| 2403 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Obraik
I also enjoy your "you say something I don't like so you're on the 'hatewagon'"... I prefer to call it "having taste" & no Fanboi Blinders... |
|
Originally posted by Obraik This was sent to EXISTING PLAYERS, not new players... so you're arguing that emails sent to the same people are not the same attempt of advertising? Again, please... you're as desperate for justification as usual... |
|
Originally posted by Obraik Ok, so let me get this straight... this is "advertising", but the 10 other emails like this begging for players to come back aren't? Please... When you have to bribe players with items that show NO ONE cares about the story anymore it's clear it's a "desperate" move... |
|
Originally posted by Stradden That's just it, it isn't hate just because you voted for SWG. I lost my hate a long time ago, and have even tried to play SWG again. My votes were honest, and disregarded for false reasons, and that does tick me off a bit. I've basiclly been told that I've cheated stuffing ballot boxes, and that I'm lying about my opinions. If you look at those who did vote for SWG, most voted for OTHER GAMES as well. Only a small few voted for it accross the board, and I would understand if you threw those out. But disgregarding honest voted for some made-up conspiracy is insulting to those who took the time to be part of this community & vote with tier honest opinions about what THEY have played this year. |
|
|
Excuse you Dan, but I meant my votes for SWG, as well as the OTHER games I voted for. I played it, I went back and tried it again. It had nothing to do with stuffing a ballot box, and I had no Alt accounts voting up a storm. I didn't vote for it across the board, and gave the reasons I did vote for it clearly. I chose it in those Cat's because it was MY OPINION, which is what you asked for. Apparently, you really didn't want what you asked for. |
|
|
Worst Graphics: Star Wars Galaxies - I don't remember seeing a mind-numbing number of partical effects in the movies... It's a shame to overwhelm the player's screens with such cheesy magic effects. Least Fun: Star Wars Galaxies - I keep trying it again & again hoping something has changed. Nothing has, just my amazement of how terrible this game is now. Most Desolate: Vanguard - It's why I barely log on anymore. Worst Use of Popular IP or License: Star Wars Galaxies - Enough said. Lamest Launch: Vanguard - The game wasn't ready. Most Likely to be Cancelled in 2008: Huxley - That's if I've missed it being canceled. Biggest Stinker: Star Wars Galaxies - I keep trying it, and keep puking a little bit in my mouth each time. The once great game is truely dead to me now. |
|
Originally posted by xluciferx
|
|
Originally posted by suske
|
|
|
Personally? My Expceptional DXR6 Rifle, with a 33% slice... I'd pup it up and go Jedi hunt'in |
|
|
SOE didnt abandon you. You abandoned them.
SWG Veteran Refuge « Star Wars Galaxies 7/22/07 12:07:04 AM
Originally posted by Ginaz Hey, no worries... I think I missed this one before... it's worth noting by it's sheer stupidity... |
|
|
SOE didnt abandon you. You abandoned them.
SWG Veteran Refuge « Star Wars Galaxies 7/22/07 12:05:58 AM
Originally posted by LakeDaemon Wow, I don't know what to say. That may be the dumbest theory I've read here... Seriously, bashing former players in a 'refugee' forum is dumb enough, but to blame them for the product is truely idiotic. Just wow... "It's your fault for not liking to eat $#!& !!!" |
|
|
RE: GreyPawn's comment (I CAN give you number)
Rumor Room « Star Wars Galaxies 7/18/07 7:56:29 PM
Originally posted by DarthMaulUKUhhhh.... That's just not true. For one, SOE's PR guy bragged a few months back about have a total, yes total, of 800k Subs for all it's games. Add to that Blizzard regularly talks about subs. The add to that NCSoft regular gives sub numbers in their PR releases to brag. So lets be clear here.... SOE has talked about it's overall subs recently, and 2 companies with more subs then SOE talk about it... oh, and Linden too.... so it seems that subs are talked about, unless they make your game look bad... |
|
|
RE: GreyPawn's comment (I CAN give you number)
Rumor Room « Star Wars Galaxies 7/18/07 7:50:16 PM
Originally posted by Obraik Heh, was waiting for you to play the "I blindly troll pro-NGE" card to be played :D /yawn |
|
|
Sony wants to pull a NGE on Vanguard....wtf
General Discussion « Vanguard: Saga of Heroes 6/15/07 5:56:56 PM
What? A server merge is the ONE thing SOE didn't do... /ponder... |
|
|
I've tried it, and.... - The crafting side of BM is better then BE in a LOT of ways, and falls short of it a few ways. One thing that bothers me: You have to kill a creature you want to sample... - The controlling side of BM is pretty near CH, and has a few better features, although CH was more fun due to it's depth. - The addition of BM has started to mix up the Template Wars. If they add Droid Commander & some Melee / Ranged expertise as rumored, things will become even more mixed up. - The balance is a bit better, although the GCW buffs are still rediculous & ruin the overall balance. - Combat is a LOT harder, and it's a welcome change. An equal LVL elite can drop you, and even a regular mob if you're not paying attention. - Grouping is back, and quite welcome. - It still has all other flaws of the NGE. - There's a rumor they're talking about removing levels in some way, although I can't find anything from the Dev's on it. |
|
Originally posted by SWGLover They left... in droves... and only a Fanboi would claim anything else, period. |
|
Originally posted by BaronJuJu You were caught exploiting by you own photos. Make up any bull you want, call me what ever you like. You were "cheating". You are lying. You are sad for denying it, and attacking me for what you've done. Guess what... Just because you don't admit it's base clubbing, doesn't mean it isn't. Even the SWG Dev's would agree it's Base Clubbing. I won, deal with it. . <----- I pushed it, you lost. I don't need to come back to this thread. If you want a jolly, go read your past posts and your doubletalk. Then poke yourself with a fork, you're done Mr Exploiter. You ARE an exploiter, and now everyone knows it. |
|
Originally posted by BaronJuJuOk, that's it, I've proven my point. |
|
Originally posted by BaronJuJu
DM's quote and your Wiki quote make the point for me, so thank you. Read the red. The Dev's did not intend for Base Clubbing to occur, as has been said for some time now, and as DM refers to in that quote. And that's the end of that debate, period. Base Clubbing is an Exploit. Now, you prove your true intent by claiming Col Pre-CU was easy to obtain. It was FAR from easy Pre-CU, and was a real accomplishment. It was not easily obtained, and could not be gained through standing around with people exploiting. An arguement can be made about "if Pre-CU Col had meaning", but to those of us that did achieve it, it had a deep meaning like all things that you earned with hard work Pre-CU. Reading your last paragraph, you prove your hypocrisy. You claim Base Clubbing isn't an exploit (even though the Dev's think it is)because it's a designed mechanic, then claim fight clubbing was although it too was a designed mechanic. Last, grow up and stop the personal attacks, you look like fool... |
|
Originally posted by charliehustl
Now, what am I not accepting? I said the pop was large in the pic, so what exactly am I denying? Is it as high as Pre-CU, heck no, but it's the largest group I've seen since the NGE hit, and if I were playing that would make me happy. Now if you ask me if the GCW system is good enough, I'd say HELL NO... sorry, but this is just sad... not the social part, but that this is what the GCW has come to... setting up camps and Clubbing bases... that's Iconic? |
|