|
|
7/31/08 7:46 AM
|
|
Viewed 703, Replies 11
|
|
Originally posted by beaverz
except, mind you, that the leader of bob, molley, did the same thing -- he revealed real life info on someone and urged them to call that guy's work and get him fired. both did it on eve-o. non-bob guy gets banned from the game. bob/molley gets told "hey you shouldn't do that, good buddy".
no exaggeration. anyone that says it didn't happen is either lying outright, or simply has no idea what they are talking about.
that is what you can expect in eve. period. to think you're playing on a level playing field is foolish. |
|
|
|
7/31/08 7:30 AM
|
|
Viewed 1676, Replies 35
|
|
Originally posted by SirLorn
when it all settled down, didn't it turn out that dentie-fresh had only actually gotten about 60b in cash+assets?
anywho -- GHSC - guiding hand social club. look 'em up.
honestly, i don't know if this is a real thread, or another of those feaux-threads, like that one by that dude that claims to have been playing eve for like a hundred years and dude confuses all sorts of common terms.
|
|
|
|
7/27/08 5:05 PM
|
|
Viewed 980, Replies 29
|
|
Originally posted by jakojako
then present them as your thoughts/opinions, not as fact. 90% of the population does not inhabit jita. i won't bother with the rest; because, if you're wrong about 90% of your post... |
|
|
|
7/27/08 11:03 AM
|
|
Viewed 980, Replies 29
|
|
Originally posted by ASmith84
some people can sit there and play checkers all day long. other people like chess, because it requires you to do a bit more thinking. heck, you can skip a rock across a lake and i'm sure there's some people that would have fun doing that all day. since some people CAN have fun skipping a rock; then, why do we need checkers OR chess? |
|
|
|
7/27/08 10:49 AM
|
|
Viewed 1040, Replies 24
|
|
Originally posted by baff
you really DON'T get points for not understanding the question. |
|
|
|
7/27/08 10:37 AM
|
|
Viewed 980, Replies 29
|
|
Originally posted by ASmith84
wow, another review/opinion of someone that played for a few hours/couple of days, and couldn't be bothered to have done any homework.
don't take this the wrong way - but eve isn't a dummied down game.
this game must suck immensely... is that why it's in the top 5 western MMOs for subs?
|
|
|
|
7/27/08 8:08 AM
|
|
Viewed 1040, Replies 24
|
|
Originally posted by happytklz
if all that is true; then, why do most of the eve populace live in high sec? |
|
|
|
7/27/08 7:46 AM
|
|
Viewed 715, Replies 13
|
|
Originally posted by therain93
I'm not sure how recently you've been back in game or following along but Powerset Profilferation is more about giving access to powersets to more archtypes. So, before Issue 12, the powerset Plant Control was only available to villain archtypes but after i12, Hero Controllers (and I think defenders) now have access to it. Therefore, it's not really like they're trying to make it like CO -- just figured I would clarify.
so none of the below powers (like fire/dark) were available to heroes (or villains, respectively) before i12?
Blaster Corruptor Controller Dominator Defender Mastermind Brute Stalker Tank Scrapper |
|
|
|
7/25/08 6:35 PM
|
|
Viewed 715, Replies 13
|
|
|
There was no demo on-hand to give us a look at how this could play out in City of Heroes, but the promise of user-created missions is enticing, to say the least. Along with that, Issue #13 will include further proliferation of powers between heroes and villains, beyond what was seen in Issue #12.
so, they're going to make it like champ online, before champ comes out and you can pick any power for any toon? i would hope they throw in a couple of new sets in the new issue as well. they're saying that user-created missions won't be in on i13. if i13 is the second and last issue this year, and no expansion is released... well, i'd hope there are a new pvp zone, a new villain-only zone (or at least a revamp or two of hero zones to turn them into co-op zones), and a normal zone added (not like that bogus new zone in the last issue).
who knows... i've heard there will be a lot of "stuff" added for bases. FINALLY.
we'll see. |
|
|
|
7/25/08 4:23 PM
|
|
Viewed 1810, Replies 34
|
|
Originally posted by Elsabolts
i can only pray to heaven that ccp realizes they have far more customers CURRENTLY than swg ever had... and that they never even pretend to joke around about contemplating something as incredibly STUPID as the nge.
ya know what REALLY gets me... why doesn't anyone sit there and whine and whine and whine and whine about how unfair it is in a game like eq2, or wow, that you have to work up to level 60/70/80/400 and THEN start grinding for your gear and that it's so totally unfair that a new player to eq2 or wow, can't just go kick everyone's ass the first day.
that makes as much sense as the quoted. |
|
|
|
7/24/08 5:55 PM
|
|
Viewed 1638, Replies 49
|
|
Originally posted by Tawn47 by definition that's what contender means: Etymology Noun contender (plural contenders)
All it means is that the game can compete with the other big name on the market. Nothing about "taking a title" . Try to learn words in their real context. This ain't boxing. "Try to learn words in their real context." Yes, quite. Well in one sense you are correct. The dictionary does have another take on the word contender.. so my bad and grimfall's bad for not being clear. Look at the context in which the word contender is used in the article.. it is clearly meant to mimic the use of the word in boxing. Oh and malall seems to be confused as to which part of the article grimfall is referring to. The end of it.
actually, words have many meanings, especially when there are many dictionaries.
con?tender noun a person who has entered a competition (for a title etc)
just one of many definitions found on http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/contender
so yes, in the definition of the word it does a bit more than imply 'for a title'.
i just wanted to play in the definition game, nerd rage is so unattractive.
|
|
|
|
7/24/08 5:47 PM
|
|
Viewed 1638, Replies 49
|
|
|
Originally posted by Tawn47
You really need to read and understand what he is trying to tell you. If the reviewer says WAR is a contender.. then by definition he is saying it is a contender to WOW/LOTRO. You were trying to be a pedant.. it has backfired. Just leave it.
bad engrishes ftl. |
|
|
|
7/24/08 5:39 PM
|
|
Viewed 4458, Replies 52
|
|
Originally posted by AveBethos
So LucasArts coded and develped arguably the WORST game in MMO history secretly behind that backs of the paying customers? Yeah right... SOE deserves every bad inch of reputation they get. They lost their market share because they lack quality, leadership, and innovation. It's mindboggling that John Smedley still has a job in this industry, let alone is STILL running SOE. He must have some pictures that somebody doesn't want the public to see.
nah, soe developers and such came up with the nge and pitched it to lucas arts as a wow-clone thingie and lucas arts said, "hey, if you think it's a good idea, go for it". what boggles my mind is how many people seem to forget the plethora of other offenses soe has commited, aside from the non-stop swg fiasco. but ya know, sheep will be sheep... |
|
|
|
7/23/08 6:33 PM
|
|
Viewed 700, Replies 15
|
|
Originally posted by Ugun
people keep saying it cuz it's true -- give eve university a try.
|
|
|
|
7/23/08 3:12 PM
|
|
Viewed 467, Replies 8
|
|
Originally posted by Meltdown
where are you seeing all these ads? other than mmorpg.com, that is. |
|
|
|
7/23/08 9:19 AM
|
|
Viewed 1171, Replies 13
|
|
Originally posted by Kyleran
good advice! |
|
|
|
7/23/08 9:05 AM
|
|
Viewed 266, Replies 6
|
|
Originally posted by beaverz
i kinda agree with what you're saying -- the buildup leading to the battle can be a lot more fun. in a roving gang, the fun isn't in the build-up, and if you're camping a gate it's not in the build-up. hopefully, ccp will continue to introduce new items to the game in order to try and spice up the pvp and make it *more fun*. i.e. heat, anti-blobbing items, etc. | |