|
|
7/11/08 8:50 PM
|
|
Viewed 326, Replies 40
|
|
|
Who is campaigning on tax cuts to big business. I’ll give you a hint, his name starts with an M and ends with a cCain. Who is complaining Obama will raise taxes on people making over 250K a year, McCain. Who wants the richest of the rich who own these business to make their personal profits tax free, that’s another longstanding Republican line. As I said elsewhere big business gives to both sides so the winner “owes” them, you’re your “facts” tell us is that no one things McCain will win. |
|
|
|
7/11/08 8:43 PM
|
|
Viewed 213, Replies 16
|
|
|
Anyone with any sense knows business gives political donations to influence the winners. That’s why they almost always give to *both* sides. Republican donations are down because it’s blindingly obvious they can’t win. All things being equal however they will normally give more to Republicans, which is why Republicans normally have 2X-3X as much money to spend on election campaign. |
|
|
|
7/11/08 7:39 PM
|
|
Viewed 213, Replies 16
|
|
|
http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/11/news/companies/indymac_close.ap/index.htm?postversion=2008071118 Banking regulators just took over Indymac, the 7th largest mortgage lender in the
|
|
|
|
7/11/08 6:46 PM
|
|
Viewed 241, Replies 21
|
|
Originally posted by olddaddy
I agree. Normally you don’t want government interfering to much, but in this case there is a strong likelihood of broad structural damage to the economy if they fail. |
|
|
|
7/11/08 6:39 PM
|
|
Viewed 398, Replies 55
|
|
|
It’s certainly not universal or even conscious but there may in fact be a sound evolutionary reason for women being attracted to guys who treat them badly, at least according to some evolutionary biologists. |
|
|
|
7/11/08 6:12 PM
|
|
Viewed 241, Replies 21
|
|
Originally posted by bluberryhaze
The Bush administration heads the executive branch of government so there is no difference. However, I can see why someone with an agenda would want to pretend there was. In related news, no link yet but I just heard on the news Indymac, the 7th largest |
|
|
|
7/10/08 10:56 PM
|
|
Viewed 326, Replies 40
|
|
Originally posted by bluberryhaze
When did the |
|
|
|
7/10/08 6:23 PM
|
|
Viewed 326, Replies 40
|
|
|
If Reagan “won” the cold war why did Gorbachev get the Nobel peace prize instead? I realize you were not even born back then but if you had been you would realize that end of the cold war came because Gorbachev decided to ignore Reagan’s militarism and act unilaterally. You would also realize the cold war wasn’t actually a war and it had been going on in every presidency on that graph. (What is it with Republicans, everything is a “war”. I think that could be why they handle real wars so badly, they don’t really understand what they are.)
BTW, the cato institute is another right wing propaganda organization designed to convince people to turn over their money and liberty to big biasness. You may want to take anything they say with a grain of salt, they do not have your best interest at heart. |
|
|
|
7/10/08 10:25 AM
|
|
Viewed 326, Replies 40
|
|
|
You are not reading it wrong, you are just looking at the wrong thing. Debt by itself isn’t very useful. A person making $100 000 a year will almost always owe more money then a person making $10 000.
What does count is debt vs income, or in the case of a country, debt vs GDP.
|
|
|
|
7/10/08 8:59 AM
|
|
Viewed 326, Replies 40
|
|
Originally posted by Vemoi
Outside of the Civil War, WWI and WWII no US president besides Reagan Bush and Bush has ever run a deficit over the course of their term. In fact 3/4 of all US debt was incurred under those three Republicans.
Originally posted by Vemoi
|
|
|
|
7/09/08 6:48 PM
|
|
Viewed 326, Replies 40
|
|
Originally posted by Thrakk
The faulty theory goes back to Reagan and the birth of the borrow-and-spend wing of the Republican Party. Bush I was actually pretty good, on that front but Republicans in Congress undermined him. Clinton was really outstanding on the economy. Look up some of the things Greenspan had to say about him.
As to the current problems, yes they are Bush’s fault.
A) Tax Cuts – these are great when you can afford them, but if they send you into deficit, as Bush’s did, they rack up enormous long term damage. The debt they accumulated dove the dollar down and is a significant factor in the increase in oil prices.
B) The war in Iraq – spend spend spend. Great for military contractors but bad for everyone else.
C) Tax Cuts #2 – Bush’s tax cuts were used to stimulate spending the soften the recession of 2001. This made for a paper recovery without really allowing the underlying fundamentals to correct. Consumer stimulus kept investors aggressive so internet bubble money flowed into the real-estate market setting the stage for last years collapse.
D) Energy policy – Bush’s energy policy essentially amounted to encouraging more drilling, but the US simply doesn’t have the resources in the ground to make headway on the production front. He failed to push conservation or better practices, so US oil consumption went up when it should have been going down. Had the US takes steps to reduce oil usage over the last 7 years not only would the impact of high gas prices be lower but the trade deficit would be as well.
E) Trade with China – trade is good for an economy, but only with partners who allow you equal access to their own markets, China does not. It imports technology and know how and natural resources, nothing else. They are not a good trade partner by any means. |
|
|
|
7/05/08 8:59 PM
|
|
Viewed 250, Replies 19
|
|
|
I didn’t include there because I couldn’t decide if they were really love songs or not. Loreena McKennitt- The Highwayman http://youtube.com/watch?v=S2CFM4ev-g8 Dr Hook - Sylvia's Mother http://youtube.com/watch?v=WGJIZmGV69A&feature=related Jacksone Brown – Shape of a Heart |
|
|
|
7/05/08 8:17 PM
|
|
Viewed 250, Replies 19
|
|
Originally posted by CactusmanX
Great choice!! I haven’t heard that song in so long I forgot about it! I need to add it to my list. I also lovethat Teala put in some Laura Branigan songs but they don’t quite make my list. I know, I know, there are some pretty sappy ones in there. 5) The Cure - Lovesong http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4SZhumbv0s&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=MIIlUHBNkEc
3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QEyS5adfRQ&feature=related 2) Tracy Ullman – They don’t know http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4K1xnVFxfw0 1) Cowboy Junkies – Misguided Angel |
|
|
|
7/03/08 6:12 PM
|
|
Viewed 368, Replies 27
|
|
|
The Bible is a spiritual guide not a science text book. It’s not intended to describe the physical universe it describes the spiritual universe using metaphor and allegory. Science describes the physical universe, but can never provide absolute certainty, final answers or look beyond some horizons.
As I see it the two don’t overlap at all and therefor can never contradict each other. Evolution describes a physical process and therefore falls firmly in the realm of science to prove or disprove. |
|
|
|
7/03/08 8:54 AM
|
|
Viewed 545, Replies 72
|
|
Originally posted by Torak You mean you don't anchor yourself to the ground at all times???? Very brave. You totally missed my point.
No. Your point totally missed reality. All of science is “just a theory” but to deny it you must deny the existence of the computer you are typing on, then electricity that powers it, they material it’s made of, the house you live in, the car you drive, etc, etc, etc.
To deny some piece of science because “it’s just a theory” is to deny science completely, and to deny the existence of every piece of technology (applied science) around you. |
|
|
|
7/02/08 11:39 PM
|
|
Viewed 545, Replies 72
|
|
Originally posted by Torak
Gravity is also a theory, aren’t you terrified you could float off into space at any moment? |
|
|
|
7/01/08 10:17 PM
|
|
Viewed 243, Replies 27
|
|
|
That’s a whole lot of excuse making.
Violent crime isn’t going to make a significant difference in life expectancy in either country. Published papers rank well ahead of your “feelings” no mater which country they are published in, and it’s not cost brining down the US in the WHO rankings. (One could make an argument for funding mechanism working against the US, but Canada also has some quirks in the ranking system working against it).
BTW don’t trust anything that comes out of the Fraser institute, they are a special interest “think tank”. Waiting lists do exist in |
|
|
|
7/01/08 6:23 PM
|
|
Viewed 243, Replies 27
|
|
|
LOL who is getting peeved at having their preconceived notions dismantled? Enigma suggested something that patently was not true and I called him on it. http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_infant_mortality_rate_(2005) Canadians have a longer lifespan (despite generally similar lifestyles) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/8/1 |
|
|
|
7/01/08 5:50 PM
|
|
Viewed 243, Replies 27
|
|
Originally posted by Enigma
If you are saying Canadians would even consider trading their system for a |
|
|
|
7/01/08 5:39 PM
|
|
Viewed 171, Replies 32
|
|
Originally posted by Cabe2323
So Obama has no experience at all leading people.
Okay I am glad we have that clear now.
Perhaps you don’t understand what leadership is… What we are talking about here is Executive experience, and neither Obama nor McCain has such experience. Leadership is a more ambiguous term. Here is what wikipeida says: “ 1) Those entities that perform one or more acts of leading. 2) The ability to affect human behavior so as to accomplish a mission. 3) Influencing a group of people to move towards its goal setting or goal achievement.” I don’t think there can be any question Obama has this quality is abundance. |
|