|
|
5/11/07 11:26 AM
|
|
Viewed 2064, Replies 44
|
|
Originally posted by HrothmundExactly the point though, if there adding Vanguard to there stable of games and its a fairly new title and has such abysmal subs right now. You think SOE is going to take SWG off its list ? |
|
|
|
5/11/07 11:23 AM
|
|
Viewed 325, Replies 11
|
|
Originally posted by jposavatzThe price for the all inclusive rate would have remained 29.99 with or without SWG. The price went up just like it has always gone up ever since they implemented it. Do you honestly believe that if the far remote possibility that SWG got removed from the all inclusive plan that SOE would even consider lowering the price ? Come off it its time to step back into reality. |
|
|
|
5/11/07 11:20 AM
|
|
Viewed 2064, Replies 44
|
|
Originally posted by CasualMakerSWG has more subs then Vanguard. |
|
|
|
5/11/07 11:16 AM
|
|
Viewed 325, Replies 11
|
|
Originally posted by UproarWRONG FORUM Please direct all whines about wanting the game to just die to the vet forums. SWG has more subs then Vanguard. |
|
|
|
5/11/07 11:03 AM
|
|
Viewed 1964, Replies 42
|
|
|
I am super anxious to get this to live, playing on test is way too much of a chore right now so i am really not interested in it. |
|
|
|
5/11/07 10:57 AM
|
|
Viewed 2064, Replies 44
|
|
Originally posted by raymerjacqueHmmm, you do realize that any player this game picks up or gets re-subbed is a plus. Your comment makes you seem like an arrogant pompous a**. (seem not stating you are one but this really makes you come across as one) Just as it is simple enough for returning vets to use a search function, it is clearly just as simple for you to not read a post or ignore one asking an annoying question you have deemed to be not worthy to be asked. The forums are there to provide knowledge for the players from the players. Just because some elitist snobs have decided it is there god given right to pass judgement on others does not make it law. Honestly if a Vet comes back the last thing anyone should be doing is discouraging them from asking questions on how to play the game. The stupidest question is the one never asked, even if its been asked repeatedly before. |
|
|
|
5/09/07 10:53 AM
|
|
Viewed 4608, Replies 136
|
|
|
No matter what improvements they make to this game, i will not even contemplate coming back to play me level 42 shaman until they have officially announced that the duping and credit frauds have been fixed and resolved. |
|
|
|
5/05/07 7:18 PM
|
|
Viewed 436, Replies 4
|
|
Originally posted by SmusattoDo you honestly expect any of us to take you seriously? Not only does this read like a 10th grader wrote it, you intend for us to expect the removal of the Cleric ? I can see if you had just said disciple but you said Cleric and Disciple... so you mean to tell us they will keep the Bloodmage and the Shaman but get rid of the most played healer class the Cleric. Nice try but take the blatant trolling elsewhere. I am far from a Van fan but jeesh try and be at least creative when you troll. |
|
|
|
4/25/07 8:16 AM
|
|
Viewed 309, Replies 5
|
|
|
I think the idea is to be able to use all the content in those games again for players who feel overwhelmed by the concept of raiding or 4+ hours of grping in dungeons. |
|
|
|
4/24/07 5:58 AM
|
|
Viewed 309, Replies 5
|
|
|
Yeah thats what i was thinking, i would love to just run around int eh game as if its just a single player like say Oblivion. |
|
|
|
4/24/07 5:49 AM
|
|
Viewed 8024, Replies 163
|
|
|
I have to admit after reading this entire post and all the replies to it i have found myself intrigued by how the game is running now. |
|
|
|
4/23/07 10:41 PM
|
|
Viewed 309, Replies 5
|
|
|
So i recently replayed Baldur's Gate 2 again and while i was playing i was thinking to how i would love to take the same kind of single player game and export it to a game like WoW, DAoC, EQ1&2, Vanguard, AO .... you get the point. In other words make encounters act liekt hey do in BG2 and add a small party option. |
|
|
|
4/15/07 3:45 AM
|
|
Viewed 4637, Replies 89
|
|
Originally posted by rznkainPersonally i do not believe you ever played AO, AO went onto win the Game of the year after its dismal release. I do not believe you even know what you are talking about. More then likely you read about the bad release of AO and just assumed that the game went down the crapper ever since. Far from it in fact AO was groundbreaking in several areas. Flying mounts were first introduced in AO, most don't know that but its true. As far as your misleading Title, Funcom has produced anything but bad titles. Longest Journey is acclaimed as one of the best games EVER, and AO as i stated above was made Game of the year by a few respected Game magazines of the time. You telling us you played AO has to be false unless you left when class balancing issues affected your particular class. Well poo poo class balancing happens in all MMOs in fact one of the biggest MMOs WoW just released a very controversial patch effectively nerfing a large portion of its classes and upsetting alot of players in the process. Does that make WoW unsuccessful now ?? Highly doubtful. So if your gonna come here and make statements You seem to think are true then back em up with facts, sad thing is i guarantee you won't have them cause as i said AO is very successful and still very popular. |
|
|
|
4/13/07 3:38 AM
|
|
Viewed 326, Replies 8
|
|
|
This seems just odd, not sure how serious this post is let alone you understand the ramifications of attempting to even make a MMO. |
|
|
|
4/11/07 7:53 AM
|
|
Viewed 1881, Replies 42
|
|
Originally posted by BlurrYet again you posting about the kettle being black. |
|
|
|
4/11/07 7:44 AM
|
|
Viewed 2107, Replies 39
|
|
Originally posted by mlbsluggerI think the main reason why people are venting and are so damned pissed off is the out and out lies Sigil has perpetrated on its players. Recommended Specs (from inside the manual since they forgot to paste them on the outside of the box, odd don't ya think?) -Windows 2000/xp/Vista (Rofl good luck with Vista) -100% DX 9.0c Compatible Computer -100% DX Compatible Mouse and Keyboard -3.0 ghz intel or 3500 AMD Processor -2 GB ram -Vertex and pixel shader 2.0 compatible hardware with 256MB of texture memory -DirectSound compatible audio hardware -broadband internet connection -16x DvD-ROM -20 GB hard drive space My computer meets or exceeds all of these recommended specs and unless i set it to ugly ass Lego land mode i get dog turd FPS, 10 on a good night at balanced. Then Brad says that the game will get better once people can afford to buy more upgrades. . . . WTF ? Why in the hell would any developer purposely make a game intending for the consumer to buy several hundred dollars worth of hardware just to play it. Sorry i will go buy a G-damned PS3 first cause it will be cheaper then buying the kind of equipment that brad thinks we all need to have to play this game. MMOs should be lowest common denominator, never bleeding edge. You want to appeal to a broad base of players not a limited small few. I can understand iD and the Quake series of games or the Unreal games, those games are bleeding edge games, but you know what, even if they are bleeding edge they still make them playable on lower end systems. Vanguard is just not playable even on a system Sigil thinks should be able to run it well. It boggles my mind to even comprehend the design decision to make Vanguard such a bitch to even play, this is not even getting into all the bugs, and Grind, and poor implementation, sad goal achievement, even worse community outreach (no central community forum). No with all those other things aside this game is CRAP to play on decent systems, this game makes you feel like you got a dog turd of a computer when it will play Graphically beasts of games on high detail with fantastic frame rates. So yeah people are angry they wasted 50 bucks, or even worse 100 if they wanted the SE. People are angry they spent months if not years play testing and telling the developers to change things, only to be ignored in the end. Players are pissed that so many things that lured us all into believing the hype that Brad perpetrated on all of us got lost in the shuffle. In the end i want a damned refund, but i know i won't get it and i won't even try to get one, in the end i feel as shafted as i did when Dark and Light came out. In the end i will not come back to Vanguard even if they fix all these issues, why ??? Because in the end the mentality that we the consumer have to suck it all up and get used to such a high disregard of respect towards its customers. Vanguard, i hope, goes down in flames, i hope it leaves the MMO scene fast, but alas i know it will sputter around begging to be in the glory it could have been if a small amount of discretion had been used. I guess thats what you get when we make developers into rockstars and treat them like there more then just a dude behind a computer inputting code to make something we all can enjoy (hell even brad doesn't actually do any programming anymore). |
|
|
|
4/11/07 7:02 AM
|
|
Viewed 1881, Replies 42
|
|
Originally posted by ElikalThing is DL LoTRO and i tell you i am a huge skeptic while its patching and DLing. Reason being i was in AC2 and i Fell for the hype with DDO and i have a resentment almost as strong towards Turbine (used to call em TURDBINE) almost as strong as i have towards SoE. So once i got the game up and running i noticed one single outstanding thing. It runs great. I mean i get sweet FPS and the game looks superb. I do not feel i am missing out on any of the graphical content like i do in Vanguard. I got a decent machine and there was no way in hell i was going to upgrade my system just for Vanguard when every other graphic intensive game on the market plays fantastic on my machine already. Seriously, what more would i need to do to get Vanguard to play at a decent frame rate and not look like a game on my old Tandy 1000. I was a huge fan of the principles of Vanguard the promises the hype, i bought into it all i even flamed detractors of the game and berated them for not seeing its vision. In the end i regretted my blind furor and realized how far from the tree this apple has fallen. I play LoTRO and i have fun, i look forward to playing it like i did when i popped my MMO cherry in DAoC. The classes are very unique the game play is immersive, and some of the quests are downright fun. I will admit i miss PvP but i can set that aside for now. Anyhow, i had high hopes for Vanguard, but in the end i realized it was just a huge grind, Grind out levels, Grind out crafting, Grind Diplo, i will not be surprised if they implement an honor thing for pvp that requires more Grinding. Attention future developers, killing the same inane mobs over and over for progression does not = fun ! Clicking tiny little boxes on my screen over and over does not = challenging, playing an online collectible card game does not = ground breaking new game mechanic. |
|
|
|
4/10/07 9:45 AM
|
|
Viewed 484, Replies 7
|
|
|
I think you all missed the frigging point. | |