrals, which would email you a link to get the US client and connect to US servers. I can email you one, just need your addy. |
|
|
Is There A Free Trial Still For LotRO?
General Discussion « Lord of the Rings Online 10/19/08 5:48:31 PM
I can send you a Buddy key. PM me your email addy. |
|
|
Thinking of returning? This might help you
General Discussion « Lord of the Rings Online 5/31/08 1:39:54 PM
I'll jump on the 'housing kinda sucks' bandwagon. I played SWG and after that DAoC. DAoC had some hook points, but only for specific features, like crafting tables and vendors. Players were free to decorate at will. My primary frustration is that it's a trend with Turbine to put something in, even if it isn't really great, just so they can check it off of a list of features to slap on the marketing. They were warned, loudly and almost unanimously, by the participants on the testing server that housing was going to land with a dull thud and it did. As far as I am concerned, housing in LOTRO is just a slightly larger but much more difficult to access bank vault. Housing has a lot more functionality and appeal in other MMOs.
|
|
|
How AOC is helping to destroy the MMO genera
General Discussion « Age of Conan 5/31/08 1:10:10 PM
Originally posted by JK-Kanosi Godwin in play. Thread over. |
|
|
Factions would've made this game a winner.
General Discussion « Lord of the Rings Online 5/30/08 8:23:16 PM
Originally posted by SaibotKangOf what relevance is that to the discussion at hand? Does it change the reality that there is an entity which has the power to veto aspects of the game which violate the lore of Tolkien's writings, and entity which would not and did not give the approval for full PvP servers? The name of that entity is besides the point. Everyone here understood the point. Your 'rightness' on the name of the entity is about as important to the discussion as if you had taken issue with my punctuation choices. So yea, you are just splitting hairs to be a nit-picky smart ass. You're kind of 'right' is very small and petty, so please do suck what little enjoyment there is in being that kind of right. |
|
Originally posted by markaedwHabbo might be the worst suggestion ever. The game is known for sickos looking for kids to prey on. Find a game that has some kind of moderation or supervision so she can report any harassment. Most pay-to-play MMOs are going to be more reliable and safe in that respect. LOTRO is a good option. It isn't graphic, there isn't much in the way of gore or skin. She can choose to sit around and chit chat while she crafts, fishes, plays music, or dresses up her character with the outfit system. When I babysit for my 11 year old niece, she sits at the Auction House and buys clothes to put on my characters. I have a guildie that spent the entire first year of the game sitting in the Shire just chatting with people, never broke L20 until just recently. Most of the starter areas have mostly non-aggressive mobs and safe roads, so she would be able to get around without being forced to fight. They also keep the PvP in a seperate zone, so she wouldn't be harassed by gankers. The community is also mostly friendly and polite. |
|
|
Originally posted by salvaje The difference is they know that going in before they purchase the game and fork over months worth of subscription fees. They are playing the game they paid for, which wasn't the case with the NGE.
|
|
|
Factions would've made this game a winner.
General Discussion « Lord of the Rings Online 5/29/08 9:56:29 PM
Good lord, you want to split hairs about what to call them? The entity/ies which control/s the copyrights and liscensing for multi-media projects and products in relation to the written works of The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit by J. R. R. Tolkien were consulted and had final approval, as reported in the New York Times. |
|
|
Why do you make the assumption that no other SWG vet has found another game to play? Why do NGE fans always assert this narrative that SWG vets do nothing but sit in their basements and blog about SWG? |
|
|
He asked about combat pets, specifically (and with extra CAPS). Didn't seem like he wanted info on cosmetic pets. /shrug |
|
|
Yes, there is a Legendary trait for an eagle. They also added a lynx pet which can, amongst other things, stealth. |
|
|
Age of Conan having any effect on LOTR population ?
General Discussion « Lord of the Rings Online 5/29/08 2:19:23 PM
To be honest, I was very disappointed they used rigid classes, and so few, from the beginning. I've been waiting for a new game to use something more like the old SWG skill-based advancment, but I'm smart enough to know that's a long shot. The genre is moving in this direction because it's easier to develop+balance and easier for players new to MMOs to pick up. Despite that, skill-based advancement would have been such a great fit for LotR. Some of the characters in the Fellowship can be easy classified as a Guardian or Hunter, but not all. Sam, for instance, was part Guardian, part Minstrel, part Burglar. Aragorn was part Champion and Captain. There's so much room in the story for characters to play more than one role, I really think Turbine missed an opportunity and went with the path of least resistance. I understand the reasons why, but it's still disappointing. |
|