Originally posted by senadin

I will be honest with you, the graphics arent nothing new and groundbreaking. heck you only have to look at the latest video to see this. When the guy gets to the shack to get the quest to kill those worms, look at the rifles on their back. The rifles kinda break the polygons and it looks goofy.

 

That being said what attract me to this game isnt the graphics. Heck i played Operation Flashpoint and the graphics in there look similar to the ones in FE. Yet i really like Flashpoint, graphics are kinda nice but they dont make a game! What really is gona be the main draw of this game is the gameplay and the genre for me.

That is a old video though.

Originally posted by Phylar

 

Originally posted by Zorvan
Your comparing the graphics of an mmorpg to a singleplayer game? A game that doesn't have to take into account hundreds of players in one spot, while also allowing for bandwidth?

 

You want to call FE graphics sub-par, then show me the mmorpg they are inferior to.

because there is no mmorpg with Half Life 2 graphics, and won't be until server/bandwidth technology improves.

Easy: EQ2. It's much better than Fallen Earth's, and it's almost 3 years old. I think that graphics are more important in an MMOFPS where players are more about eye candy than roleplaying and such.

 

Bandwidth isn't an issue in some aspects. Does it take more bandwidth to have models that have higher polygon counts? that do subsurface rendering, or utilize high dynamic range? no. It's purely based on the local machine's performance, which has greatly improved.

I'd dare say the graphics are worse than Planetside, which is from 2003, and was a MMOFPS. I remember flying over a battlefield of 80 people fighting, and my FPS would drop a bit, but I wouldn't get lag (well lower FPS is inheritly 'latency' to my eyes, but not network packet loss). I was blown away how well the servers performed for it.

But reading about how the game is built, I"ll still play it :) twitch style combat, factions, crafting, mutations... drool It sounds like they are doing something different yet doing it right.

 

I do not agree that eq2 has better graphics.

Originally posted by ownedyou1

Noone is crying rollback, the new changes where creatures are harder, have had the devs being thanked.



I myself thanked them for bringing back CH in a new sexy way, I can now make my rancor stronger, aswell as attach armour to it, or have it as a mount.



So keep crying my fellow pre-cu kiddies, SWG has moved on and pre-cu has been forgotten, and you can't handle it, lol.

 You cant have a rancor as mount dont know what you are smoking the only mounts will be the same ones that were mounts previously there will be no new mounts with this publish, also there are like 5 threads crying about the difficulty right now, so before you come here spewing crap out of your mouth make sure your facts are correct first.

Originally posted by Aikes

Originally posted by Pjay2k

I beg you guys to come back and see what a piece of crap this game is, in case you ever feel like throwing 15 bucks out of the window...

come and check out the lonely few entertainers in mos eisley enjoying their holobands

jep right... they got holobands so they dont feel alone ingame :)

This is a joke right ?  So now they are having to add more NPCs in order to create the illuusion that people are playing the game?

Am I understanding this correctly?

I wonder if their number one fanboy Wepps is still playing or if even he left.

Looks like taking advantage of your customers and putting the screws to them isn't working out so well eh Freeman?