|
|
6/25/06 7:20 PM
|
|
Viewed 470, Replies 22
|
|
Is it really too late? I'm not sure, they could easily fix it in the xpac if they wanted. I don't think they will. But I think with a little bit of creativeness they could without alienating too many people. Yeah its a moot point since they show no indication of changing their raiding is better philosophy. |
|
|
|
6/25/06 7:16 PM
|
|
Viewed 470, Replies 22
|
|
I have a better idea, how about we give people who do 5-10 mans a minor and slight edge to keep them running those instances? Then the raiders will have no reasopn to complain just like the 5-10 manners will have no reason to complain in your scenario and they can do raids because they enjoy raiding. If one is acceptable why isn't the other? Sure you can minimize the difference so people are less pissed. So if we follow that route why not take it even farther? Why not minimize the number of people pissed by making raiding inferior instead of 5-10 mans inferior? Even by Kaplan's admission raiders are a minority so lets give them the sh*tend of the stick to minmize as much as we can. Now we minimized the gap and the number of people for whom the gap is a problem. Isn't that an even better solution? Or you could make the both equivalent. |
|
|
|
6/25/06 5:09 PM
|
|
Viewed 1227, Replies 31
|
|
Those sound boring not hardcore. They are just annoying or a timesink. No game will be hardcore until it shocks you in the balls when you make a mistake and you need to control the pain to not die or else you get an even worse shock to the balls. When i used to wrestle I had some guy crossface me until my nose bled and I ignored the blood and the pain, that was somewhat hardcore. I used to work armbars until my forearms screamed in pain and barely worked for ten minutes straight. MMO's are not hardcore. Not saying I'm some super tough guy, just tryign to put in a little perspective. Next person who says some game is hardcore or that something like raiding is challenging; go step in the ring with Mike Tyson. That is hardcore and takes a ton of skill. |
|
|
|
6/25/06 4:32 PM
|
|
Viewed 274, Replies 24
|
|
|
This article is quite old btw, I have seen ot posted on WoW forums like 4 different times. |
|
|
|
6/25/06 3:06 PM
|
|
Viewed 394, Replies 23
|
|
|
It reminds me of Soul Caliber for some reason. |
|
|
|
6/25/06 2:13 PM
|
|
Viewed 233, Replies 9
|
|
July is just an artifact of Game Shops making up dates. October is possible but I would be surprised since there is no Beta yet. I'm sure they are shooting for Christmas. Seems to me they gotta get going even for that date. But I can't really imagine them missing chisrtmas. Vivendi would certainly get really pissed if they did. |
|
|
|
6/25/06 2:07 PM
|
|
Viewed 470, Replies 22
|
|
Who cares if they moan? They will moan if they can't be better than everyone else? That is childish and ridiculous and they will rightfully be shouted down. Yes there is an extremely vocal segement of raiders that demand that they be exalted above others. But there are all sorts of unreasonable whines. You get all kinds of silly nerf calls etc. Sure that segment of raider insist that their playstyle is harder and superior. But so what? There are a bajillion rogues and mages who want to one shot everyone they come across. That segment of the raiders is just as ridiculous and childish as that segement of the DPS classes. That sad thing is Blizzard agrees with them. I'm sorry but I won't accept that raiders deserve anything better. And further it is far more important to resist the urge to mess up your game by making it lopsided than by rewarding childish, greedy people. The vocal greedy segment of raiders always claim that not giving them the best trivializes their accomplishments. Of course they conveniently ignore the other side of the the coin. That they are implicitly advocating and acknowledging they want to trivialize everyone else. |
|
|
|
6/25/06 1:47 PM
|
|
Viewed 106, Replies 4
|
|
|
The only game that trains skills offline that I know of is Eve. Eve is alot different than FFXI or WoW/EQ. You might like it, I dunno. It has a 14-day free trial that you can DL. |
|
|
|
6/25/06 12:22 AM
|
|
Viewed 379, Replies 25
|
|
|
Their mistake is putting it into channel form not making it global. There are too many people on a server to have a global channel be useful, it might be fun but it won't be that useful. They should have made some tool like Call to Arms and some kinda global communicaiton with that tool. |
|
|
|
6/24/06 11:36 PM
|
|
Viewed 319, Replies 20
|
|
|
I didn't really think it was that great. I guess having a pretty boy blood elf doing it just isn't the same. Maybe if it was a dwarf. |
|
|
|
6/24/06 11:10 PM
|
|
Viewed 470, Replies 22
|
|
|
WoW is a gear based game. All significant rewards that people aspire are gear. Xp is fairly constant is not really considered a reward. |
|
|
|
6/24/06 10:56 PM
|
|
Viewed 233, Replies 9
|
|
|
I don't think they have even announced Beta. I would add 6 months to an official Beta announcement. |
|
|
|
6/24/06 10:52 PM
|
|
Viewed 380, Replies 13
|
|
|
The only non FPS one I can think of is Auto Assault since its kinda a hybrid. |
|
|
|
6/23/06 9:11 PM
|
|
Viewed 54, Replies 5
|
|
|
Well trolling generally involves doing some work to intentionally incite people. So if the fanboyus are intentionally start praise threads to start an argument I suppose you could call them trolls. |
|
|
|
6/23/06 9:06 PM
|
|
Viewed 827, Replies 34
|
|
Yeah this is also a problem some people have had with AA, although in the case of AA I think the devs intend to work on that to some degree. AA does have pretty interesting crafting IMO though. It has a some interesting bosses and some nice zones but its somewhat thin on content. It does have various PvP mechanisms so there is that too, but often the low pop gets in the way of pvp. Say what you want about WoW but they made sure they had a ton of content when they released, plenty of quests and a number of instances. Of course they have good marketing and a huge/rabid fanbase so they could afford to take the time to have it. |
|
|
|
6/23/06 8:41 PM
|
|
Viewed 827, Replies 34
|
|
I dunno, if Blizzard had released World of Starcraft instead of WoW do you think it woulda been less popular? IMO and many others starcraft was the best of the Blizz RTS games and I woulda been more hyped for that. |
|
|
|
6/23/06 8:36 PM
|
|
Viewed 207, Replies 11
|
|
|
|
6/23/06 7:59 PM
|
|
Viewed 827, Replies 34
|
|
This is what I would think. AA may eventually make them money, not real sure. Its not marketed well, it has pretty bad hype from reviewers who seem to get alot of thigns about the game wrong, and it has a number of people like a previous poster who think that it really needed like 4 more months. However all in all its a pretty good game and had a decent release bug-wise. There certainly were bugs at release but certainly no worse than many MMO's. It may wind up slowly growing. But really MMO's need a certain ciritical mass of people. There are so many people I have heard say I woulda played AA but not enoough people. Seemed like a Catch-22. Not sure what will happen with AA, it has some nice stuff in it. But either way I doubt AA will make or break NCsoft. Not with Lineage/lineage2 having about 3 million subs That would have to be the big money maker. For the most part this just shows NCSoft has some trouble in wetern markets and has alot of games in development that are not making profit yet. |
|
|
|
6/23/06 5:10 PM
|
|
Viewed 1393, Replies 66
|
|
|
They made it clear that it would be pay for transfer a long long time ago. |
|
|
|
6/23/06 5:04 PM
|
|
Viewed 379, Replies 25
|
|
|
I heard beta testers say there used to be an actual LFG tool. But it was taken out before release. Blizzard mistakenly made some channel server wide a couple patches ago and then people asked for the current functionality and the decided that "bug" was actually a good feature. |
|