|
|
4/28/08 7:47 AM
|
|
Viewed 834, Replies 31
|
|
Originally posted by jokuvaan Your post is both thought provoking and original. Nobody has ever suggested moving on before. Do you, perhaps, have a newsletter I could subscribe to? |
|
|
|
4/28/08 12:34 AM
|
|
Viewed 1649, Replies 32
|
|
Originally posted by Ginaz I don't know how many different ways I can say it: I have *never* said that SOE was responsible for PotBS' poor gameplay. |
|
|
|
4/27/08 10:44 PM
|
|
Viewed 1649, Replies 32
|
|
Originally posted by BountytakerI have *never* said that SOE was responsible for PotBS poor gameplay. I do believe that SOE put pressure on FLS to release the game before it was ready but that's just a theory. It's just too much like Vanguard's release where the same thing happened.
Believe me, I know that FLS is responsible for the poor gameplay. |
|
|
|
4/27/08 10:40 PM
|
|
Viewed 1121, Replies 38
|
|
Originally posted by Rippentuck I honestly don't believe that. I think that if they had buckled down and fixed the original sandbox game and added content on that framework that we would be in a golden age of SWG right now. People getting bored with WoW would be flocking to a game with more depth and meaning and SWG might actually have a decent subscriber base. |
|
|
|
4/27/08 5:18 PM
|
|
Viewed 1682, Replies 50
|
|
Originally posted by TorakKind of like how the fanbois do the same thing? We keep asking for some screenshots of heavily populated servers because they keep insisting that there are thousands of players on every server but amazingly the only screenshot that has been posted that showed a large group of people was a big bunch of afkers pet grinding.
Anybody can sign up for the free trial and take a look at the population for themselves. I tell curious people to do it all the time so they can see we're *not* exaggerating. |
|
|
|
4/27/08 5:10 PM
|
|
Viewed 4912, Replies 154
|
|
Originally posted by hipiap rofl...it's just some concept art. This is just like when they showed the clip of the guild-owned star destroyer that got everybody all worked up. This is the very definition of vaporware. |
|
|
|
4/27/08 1:56 PM
|
|
Viewed 4912, Replies 154
|
|
Originally posted by SioBabbleOh there's no way it will be an actual planet. It will be a cookie-cutter instance.
Not exactly what the players have been asking for... |
|
|
|
4/24/08 11:21 AM
|
|
Viewed 3656, Replies 110
|
|
Originally posted by Sam123jo0123 Wow...this is just classic. |
|
|
|
4/24/08 11:20 AM
|
|
Viewed 828, Replies 19
|
|
Originally posted by Obraik You could be right but that's not the reason they did it. They specifically said it was because of the issue with the tutorial. SOE would never give anything away just to be nice...they either do it to screw people over somehow or because coming up with a real solution is just too hard. |
|
|
|
4/24/08 10:41 AM
|
|
Viewed 3656, Replies 110
|
|
Originally posted by Sam123jo0123 Hmmm...you should probably proofread your posts before you start accusing other posters of being ignorant. |
|
|
|
4/24/08 6:43 AM
|
|
Viewed 1073, Replies 35
|
|
Originally posted by Sam123jo0123 Of course you can back up this statement with a screenshot or two, right? |
|
|
|
4/24/08 12:12 AM
|
|
Viewed 4952, Replies 137
|
|
Originally posted by Gutboy Yet thousands of people had strange hybrid templates. You want to know why? Because those combinations of skills were fun for *that* person. You might not want to play an artisan/scout/dancer but to another person that is the perfect combination of combat/crafting/entertaining to keep them playing happily for years. That is what was so special about the old game--there really was something there for everybody. |
|
|
|
4/23/08 11:48 PM
|
|
Viewed 547, Replies 12
|
|
Originally posted by Sam123jo0123 Come on, Sam, don't be a hater. People will mistake you for a true SWG vet. |
|
|
|
4/23/08 11:44 PM
|
|
Viewed 1108, Replies 37
|
|
Originally posted by Thunderous Which is exactly why they won't do it. Why do the ethical thing when you can screw your customers out of even more money if they are dumb enough to pay it? |
|
|
|
4/23/08 8:38 PM
|
|
Viewed 596, Replies 24
|
|
Originally posted by Antarious I don't know if funded is the right word but SOE's advertising dollars are clearly more important to them than remaining objective. |
|
|
|
4/23/08 7:12 PM
|
|
Viewed 742, Replies 31
|
|
|
You making this post shows more effort than FLS is going to show to actually fix the problems. They don't care about PvE and they don't care about the economy. They cater to gankers and griefers only. |
|
|
|
4/23/08 6:27 PM
|
|
Viewed 596, Replies 24
|
|
Originally posted by iwantmyswg I wouldn't be so sure. The fanbois report almost all of my posts and I receive "warnings" regularly for things that aren't even against the TOS. |
|
|
|
4/23/08 6:26 PM
|
|
Viewed 5524, Replies 158
|
|
Originally posted by Antarious Please check your attributes...I didn't write what you quoted above... |
|
|
|
4/23/08 4:23 PM
|
|
Viewed 5524, Replies 158
|
|
Originally posted by KrackenOne Welcome to the Veteran's Refuge, Kraken. Hopefully you'll stick around and not just be a drive-by poster. |
|
|
|
4/23/08 4:21 PM
|
|
Viewed 1091, Replies 36
|
|
Originally posted by Kapazo I don't think anybody every says that the pre-CU game was perfect but it was still a vastly better game than the NGE. |
|