<
>

Page 1 of 2

1

2

All Posts by ghaleonx128 - 33 found

8/06/08 11:20 PM
Viewed 2496, Replies 69

I think a large majority of people aren't going to want to stay up until 3:30 for a raid if they are EST.  Even 2:30 for CST is a bit ridiculous, but I'm sure you'll have plenty of Red Bulls standing by so best of luck

8/06/08 7:32 PM
Viewed 2496, Replies 69

I'd be interested, except for the late night raiding.  Looks like it'd be a good guild otherwise.

7/22/08 9:48 AM
Viewed 1010, Replies 18

I'm enjoying the combat as well.  I'm a big fan of strategy games so I can only hope that more mmo's come out with a turn-based system.

7/22/08 9:43 AM
Viewed 1223, Replies 34

I was playing it last night and I found it to be, surprisingly, very fun.  It's too bad though that the game wasn't developed by an American company with more funding, but it's still nice.  I think in the future it will be fun mixing the different classes together and finding the more powerful combinations. If they have a way of storing merchant classes at end game I can see a lot of people collecting the different classes to add some diversity.  The turn based gameplay is a lot better than pressing 1,3,11 and mob is dead, the strategic factor is what makes it interesting.  They could do some really interesting things with pvp and town sieges.

5/25/08 8:18 AM
Viewed 6336, Replies 114

As for the questing, I don't see a problem with them telling you where to go.  I hate having to go search on the internet for the right cords, that's a real errand (or spending x8 times longer on a quest because you couldn't find the spawnsite).  Best questing I've seen imo. 

5/17/08 10:21 AM
Viewed 1666, Replies 41

I agree with the OP, going to wait for trial at least as beta was a mess.

5/16/08 9:53 AM
Viewed 766, Replies 20

I'm not surprised, Tortage for me on a 5 month old computer took about 1 1/2 minutes to load.  Content of the game I really thought had potential but the technical side might be the downfall, what a crappy way to go out lol.

5/12/08 3:05 PM
Viewed 571, Replies 11

I have a 2.6 ghz phenom, 2gb ram, Radeon 3870 CF, 32 bit vista and it is unplayable for me.  The part in the review where it says if this isn't corrected will be the doom for this game should be in bold, that was one of my first impression when playing the beta.  I guess they didn't allow dual or quad processors or CF/SLI for the beta, which might explain the performance issues, why they would do that I have no idea. It's strange because even on the absolute lowest settings and resolution, it is still horribly unplayable.

5/10/08 5:46 PM
Viewed 3340, Replies 72

I think the programmers really messed up, I bought a $1500 computer about 4 months ago and even at lowest settings I get horrible spikes of lag.  I can run Crysis fine, but even though this is a lot less graphics heavy it doesn't perform well at all.  My 4 year old computer actually ran it better than my new one, so something is wrong with their software.

Content aside, I would recommend that you don't buy it until you know for sure how well it will run on your computer, whether its an old or new comp.  It's a joke as far as I'm concerned, worst programming/performance I've seen from any videogame.

5/03/08 3:54 PM
Viewed 579, Replies 19

"We burned out some quantity of our beta-testers when the game wasn't yet fun. As we've begun to sell the game, the people who hadn't participated in the beta became our fast early-adopters. And the people who did participate in the beta, we've had to go back to and say 'look, look, we promise: we know it wasn't fun two months ago, but we fixed all that. Really, come try it again.' We've had to go out and develop free programs to invite those people back for free before they go buy it. So the beta process, which we used to think of as a QA process, is really a marketing process."

In the words of Richard Garriott. 

5/02/08 7:00 PM
Viewed 3894, Replies 104

I will say the performance is indeed pretty horrid.  I seem to run Crysis fine, but this is a lot less graphics heavy and runs worse, even at the lowest settings.  Something is wrong, and it's not my hardware and drivers are fresh.  So really I'm waiting on Funcom to fix something, or ATI to release better drivers.  

So far, content is pretty fun.  Can't really talk about longevity though.  I can see why some think of it as a single player in disguise, but I don't mind it really.  Combat is pretty fun too, but the novelty will probably wear off.

Loading times are what kills the game for me.  Content aside, loading into Tortage for the first time took at least 2 minutes.  It's hard to believe that much of the technical stuff is what's bringing the game down, and an open beta isn't going to help fix it.

5/01/08 8:28 PM
Viewed 178, Replies 2

It's all for you, just don't expect any more favors

1/03/08 12:28 PM
Viewed 6437, Replies 127

 

Originally posted by Daedalus732

I'm amazed that anyone would support Ron Paul. Not that it matters since he could never get elected and represents a viewpoint that has as much popularity as communism.

I would probably lose my job if Paul got elected because he wants to destroy almost every federal agency in the U.S. Most presidents try to create jobs, Paul wants to to hundreds of thousands out on the streets.

I cant figure out what he offers that's appealing to anyone except the super rich.  All of his viewpoints are based on his faith based devotion to extreme right-wing laissez-faire capitalism. The man's also a religious nut.

 

Considering he raised over 20 million dollars in the fourth quarter, I wouldn't say he could never get elected.  Slim currently, but his support is growing faster than just about any candidate out there.  His viewpoints are a lot more popular than communism.  He's the only Republican that wants out of Iraq asap, and he wants to follow the constitution and protect civil liberties, which are sadly disappearing.  Something like 70% of Americans want out of Iraq, he more than any other candidate will deliver on that message. 

 

Sadly, with the way our economy is going,  the only "safe" jobs will be government and low paying service orientated jobs.  Ron Paul wants to lower taxes by withdrawing troops from overseas bases and eliminating some federal agencies.  This places less tax burden on people so they can live more prosperously.  He wants to create jobs by eliminating these parasitic free trade agreements that are destroying our manufacturing base.  Without manufacturing, we can't trade with other countries and we have to buy all our products from china for instance.  Not much reason to hold on to a currency when you can't buy anything with it.  Even oil, which has been sold exclusively in the past in US Dollars, is now being sold in other currencies.  Further eliminating the need to keep dollars.  The trade deficit and the nation debt further hurt our economy.  He understands this, unlike most politicians, and wants to create and protect jobs.  So many middle class jobs are being outsourced to 3rd world countries and are being replaced with low paying service jobs, why should federal government jobs be safe when they aren't even protecting the jobs of average American citizens?

 

Even the poor get taxed, and often at much higher percentages than the rich.  Warren Buffet recently testified to Congress that taxes on the rich should be increased; he gets taxed percent-wise lower than his maids.  Eliminating the federal income tax (by eliminating costly, controlling, and inefficient federal bureaucracies) certainly has it's appeal to lower, and upper class citizens.  And support for Ron Paul isn't solely from the fiscal conservatives.  /rant end   lol

Something important that all Americans in particular should retain.

" If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all. "
~Naom Chomsky


12/28/07 8:21 PM
Viewed 6437, Replies 127

Marches of any kind are fun, so I don't get what the big deal is.  Mmorpg's should have change and large social gatherings, it's what keeps it fun - so stop complaining :P  If you want your "relative peace" turn off your public chat and go sit in Darnassus, or just logout of WoW for a whole day if it's such a big deal. 

Seeing how this could just be free publicity for WoW, I wonder how much they would do to stop it. 

12/23/07 9:42 PM
Viewed 285, Replies 9

I don't have the game but I heard around 17gb?

12/22/07 12:48 PM
Viewed 370, Replies 12

yes they are, and very scurry to don't do it for the love of mmos!

12/22/07 12:45 PM
Viewed 37851, Replies 671

Not sure if anyone actually reads this but I would love to give Vanguard a try now that my computer can run it.  Q6600 with crossfire 3870 HD Radeon, looking forward to seeing Vanguard on high settings

12/22/07 12:42 PM
Viewed 370, Replies 12

Some of the mods are deleting these kind of topics and issuing "warnings" lol.  Just thought I'd let you know from experience.  Hope you have fun :) 

If anyone else has a buddy key let me know, just got my new system.  Quad core with dual 3870 HD radeon

12/17/07 10:23 AM
Viewed 3901, Replies 86

Originally posted by daylight01

the biggest downside was also the population to say I could play for 8hrs without bumping into another player as the world was so huge and the player base so low when i played is realistic.

That's my only concern. I loved when I played back in beta but didn't buy because I thought the pops would be low.  I really didn't want to spend the time playing if I could hardly ever group or by the time I hit max level, no one was playing. So I'll be curious how that goes for you.

Anyone else with experience on the seradon server, I'd like to hear how the population is.

12/15/07 1:53 AM
Viewed 484, Replies 8

Haven't seriously played L2 but exp loss in pvp is just a tad bit under what I would say is ideal.  Wouldn't want to know how much exp I would have lost in WoW if that were in there

Page 1 of 2

1

2

Legend

Locked
Hot (25+ Posts)
New Posts
No New Posts